EU SAFA Programme - IACAs perspective ir. Erik MOYSON Director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

eu safa programme iaca s perspective
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EU SAFA Programme - IACAs perspective ir. Erik MOYSON Director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2 nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, 25 October 2012, Cologne, Germany EU SAFA Programme - IACAs perspective ir. Erik MOYSON Director Safety & Technical erik.moyson@iaca.be SAFA Programme 2 nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum :


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EU SAFA Programme

  • IACA’s perspective

2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, 25 October 2012, Cologne, Germany

  • ir. Erik MOYSON

Director Safety & Technical erik.moyson@iaca.be

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SAFA Programme

2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum:

From the beginning, it is a main principle of the programme that it should be standardised, transparent and fair. (focus & findings)

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SAFA findings vs inspections (27+4)

5

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 findings per inspection inspections per 1000 flights

2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SAFA findings vs inspections (27+4)

6

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 findings per inspection inspections per 1000 flights

2009 2010

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SAFA findings per inspection (27+4)

7

R² = 0.8445 R² = 0.8477

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 SAFA findinngs SAFA inspections

2009 2010 Linear (2009) Linear (2010)

2010 1.03 (0.96 ± 0.70) 2009 0.89 (0.76 ± 0.59)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Focus SAFA inspections

  • EC SAFA Report 2010

8

findings per inspected items

42 States EASA States 2010 0.0252 0.0274 (0.025 ± 0.017) 2009 0.0237 0.0249 (0.022 ± 0.018)

  • but
slide-9
SLIDE 9

SAFA findings vs inspected items (27+4)

9

0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 0.070 0.080 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 findings per inspected items inspected items per 1000 flights

2009 2010

slide-10
SLIDE 10

R² = 0.7278 R² = 0.7404

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 SAFA inspected items flights in State

2009 2010 Linear (2009) Linear (2010)

SAFA inspected items per 1000flights(27+4)

10

2010 46.80 (53.7 ± 34.5) 2009 44.59 (40.8 ± 25.3)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CFMU EC SAFA/Blacklist Alarming function

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Prioritisation list (PL)

  • EC SAFA Report 2010

13

  • but, are the operators informed when they are on the

Prioritisation List ?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SAFA centralised database

  • EC SAFA Report 2010

14

  • but, there are cases > 5 months to get report !

Are all national databases linked to EU SAFA database ? Do all operators get automatic notification ? Did all SAFA coordinators granted access to operators ?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SAFA FINDINGS

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SAFA programme 2010

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A23 – Defect notification and rectification

  • in general, operators appreciate SAFA programme
  • SAFA was good as wake-up call, an eye-opener
  • lessons learned from previous inspections
  • but…

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A23 – Defect notification and rectification

[EASA Decision 2012/001/S published on 27/07/2012] 19

  • welcome discussion with manufacturers and industry
slide-20
SLIDE 20

SAFA programme 2010

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

B01 – General internal condition

  • .

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

B07 – Emergency exit, lighting/marking, torches

[airport] : Only “personal” torches available in the flight deck. Original Airbus torches in place since aircraft delivery and approved by [NAA]. Again, it is doubtful, how this can generate a finding…!

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

SAFA programme 2010

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

[airport]: Safety markings on the engine missing. Answer sent to [SAFA inspecting NAA] asking for removal of this finding, as it is not a certification criterion. No answer received neither to clarify what exact sticker is missing nor to remove or at least to close that finding for almost 6 months.

C01 – General external condition

24

[airport]: Break-in point markings (if applied) faded or incorrect. It is again very hard to understand, how something can create a Cat. 2 finding even if it is not mandatory! Even if correction measures have been taken, SAFA database entry has been made and to [SAFA inspecting NAA] has been contacted, the finding is still open and no answer received until now!

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SAFA Cat. 2 finding: lack of hazard placards on the engines. [operator] : not mandatory, decided not to put these on the aircraft.

C07 – Powerplant and pylon

25

[state] -CAA cannot accept the comments of [operator] . It is not mandatory according to the documents of the manufacturer and EASA. However, it is the obligation of the Operator and the Safety Oversight Authorities to ensure safe work of the ground servicing staff…

  • perators obviously have a different procedure on awareness of the

danger zones on the aircraft, which has not been demonstrated to the [state] SAFA inspecting team…the raised finding C07, cannot be closed until the Operator provides evidences of precautions, taken to ensure safety of ground handling staff. [operator] responded with well documented procedure…Still, [operator] finds the finding unjustifiable as item C07 on the SAFA Checklist is related to “Powerplant and pylon”. [operator] sent a couple of messages to SAFA in [state] , but there is no response.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Federal Aviation Administration 26 Safety Performance Measurement and Responsibilities of Authorities

Illegal Unsafe SMS Regulatory Inefficiency Regulatory (O/S) Effectiveness

  • State: O/S
  • P/SP: Compliance

SMS Effectiveness Common Cause Unique Cause No Risk Regulatory (O/S) Ineffectiveness (Uncontrolled Common Cause)

Source: Professor Malcolm K. Sparrow Practice of Public Management John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Focus SAFA inspections

28

1996 – ECAC SAFA Programme

  • confidence safety oversight other States

2004 – EASA SAFA Directive 2004/36/CE

  • third country aircraft: not used or operated

under control of a Member State 2011 – EASA Opinion 04/2011 (ARO.RAMP)

  • third country aircraft + from another MS
slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • EC SAFA Report 2010
  • but

Inspections on EASA operators Inspections on non-EASA operators 2010 6,458 5,245 Precentage 55.2% 44.8%

29

Focus SAFA inspections

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2010 Top 33 SAFA inspected operator SoR

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 SAFA inspections Europe (non-EASA) Oceania Asia Middle East America (South) America (Central ) America (North) Africa EU EASA (non-EU)

Top 33 States (on 131) with more than the average of 89 SAFA inspections

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2010 Top 33 SAFA inspected operator SoR EASA 65.6%

Europe (non-EASA) 9.4% Asia 10.2% Middle East 3.0% America (North) 5.3% Africa 6.5%

Foreign

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Focus SAFA inspections

32

SAFA inspections flights inspections/1000 flights CAT EASA 6,400 7,346,266 0.87 CAT non-EASA 550,256

  • thers

87,832 total 11,349 7,984,354 1.42 CAT EASA 6,458 7,259,482 0.89 CAT non-EASA 586,222

  • thers

80,829 total 11,703 7,926,533 1.48 2009 4,949 7.76 5,245 7.86 2010

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Standardised

  • common approach States and SAFA inspectors
  • discussion with manufacturers and industry

Transparent

  • Prioritisation List
  • EU SAFA Database
  • communication (English proficiency)

Fair

  • precise, documented and verifiable findings

(photographic evidence facilitates understanding and follow-up)

  • findings competent authority iso operator (AOC layout…)

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Fair

  • Time to respond and/or accept corrective

actions and close SAFA findings must be reasonable.

  • Possibility to contest findings prior filing in

SAFA database should be extended to all participating States.

  • Provide airlines on-line access to SAFA

database.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

SAFA,

airlines…

42

SAF A

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Thank you for your attention