Interreg NSR FAIR Remco Schrijver, Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Remco Schrijver, Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands

Interreg NSR FAIR

Flood infrastructure Asset management & Investment in Renovation, adaptation, optimization & maintenance

+ The motivation for FAIR + The consortium and WP structure + What are we hoping to achieve + How we propose to achieve it + Next steps

Outline

Across the North Sea Region (and globally):

The motivation for FAIR

+ Infrastructure is aging + Performance is uncertain + But money is limited

Sunk investment in England alone is estimated at £20bn

Infrastructure is aging

Climate change and deterioration mean performance may no longer be at the desired level.

Performance is uncertain

How can we ‘best’ protect people, communities, essential services and the economy from the impacts of flooding with the resources we have.

But money is limited

The FAIR consortium

Asse set t mana nager gers: s: Bringing real problems and challenges Scien ience ce partn tner ers: s: Bringing domain expertise and innovations

FAIR work packages

WP1: : Project Management

Lead: RWS

WP2: : Communication activities

Lead: LS

Central activities

WP3: : Investment Planning and asset management

Lead: SPL

WP5: : Research and capacity building facility

Lead: IHE

Asset manager led activities

WP4: : Adaptive design and mainstreaming

Lead: DCA

WP6: : Upscaling and replication

Lead: RWS

Science partner led activities

We have set ourselves clear and ambitious objectives to:

What are we hoping to achieve?

+ Help do more for less – through better targeting of investment + Encourage multi functionality – and discourage mono-

functionality

+ Extend asset life – through smarter maintenance and renovation

Despite the heterogeneity of the NSR, asset managers face common challenges:

+

Where to act: which asset would yield the greatest benefit and reduce risk most?

+

When n to act: is action required now, or can investment be postponed?

+

How w to act: should we collect more data or intervene? If we intervene what approach is best? By sh sharing ing exper xperience ience and knowled wledge ge FAIR will promote improved practice across the NSR.

How we propose to achieve it

The proof is in the pudding

How we propose to achieve it

FAIR includes Ass sset Owner ners s and Science ence Pa Partner

• ners. This provides an opportunity to

share and improve ‘real world practice’ across a series es of quite different demo mons nstrat ation

• n sites.

Demonstration sites

Hvide Sande and Ribe, Denmark

Hollandsche IJssel, The Netherlands

Middelkerke, Belgium

Hamburg, Germany

Helsingborg, Sweden

Marken, The Netherlands

Results so far:

Work in progress

+ An inventory of procedures, data and tools used nationally + Framework for asset management + Maturity analysis: where are the weakness and the strengths,

where are the opportunities for improvement

Immediate next steps

Work in progress

+ Adaptive designing including opportunities for multi

functionality

+ The Asset Owners lead the pilots with the Science team

providing suggestions, innovations and guidance

Suggest innovations and provide science support

Work in progress

+ The Asset Owners lead the pilots with the Science team

povididng suggestions and guidance.

Assetmanagement framework

Project performance

Outpu put

Outputs are the direct immediate term results associated with a project (often the deliverables of the project). Outputs are measurable and readily determined.

Outcome come

Outcomes refer to the medium term consequences of a

• project. An outcome is a change that
• ccurred because of the outputs.

Imp mpact act

Impacts are the long-term or indirect effects of the

• utcomes. Ideally, impacts aligns with the strategic
• bjectives of an organization.

Impact Outcome Output

+ Collaboration with and

between project partners

+ Early involvement: from

stakeholders to shareholders

Upscaling and replication

Partner Partner Partner National networks International networks FAIR