Electricity demand forecasting and the problem of embedded - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

electricity demand forecasting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Electricity demand forecasting and the problem of embedded - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Electricity demand forecasting and the problem of embedded generation Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. John Young


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.

Electricity demand forecasting

and the problem of embedded generation

John Young 6th March 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Operating the system

 Electricity National Control Centre

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

50.7 50.6 50.5 50.4 50.3 50.2 50.1 50.0 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.6 49.5 49.4 49.3 49.2 49.1 49.0 48.9 48.8 50.0 Normal operating frequency 50.5 Upper statutory limit 52.0 Generators tripping 49.5 Lower statutory limit 48.8 Demand disconnection starts 47.0 Demand disconnection complete Hz

Generation Demand

Operating the system

50.0 49.5 50.5

Frequency

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Demand profile shapes

 Shape of demand curves – in terms of turning points and points of inflections - remains fairly constant from day to day  Exact position of turning points, both in vertical (Demand) and horizontal (Time) directions varies, at least partially because of weather and non-weather variables  Shape evolves slowly over time, with some abrupt discontinuities

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: January

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW Winter Minimum ~ 32,000 MW

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: January

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW Winter Minimum ~ 32,000 MW

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: February

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: March

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: April

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: May

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: June

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

GB National Demand A Typical Daily Profile: June

Winter Peak ~ 56,000 MW Summer Minimum ~ 20,000 MW Summer Maximum ~ 40,000 MW

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Forecasting electricity demand

 Typical demand profile shape  2 distinct shapes: GMT and BST

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

What Else Affects Demand?  Time of Day  Bank Holidays  School Holidays  Day of Week

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Day of week impact

Friday Demand curve for weekday in GMT Monday Demand curve for Saturday in GMT Demand curve for Sunday in GMT

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

What Else Affects Demand?  Time of Day  Day of Week  Bank Holidays  School Holidays  Weather  Special Events  TV

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Temperature Demand Effect (MW)

COLD High Demand MILD Low Demand HOT Quite High Demand

Temperature

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 Radiation Demand Effect (MW)

DULL High Demand BRIGHT Low Demand

Illumination

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 Strong Wind: High Demand Low Wind: Low Demand Wind Speed Demand (MW)

The Impact of Weather Cooling Power of the Wind

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

The Impact of Weather Rain

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Temperature (1°C fall in cold conditions) Cloud cover (clear sky to thick cloud) Precipitation (no rain to heavy rain) Temperature (1°C rise in hot conditions)

+ 500 MW + 500 MW + 1,000 MW + 1,500 MW

Cooling power (10 mph rise in cold conditions)

+ 1,000 MW

The Impact of Weather Some Numbers

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Weather Variables

 4-Hourly Average Temperature [TO]  Effective temperature [TE]  Wind Speed [WS]  Cooling Power of the Wind [CP] – a function of Wind Speed and Temperature (TO)  Effective illumination of the Sky [EI] - A derived quantity calculated from radiation levels and measurements of cloud type and cover

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Non-weather variables

 Day of week  Year Effect – indicator variable for different years: mostly owing

to different economic conditions

 Time of year – seasonality  Time of Sunrise and Sunset  School Holidays - % of schools on holiday  Annual Holidays – indicator variable from common August

holiday weeks

 Bank Holidays – excluded from data set for purposes of

modelling, then deal with on an ad hoc basis

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

GB National Demand Cardinal Points

1B 2B DP

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

 Model Inputs:  Historic Demands  Historic Weather – Heathrow, Glasgow, Manchester, Bristol, Leeds, Bimingham  Additional Effects – School Holidays, Day of Week, Time of Year

Basic Demand Day of Week Component Weather Component

Standard Linear Regression Conventional Models

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Modelling

 Construct different models for each of the Cardinal Points (CPs)  Construct different models for GMT and BST  Construct models of two different types for each CP:

Standard linear regression models (Conventional Models) Time series models with linear regression (Trend models)

 Depending on the CP we construct 7 day models, 5 day models, Saturday models and Sunday models  On any day of the week there are at least two (and up to four) models that we forecast with

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

2B Demand (12:30)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

2B Model On Day Of Week Effect

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Including A Seasonal Effect

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Including A Weather Effect

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Including A School Holiday Effect

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32 2A 2B 3B 3C/DP 4B

Time Series with Linear Regression

Trend Models

1F

Yesterday Today

1A 04 1B 1F 1A 04 1B

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Including A School Holiday Effect

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Including A Trend Component

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

The Model Symbolically

      CP EI SCH DWK L B L 04 ~ 2

Day of Week Effect Weather Effect Error term Trend term

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Modelling CP Demand

 Construct forecast models using variables that make sense  Use best model possible with variables that reduce the residual error significantly

