Electronic Spectroscopy Chem 344 final lecture topics Time out - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Electronic Spectroscopy Chem 344 final lecture topics Time out - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Electronic Spectroscopy Chem 344 final lecture topics Time out states and transitions Spectroscopy transitions between energy states of a molecule excited by absorption or emission of a photon h n = D E = E i - E f Energy levels due to
Time out—states and transitions
Spectroscopy—transitions between energy states of a molecule excited by absorption or emission of a photon
hn = DE = Ei - Ef
Energy levels due to interactions between parts of molecule (atoms, electrons and nucleii) as described by quantum mechanics, and are characteristic of components involved, i.e. electron distributions (orbitals), bond strengths and types plus molecular geometries and atomic masses involved
Spectroscopy
- Study of the consequences of the interaction of
electromagnetic radiation (light) with molecules.
- Light beam characteristics - wavelength
(frequency), intensity, polarization - determine types of transitions and information accessed.
l
E || z B || x
n = c/l
x z y Wavelength Frequency Intensity I ~ |E|2
}
Polarization B | E k || y
Properties of light – probes of structure
- Frequency matches change in energy, type of motion
E = hn, where n = c/l (in sec-1)
- Intensity increases the transition probability—
I ~ e2 –where e is the radiation Electric Field strength
Linear Polarization (absorption) aligns with direction of
dipole change—(scattering to the polarizability)
I ~ [dm/dQ]2 where Q is the coordinate of the motion
Circular Polarization results from an interference:
Im(m • m) m and m are electric and magnetic dipole
.4 .8 1.2 4000 3000 2000 1000
Frequency (cm ) Absorbance
- 1
l n
Intensity (Absorbance) IR of vegetable
- il
Optical Spectroscopy - Processes Monitored
UV/ Fluorescence/ IR/ Raman/ Circular Dichroism
IR – move nuclei
low freq. & inten.
Raman –nuclei,
inelastic scatter very low intensity
CD – circ. polarized
absorption, UV or IR
Raman: DE = hn0-hns Infrared: DE = hnvib = hnvib Fluorescence hn = Eex - Egrd Absorption hn = Egrd - Eex
Excited State (distorted geometry) Ground State (equil. geom.)
Q
n0 nS
- molec. coord.
UV-vis absorp. & Fluorescence.
move e- (change electronic state) high freq., intense
Analytical Methods
Diatomic Model
Essentially a probe technique sensing changes in the local environment of fluorophores
Opt ptica ical l Spe pectrosc troscopy
- py – Ele
lectronic, tronic, Examp ample le Abs bsorpti
- rption
- n an
and d Flu luor
- res
escen cence ce
Intrinsic fluorophores
- eg. Trp, Tyr
Change with tertiary structure, compactness
e (M-1 cm-1)
What do you see? (typical protein) Amide absorption broad, Intense, featureless, far UV ~200 nm and below
Circular Dichroism
- Most protein secondary structure studies
use CD
- Method is bandshape dependent. Need a
different analysis
- Transitions fully overlap, peptide models
are similar but not quantitative
- Length effects left out, also solvent shifts
- Comparison revert to libraries of proteins
- None are pure, all mixed
CD is polarized differential absorption
DA = AL - AR
- nly non-zero for chiral molecules
Biopolymers are Chiral (L-amino acid, sugars, etc.) Peptide/ Protein - in uv - for amide: n-p* or p-p* in -HN-C=O- partially delocalized p-system senses structure in IR - amide centered vibrations most important Nucleic Acids – base p-p* in uv, PO2-, C=O in IR Coupled transitions between amides along chain lead to distinctive bandshapes
Circular Dichroism
UV-vis Circular Dichroism Spectrometer
JASCO–quartz prisms disperse and linearly polarize light Xe arc source Double prism Monochromator (inc. dispersion,
- dec. scatter, important in uv)
PEM quartz PMT Sample Slits
This is shown to provide a comparison to VCD and ROA instruments
Amino Acids - linked by Peptide bonds coupling yields structure sensitivity
Link is mostly planar and trans, except for Xxx-Pro
UV absorption of peptides is featureless --except aromatics
TrpZip peptide in water Rong Huang, unpublished
Trp – aromatic bands Amide p-p* and n-p*
a-helix - common peptide secondary structure
(ii+4)
b-sheet cross-strand H-bonding
Anti-parallel b-sheet (extended strands)
poly-L-glu(a,____), poly-L-(lys-leu)(b,- - - -), L-ala2-gly2(turn, . . . . . )
Polypeptide Circular Dichroism
- rdered secondary structure types
De l
Critical issue in CD structure studies is SHAPE of the De pattern a-helix b-sheet turn
Brahms et al. PNAS, 1977
Large electric dipole transitions can couple over longer ranges to sense extended conformation
Simplest representation is coupled oscillator
Tab ma mb
Real systems - more complex interactions
- but pattern is often consistent
)
b a ab
T c m m n
2 π R
Dipole coupling results in a derivative shaped circular dichroism
De eL-eR l
B-DNA
Right -hand
Z-DNA
Left-hand
B- vs. Z-DNA, major success of CD
Sign change in near-UV CD suggested the helix changed handedness
Protein Circular Dichroism
Myoglobin-high helix (_______), Immunoglobin high sheet (_______) Lysozyme, a+b (_______), Casein, “unordered” (_______),
DA
Coupling shapes, but not isolated & modeling tough
Simplest Analyses – Single Frequency Response
Basis in analytical chemistry Beer’s law response if isolated Protein treated as a solution % helix, etc. is the unknown
Standard in IR and Raman,
Method: deconvolve to get components Problem – must assign component transitions, overlap
- secondary structure components disperse freq.
