Erik Dahlman Ericsson Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

erik dahlman ericsson research
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Erik Dahlman Ericsson Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Erik Dahlman Ericsson Research A Heterogeneous Network Technology Use cases


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • Erik Dahlman

Ericsson Research

slide-2
SLIDE 2 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 2

Deployment

  • Widearea to localarea
  • Outdoor and Indoor
  • Public, enterprise, residential, )

Use cases Spectrum

  • SubGHz to mmw
  • Different duplex arrangements
  • Different spectrum regimes

A Heterogeneous Network

  • Highquality mobile broadband
  • Billions of sensors
  • Critical communication for infrastructure,

traffic safety, medical applications, )

  • Smart homes, education, )
  • )

Technology

slide-3
SLIDE 3 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 3
  • A wide range of requirements
slide-4
SLIDE 4 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 4
  • Spectrum range relevant for 5G networks
  • › Lower frequencies for full area coverage

› Complementary use of higher frequencies

For extreme capacity and data rates in dense scenarios

Coverage

Extreme capacity and data rates

slide-5
SLIDE 5 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 5
  • TDD more relevant for higher bands targeting

very wide bandwidths in dense deployments

Easier to find unpaired spectrum Access nodes and devices becoming more similar More dynamic traffic variations

On link level ) ) or only on system level

Dynamic assignment of downlink/uplink resources Full duplex may eventually be introduced

Simultaneous TX/RX on same frequency

FDD dominating in lower (licensed) bands

Coverage benefits Avoids some nasty interference situations (BS BS, device device)

slide-6
SLIDE 6 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 6
  • › Becoming more relevant for very wide bandwidths

in dense deployments

Difficult to find dedicated spectrum for multiple operators More dynamic traffic variations

  • Will remain the backbone of IMT

Controlled interference “Guaranteed” quality Efficient at high load

› Complemented by unlicensed spectrum

To get access to more spectrum WiFi or unlicensed LTE

› Unlicensed › Shared licensed spectrum › What about network sharing?

slide-7
SLIDE 7 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 7
  • › Multiantenna TX/RX extended to multiple sites

!

  • › RRC connectivity to overlaid layer

› Robust mobility for (ultra) dense deployments

› For both low and high frequencies › Beam forming for coverage › Multiuser MIMO for capacity

slide-8
SLIDE 8 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 8

› Minimize broadcast of system information

Main part provided on a perneed basis

› Separate userdata plane from system information

System information broadcast widearea Underlaid nodes only active when userdata to convey

"#

!"# $%

› Network transmissions not related to user data

Reference signals, system information, )’

› Networks lightly loaded on average › Will not change dramatically in the future

Much more traffic but also much more network nodes

  • !
slide-9
SLIDE 9 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 9

$%

!&'

› Same technology for access and backhaul › Same spectrum for access and backhaul

mmw bands as well as lower frequencies

› Do not distinguish between access and backhaul

Get from point A to B without a wire

()Massive use of wireless backhaul

P2P mmW lineofsight links to macro sites using dedicated technology in dedicated spectrum

(*)Large number of lowpower nodes

Targeting very high data rates Indoor and outdoor

"#

slide-10
SLIDE 10 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 10

&#&

Why D2D?

+,-

Proximity detection Communication

Social media Advertising

".#

  • Already in LTE
slide-11
SLIDE 11 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 11

&#&

"(# "(*#

$%&' $%&'

slide-12
SLIDE 12 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 12

'&(#&)

› Maybe one should not differ between “base stations” and “devices” ) ) but rather between “highpower” nodes and “lowpower” nodes › Maybe one should not differ between downlink spectrum and uplink spectrum ) ) but rather between “highpower” spectrum and ”lowpower” spectrum? › Maybe there should just be different types of “devices” communication with each other?

Some devices move around, some do not! Some devices provide wired connectivity, some do not! Some devices “belong” to operators, some do not! )

Or maybe not?

slide-13
SLIDE 13 CTW 2014 | Ericsson Proprietary Information | 20140526 | Page 13