Epidemiology: challenges in the interpretation and analysis with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

epidemiology challenges in the interpretation and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Epidemiology: challenges in the interpretation and analysis with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Epidemiology: challenges in the interpretation and analysis with some examples Lars T. Fadnes Centre for International Health University of Bergen Example Zinc sirup Metallic and bitter taste Accepted mostly by the most sick and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Epidemiology: challenges in the interpretation and analysis with some examples

Lars T. Fadnes Centre for International Health University of Bergen

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Example

  • Zinc sirup

– Metallic and bitter taste – Accepted mostly by the most sick and less by the healthier

  • Placebo sirup

– Taste like fruit juice – Accepted my most children

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Epidemiology: challenges in the interpretation and analysis with s Randomised to treatmentarm Taking all doses Proportion taking all doses in analysis zinc Most sick 55 45 82% Least sick 110 55 50% placebo Most sick 55 50 91% Least sick 110 100 91%

Intention-to-treat analysis Per protocol What are the challenges?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interactions/ effect modification

  • The effect of one factor on the outcome is dependant on

an other factor

  • How to assess?

– Stratified analysis – Multivariable analysis

  • E.g. effect of treatment (zinc) on diarrhoea severity is

depending on whether the child had fever or not

– Those with fever had protective effect of zinc – Those without fever had no positive effects of zinc

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Observation of associations between

investigated exposure factors and their

  • utcomes does not necessarily imply causation.

In the absence of random error and bias, there are three possible explanations for these associations in nature:

1) The exposure causes the outcome 2) The outcome causes the exposure (reverse causation) 3) The exposure and outcome share a common cause

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

unlikely if the exposure always comes before the outcome

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What is this effect called? Confounding…

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Confounding

  • Exposure and outcome share a common cause

– Confounding can be seen as a mixing of effects – A confounder is a variable that causes confounding or a variable which removes confounding when adjusted for – hinders our ability to see the true causal effect of the exposure on the outcome

  • When do we need to suspect it?

– Imbalance in factor/ determinant between the exposed and unexposed groups

  • Design

– Randomisation (equal distribution of common causes of both the exposures and outcome) – matching of cases

  • How to assess?

– Stratified analysis – Multivariable analysis

  • regression methods to control for multiple confounders at the same time
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mediation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Accuracy versus precision

High accuracy, but low precision High precision, but low accuracy

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Before you finish…

  • Take 1 minute to fill in short evaluation of

these sessions in the computer lab on the following web site http://evaluation.fadnes.net/

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Questions and comments

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Installation of RcmdrPlugin.Cih.Epi

  • Install R (if not done already)

– http://www.r-project.org/

  • Install package Rcmdr (if not done already)

– Package  Install package  scroll down to Rcmdr  click OK

  • Install package Epi

– Package  Install package  scroll down to Rcmdr  click OK

  • Download RcmdrPlugin.Cih.Epi from

http://statistics.fadnes.net/epi/

  • Install package(s) from local zip file (choose the package you just downloaded)
  • Open program

– Load package Rcmdr – Tools -> load Rcmdr plug-in(s)  RcmdrPlugin.Cih.Epi

  • click ok and Yes
  • Now you are ready