Evaluation of Global Ionospheric Maps for Single Frequency PPP in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evaluation of global ionospheric maps for single
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evaluation of Global Ionospheric Maps for Single Frequency PPP in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluation of Global Ionospheric Maps for Single Frequency PPP in Egypt Amr El-Demiry, Mahmoud Abd Rabbou, and Adel El-Shazly Department of Civil Engineering, Cairo University Presented by; Prof. Adel El-Shazly Outlines Introduction


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Evaluation of Global Ionospheric Maps for Single Frequency PPP in Egypt

Amr El-Demiry, Mahmoud Abd Rabbou, and Adel El-Shazly Department of Civil Engineering, Cairo University

Presented by;

  • Prof. Adel El-Shazly
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outlines

  • Introduction
  • Problem statement
  • Research objectives
  • Mathematical models
  • Results and analysis
  • Conclusion
  • Recommendations
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

  • The ionosphere is part of the Earth’s atmosphere, extending

from about 50 km up to about 1,000 km or more above the Earth depending on the sun activities.

  • The ionosphere layer is a shell of electrons and electrically

atoms.

  • The number electrons affects the GPS signal path through the

layer, is affected by the sun activities .

  • The effect of the ionosphere is proportional to the total

number of the electrons along the path of the signals called the total electron content TEC and the signal frequecy.

  • For GPS signals which have high frequencies, it causes a delay
  • f GPS signal - code modulation and carrier phases.
  • It

causes a delay in code pseudorange measurement and advances the phase measurement by the same amount .

http://www.wirelessdictionary.com/Wireless-Dictionary-Ionospheric-Delay- Definition.html

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

  • The IGS global ionospheric maps (GIMs) are typically used to correct

for the ionospheric error for single frequency PPP due to its superior accuracy compared with the empirical methods.

  • IGS is The main organization responsible for the production of

precise satellite ephemerides, clock corrections and ionospheric maps,------

  • The products generated from the IGS are based on the combined

effort from all, or most of the IGS centers.

  • Each of the centers uses data collected from all IGS stations around

the world. Presently IGS manages a network of 384 stations

  • For ionospheric maps, four IGS Ionosphere Associate Analysis

Centres (IAACs) are contributing their ionospheric products to the IGS.

  • Include the CODE, ESOC, JPL, and Technical University of Catalonia

(UPC).

  • The four centers produce 2-dimensional ionosphere TEC maps that

refer to a 450km shell height.

Acquired from IGS website

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Problem statement

  • The accuracy of these maps is affected by the IGS stations

distribution and network resolution.

  • Up to date, unfortunately, there are no IGS stations in Egypt

which in role affected the IGS product accuracy for PPP accuracy.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Research Objectives

  • This research aims to asses the accuracy of the final and rapid

GIM ionospheric models for single frequency PPP in Egypt, To do so;

  • Investigate the traditional accuracy of GIM products for single

frequency PPP under well distributed stations network ( North America) to be considered as a reference for these products accuracy in Egypt.

  • Use GPS dual frequency linear combination mainly the geometry-

free to roughly investigate the behaviour of the ionospheric delay effect in Egypt.

  • Investigate the positioning accuracy and performance of the GIM

for SF PPP in Egypt using number of data sets.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Mathematical Model

  • 1

s s 1 r 1 r p1 p1

P =ρ (t,t-τ)+c[dt (t)-dt (t-τ)]+T+I +c[d (t)-d (t-τ)] +m +e

1 1 1 1 1 s s 1 r 1 r 1 1 s r

= ρ(t,t-τ)+c[dt (t)-dt (t-τ)]+ T - I +c[ (t)- (t-τ)] + m +e + [ N + (t )- (t ) ]       

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Mathematical Model

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mathematical Model

  • To detect the real behaviour of ionosphere effect leveling geometry-

free technique is used.

2 2 2 1 12 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 12 1 2 1 12 2 2 noise noise

f f P P P I DCB e f f f I DPB N f                    ( )

DCB is the differential code bias and DPB is the differential phase bias

  • To apply those equations the frequency depended bias and errors

such as DPB and the ambiguity parameters should be removed from the Geometry free observations

  • To do so, leveling Phase GF observations to the level of the

ionosphere is required to insure that the geometry free contains only the total ionosphere.

  • Code-GF can be used in leveling but in this case the DCB will be added

which worse the accuracy. In this research, GIM ionosphere products are used instead code-GF to investigate the difference between the GIM and real ionosphere variation trend.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results and Analysis

SF PPP Positioning accuracy using final and rapid GIM for North America network.

  • Data were collected from five North American stations representing

different latitudes (low, medium and high).

  • The data were collected at three different seasons (January, June and

October), each for three days of the years: 2008 and 2012to reflect the seasonal variations of the ionospheric delay.

  • 24 hour data sets with 30 seconds observation interval for the five

stations were downloaded from IGS website.

  • The tropospheric ZPD was using Hopfield model

with default atmospheric parameters, and the Neil mapping function is used.

  • The IGS Final satellite orbit and clock corrections were used.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results and Analysis

  • North America stations network.

Station name Latitude (degree) Longitude (degree) MDO1 30.68

  • 104.014

QUIN 39.97

  • 120.944

PRDS 50.87

  • 114.293

SASK 52.19625

  • 106.3983

CRO1 17.75

  • 64.5843
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results and Analysis

  • Positioning accuracy for station CRO1 at January 2012 (as an

example).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results and Analysis

  • Summary of positioning accuracy for the five stations for

January 2008 and 2012 (as an example)

Jan-12 GIM final rapid station name DLAT(m) DLON(m) DHGT(m) DLAT(m) DLON(m) DHGT(m) cro1

  • 0.65

0.91

  • 2.31

0.43

  • 1.20

1.83 mdo1 0.96

  • 0.53

0.19

  • 0.32

0.98 0.76 prds 0.78

  • 0.64
  • 0.31
  • 1.62

0.69

  • 0.14

quin 0.74

  • 0.74

1.75

  • 1.41

0.98

  • 5.06

sask

  • 0.52
  • 0.23
  • 0.42
  • 0.52

1.26 1.15 Jan-08 GIM final rapid station name DLAT(m) DLON(m) DHGT(m) DLAT(m) DLON(m) DHGT(m) cro1

  • 0.28

0.07

  • 0.24
  • 0.28

0.05

  • 0.23

mdo1

  • 0.14

0.49

  • 0.48
  • 0.11

0.52

  • 0.50

prds 0.09

  • 0.01
  • 0.70

0.09

  • 0.09
  • 0.75

quin 0.24 0.12

  • 0.84

0.33 0.13

  • 0.88

sask

  • 0.86

0.52

  • 1.47
  • 0.88

0.39

  • 1.66
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results and Analysis

  • Estimated ionospheric delay using leveling geometry-free linear

combination compared with GIM delay products

Comparable vertical ionospheric delay is extracted from GIM for Station CRO1.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results and Analysis

  • Estimated ionospheric delay using leveling geometry-free

linear combination compared with GIM delay products in Egypt.

GPS data at Alexandria GPS data at Helwan In contrast, the GIM ionospheric delay products trend variation is far from the leveling geometry-free ionospheric delay estimated trend.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results and Analysis

  • Investigate the positioning accuracy of single frequency PPP in

Egypt using final and rapid GIM model.

  • Three sets of GPS static data were collected in different

geographic regions in Egypt mainly Alexandria, Helwan and Aswan.

  • The data is processed considering IGS precise orbital and clock

products.

  • The tropospheric ZPD was using the empirical Hopfield model

with default atmospheric parameters, and the Neil mapping function is used.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results and Analysis

  • Positioning accuracy for Helwan station at July 2014
  • It can be seen that no

convergence is detected compared with dual frequency results due to the effect

  • f

the ionosphere.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Results and Analysis

  • Positioning accuracy for Alexandria station at April 2009
  • Although,

the ionospheric effect is eliminated in dual- frequency model, the convergence time extended to 50 minutes due to the clock and

  • rbital

products accuracy in weak stations resolution.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Results and Analysis

  • Positioning accuracy for Aswan station at July 2014
  • The

single frequency PPP ended up accuracy with 1.5 meter for both latitude and altitude after 4 hours of continues data using final GIM model.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions

  • In this research, the performance and accuracy of final and rapid

GIM ionospheric model is assessed for single frequency PPP in Egypt.

  • Well distributed station network is used to represent the traditional

accuracy of the GIM ionospheric products as a reference for the accuracy of these products in Egypt.

  • Leveling geometry-free linear combination (L1-L2) is used to

investigate the accuracy of the GIM final ionospheric map products in Egypt in comparison with North America station case.

  • The results show that the final GIM TEC products failed to detect the

actual trend and variation of the ionosphere affected the GPS data in Egypt. As seen from the results, the GIM delay products are affected from the low resolution of IGS stations in Egypt.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusions

  • In general, both the final and rapid GIM ionospheric model

achieve decimeter- level to meter-level accuracy after two hours of continues GPS data processing in well distributed station network such as North America IGS station network. However, the final GIM model present better convergence time than the rapid.

  • In Egypt, both the final and rapid GIM ionospheric model

achieve meter-level accuracy after four hours of continues GPS data processing with no convergence in the positioning solution using three sets of static data at Helwan, Alexandria and Aswan.

  • The dual frequency

ionosphere-free solution present encourage positioning solution compared with the traditional differential positioning solution in Egypt with convergence time extend to 50 minutes.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Recommendations

  • Using PPP techniques as an option for positioning will reduce

the cost and complexity compared to the traditional differential solution.

  • However, to start using PPP practically in Egypt, this research

show the great needing of set up number of distributed stations which can be linked to the IGS network to enhance the PPP products such as orbital, clock and ionosphere maps,….

  • Other option which may be currently more practically is

benefited from the local stations which set up in Egypt to start produce local products by processing the data of these stations to build local (regional) network such as NOAA and Australia network (RMIT)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thanks