Alternate: uv CD - helix correlate to negative intensity at
222 nm, CD spectra in far-UV dominated by helical contribution Problem - limited to one factor,
- interference by chromophores]
Single frequency correlation of De with FC helix
FC helix [%]
20 40 60 80
De at 222nm/193 nm
10
(222 nm) vs FC helix (193 nm) vs FC helix
Problem of secondary structure definition No pure states for calibration purposes
? ? ? ?
helix sheet
Where do segments begin and end?
Need definition:
Next step - project onto model spectra –Band shape analysis
Peptides as models
- fine for a-helix,
- problematic for b-sheet or turns - solubility and stability
- old method:Greenfield - Fasman --poly-L-lysine, vary pH
i = aifa +bifb + cifc
- -Modelled on multivariate analyses
Proteins as models - need to decompose spectra
- structures reflect environment of protein
- spectra reflect proteins used as models
Basis set (protein spectra) size and form - major issue
Electronic CD spectra consistent with predicted helix content
- 3
- 2
- 1
1 2 3 4 5 1 9 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6
Ellipticity Wavelength (nm)
190 210 230
Note helical bands, coil has residual at 222 nm, growth of 200 nm band
Electronic CD for helix to coil change in a peptide
Loss of order becomes a question -- ECD long range sensitivity cannot determine remaining local order Low temp helix High temp “coil”
- 6
b b sheet , 2 )
Tyr97 Tyr25 Tyr92 H1 H3 H2 Tyr76 Tyr115 Tyr73
- 124 amino acid residues, 1 domain, MW= 13.7 KDa
- 3 a-helices
- 6 b-strands in an AP b-sheet
- 6 Tyr residues (no Trp), 4 Pro residues (2 cis, 2 trans)
Ribonuclease A combined uv-CD and FTIR study
Wavelength (nm)
260 280 300 320
Ellipticity (mdeg)
- 16
- 14
- 12
- 10
- 8
- 6
- 4
- 2
Near-UV CD
Wavenumber (cm-1)
1600 1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720
Absorbance
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
FTIR
Wavelength (nm)
190 200 210 220 230 240 250
Ellipticity (mdeg)
- 15
- 10
- 5
5
Far-UV CD
Temperature 10-70oC
FTIR—amide I
Loss of b-sheet
RibonucleaseA
Far-uv CD
Loss of a-helix
Near –uv CD
Loss of tertiary structure Spectral Change
Stelea, et al. Prot. Sci. 2001
Ci1 (x10
2)
- 8.0
- 7.6
- 7.2
- 6.8
- 6.4
- 1.0
- 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0
FTIR
Ci1
- 17
- 15
- 13
- 11
- 9
- 7
- 5
Ci2
- 15
- 10
- 5
5 10
Near-UV CD
20 40 60 80 100
Ci1
- 13
- 12
- 11
- 10
Ci2
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
- 5
5
Far-UV CD
Ribonuclease A
PC/FA loadings
- Temp. variation
FTIR (a,b) Near-uv CD (tertiary) Far-uv CD (a-helix)
Pre-transition - far-uv CD and FTIR, not near-uv Temperature
Stelea, et al.
