Feasibility and Efficiency of Tele-Proctoring for Robotic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

feasibility and efficiency of tele proctoring for robotic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Feasibility and Efficiency of Tele-Proctoring for Robotic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feasibility and Efficiency of Tele-Proctoring for Robotic Gynecologic Surgery A.M. Artsen MD, L.S. Burkett MD, M. Bonidie MD Disclosures I have no relevant financial relationships to disclose Objectives Surgical proctoring requires


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Feasibility and Efficiency of Tele-Proctoring for Robotic Gynecologic Surgery

A.M. Artsen MD, L.S. Burkett MD, M. Bonidie MD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

I have no relevant financial relationships to disclose

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives

  • Surgical proctoring requires increasing resources
  • AIM: demonstrate feasibility of tele-proctoring in

robotic gynecologic surgery.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methods: System Testing

TELEMEDICINE TECHNOLOGY SIMULATION LAB CADAVER LAB

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methods: Tele-Proctoring

  • Two experienced surgeons underwent tele-proctoring for

hospital credentialing, completing 7 total cases.

  • MISSeS survey and GEARS assessment
  • Case characteristics were compared between tele-proctored

cases and 59 historical cases proctored in-person over the last 8 years.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results

  • Increased confidence in the robotic procedure (4.3 ± 0.8)
  • Unanimous high satisfaction with proctoring (5±0)
  • No major technologic issues
  • Proctor able to address all questions in real time
  • Excellent proctored surgeon robotic skills (GEARS assessment

average 4.3/5).

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results

Age (years) Tele-proctored (n=7) In-person (n=59) P value 41.9±13.3 48.9±11.2 0.12 BMI (kg/m2) 31.0±11.7 29.4±6.8 0.73 Prior abdominal surgery 4 (57%) 41 (70%) 0.52 Surgery Total hysterectomy 5 (71.4%) 35 (59.3%) 0.77 Adnexal surgery only 2 (28.6%) 5 (8.5%) 0.21 Sacrocolpopexy 16 (27.1%) 0.33 Myomectomy 2 (3.4%) 0.80 Excision endometriosis 1 (1.7%) 0.90 Uterine weight (grams) 145.2±124.4 153.6±112.4 0.88 Estimated blood loss (mL) All cases 27.1±17.0 46.5±32.9 0.13 Hysterectomy only 34.0± 15.2 50.1 ± 35.6 0.33 Operating time (min) All cases 110.3±26.8 187.5±70.6 <0.0001 Hysterectomy only 124.2±14.6 182.2±68.2 0.001

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Conclusions

  • Tele-proctoring is feasible and may have advantages in

surgical efficiency over in-person proctoring.

  • Tele-mentoring is a natural extension of tele-proctoring that

could provide advanced surgical expertise far beyond where we can physically reach.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Feasibility and Efficiency of Tele-Proctoring for Robotic Gynecologic Surgery

A.M. Artsen MD, L.S. Burkett MD, M. Bonidie MD