Entanglement Entropy in 2+1 Chern-Simons Theory Shiying Dong UIUC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

entanglement entropy in 2 1 chern simons theory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Entanglement Entropy in 2+1 Chern-Simons Theory Shiying Dong UIUC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Entanglement Entropy in 2+1 Chern-Simons Theory Shiying Dong UIUC With: Eduardo Fradkin, Rob Leigh, Sean Nowling arXiv: hep-th/0802.3231 4/27/2008 Great Lakes String Conference @ University of Wisconsin-Madison Motivation Candidate of black


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Entanglement Entropy in 2+1 Chern-Simons Theory

Shiying Dong UIUC With: Eduardo Fradkin, Rob Leigh, Sean Nowling arXiv: hep-th/0802.3231

4/27/2008 Great Lakes String Conference @ University of Wisconsin-Madison

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation

Candidate of black hole entropy 2+1 Gravity, BTZ Order parameter of topological states Fractional quantum Hall effect p+ip superconductors Quantum computing with anyons

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Definition

For a system consisting of two subsystems A, B, from any pure state , the density matrix , define the reduced density matrix on A by , and the entanglement entropy is For a pure state, The entanglement entropy should depend

  • n the common features of A and B.

ρ = |φφ| |φ SA = −tr(ρA ln ρA). ρA = trBρ SA = SB.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Scale Dependence

It depends on the interface length scale L, the correlation length ξ , and the ultraviolet cutoff ε. Area law: When the interface is rotational symmetric, the leading term is proportional to the area of the interface. In general, for spatial dimension d, SA = gd−1(L ǫ )d−1 + gd−2(L ǫ )d−2 + · · · + g0 ln L ǫ + S0.

H.Casini and M. Huerta ’06

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Universal Terms

In odd d dimensions, or even d dimensions with non-smooth interfaces, the entanglement entropy has a logarithmic divergent term, which is universal. Otherwise, there is a universal constant term. In particular, d=1, d=2, SA = αL − γ. SA = β ln L ǫ − δ,

H.Casini and M. Huerta ’06

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Calculation

Define , for integer n. There is an unambiguous analytic continuation to real n≥1. In practice we usually have to normalize it, SA = − lim

n→1

∂ ∂n Zn Z1

n .

SA = − lim

n→1

∂ ∂nZn. Zn = tr(ρA

n)

  • P. Calabrese and J. Cardy ’04
slide-7
SLIDE 7

2D Free Boson CFT

ρ = lim

β→∞ e−βH

ρA = trBρ

slide-8
SLIDE 8

n-sheeted e.g., n=3

w u v

Zn = tr(ρA

n)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

T(w) = ( dz dw)2T(z) + c 12{z, w} = c(1 − 1/n2) 24 (v − u)2 (w − u)2(w − v)2 = T(w)Φn(u)Φ−n(v) Φn(u)Φ−n(v) Where And so ∆±n = c 24(1 − 1 n2 ). SA = c 3 ln(|u − v| ǫ ). z = (w − u w − v )

1 n

  • P. Calabrese and J. Cardy ’04
slide-10
SLIDE 10

2D Massive Free Boson

ξ=1/m≪R. The Green function is defined on the n-sheeted complex plane.

R A B R

SA = 1 6 ln 1 mǫ.

∂ ∂m2 ln ZB

n = − 1

2m2 ( 1 12n + n 2 (mR − 1 2)2),

∂ ∂m2 ln ZB

n = −1

2

  • d2rGn(

r, r)

  • P. Calabrese and J. Cardy ’04
slide-11
SLIDE 11

2D Massive Free Fermion

∂ ∂m ln ZF

n =

  • d2r trSn(

r, r). ∂ ∂m2 ln ZF

n = − 1

2m2 ( 1 24n − n 2 (mR − 1 2)2), SA = 1 12 ln 1 mǫ. ∂ ∂m2 ln(ZB

n ZF n ) = −

1 24m2n(1 + 1 2), The linear divergence is cancelled between the bosons and fermions.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Summary for 2D

The logarithmic term in the entanglement entropy of 2D free QFT is universal. It is proportional to the conformal anomaly

  • f the system.

