evh black holes their ads 3 throats and evh cft proposal
play

EVH black holes, Their AdS 3 throats and EVH/CFT proposal By: M.M. - PDF document

EVH black holes, Their AdS 3 throats and EVH/CFT proposal By: M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari Based on: My Recent Work, arXiv:1107.5705 [hep-th] In collaboration with H. Yavartanoo. Istanbul, August 2011 1 Outline Motivation and Introduction EVH


  1. EVH black holes, Their AdS 3 throats and EVH/CFT proposal By: M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari Based on: My Recent Work, arXiv:1107.5705 [hep-th] In collaboration with H. Yavartanoo. Istanbul, August 2011 1

  2. Outline • Motivation and Introduction • EVH black holes in general dimensions • 4d EVH black holes of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories • EVH black holes have near horizon AdS 3 throat • EVH/CFT correspondence • Connection to Kerr/CFT • Summary and outlook 2

  3. � Introduction and Motivation • Black holes can be understood as thermo- dynamical systems • Black holes Hawking-radiate • Formation and evaporation of black holes is hence not a unitary process, unless • there exists an underlying stat. mech. sys- tem, i.e. • resolution of black hole information loss prob- lem replies on identification of its microstates. 3

  4. • String theory has been successful in the black hole microstate counting project of certain supersymmetric BPS black holes. • The idea is that the microstates reside on the horizon ⇒ near horizon geometry and not its asymp- totics carries the microstate information. • Therefore, for BPS black holes the entropy is ought to be only a function of the charges and independent of the moduli, the attractor mechanism. • Extremal (but non-BPS) black holes are in many ways similar to BPS black holes, e.g. attractor mechanism works for them. • Extremal black holes have zero Hawking tem- perature, but generically finite Bekenstein- Hawking entropy. 4

  5. • Near horizon geometry of extremal black holes contain AdS 2 throats. • One may use AdS2/CFT1 for identification of microstates of extremal black holes. • Kerr/CFT or Ext/CFT: ∀ Extremal black holes, ∃ chiral 2d CFT description. • Kerr/CFT instructs usage of Cardy formula to relate black hole entropy to the 2d CFT density of states. 5

  6. • BUT, AdS2/CFT1 is not well understood and, • What is a chiral 2d CFT? How do we identify it? Does Kerr/CFT have a dynamical content? Can it help with understanding generic non- extremal black holes? • Black hole microstate counting have been most successful when based upon AdS3/CFT2, like D1-D5-P system. • Can we get AdS3 throat as the near hori- zon limit of a black hole (and not black brane/string)? This is what we explore and its answer is Yes, for EVH black hole..... 6

  7. Extremal Vanishing Horizon (EVH) black holes • Black holes with vanishing T , A h but with A h /T = fixed . • In the class of n parameter black holes, EVH are defined by n − 2 dim. EVH hypersurface. • Examples of EVH black holes: – n = 2: massless BTZ. – n = 3: 5d Kerr with one vanishing angu- lar momentum. – n = 4: two-charge AdS5 black holes of U (1) 3 5d gauged SUGRA. – n = 5: three-charge AdS4 black holes of U (1) 4 4d gauged SUGRA, and ..... 7

  8. • Once we specified an EVH point on a given EVH hypersurface, then Near EVH black holes are determined by two parameters. • EVH black holes can be supersymmetric or non-BPS. • EVH black holes can be asymptotically flat or AdS. • There are examples of stationary and static EVH black holes. • NOTE: We have not an example of station- ary BPS EVH black hole, but no proof that it cannot happen. 8

  9. • Regardless of the details: Near Horizon geometry of any EVH black hole has a (pinching) AdS 3 throat. pinching AdS 3 ≡ AdS 3 /Z K , K → ∞ . • Near horizon limit of Near EVH black hole contains a (pinching) BTZ geometry. • We prove above for any EVH solution to generic 4d (gauged) Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton theory. • The above are more general and is presum- ably true for any non-BPS EVH black hole. 9

  10. � 4d EVH black holes Consider the 4d gravity theory R − 2 G AB ∂ Φ A ∂ Φ B − f IJ (Φ) F I µν F J µν L = 1 f IJ (Φ) F I µν F J µν + V (Φ) . 2 √− gǫ µναβ ˜ − The most general stationary black hole ansatz − N 2 ( ρ, θ ) dt 2 + g ρρ ( ρ, θ ) dρ 2 ds 2 = � 2 , g θθ ( ρ, θ ) dθ 2 + g φφ ( ρ, θ ) � dφ + N φ ( ρ, θ ) dt + A = A t ( ρ, θ ) dt + A ρ ( ρ, θ ) dρ + A φ ( ρ, θ ) dφ, Φ = Φ( ρ, θ ) . In A θ = 0 gauge. N 2 = ( ρ − ρ + )( ρ − ρ − ) µ ( ρ, θ ) , N φ = − ω + ( ρ − ρ + ) η ( ρ, θ ) , 1 g ρρ = ( ρ − ρ + )( ρ − ρ − )Λ( ρ, θ ) , 10

  11. • µ ( ρ, θ ) and Λ( ρ, θ ) do not have zero in ( ρ + , ∞ ). • Finite horizon angular velocity at the hori- zon, requires having finite η ( ρ + , θ ). • Hawking temperature   ( N 2 ) ′ T =   �   g ρρ N 2 4 π ρ = ρ + prime denotes derivative with respect to ρ and ρ + is the location of the outer horizon. • The area of horizon A h can be expressed as � π � g (0) θθ ( θ ) g (0) A h = 2 π φφ ( θ ) dθ 0 where g (0) θθ ( θ ) + ( ρ − ρ + ) g (1) g θθ ( ρ, θ ) = θθ ( θ ) + · · · , g (0) φφ ( θ ) + ( ρ − ρ + ) g (1) g φφ ( ρ, θ ) = φφ ( θ ) + · · · , 11

