EXPERIMENTAL UPPER LIMITS ON (ULTRA) HIGH-FREQUENCY GRAVITATIONAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

experimental upper limits on ultra high frequency
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EXPERIMENTAL UPPER LIMITS ON (ULTRA) HIGH-FREQUENCY GRAVITATIONAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EXPERIMENTAL UPPER LIMITS ON (ULTRA) HIGH-FREQUENCY GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND PROSPECTS FOR MORE: MAGNETIC CONVERSION DETECTORS AND CORRELATED INTERFEROMETRY Hartmut Grote, Cardiff University ICTP workshop, Trieste 14/10/2019 Work in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EXPERIMENTAL UPPER LIMITS ON (ULTRA) HIGH-FREQUENCY GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND PROSPECTS FOR MORE: MAGNETIC CONVERSION DETECTORS AND CORRELATED INTERFEROMETRY

Hartmut Grote, Cardiff University ICTP workshop, Trieste 14/10/2019 Work in collaboration with: Aldo Ejlli, Mike Cruise, Damian Ejlli, and Giampaolo Pisano

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Joseph Weber: Pioneer of GW detection

1969: Sensitivity ~10 million times less that IFO’s today.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

John A. Wheeler

He [Weber] threw himself with religious fervor at the gravitational waves and pursued them for the rest of his career. Sometimes I wonder if I didn’t fill him with too much enthusiasm for this monumental task.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Michelson Interferometer

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Michelson-Morley experiment: Accuracy: 10^-8 m (10^-9 relative) Advanced Interferometer: Accuracy: 10^-19 m (3 x 10^-23 relative), 100Hz BW 4 optical resonators arranged around Michelson IFO

Michelson, with additions...

10m arm-length 3-4 km arm-length

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Michelson-Morley experiment: Accuracy: 10^-8 m (10^-9 relative) Advanced Interferometer: Accuracy: 10^-19 m (3 x 10^-23 relative), 100Hz BW 10m arm-length 3-4 km arm-length

Michelson, with additions...

Measurement limited by Heisenberg uncertainty h ~ dx * dp (40kg masses)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Other Interferometers

Illustration: Josh Field

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Other Interferometers

Illustration: Josh Field

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Japanese synchronous recycling interferometer (100 MHz)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fermilab ‘holometer’ interferometer (1-13 MHz)

2 x PRMI IFO

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Interferometry gets harder at high frequencies

■ h = dL / L loss of strain (h) due to smaller L → ■ Small L small beam sizes harder to operate high power to reduce → → shot noise

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The (inverse) Gertsenshtein effect

■ Gravitational-waves propagating in magnetic fjelds convert into photons.

(G. A. Lupanov JETP 25, 76 (1967), Gertsenshtein, Sov. Phys., JETP 14, 84 (1962))

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Similarity: Axion search using laboratory static magnetic fjelds

■ Axions are generated in the magnetic fjeld coupled to two photons. ■ Axions, in the second region of the magnetic fjeld, decay into photons.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ALPS (Any-Like Particle Search) DESY Germany

Magnet Light Source Detector Magnet EM generation Optical barrier Gravitational wave B

slide-15
SLIDE 15

OSQAR (Optical Search of QED, Axion and photon Regeneration) CERN Switzerland

Magnet Light Source Detector Magnet EM generation Optical barrier Gravitational wave B

 Magnets provided from spare LHC particle accelerator working @ superfluid helium (2 K).  Magnetic fjeld Field: = 9 T. 𝐶  Magnet length: = 14.3 m. 𝑀  Photodetector @ 532 nm.  Data acquisition 2014-2015.  Excluded detection of physical signal @ 95% confjdence interval.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CAST (CERN Axion Solar Telescope) CERN Switzerland

 Magnet provided from spare LHC particle accelerator working @ superfluid helium (2 K).  Magnetic fjeld: 9 Tesla.  Length: 9 m.  X-Ray detector @ 3 nm.  Data acquisition 2013-2015.  Excluded detection of physical signal @ 95% confjdence interval.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

GWs upper limits: ALPS, OSQAR, CAST

Detectors ■ Cannot be pointed deliberately to the emitting sources, except CAST ■ GWs upper limits at Ultra-High-Frequencies (UHF): optical 5x1014 Hz and X-ray 1018 Hz Suited sources ■ Cosmological sources: stochastic, isotropic, stationary, and Gaussian gravitational-waves. ■ UHF GWs candidates: Primordial black holes (PHB), thermal GWs from the Sun.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Parameters necessary to compute the characteristic amplitude