It is also proportional to the number of interfaces between A and B subsystems.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2+1 Chern-Simons

The Hilbert space on a 2d closed surface is spanned by the conformal blocks of the WZW CFT living on that surface. The wavefunctions can be written as the partition function of the gauged WZW model,

  • E. Witten ’89, ’92, Elitzur, Moore,

Schwimmer and Serberg, ‘89

ψ

¯ J(Az) = exp[ ik

  • Tr( ¯

JA)]

  • [Dg]exp[ikS+(g, Az, ¯

J)]

slide-14
SLIDE 14

We define a state by doing path integral on a 3D manifold enclosed by the surface. And the density matrix has two manifolds with opposite orientations. Trace over B means to identify the boundary value of the Chern-Simons fields

  • n the two B surfaces, and sum over them
  • properly. This means is

generated by gluing the two manifolds along their B surfaces. To calculate , we need to glue n pieces of the manifolds, and study the CS partition function of the final manifold. Zn = tr(ρA

n)

ρA = trBρ ρA

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A Simplest Example: S2

ρA |φ φ| ρ =

slide-16
SLIDE 16

quantum dimension

SA = − lim

n→1

∂ ∂nZ(S3)1−n = ln Z(S3) = ln S00 = − ln D D =

  • i

d2

i =

  • i

( S0i S00 )2 = 1 S00 Tr(ρA

n) = Zn

Z1

n = Z(S3)

Z(S3)n

modular S matrix

  • E. Witten ’89
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Remarks

In 2+1 theory, we have in

  • general. Since Chern-Simons theory is

topological, there is no scale dependence,

  • nly the topological piece survives.

If we move away the topological phase, we can still calculate the topological entropy by computing SA = αL − γ

A B C D

−γ0 = SA + SB + SC −SAB − SAC − SBC + SABC.

  • A. Kitaev and J. Preskill ’06
slide-18
SLIDE 18

S2 With Two Interfaces

ρA

A A* b2 b1

|φ φ| ρ =

A B1 B2 b2 b1 A* B2* B1* b1 b2 A A* b1 A A* b2

=

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Now the final manifold is the connected sum of two S3’s along n S2’s, The entanglement entropy is doubled, In general, S2 with I interfaces gives us SA = − lim

n→1

∂ ∂nZ(S3)2(1−n) = −2 ln D. Tr(ρA

n) = Zn

Z1

n = Z(S3, S3, n)

Z(S3)n = Z(S3)2 Z(S3)2n . SA = −I ln D.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Useful Facts

The key to generalize the operation is that, if any three manifold is a connected sum of two submanifolds, with their interface supporting only one state, we can cut it into two pieces. On S2 with two punctures, the Hilbert space is one dimensional if they are a conjugate pair, zero otherwise. A single link inside S3 has expectation value S0

j.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

General Manifolds and States

Finding all the conformal blocks Squeeze all the interfaces Cut and glue around each interface The “ears” will cancel after the normalization

slide-22
SLIDE 22

An Example: 2-Tori

B A b b A B

i k j

|Ψ =

  • {i,j,k}

φ{i,j,k}|{i, j, k}

slide-23
SLIDE 23

b A B D2

S2

2n j j i1 i2 k1 k2

S3

Zn =

  • {{i,k},j}

S0

j n

  • t=1

φ{it,j,kt}φ∗

{it,j,kt+1}

ψA|ψA{it,j}ψB|ψB{kt,j} (S0

j)2

slide-24
SLIDE 24

General Result

SA = I ln S0

0 −

  • {ji}

(

I

  • i=1

dji)tr

  • ρ{ji}

I

i=1 dji

ln ρ{ji} I

i=1 dji

  • .

# of interfaces all possible configurations around interfaces quantum dimensions projected density matrix Ψ|Ψ = ψA|ψAψB|ψB S0

j

= 1 Zn =

  • {{i,k},j}

(S0

j)1−n n

  • t=1

φ{it,j,kt}φ∗

{it,j,kt+1} =

  • j

(S0

j)1−ntr(ρj)n

Normalize the basis states

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Summary for Chern-Simons

The entanglement entropy has a vacuum contribution, which is proportional to the number of interfaces. The nontrivial part comes from the sewing law of CFT. The total entropy is a sum of the traditional entanglement entropy from all the sewing channels. There is a microscopic degeneracy for all the states, associated with the quantum dimensions of the states defined on loops.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Thank you.