Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS
EOM 2.0 – tutorial Giancarlo Tria giancarlo.tria@embl-hamburg.de BioSAXS group @ EMBL Hamburg
EMBO Practical Course on Solution Scattering from Biological Macromolecular October 21st, 2012
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS EOM 2.0 tutorial Giancarlo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS EOM 2.0 tutorial Giancarlo Tria giancarlo.tria@embl-hamburg.de BioSAXS group @ EMBL Hamburg EMBO Practical Course on Solution Scattering from Biological Macromolecular October 21 st , 2012 Kratky Plots
EOM 2.0 – tutorial Giancarlo Tria giancarlo.tria@embl-hamburg.de BioSAXS group @ EMBL Hamburg
EMBO Practical Course on Solution Scattering from Biological Macromolecular October 21st, 2012
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
2
Unfolded Folded Multi-domains with flexible linkers Kratky plot establishes an approximate relationship between I(s) vs s for folded and unfolded proteins
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
► Smooth Scattering profiles and featureless Kratky Plots ► Large Rg and Dmax ► Absence of correlation peaks in the p(r) function ► Low correlation densities in ab initio reconstructions ► Isolated domains in rigid body modelling ► Prediction of disorder using bioinformatics tools
http://www.idpbynmr.eu/home/science/research-tools.html
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0 SAXS curves
Analysis of the overall size descriptors (Rg, p(r), Kratky)
Modelling: ab initio (DAMMIN/DAMMIF) and Rigid body (BUNCH/CORAL) Analysis of the differences
Rigid Scenario Flexible Scenario
Go for flexibility!
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
5
k k k
dr sr sr r p s I
D
= sin ) ( 4 ) ( π
vk = volume fraction Ik(s) = scattering intensity from the k-th component For monodisperse systems the scattering is proportional to that of a single particle averaged
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
6
... Rg
1
Rg
2 Rg 3 Rg 4
Rg
5
...
ρ (Rg)
...
∑
==
N n n sI N s I
1) ( 1 ) (
Genetic Algorithm Pool generation Crysol
The Ensemble Optimization Method (EOM)
Bernadó, Mylonas, Petoukhov, Blackledge, and Svergun. Structural characterization of flexible proteins using small-angle X-ray
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
7
Mutation Crossing Crossing Mutation Elitism Generation 1 Elitism Generation 2 Chromosome Chromosome
∑
=
=
N n n s
I N s I
1
) ( 1 ) (
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
8
ψ φ
Cα Cα
Kohn et al. PNAS, 2004, 101, 12491 Rg
Rg = R0·Nν R0 Persistence Length ν Solvent ‘quality’
Several experimental and theoretical studies establish ν ≈ 0.588 as an indication of the ‘random coil’ in chemically denatured (Urea or GuHCl) proteins. N
Theoretical distribution of the bond and dihedral angles for random chains Quasi Cα -Cα Ramachandran plot
coordinates alone, JMB, 1997, 273, 371-376
Bond angles vs. Dihedral angles
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
9
> CYLSRKLMLDARENLKLLDRMNRLSPHSCL QDRKDFGLPQEMVEGDQLQKDQAFPVLYE MLQQSFNLFYTEHSSAAWDTTLLEQLCTGL QQQLDHLDTCRGQVMGEEDSELGNMDPIV TVKKYF sequence.seq curve.dat
Inputs for using EOM:
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
10
…
<1min per repetition
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
11
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 20 40 60 80 Series1 Series2 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 50 100 150 200 250 Series1 Series2 pool ensembles pool ensembles Rg [Å] Dmax [Å] Rg = 45.05 Rg = 32.96 Dmax = 140.38 Dmax = 101.02
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
12
MRIGMV……..GGVQSHVLQ…..VLRDAGHEVS…….PHVKLPDYVS
missing loop 30 AA
Kratky Plot
apoferritin
vs.
pool
Nter.pdb Cter.pdb seq.seq curve.dat
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
13
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 21 23 25 27 Series1 Series2 Rg [Å] pool ensembles Rg = 24.46 Rg = 24.28
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
??missing??
31 AA N-terminal tail
??missing??
14
pool
high resolution (MX) N-terminal pentamer domain
(full length protein measured in two buffers, with low and high ionic strength respectively)
high resolution (MX) C-terminal monomer domain
??missing??
122 AA inter-domains linker
??missing??
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
15
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 20 40 60 80 100 Pool High ionic strength Low ionic strength 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 80 130 180 230 280 330 380 Pool High ionic strength Low ionic strength
Rg, Å Dmax, Å
Multi-curves fitting
pool
(full length protein measured in two buffers with low and high ionic strength respectively)
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
16
Case extra: dodecamer (P62, 2 domains) + tRNA
158 AA N-terminal tail high resolution (MX) N-terminal monomer domain (141 AA) 9 AA inter-domains linker high resolution (MX) C-terminal monomer domain (270 AA) 30 N single strand tRNA
subUnit contact residues range max distance in
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
Number of chains: 1 000
Rg Density 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08Number of chains: 5 000
Rg Density 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08Number of chains: 10
Rg Density 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30Number of chains: 10 000
Rg Density 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08Number of chains: 64 790
Rg Density 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08Number of chains: 100
Rg Density 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.1517
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
Generate a pool, select two subpopulations from it and calculate scattering curve for their union
Wide subpopulations
Rg, Å Rg, Å Rg, ÅNarrow subpopulations
18
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
Scattering curves
20 30 40 50 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 Rg, Å Density 0% < Rg < 5%, 95% < Rg < 100% 10% < Rg < 15%, 85% < Rg < 90% 5% < Rg < 10%, 90% < Rg < 95% 15% < Rg < 20%, 80% < Rg < 85% 20% < Rg < 25%, 75% < Rg < 80% 25% < Rg < 30%, 70% < Rg < 75% 30% < Rg < 35%, 65% < Rg < 70% 35% < Rg < 40%, 60% < Rg < 65% 40% < Rg < 45%, 55% < Rg < 60% 45% < Rg < 50%, 50% < Rg < 55% Pool
10-15% Well distinguishable ΔRg = 13.02 15-20% Undistinguishable ΔRg = 11.33 100 AA Genetic Algorithm
19
Ensemble Optimization Method on SAXS – EOM 2.0
allows
to quantitatively characterize the flexibility of a particle (what the conformations that the protein prefers in solution)
with EOM (no Size limitations)
in solution can be used as complementary technique to model flexible systems, disordered regions, etc..
20