Emerging phytoplasma diseases: research of the insect vectors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

emerging phytoplasma diseases research of the insect
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Emerging phytoplasma diseases: research of the insect vectors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Emerging phytoplasma diseases: research of the insect vectors Alberto Alma and Rosemarie Tedeschi DIVAPRA Entomologia e Zoologia applicate allAmbiente C. Vidano University of Torino - Italy In the last years: Discovery of new


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Emerging phytoplasma diseases: research of the insect vectors

Alberto Alma and Rosemarie Tedeschi

DIVAPRA – Entomologia e Zoologia applicate all’Ambiente «C. Vidano» University of Torino - Italy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

In the last years:

Discovery of new phytoplasma diseases Outbreaks of already known phytoplasma

diseases

Europe Mediterranean Basin and Middle East

Impact on EU Countries

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Europe

‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pini’

(16SrXXI, subgroup A)

Poland, Lithuania, Germany, Spain Vectors: unknown

Kamìnska & Berniak, 2011 Valiunas et al., 2010 Kamìnska et al., 2011

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Maize redness – Stolbur phytoplasma

(16SrXII-A)

Serbia, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Italy Vectors: Reptalus panzeri

Jović, 2010

Europe

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mediterranean Basin and Middle East

‘Candidatus Phytoplasma phoenicium’

(16SrIX)

Lebanon, Iran Vectors: unknown

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The insect vectors

New phytoplasma diseases New outbreaks Unknown Known Possible new vectors

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Knowledge of the insect vectors Well timed and efficient control strategies

slide-8
SLIDE 8

How to optimize the search of the vectors

Choise of the best sampling method/s Do not restrict the search only to the

crop of interest, but extend it also to the surrounding weeds and shrubs

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Malaise traps

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Malaise traps

Very good when nothing is know in a certain

area

High number of insects belonging to different

species

‼ No direct association with the crop or the wild

vegetation

‼ No alive specimens

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The sticky traps

A good support to the Malaise traps for a

preliminary screening

Very good to study the population dynamics

  • f a selected group of possible vectors

‼ No direct association with the crop or the wild

vegetation

‼ No alive specimens

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The beating tray

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The sweep net

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Very cheap Allow to investigate plant species selectively

The beating tray and the sweep net

Allow to collect alive insects

Host plant association Molecular analyses, laboratory rearings, transmission trials

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The vacuum insect collector (D-VAC)

Very useful to sample dense vegetation or the soil surface Collection of alive insects

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Handling of the collected insects

If molecular analyses, laboratory rearings,

transmission trials are required

Good practices to be followed

Place collected insects in vials containing a

leaf or a twig

Use a cool box for transfers

Preserve the samples in pure ethanol or at -20° C

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The identification of collected insects

Order Hemiptera

(Feeding using piercing and sucking mouth parts)

Sternorrhyncha

(whiteflies, scale insects, aphids, psyllids)

Auchenorrhyncha

Leafhoppers and planthoppers, spittlebugs etc

Heteroptera

(True bugs)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Use morphological tools following

dichotomous keys.

Good expertise is required Appropriate grounding of the technicians

The identification of collected insects

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The identification of collected insects The dissection

slide-20
SLIDE 20

In the case of criptic species The identification of collected insects

Molecular tools for species discrimination

They are very useful also for females and young stages

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The identification of collected insects

  • R. q.
  • R. c.
  • R. p.
  • R. m.

M 600bp 300bp 100bp R.q.=R. quinquecostatus R.c.=R. cuspidatus R.p.=R. panzeri R.m.=R. melanochaetus;

Bertin et al., 2010. Bulletin

  • f Entomological Research

Reptalus spp.

  • R. q.
  • R. c.
  • R. p.
  • R. m.

M 1600bp 1000bp

  • R. c.
  • R. p.

M 900bp 400bp 200bp

COI-PCR + AluI ITS2- PCR

  • TaqI
slide-22
SLIDE 22

The identification of collected insects

M

  • H. scotti
  • H. luteipes
  • H. obsoletus

600bp 300bp

COI-PCR + AluI

  • H. s.
  • H. l.
  • H. o.

ITS2-PCR

  • TaqI

M 1600bp 500bp

  • H. s.
  • H. o.

M

800bp 200bp

Hyalesthes spp.

Bertin et al., 2010. Annals of Applied Biology

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The identification of collected insects

MEL_fw/MEL_rev AFF_fw/AFF_rev

DUPLEX-PCR

Mitochondrial Control Region (CR)-PCR

Cacopsylla spp.

  • C. melanoneura
  • C. affinis

Tedeschi & Nardi, 2010. Bulletin

  • f Entomological Research.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Preliminary screening to assess the presence

  • f phytoplasmas

Molecular analyses to ascertain the presence of phytoplasmas in the insects Positive insect

≠ ≠ ≠ ≠

vector

slide-25
SLIDE 25

They are the only prove of vector ability

Transmission trials

Infected plants Acquisition access period (AAP) Healthy plants Healthy plants Latent period (LP) Inoculation access period (AAP) Plants tested for phytoplasma presence by molecular tools

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Transmission trials

Very laborious procedure that requires big ammounts

  • f healty and infected insects and healthy plants

Sometimes we do not know the host plants

Transmission trials to an artificial feeding medium

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Transmission trials to an artificial feeding medium

Feeding solution covered by parafilm Breeding chamber Cotton for air source