- Prot. Sci. 2001
Changing protein conformational order by organic solvent
TFE and MeOH often used to induce helix formation
- -sometimes thought to mimic membrane
- -reported that the consequent unfolding can lead to
aggregation and fibril formation in selected cases Examples presented show solvent perturbation of dominantly b-sheet proteins TFE and MeOH behave differently thermal stability key to differentiating states indicates residual partial order
3D Structure of Concanavalin A
Dimer (acidic, pH<6) Tetramer (pH=6-7)
Trp40 Trp88 Trp109 Trp182
High b-sheet structure, flat back extended, curved front Monomer only at very low pH, 4 Trp give fluorescence
Effect of TFE (50%) on Con A in Far and Near UV- CD
Helical Content pH=7 43% pH=2 57%
Far UV-CD Near UV-CD
Helix induced with TFE addition Tertiary change with TFE - loosen
Xu&Keiderling, Biochemistry 2005
Dynamics--Scheme of Stopped-flow System
Denatured protein solution Refolding buffer solution
- add dynamics to experiment
Stopped-Flow CD for Con A Unfolding with TFE (1:1) at Different pH Conditions
Far UV (222 nm);
[Con]f=0.2mg/ml
Near UV (290 nm);
[Con]f=2mg/ml
pH=2.0
Xu&Keiderling, Biochemistry 2005
Native state: b-sheet dominant, but high helical propensity.
Model: intramolecular ba transition pathway as opposed to folding pathways from a denatured state.
b-lactoglobulin: a protein that goes both ways!
Zhang & Keiderling, Biochemistry 2006
Lipid-induced Conformational Transition b-Lactoglobulin
- 1. DMPG-dependent ba transition at pH 6.8
1 2 3 4 5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
b-Sheet a-Helix
Unordered
Fractional secondary structure
DMPG / mM
Zhang & Keiderling, Biochemistry 2006
Charge-induced Lipid -- b-Lactoglobulin Interaction
20 40 60 80 100
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
DMPC/ (DMPC+DMPG)/ %
Unordered Sheet Helix
Fractional secondary structure
DMPG / (DMPC+DMPG) / %
100 80 60 40 20
Increase DMPG, increases helix at expense of sheet
Zhang & Keiderling, Biochemistry 2006
1 Volume
Vesicles (SUV)
+
BLG (0.2mg/ml)
CD: 222nm to monitor alpha-helix Fluorescence: filter with a 320nm cutoff ( Trp Tertiary Structure) 10-15 kinetic traces are collected and averaged
5 Volume
Vesicles (SUV)
(DOPG, DMPG, DSPG)
BLG (1.2mg/ml)
Stopped Flow Experiments : (pH 4.60)
Analysis:Multi-exponential function using Simplex Method: S(t)=a*t+b+∑i(ci Exp(-ki*t))
Ge, Keiderling, to be submitted
5 10 15 20
- 50
- 40
- 30
- 20
- 10
0.15m 0.50m 1.00m 2.00m 5.00m N 0.25m
Sto topped pped-Flo Flow w CD ki kinetic netic tr traces ces
DM DMPG
Record at 222nm; N: trace without lipid vesicles; Traces are fitted to single-exponential function
5 10 15 20 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4
0.15mM 0.50mM 1.00mM 2.00mM 5.00mM 0.25mM
St Stopped pped-Flo Flow w fl fluoresc
- rescence
ence ki kinetics netics
Total fluorescence >320nm; Each trace has been divided by kinetic trace without lipid vesicles; Traces are fitted to two- exponential function
DM DMPG
At pH 6.8 & 4.6, 4 & 6 nm blue shift in lmax.
1700 1600 1500 1400 1300
1654 1637 1745 1731 1654 1637 1467 1343 1328 1305 1280 1255 1229
pH 6.8 pH 4.6
Wavelength/cm-1
a-helix Membrane surface
Lipid bilayer insertion of b-Lactoglobulin
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
bLG bLG-DMPG, pH4.6 bLG-DMPG, pH6.8
F0 / F
Acrylamide/M
Zhang & Keiderling, Biochemistry 2006
ATR-FTIR orientation Fluorescence quenching
Summary: Lipid - b-Lactoglobulin Interaction
Nw Ns Unfolding Us
Insertion Um Binding
Zhang & Keiderling, Biochemistry 2006
- Continued in Part b