Effect of small strain rate variations on the identification of the compressive behaviour of Ti6Al4V
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias
14 eme Colloque National en calcul des structures 13-17 mai 2019, Giens (Var), France
Effect of small strain rate variations on the identification of the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Facultad de Ingeniera y Ciencias Effect of small strain rate variations on the identification of the compressive behaviour of Ti6Al4V 14 eme Colloque National en calcul des structures 13-17 mai 2019, Giens (Var), France Outline
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias
14 eme Colloque National en calcul des structures 13-17 mai 2019, Giens (Var), France
2
3
4
Conventional Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machine
5
e.g. sheet pile
FBO Engine test
6
Tensile tests Compression tests Biaxial tests Shear, plane strain Etc.
7
Based on micromechanics:
Based on macroscopic
8
Young moduli Poisson coefficients Stress strain curves Lankfords (anisotropy) Initial yield points Strain fields (DIC) Etc.
Temperature dependent
9 Khan et al., 2004.
Strain rate dependent
10 Khan et al., 2004.
Anisotropic hardening
11
Tension/compression asymmetry (yielding)
12
Strength differential (SD) effect
Plastic anisotropy
13
Initial cross-section Final cross-section Notched tensile specimen
The macroscopic orthotropic yield criterion CPB06*
14
Notched tensile specimen
* Cazacu et al., 2006
a a a
3 3 2 2 1 1 1
CPB06 Implemented in the Lagamine code by G. Gilles
are the principal values of the tensor is a fourth–order orthotropic tensor that accounts for the plastic anisotropy is the deviator of the Cauchy stress tensor
3 , 2 1,
66 55 44 33 23 13 23 22 12 13 12 11
C C C C C C C C C C C C C
15
Identification of the constitutive model
Yield criterion?
Hardening law?
Experimental tests required for the identification:
Tension LD (several temperatures), TD and ST directions Compression LD (several temperatures), TD and ST directions Plane strain LD direction (plane LD-ST) Shear strain ST direction (plane LD-ST)
16
Machine vs specimen deformation durinf compression test
SCHENCK Hydropuls 400 kN press
18
Tests at constant die speed (former method at MSM lab)
Displacement Time (t) Ramp
Imposed displacement
Xgl
Time (t=t1) Time (t=tn) Time (t=0) Time (t=0) Time (t=tn)
Deformation of the specimen (Unknown)
Deflection of the machine (Unknown) Xgl
Time (t=t1)
Xgl
Time (t=tn)
19
Load Time (t) Ramp
Xma
Time (t=t1) Time (t=0)
Xma
Time (t=t1)
Xma
Time (t=tn) Load kN Displcement Xma - mm
20
Computation of the deformation of the specimen
Deformation of the specimen is computed Xep known
Measured - test 1 Measured - test machine
21
Strain vs time computation
Strain rate is not constant Strain evolution on the specimen is computed from Xep known
height initial ln H H t X H t
ep
test at constant die speed + machine deflection forgotten
At the Time t* the machine deflection (X*
ma) is known
gl ma gl ma
* 22
So we can compute the deformation of the specimen (Xep)
) (
Test1 Test1
t X t X t X
ma gl ep
23
Also, theoretically we know (Xep Theoretical) for constant strain rate
24
25
Globlal displacement Xgl Test 1 is computed
26
Comparison constant and non-constant strain rate tests
Commonly used method is wrong
27
28
Comparison constant and non-constant strain rate tests
29
Important for strain hardening rate
strain hardening rate
p y y
(ramp) constant non constant
Compression 600°C
y
(ramp) constant non constant
Compression 400°C
y
30
Basic concept: DIC is measurement technique for full field non-
31
Results: strain/displacement field
Calibration target
Step #2: calibration of the cameras
Loading (F)
Step #3: record images of the event Step #4: apply the correlation method Step #1: spray paint to the
Sample
32
3D-DIC systems configuration
Accurate displacement measurements and strain field computations reached
Axial log. strain 33
34
barreling
y coordinates - mm x coordinates - mm
Strain distribution at dashed line
One-eight of the specimen is modeled
Contact elements
Numerical investigations of compression tests
1. Computation of Coulomb friction coefficient
ST
1st Inverse modeling of compression for
computation of f 0.08
Iteration fitting Load + barreling VM identified with compression Verification with CPB06(4) 35
barreling is more sensitive to friction than to anisotropy
36
horizontal centerline
Numerical investigations of compression tests
TD ST LD LD
37
Numerical investigations of compression tests
Material Including friction Characteristic of strain distribution Isotropic Yes Inhomogeneous No Homogeneous Anisotropic Yes Inhomogeneous No Homogeneous
(Anisotropic) (Isotropic)
38
Numerical investigations of compression tests with friction
(Anisotropic) (Strongly anisotropic sheet)
Material Characteristic
strain distribution Isotropic Weakly inhomogeneous Anisotropic Weakly inhomogeneous (different shape than isotropic) Strongly anisotropic sheet Strongly inhomogeneous
Compression sheet (stack)
Two ways of computing the strain:
DIC or volume conservation (Eq. 1)
39
ln H t X H t
ep
Two ways of computing the strain:
DIC or volume conservation (Eq. 1)
40
Difference caused by barreling of the sample (friction)
41
42
Method for compression and tension tests at constant strain
Validation by two method, Volume conservation and DIC
Effect of the strain rate variations on the mechanical behavior
Mainly initial yield point Stress hardening rate
Axial strain sensitivity to the plastic anisotropy proposed for