EPAs Proposed Affordable Clean Energy Rule Basics and Implications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

epa s proposed affordable clean energy rule
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EPAs Proposed Affordable Clean Energy Rule Basics and Implications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EPAs Proposed Affordable Clean Energy Rule Basics and Implications September 6, 2018 United States Energy Association Washington, D.C. Chronology Clean Power Plan (CPP) Litigation in DC Circuit Supreme Court stayed enforcement


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EPA’s Proposed Affordable Clean Energy Rule

Basics and Implications

September 6, 2018 United States Energy Association Washington, D.C.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Chronology

◘ Clean Power Plan (CPP)

  • Litigation in DC Circuit
  • Supreme Court stayed enforcement of CPP pending litigation

◘ Trump EPA asked DC Circuit to hold litigation in abeyance ◘ Trump EPA proposed rule to repeal the CPP ◘ Trump EPA proposed rule to replace the CPP: Affordable Clean Energy Rule

@kyledanish

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background: Sec. 111 of the Clean Air Act

◘ “Standards of performance” for major sources of emissions ◘ 111(b): New, modified, and reconstructed sources

  • EPA sets standards based on “best system of emission reduction”

(BSER)

◘ 111(d): Existing sources

  • EPA establishes “guideline” identifying BSER
  • States set standards consistent with EPA’s determination of

BSER

  • States submit plans of compliance for EPA approval
  • If state plan is un

@kyledanish

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Obama EPA Rulemakings

  • Separate CO2 emission standards for new/modified coal and gas

plants 111(b) rule: Carbon Pollution Standards Rule

  • Based BSER mostly on reductions achievable by generation shifting
  • Heat rate improvements at coal plants
  • Shifting of generation from coal to gas plants
  • Shifting of generation from fossil to renewable plants
  • Yielded numerical emission limits for each state
  • State compliance plan can allow averaging/trading approaches

111(d) rule: Clean Power Plan

@kyledanish

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Trump EPA’s Proposed Repeal of CPP

◘ Interpretation of BSER exceeds authority under Section 111 ◘ BSER limited to measures implemented at, or to individual plants – not power system as a whole

@kyledanish

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Proposed Replacement: Affordable Clean Energy Rule

  • Published in Federal Register Aug. 31
  • Comments due Oct. 31

Basics:

  • Emission guideline with BSER based on new

interpretation

  • Changes to general guidelines for 111(d) rules
  • Reform of New Source Review program

Three components

@kyledanish

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EPA Proposed Guideline

◘ Only applies to coal-fired plants ◘ BSER = heat rate improvements (HRI) ◘ Guideline = list of “candidate [HRI] technologies”

  • Neural Network/Intelligent Sootblowers
  • Boiler Feed Pumps
  • Air Heater and Duct Leakage Control
  • Variable Frequency Drives
  • Blade Path Upgrade (Steam Turbine)
  • Redesign/Replace Economizer
  • Improved Operating and Maintenance Practices

@kyledanish

slide-8
SLIDE 8

State Plans

◘ State plans establish standards

  • Analyze candidate technologies for each plant
  • Adopt emission rate standard for each plant based on an HRI

technology or other inside-the-fence measure

  • Plans due 3 years after final rule
  • Standard presumptively applies 2 years after plan is due
  • May not rely on multi-plant trading or averaging

◘ State flexibility to adjust standard/deadline

  • May adjust in light of “remaining useful life”
  • May consider other compliance obstacles

@kyledanish

slide-9
SLIDE 9

New Source Review (NSR) Reform

◘ NSR basics

  • Preconstruction permitting requirement for new construction or

modifications at major sources

  • Forces stringent emission control requirements
  • Modification triggers NSR if:
  • Non-routine physical or operational change; and
  • Significant emission increase – measured in terms of annual emissions

◘ Concern with NSR

  • State plans could require HRI improvements that trigger NSR
  • Higher costs, discouraging emission rate improvements

@kyledanish

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Reform Idea

◘ Change test for “significant emissions increase”

  • Current test: Will change result in increase in annual emissions?

◘ Proposed new test

1. Will change result in increase in maximum achieved/achievable hourly emissions? 2. If so, will change also result in increase in annual emissions?

◘ EPA asserts: Change will not result in increase in overall power sector emissions

@kyledanish

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Impacts Debate

◘ Impacts on CO2 emissions ◘ Impacts on emissions of other pollutants ◘ Impacts on coal ◘ Broader impacts on climate policy

@kyledanish

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Legal Flashpoints

◘ Interpretation of BSER ◘ EPA-state roles ◘ Changes to NSR

@kyledanish

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Timeline

2019

  • EPA finalizes

ACE

  • Litigation

commences

2020

  • Presidential

election

2021 2022

  • State ACE

plans due

2023 2024

  • Presumptive

ACE compliance deadline

@kyledanish

slide-14
SLIDE 14

For more information:

Kyle Danish

202-298-1876 kwd@vnf.com