Basic Demand Day of Week Component Weather Component

 Track ‘Basic Demand’, non-model component of demand

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Basic Demand

 Manually track and forecast basic element of demand

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Profile Matching

 Check how well CP forecasts match historic days

Daily Demand Profile

06-5 06-9 06-13 06-17 06-21 06-25 06-29 06-33 06-37 06-41 06-45 20110301 20110309 20110316 20100309 Actual_20130306 Forecast_20130306 Eview s

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Choosing Basics

 Forecast basic demand  Aim is to reduce risk of error

2B model: Jan-Feb 2013

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Embedded PV Generation

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 20100331 20100629 20100927 20101226 20110326 20110624 20110922 20111221 20120320 20120618 20120916 20121215

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Embedded PV Generation

Daily Demand Profile

28.5 33.5 38.5 43.5 48.5 05-1 05-5 05-9 05-13 05-17 05-21 05-25 05-29 05-33 05-37 05-41 05-45 20120306 20110308 20100302 20130304 Actual_20130305 Forecast_20130305 Eview s

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Embedded Generation

 ‘Invisible’, non-metered  Connected directly into distribution networks  Effectively reduces demand on the system  Not just PV…

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

National Demand Embedded Generation

 True GB Demand is higher than National Grid observe  Not a new phenomenon, but an increase in more variable technologies means it is a more significant effect  Wind Power ~ 2,000 MW  Solar Power ~ 1,500 MW

The Impact of Embedded Generation

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Virtual Demand National Demand Embedded Generation

Virtual Demand: A True National Demand

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Basic Demand Week Day Component Weather Component

Model Using Virtual Demand

Virtual Demand

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Basic Demand National Demand Embedded Generation Week Day Component Weather Component

Forecast Virtual Demand; Adjust for Embedded Generation

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

The Forecasting Process

National Demand Embedded Generation Basic Demand Week Day Component Weather Component National Demand Embedded Generation Basic Demand Week Day Component Weather Component

Model using Virtual Demand Forecast Virtual Demand; Adjust for Embedded Generation

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Wind Power Forecasting System

  • Metered Wind ~ 5,800 MW
  • Embedded ~ 2,000 MW

National Demand Forecast Metered Wind Power Forecast Embedded Wind Farms Metered Wind Farms

Forecasting Embedded Wind Generation Existing Forecasting Methods

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Standard Wind Power Curve

Wind Farm

10 20 30 40 50 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Forecast Wind Speed / mph Load Factor

 Decile wind speed forecast applied to a load curve  Load curves for each wind generator, optimised using actual metering

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Wind Power forecast probabilistic view for next 5 days from Mon 3rd Dec 2012

Wind Power Forecast - Probabilistic View for Next 5 Days 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 03-DEC-2012 5:00 8:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 04-DEC-2012 5:00 8:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 05-DEC-2012 5:00 8:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 06-DEC-2012 5:00 8:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 07-DEC-2012 5:00 8:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 20% confidence 40% confidence 60% confidence 80% confidence Mean Forecast Excluding Cut-out Mean Forecast Wind Cut-out Forecast 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 20% confidence 40% confidence 60% confidence 80% confidence Mean Cut-out

Wind cut out forecast

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Metered wind generation forecast

 Use same process to forecast embedded wind  Have information

  • n location and

capacity for all embedded wind generators above 2MW

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Forecasting Embedded Generation Simulated National PV Output

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 20100331 20100629 20100927 20101226 20110326 20110624 20110922 20111221 20120320 20120618 20120916 20121215

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Forecasting Embedded Generation Forecasting PV

David Lenaghan - Load Factor Vs Odiham Radiation 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Mark Holland - Load Factor Vs Heathrow Radiation 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 National Average RA Load Factor

 National average radiation forecast  Generic power curve  National capacity

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

The challenges of PV

Embedded Wind  Individual locations and capacities  Wind speed forecasts for various locations  Experience forecasting metered wind Embedded PV  Overall capacity for whole country  National Average radiation  No operational experience yet

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Forecasting Embedded Generation Forecasting PV

10 20 30 40 50 53000 54000 55000 56000 57000 Index X3B_Basic 10 20 30 40 50 55000 56000 57000 58000 59000 Index X3C_Basic 53000 54000 55000 56000 57000 58000 0e+00 2e-04 4e-04 6e-04

density.default(x = X3B_Basic + Output_1500, bw = 300)

N = 57 Bandwidth = 300 Density 54000 55000 56000 57000 58000 59000 60000 0e+00 2e-04 4e-04 6e-04

density.default(x = X3C_Basic + Output_1700, bw = 300)

N = 57 Bandwidth = 300 Density

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

The Problem with Embedded Generation

~ 3,500 MW installed capacity Variable output dependant on weather effects Changing capacity levels Reliant on estimates of output No means of directly testing forecast models Increases the volatility of National Demand

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Including A Trend Component

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Including Embedded Wind Generation

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

Including Embedded Solar Generation

Actual Demand Vs Fitted Values

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

Thanks for listening

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

Demand and Wind Forecasting