clarifying and fine tuning passenger rights
play

Clarifying and fine-tuning passenger rights Sylviane Lust - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Clarifying and fine-tuning passenger rights Sylviane Lust Director-General, IACA Air Passenger Rights Seminar - 30 May 2012 Regulation 261: original purpose Commissions Explanatory Memorandum of Proposal for a Regulation (COM


  1. “Clarifying and fine-tuning passenger rights” Sylviane Lust Director-General, IACA Air Passenger Rights Seminar - 30 May 2012

  2. Regulation 261: original purpose � Commission’s Explanatory Memorandum of Proposal for a Regulation (COM 2001/784 ; 21.12.2001, para 5) • “protect passengers adequately when confronted by denied boarding or cancellation” • “dissuade carriers from excessive denial of boarding or cancellation” • “give incentives to balance the commercial advantages against to cost to passengers” = protection against commercial decisions

  3. Regulation 261: original purpose � A delay is never a commercial decision, therefore no compensation under 261 � All events outside an airline’s control are by definition not commercial decisions � Provision on ‘extraordinary circumstances’ exonerates airlines from paying compenstation

  4. Regulation 261: poor drafting � Too vague a description of ‘extraodinary circumstances’ � ECJ’s decisions � Airlines’ legitimate expectation: a balanced approach. …. the legislator must take into account the principal objective of the act, but “all the interests involved” Case C- 127/07 Arcelor

  5. Regulation 261: ECJ’s decisions � Sturgeon: creates new law � Wallentin and McDonagh: ignore complex operating environment, the chain of suppliers � Decisions unbalanced, disproportionate and political instead of legal � Airlines have become insurers of last resort

  6. Airlines expect “ good regulation ” from legislators � Extraordinary circumstances to be reviewed • Clarification now, not in 2014 • Way-out: e.g. non-exhaustive list of cases � Revision not to be based on Sturgeon / Wallentin cases � Genuine and automatic “legal redress” • Airlines to deduct cost of compliance from invoices when disruptions caused by their providers • Airlines to remain first contact point for passengers � Limit on care/assistance (incl. for package passengers)

  7. Airlines expect “ good regulation ” from legislators � Good regulation = reasonable and proportionate protection of the weakest � Passengers are weaker than the airlines � But airlines are weaker than • Their monopoly providers • Weather conditions • Natural disasters…

  8. It is time to fix this !

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend