evaluating information
play

Evaluating Information How to incorporate information literacy into - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluating Information How to incorporate information literacy into English classrooms Can YOU tell fact from fake? Whats up with fake news? Why is this issue at the forefront of so many civic discussions? What are attitudes


  1. Evaluating Information How to incorporate information literacy into English classrooms

  2. Can YOU tell fact from fake?

  3. What’s up with “fake news”? ● Why is this issue at the forefront of so many civic discussions? ● What are attitudes you see about “fake news” or “mass media” in general in your classroom? Describe your students’ ● healthy/unhealthy information seeking behaviors. ● In what ways are you currently teaching about this issue?

  4. What do we know about how students think about news and information? In academic contexts, 66% of college students use the library for research. In personal research, 56% of college students rely on social media. Most students have some level of distrust for the media’s accuracy, independence, and fairness. 36% of college students say “fake news” has made them distrust any news. Source: Project Information Literacy, October 2018, The News Study Executive Summary.

  5. The research “The first state that a user goes through for judging the credibility of online information is evaluation of surface credibility, which involves a consideration of such surface characteristics as appearance / presentation and information organization, as well as interface design elements such as interactivity, navigability, and download speed. This is true even for highly motivated users…” -Sundar, 2008

  6. “Subjects were observed to make choices cont’d among various information sources . . . [by] satisfying their information needs to quickly select sources whose convenience made them ‘ good enough .’” e h t , s e i t s t e n r e n t i g n s i s e s s s e -Connaway et al, 2011 a i t n l i e a u h W q n t “ a t r o p m g i n t s i s o o m o h e c e n r i h t o r f d e k o o l ] e s h t t n e a t d h u t s t e r [ e w o s e t y c r s u a o s e t , e d n n r f i e t o n t i y s a ” e . s e s r e e c w c s a e o c r t u y s o s a e d “77 % of sampled student n a , d n a s t r e d n u populations said that they were 3 1 0 ‘extremely likely’ to use Google to 2 x , a i F - start research for their assignments.” -Kean et al, 2015

  7. Features of web articles ● Author credentials Hyperlinks that actually source facts ● and statistics ● Content that matches claims ● Advertisements that cater to specific viewpoints ● Graphs and visuals that support the argument

  8. Principle 1: Define your information need ● What is my information need? What kind of information will fulfill this need? ● ● What is my writing task and what kind of information do I need to complete it? ● Where do I go to find the best information for my research context? Teaching ideas: compare/contrast different information need scenarios; give students multiple source types and assess which best fits an information need; have students discuss where they normally go to find information, why they go there, and teach them other places they could go to answer their questions

  9. Principle 2: Information creation as a process ● What are different source types and how are they created? How does the way information is created affect its value in different contexts ● and to different audiences? ● What kinds of content creation processes are there? ● Does the way a source is created affect its authority? How so? How do you figure out what kind of information creation process a source went ● through? Teaching ideas: compare/contrast source types with guiding questions; analyze an audience and what kind of a source would be persuasive for that audience; model how to assess a source's creation process

  10. Principle 3: Information corroboration habits ● How can I decide if the information is trustworthy? If a source seems fishy, how can I use other sources to prove/disprove it? ● ● How do information professionals (journalists, librarians) decide whether something is credible? Teaching ideas: Credibility indicators: author, correctly sourced info, balanced argument, horizontal (or lateral) reading; Fact-checking websites: mediabiasfactcheck, politifact, allsides; Expert fact-checking: looking at what outside sources say, finding multiples sources that agree

  11. Lesson Planning Focus on one of our main principles: 1. Defining an information need 2. Information creation as a process 3. Information corroboration habits Create a lesson plan OR assignment sheet dealing with this principle. Perhaps it is an assignment that will go along with a research paper; perhaps it is an in-class discussion you will have; perhaps you can fit it in with a media literacy unit. Share and discuss your ideas with a small group

  12. Works Referenced / Further Reading Caulfield, Mike. Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers. PBPRESSBOOKS. Digital Download: https://webliteracy.pressbooks.com/ Connaway, Lynn S., Timothy J. Dickey, and Marie L. Radford. “ ‘ If it is Too Inconvenient I'M Not Going After it:’ Convenience as a Critical Factor in Information-Seeking Behaviors.” Library & Information Science Research. vol. 33, , 2011, doi://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.002. Faix, Allison. “Assisting Students to Identify Sources: An Investigation.” Library Review. vol. 63, 2014. https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/LR-07-2013-0100 Head, Alison J and Michael B Eisenberg. "Truth be Told: How College Students Evaluate and use Information in the Digital Age." Project Information Literacy Research Omstotite , 2010, http://dev.journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf. Head, Alison J, John Wihbey, P. Takis Metaxas, Margy MacMillan, and Dan Cohen, “How Students Engage with News: Five Takeaways for Educators, Journalists, and Librarians.” Project Information Literacy Research Institute, 2018, http://www.projectinfolit.org/uploads/2/7/5/4/27541717/newsexecutivesummary.pdf Kean, Cheryl, et al. "Students' Choice and Evaluation of Information Sources at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus." New Library World , vol. 117, no. 3/4, 2016, pp. 279-288 , https://search.proquest.com/docview/1766267708?accountid=4488. Otero, Vanessa. 2018. What Exactly Are We Reading? 3.0 https://www.adfontesmedia.com/the-chart-version-3-0-what-exactly-are-we-reading/ Sundar, S. S. "The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility." Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility , vol. 73100, 2008. Wineburg et al. “Civic Online Reasoning.” Stanford History Education Group . https://sheg.stanford.edu/civic-online-reasoning. Accessed October 19, 2018.

  13. Contact Elise Silva Writing Programs Librarian elise_silva@byu.edu 801-422-7089 Jessica Green Research & Writing Center Specialist jessica_green@byu.edu 801-422-1165

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend