Clarifying and fine-tuning passenger rights Sylviane Lust - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

clarifying and fine tuning passenger rights
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Clarifying and fine-tuning passenger rights Sylviane Lust - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Clarifying and fine-tuning passenger rights Sylviane Lust Director-General, IACA Air Passenger Rights Seminar - 30 May 2012 Regulation 261: original purpose Commissions Explanatory Memorandum of Proposal for a Regulation (COM


slide-1
SLIDE 1

“Clarifying and fine-tuning passenger rights”

Sylviane Lust Director-General, IACA Air Passenger Rights Seminar - 30 May 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Regulation 261: original purpose

  • Commission’s Explanatory Memorandum of

Proposal for a Regulation (COM 2001/784 ; 21.12.2001, para 5)

  • “protect passengers adequately when

confronted by denied boarding or cancellation”

  • “dissuade carriers from excessive denial of

boarding or cancellation”

  • “give incentives to balance the commercial

advantages against to cost to passengers”

= protection against commercial decisions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Regulation 261: original purpose

  • A delay is never a commercial decision, therefore

no compensation under 261

  • All events outside an airline’s control are by

definition not commercial decisions

  • Provision on ‘extraordinary circumstances’

exonerates airlines from paying compenstation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Regulation 261: poor drafting

  • Too vague a description of ‘extraodinary

circumstances’

  • ECJ’s decisions
  • Airlines’ legitimate expectation: a balanced
  • approach. …. the legislator must take into account

the principal objective of the act, but “all the interests involved” Case C- 127/07 Arcelor

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Regulation 261: ECJ’s decisions

  • Sturgeon: creates new law
  • Wallentin and McDonagh: ignore complex operating

environment, the chain of suppliers

  • Decisions unbalanced, disproportionate and

political instead of legal

  • Airlines have become insurers of last resort
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Airlines expect “good regulation” from legislators

  • Extraordinary circumstances to be reviewed
  • Clarification now, not in 2014
  • Way-out: e.g. non-exhaustive list of cases
  • Revision not to be based on Sturgeon / Wallentin

cases

  • Genuine and automatic “legal redress”
  • Airlines to deduct cost of compliance from invoices

when disruptions caused by their providers

  • Airlines to remain first contact point for passengers
  • Limit on care/assistance (incl. for package

passengers)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Airlines expect “good regulation” from legislators

  • Good regulation = reasonable and proportionate

protection of the weakest

  • Passengers are weaker than the airlines
  • But airlines are weaker than
  • Their monopoly providers
  • Weather conditions
  • Natural disasters…
slide-9
SLIDE 9

It is time to fix this !

slide-10
SLIDE 10