■ detected number of photons per second, ■ cross-section of the detector, ■ magnetic fjeld amplitude, ■ distance extension of the magnetic fjeld, ■ frequency of the detector ■ quantum effjciency of the detector

slide-19
SLIDE 19

UHF GW characteristic amplitude upper limits

ArXiv 1908:00232

slide-20
SLIDE 20

STRAIN UPPER LIMITS

10

  • 40

10

  • 37

10

  • 34

10

  • 31

10

  • 28

10

  • 25

10

  • 22

10

  • 19

10

  • 16

10

  • 13

10

  • 10

Strain [1/√Hz] 10

0 10 2 10 4 10 6 10 8 10 10 10 12 10 14 10 16 10 18 10 20

Frequency [Hz]

LIGO Fermilab Holometer

PRD 95, 063002 (2017)

waveguide

CQG 23, 22 (2006)

0.75m

PRL 101, 101101 (2008)

graviton-magnon resonance

(arXiv:1903.04843v2)

  • ur work

(arXiv:1908.00232)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

STRAIN UPPER LIMITS

10

  • 40

10

  • 37

10

  • 34

10

  • 31

10

  • 28

10

  • 25

10

  • 22

10

  • 19

10

  • 16

10

  • 13

10

  • 10

Strain [1/√Hz] 10

0 10 2 10 4 10 6 10 8 10 10 10 12 10 14 10 16 10 18 10 20

Frequency [Hz]

LIGO Fermilab Holometer

PRD 95, 063002 (2017)

waveguide

CQG 23, 22 (2006)

0.75m

PRL 101, 101101 (2008)

graviton-magnon resonance

(arXiv:1903.04843v2)

  • ur work

(arXiv:1908.00232)

“Large signal” is here...

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Primordial black hole evaporation and upper limits

■ PBH evaporation: predicted stochastic isotropic UHF GWs background ■ Sun: thermal activity in core generates UHF GWs.

10 12 14 16 18 20

  • 45
  • 40
  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20

Frequency f [Hz] Amplitude hc

g g sun

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Graviton to photon mixing and future laboratory axion experiments ALPS II, JURA, IAXO

ALPS II

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Graviton to photon conversion in resonant Fabry-Perot cavity, ALPS II and JURA

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Graviton to photon mixing and future laboratory axion experiments ALPS II, JURA, IAXO

ALPS II

JURA

960 960

new

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Graviton to photon mixing and future laboratory axion experiments ALPS II, JURA, IAXO

IAXO

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Graviton to photon mixing and future laboratory axion experiments ALPS II, JURA, IAXO

γ

N dark (Hz) A (m2) B (T) L (m) F ALPS IIc 0.75 ⇡ 10− 6 ⇡ 2 ⇥ 10− 3 5.3 120 40000 JURA 1 ⇡ 10− 6 ⇡ 8 ⇥ 10− 3 13 960 100000 IAXO 1 ⇡ 10− 4 ⇡ 21 2.5 25

  • IAXO

ALPS II (successor JURA )

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Prospects

10 12 14 16 18 20

  • 45
  • 40
  • 35
  • 30
  • 25
  • 20

Frequency f [Hz] Amplitude hc N u c l e

  • s

y n t h e s i s l i m i t g g g ALPS IIc s u n OSQAR CAST JURA IAXO

slide-29
SLIDE 29

A Hertz experiment?

Weber’s / Sinsky’s idea: GW generator and matched detector Maybe possible for EM-GW / GW-EM conversion experiments?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

A Hertz experiment?

Weber’s / Sinsky’s idea Maybe possible for conversion experiments?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

JURA could get close to detecting its generated gravitational waves

JURA

960 960

new

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Interferometry up to ~100MHz

A case for co-located interferometry for cross-correlation studies

slide-33
SLIDE 33

CAD Layout: A. Ejlli

Cardiff co-located interferometers

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Cardiff co-located interferometers

Multi-purpose facility for correlated interferometry:

  • Technology development (squeezing and entangled

squeezing for correlated interferometry)

  • Quantization of space-time
  • Dark matter searches
  • High-frequency gravitational waves (1 - 100 MHz)
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Conclusions

■ We set upper limits on stochastic UHF GWs using data of laboratory axion search experiments. ■ The upgraded ALPS II, JURA, and IAXO are potential infrastructure for the stochastic UHF GWs detection. ■ UHF GWs of PBH evaporation are an investigation at the very early universe and observation at the Planck Scale.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Questions

■ Should we be discouredged by being many orders of magnitude away from meaningful sensitivities? ■ What do you think about the value of a Hertz experiment? ■ Could funding be motivated for magnetic conversion detectors (as dedicated facilities or at least modifjcations of existing facilities)?