  12. • EVH point: A h ∼ T ∼ ˜ ǫ • The above, demanding the regularity of the geometry, is possible if g (0) ǫ 2 , φφ ∼ ˜ ǫ s , ǫ v , ρ + ∼ ˜ ρ + − ρ − ∼ ˜ v ≥ s > 0 . • That is, horizon is located at ρ = 0. • Demanding the geometry to be smooth around ρ = 0 (for generic values of θ ) implies N 2 ( ρ = 0) = 0 . • To avoid having a naked singularity and to keep A h /T finite d dρN 2 | ρ =0 � = 0 . 12

  13. • In summary N 2 = ρµ ( ρ, θ ) µ is an analytic function with no zeros at ρ > 0. • Roots of µ are potential loci of EVH black hole singularity. These roots are hence located at ρ < 0. • Singularity line ρ = ρ s ( θ ) , µ ( ρ s , θ ) = 0 touches the horizon ρ s ( θ ) = 0 which occurs at some isolated points in θ . • Away from these isolated points the near horizon geometry of the EVH black hole is expected to be smooth. • EVH black holes are different from small black holes where the horizon and the sin- gularity are basically becoming identical. 13

  14. The most generic 4d EVH black hole metric: µdt 2 + dρ 2 � 2 + ˜ ds 2 = − ρ ˜ g θθ dθ 2 � N φ dt dφ + ˜ Λ + ρ ˜ g φφ ρ 2 ˜ where N φ and ˜ µ, ˜ ˜ • ˜ Λ , ˜ g θθ are analytic functions g φφ , of ( ρ, θ ). µ and ˜ • ˜ Λ do not have any zero in [0 , ∞ ). • g − 1 ρρ has double roots at the horizon ρ = 0. • These functions may be determined using the equations of motion. • Temperature (surface gravity) must be in- dependent of the angular coordinate θ : Λ(0 , θ ) = L 2 . µ (0 , θ )˜ ˜ 14

  15. � EVH black holes have AdS 3 throats, the Proof • Under the near horizon limit ρ = ǫ 2 r 2 , ˜ ˜ t = ǫt , φ = ǫ ( φ − ˜ ωt ) , ǫ → 0 • The EVH geometry goes to t 2 + L 2 dr 2 � � ds 2 = a (˜ φ 2 + R 2 d ˜ − r 2 d ˜ θ ) r 2 d ˜ θ 2 r 2 + b (˜ θ ) where L, R are constants. • ˜ ω is the angular velocity of the horizon at EVH limit. • We note that ˜ φ ∈ [0 , 2 πǫ ]. 15

  16. • How about gauge and scalar fields? E.o.M. to have only ˜ θ dependent solutions ⇒ All the components of the gauge field strength should vanish. • E.o.M. for metric, assuming constant poten- tial V = V 0 , implies: db θ = 0 b = b 0 = const. , ⇒ d ˜ d 2 a θ 2 + 4 R 2 L 2 a − V 0 R 2 a 2 = 0 . d ˜ • For V 0 = 0 (ungauged gravity) case a = a 0 sin 2 R ˜ θ , L where C = 2 R L a 0 . E.o.M for Φ: √ 3 = g 0 tan R ˜ 2Φ d Φ 3 C θ √ θ = ± ⇒ e L , d ˜ a where g 0 is a constant. 16

  17. • In summary, and for V = 0 case − r 2 dτ 2 + dr 2 � � r 2 + r 2 dψ 2 + 1 ds 2 = R 2 4 dθ 2 AdS 3 sin θ , 2Φ 3 = g 0 tan θ √ F µν = 0 , e 2 where • we have redefined ˜ θ such that θ ∈ [0 , π ] and, • ψ ∈ [0 , 2 πǫ ], i.e. the AdS 3 throat in the near horizon limit of the EVH black hole is a pinching AdS 3 . • A two parameter family of solutions; R AdS 3 , g 0 are not fixed by E.o.M. • NOTE: the near horizon limit and the EVH black hole limits do not commute. • θ = 0 , π are singular points of the near hori- zon EVH geometry. 17

  18. � Near horizon limit of near EVH black holes • Near EVH black holes have non-zero but very small A h and T with their ratio finite and, • are defined by two parameters, parameteriz- ing how we have moved away from the EVH point. • Their near horizon geometry can be taken along the same arguments as the EVH case, leading to − F ( r ) dτ 2 + dr 2 � � F ( r ) + r 2 ( dψ − r + r − r 2 dτ ) 2 + 1 ds 2 = R 2 4 dθ 2 AdS 3 sin θ where ( r 2 − r 2 + )( r 2 − r 2 − ) F ( r ) = . r 2 • i.e. the same as before but pinching AdS 3 is replaced by pinching BTZ. • The solution has now four parameters: R AdS 3 , g 0 , r ± . 18

  19. Near horizon structure of the EVH black hole in flat or AdS background: • The Near horizon region is warped (AdS 3 or BTZ × I ) geometry. • In the strict near horizon limit the intermedi- ate and asymptotic regions are cut off from the geometry. 19

  20. � Examples of 4d EVH black holes • KK black holes: – four parameter family of 4d black holes with electric and magnetic charges Q , P angular momentum J and mass M . – uplifted to 5d Einstein gravity stationary solutions. – may be embedded in the string theory to a rotating D0-D6 brane system Q ∝ N 0 , P ∝ N 6 . – have two different branches: ergo-branch PQ < G 4 J, ergo-free branch PQ > G 4 J . 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend