Quantum Black Holes and Global Symmetries Daniel Klaewer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quantum black holes and global symmetries
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quantum Black Holes and Global Symmetries Daniel Klaewer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum Black Holes and Global Symmetries Daniel Klaewer Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Young Scientist Workshop 2017, Schloss Ringberg Outline 1) Quantum fields in curved spacetime 2) The Unruh effect 3) Quantum black holes and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quantum Black Holes and Global Symmetries

Daniel Klaewer

Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich

Young Scientist Workshop 2017, Schloss Ringberg

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

2

1) Quantum fields in curved spacetime 2) The Unruh effect 3) Quantum black holes and Hawking radiation 4) Problems with global symmetries

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quantum Gravity?

3

  • Collider physics described by (perturbative) quantum field theory
  • Prototype: scalar field theory
  • Dictated by unification of quantum mechanics
  • With special relativity

S =

  • d4x

1 2ηµν∂µφ∂νφ − 1 2m2φ2 − λφ4

  • ∼ λ
  • Lfree

Lint i∂t|ψ = ˆ H|ψ ηµν =     1 −1 −1 −1     d 2 = µνxµxν = (ct)2 − x2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Quantum Gravity?

4

  • General relativity described by highly non-linear, complicated Einstein

field equations for the metric (spacetime geometry)

  • Naive treatment as perturbative QFT runs into big problems (non-

renormalizability) Rµν − 1 2Rgµν = 8πG c4 Tµν Gravity has to be quantized - we just don’t know for sure how! R ∼ d(g−1dg) + (g−1dg)2 For this talk we will remain ignorant! ηµν =     1 −1 −1 −1     → gµν =     g00 g01 g02 g03 g10 g11 g12 g13 g20 g21 g22 g23 g30 g31 g32 g33     gµν

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Necessity of Quantization

5

Rµν − 1

2Rgµν = 8πG c4 Tµν

  • gravity

matter

  • Why not just quantize RHS?
  • Superposition states: gravitational field is “average” over possible
  • utcomes. Upon measurement we have collapse and discontinuous

change of the gravitational field.

  • Violates locality, Lorentz invariance, also , which is

inconsistent with the proposed equation. Rµν − 1

2Rgµν = 8πG c4 ⟨ ˆ

Tµν⟩ ∇µ⟨ ˆ Tµν⟩ ̸= 0

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime!

6

  • Study quantum fields in classical gravity background (e.g. black hole)
  • Surprisingly, leads to non-trivial, robust insights about quantum gravity
  • Works as long as curvature is not too strong (black hole singularity)
  • d4x

1 2ηµν∂µφ∂νφ − 1 2m2φ2 − λφ4

  • d4x
  • det(g)

1 2gµν∂µφ∂νφ − 1 2m2φ2 − λφ4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Vacuum State

7

  • QFT vacuum: state of lowest energy
  • Equivalently killed by annihilation operators for every particle
  • Lorentz symmetry: inertial observers agree on vacuum
  • In fact only true for inertial observers
  • In general relativity: no privileged class of observers!
  • Mathematically: creation/annihilation operators of two observers related

by Bogolyubov transformation ˆ H|Ω⟩ = Emin|Ω⟩ ˆ aI|Ω⟩ = 0 The definition of “vacuum” or “particle” in GR is inherently ambiguous ˆ bI =

J

  • αIJˆ

aJ + βIJˆ a†

J

  • [H, Λµν] = 0

ˆ bI|ΩA =

  • J

βIJˆ a†

J|ΩA = 0

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Unruh Effect

8

  • Equivalence Principle: gravity is locally equivalent to accelerated frame
  • f reference
  • For a qualitative picture, we thus consider constantly accelerated
  • bserver (constant proper acceleration)
  • Calculate expectation value of number density
  • perator of the accelerated observer A in

Minkowski vacuum

  • This is precisely Planck’s law! A sees radiation!

ct = c2

α sinh(ατ/c)

x = c2

α cosh(ατ/c)

Unruh Effect ⟨ΩM|ˆ nA(E)|ΩM⟩ = 1 exp 2πcE

α

  • − 1

T = kB c α 2π

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Quantum Black Holes

9

  • Classical black hole: nothing can escape from within the horizon
  • Hawking showed: vacuum of collapse that of free falling observer
  • Observer at infinity has relative acceleration and sees Hawking radiation
  • Black holes lose mass and evaporate after all!
  • Black hole thermodynamics:

T = c3 8πGkB 1 M dM = TdS S = kB 4πG c3 M 2 = A 4ℓ2

P

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Some Ballpark Figures

10

  • Both Unruh and Hawking radiation are hard to measure
  • Measuring Hawking radiation requires getting close to small black

holes - only option: micro black holes at accelerators

  • For a 1K black hole we are looking at
  • Unruh radiation is in principle easy to measure but the amount of

acceleration is huge, again for 1K we need M ≃ 10−8M α ≃ 1020 m s2

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Global Symmetries and Black Holes

11

  • Imagine a world with gravity, matter and a continuous global symmetry

(no gauge symmetry! no associated force!)

  • Noether’s theorem guarantees associated charge, e.g. baryon number
  • To avoid subtleties, assume single particle species interacting only

through gravity and with charge under such symmetry

  • By collapsing of these to a black hole with mass and waiting until

it evaporates to mass we get black holes with arbitrary charge, all of the same mass/energy |p⟩ |q⟩ → e/3|q⟩ |¯ q⟩ → e−/3|¯ q⟩ B = 1 3 (Nq − N¯

q)

p U(1) |p⟩ → ep|p⟩ N N · m m

slide-12
SLIDE 12

No Global Symmetries

12

+

  • Important: Hawking radiation contains same number of + and - charged

particles, so black hole cannot lose charge

  • If we let the black hole completely evaporate, charge is gone!
  • We have created a process

which explicitly violates charge conservation

  • N · (m, q)

(N · m − ∆E, N · q) (m, N · q) Q = Nq Q = 0

slide-13
SLIDE 13

No Global Symmetries: Loophole

13

+

  • N · (m, q)

(N · m − ∆E, N · q) (m, N · q)

  • Hawking calculation only valid until
  • What if evaporation stops and remnant forms?
  • No-Hair theorem: black holes with different but same are

indistinguishable from outside

  • Since we can construct BH with arbitrary for a fixed and thus

energy, we see that black holes in the theory have infinite microcanonical entropy!

  • Leads to various inconsistencies, violates entropy bounds!

MBH ≃ Mp Q M Q M

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Bonus: The Stringy Version

14

  • We believe string theory is a consistent theory of quantum gravity
  • Should rather forbid global symmetries then
  • Explicit mechanism: perturbative string theory is described by two

dimensional field theory on the string world sheet

  • Introducing a global symmetry on the world-sheet magically gives rise to

a gauge symmetry with associated gauge bosons in the spacetime! S =

  • dtdl
  • ηMNgab∂aXM∂bXN + · · ·
  • XM(t, l) string position
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bonus: The AdS/CFT version

15

  • Reminder: AdS/CFT is an isomorphism of two very different theories

1) Quantum gravity in Anti-de-Sitter (AdS) space 2) Conformal field theory (non-gravitational) on the AdS boundary AdS CFT global symmetry in CFT gauge symmetry in AdS global symmetry in AdS Contradiction!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conclusion

16

  • Even if ignorant about the details of quantum gravity, we can gain non-

trivial insights by using usual QFT techniques in curved backgrounds

  • Accelerated observers experience Unruh radiation
  • A different manifestation of this is Hawking radiation of black holes
  • Combining global symmetries with these expectations leads to

paradoxes

  • Hence global symmetries are not allowed in quantum gravity and thus

nature!

  • String theory seems to obey this!
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank You