een vet probleem A.G. (Onno) Holleboom, endocrinoloog; per 31-12 vasc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

een vet probleem
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

een vet probleem A.G. (Onno) Holleboom, endocrinoloog; per 31-12 vasc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): een vet probleem A.G. (Onno) Holleboom, endocrinoloog; per 31-12 vasc gnk, Vasculaire Geneeskunde | 14-05- 19 Disclosures Sponsor / grant Gilead research Scholar award 2019(1)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): ‘een vet probleem’

A.G. (Onno) Holleboom, endocrinoloog; per 31-12 vasc gnk, Vasculaire Geneeskunde | 14-05-’19

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • Sponsor / grant
  • Gilead research Scholar award 2019(1)
  • Honorarium
  • Gilead NAFLD round table meeting Nederland-België 2019(1)
slide-3
SLIDE 3

NAFLD-NASH: a disease spectrum

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hardy, Anstee, Ann Rev Pathol 2016

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NASH: coined in 1981

slide-6
SLIDE 6

NAFLD-NASH field in 2019:

slide-7
SLIDE 7

NAFLD-NASH: prevalence and burden

  • Increase in obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, ageing population
  • US: 64 million have NAFLD, medical cost $103 billion.
  • NASH-related cirrhosis: primary indication for liver Tx since 2018
  • Europe-4: (Germany, France, Italy, UK): 52 million have NAFLD
  • annual cost €35 billion

Younossi, Hepatology 2016; Paris NASH meeting 2018

  • China: Unexpected Rapid Increase in the Burden of NAFLD in China From 2008 to 2018
  • 2,054,554: 29,2%

Zhou et al, Hepatology. 2019 May 9

  • Modelling of the epidemic: exponential increase in disease burden

Estes, Hepatology 2018

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Younossi, Z. et al., Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017 Koehler et al, Hepatology 2016

Worldwide estimated prevalence of NAFLD

Rotterdam study - 3,041 participants general population > 45 years: transient elastography: significant liver fibrosis in 5.6%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

NAFLD-NASH: hepatic component of MetSy

75% of DM2 has NAFLD 50% of hypertensives has NAFLD → mixed hyperlipidemia

slide-10
SLIDE 10

NAFLD: driven by IR

Hardy, Anstee, Ann Rev Pathol 2016, after Donnelly, JCI 2015 Continuous NEFA flux, independent of feeding – metabolic inflexibility LXR, FAS

Isokuortti, Diabetologia 2017

slide-11
SLIDE 11

NAFLD-NASH: major asCVD

‘Two sides of the same dysmetabolic medal’

75% of DM2 has NAFLD 50% of hypertensives has NAFLD → mixed hyperlipidemia

Targer, NEJM 2010 Friedman, Nature Medicine 2018, Stols-Goncalves, Holleboom, Nieuwdorp, Hovingh, Trends in Endocrinology in press 2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NAFLD-NASH: major asCVD

‘Two sides of the same dysmetabolic medal’

75% of DM2 has NAFLD 50% of hypertensives has NAFLD → mixed hyperlipidemia

  • Meta-analysis Wu et al, Sci Rep 2016:

164,494 participants, 21 cross-sectional studies, and 13 cohort studies) HR 1.9 - 2.3 n = 164,494

  • Meta-analysis Stepanova & Younossi,

Clin Gastr Hepatol 2012: NHANES-III, 11,500 participants, mean follow-up 171 months: asCVD most prevalent cause of death in patients with NAFLD: 5.62% Incident and prevalent asCVD higher in NAFLD patients, even after adjustments, ORs 1-3 – 1.4 – 2.0

  • Multiple CAC studies, cIMT studies, a.o.

Framingham Heart Study: congruent

Targer, NEJM 2010 Friedman, Nature Medicine 2018, Stols-Goncalves, Holleboom, Nieuwdorp, Hovingh, Trends in Endocrinology in press 2019

slide-13
SLIDE 13

NAFLD-NASH: major asCVD → mechanism?

In my view: atherogenic, mixed dyslipidemia – hypersecretion of VLDL Liver has 4 protective mechanisms against lipid overload in NAFLD

  • Storage in lipid droplets
  • Mitochondrial beta-oxidation
  • Lysosomal degradation of lipid droplets / FFAs: lipophagy
  • Secretion of TG-rich apoB particles – VLDL

Support from Mendelian randomization studies (Romeo Gothenburg; CCHS group Copenhagen):

  • PNPLA3, pure lipid droplet gene, no effect on VLDL.
  • -> SNP: more NASH progression, not VLDL → not asCVD
  • TM6SF2, VLDL secretion gene, SNP:
  • -> more NASH, reduced VLDL secretion, less asCVD

Ergo:

  • NAFLD and asCVD: two sides of the same dyslipidemic medal?
  • NAFLD misnomer? Cardiometabolic liver disease?
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Our view on NAFLD-NASH

  • 1. Current clinical practice falls short is improving
  • 2. Distinction between NAFL and NASH
  • 3. Pathophysiology & drug targets
  • 4. NAFLD-NASH in AUMC
  • Patient care
  • ANCHOR study: Amsterdam NAFLD NASH cohort
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 1. Patient care in NAFLD-NASH:

why do we need to improve?

Few validated non-invasive tests

Few

  • utpatient clinics

in NL

No approved treatment; many trails and compounds underway Need for detection of early cases to prevent fibrosis/cirrhosis/asCVD

Scepsis

Case finding No Dutch guideline

Tushuizen, Holleboom, …, Blokzijl, Koek Capita Selecta NTVG, in revision

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Case 1: mr. Y ., ~50 years, Dutch descent

Algemene vasculaire spreekuur: CVRM, secundaire preventie na OWI 2012 Worsening DM2, BMI 35 𝝳-GT 67 U/l (0-40) ALAT 85 U/l (0 – 34) Fibroscan elastography: LSM: 17 kPa (<7) CAP: 354 dB/m Other causes such as alcohol, viral hepatitis and hemochromatosis: excluded No biopsy due to anticoagulant use C/ NASH-related cirrhosis, CPA B/ initiated liraglutide for his worsening DM

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Case 2: mr. C, 62 years, Dutch descent

  • DM2 since 1999, poorly controlled despite insulin and oral medication
  • Former technical worker; osteoarthritis
  • BMI 32
  • Diabetic foot ulcers, polyneuropathy
  • Fibroscan: LSM 24 kPa
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Case 3: ms. O., 58 years, Indian descent

Recently hypertensie-poli: malaise despite well controlled hypertension & DM2 Alkaline phosphatase 128 (40 - 120 U/L), gamma-GT 504 U/l (0-40), ASAT 83 U/l (0- 40), ALAT 79 U/l (0 – 34) Ultrasound of liver: Coarse parenchyma, uneven contours, prominent caudate lobe, maximal diameter 12 cm (15). Reduced hepatopetal flow in portal vein: 6-8 cm/s (20-40) Fibroscan: 75 kPa (<7) Other causes such as viral hepatitis and hemochromatosis: excluded Biopsy: NASH-related cirrhoses →1992 evaluation including biopsy OLVG-O – prolonged course → Need for earlier detection and management → We see the target population for early management, not the hepatologists → Pure endocrinologists don’t care about MetSy?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Involved in NAFLD-NASH

Sumida et al, NASH therapies, J Gastro-enterol 2018

Vascular Medicine Diabetes nurses GPs

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 2. Distinction NAFL-NASH
slide-21
SLIDE 21

2016 Fibrosis-4 score, Fib-4: ( Age x AST ) / ( Plts x ( sqr ( ALT ) )

Shah et al, Clin Gastro Hepatol 2009

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fibroscan ultrasound transient elastography: liver stiffness measurement

Validated values for fibrosis staging: F0-F1 F2 F3 F4 ≤7.0 ≥7.5 ≤10 ≥14.0 kPa

Eddowes, Gastroenterology 2019(1)

Fibroscan, 2nd measure: steatosis, with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP , dB/m)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Eddowes et al, Gastroenterology 2019(1): first prospective validation of Fibroscan - transient elastography

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Liver biopsy - activity

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Liver biopsy - fibrosis

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • 3. NAFLD: Pathophysiology & drug targets

Arab & Trauner, Annu Rev Pathol 2018 Dongiovanni & Anstee, Curr Pharm Des 2013

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Insulin resistance GLP1 agonists Phase 2 LEAN trial with liraglutide:

  • Reduction in NASH and fibrosis
  • n = 22, vs 23 placebo

Armstrong et al, Lancet 2016 ________________ Phase 2b – SEMANASH, semaglutide: underway

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Insulin resistance & lipotoxicity PPARγ agonists: pioglitazone Phase 2 RCT , Cusi et al, Ann Int Med 2016

  • 36 months
  • 168 patients with biopsy proven NASH and (pre)DM:

Positive trial

  • no increase in AE
  • reproduced
  • phase 3 = ?

Could consider pioglitazone, perhaps periodic treatments?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Lipotoxicity ACC inhibitor GS-0976 increase FFA beta oxidation by inhibiting enzymes of DNL Side effect: HTG via SREBP1 upregulation VLDL- packing, only in some patients (who already had hyperTG) Phase 2, 127 patients, Loomba Gastroenterology ’18

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Lipotoxicity Selective thyromimetics Madrigal MGL-3196, Phase 2 positive halfway analysis, presented at EASL 2018 Diodenases are down in NASH: liver is in a state of hypothyroidism, Bohinc JCEM 2016 Positive effect on lipid profile: LDL down, Lp(a) strongy down, apoB and TG down May work via increase in lipophagy

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Oxidative stress FFAs and other lipids (LPC?) disrupt membranes, leading to necroinflammation Vitamin E – PIVENS trial Sanyal et al NEJM 2010, vs pio and placebo 800 mg/day No overt DM Histologic improvement NASH No data on fibrosis Long-term safety? (prostatic cancer) Guideline: not firmly recommended

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Bile acid receptors FXR agonists: obeticholic acid Flint study Phase 2b, stopped early for efficacy: reduction in NASH fibrosis. Also: reduced bacterial translocation (occludines), reduced portal hypertension Yet: LDL rose by 0.5 mmol/l Neuschwander-Petri et al, Lancet 2015 Phase 3 REGENERATE: significant, yet minute effect Also: FGF-19 and -21 analogues

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Apoptosis ASK1-inhibitor: selonsertib Phase 2: positive, reduced fibrosis Loomba, Hepatology 2018 Phase 3 STELLAR3 for F3, STELLAR4 for cirrhosis, results presented @ ILC 2019(3): negative!

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Inflammation and fibrogenesis Cenocriviroc CCR2/5 antagonist, reduces macrophage recruitment into adipose tissue Centaur phase 2b trial, positive Friedman, Ratziu Hepatology 2018 Currently in Phase 3, AURORA trial

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Gut microbiome SIBO: Proteobacteria drive NAFLD-NASH Gut permeability increased in NAFLD- NASH Butyrogenics may protect

  • anti-inflammatory
  • reduced fatty acid synthase in

murine model FMT trial, manuscript in preparation (Smits, Witjes, Nieuwdorp) For review: Koopman, Molinaro, Nieuwdorp, Holleboom, Aliment Pharm Ther, accepted 2019

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Clinical practice in the near future: combination of therapies for this multifactorial disease

  • As for diabetes / MetSy / hypertension / dyslipidemia
  • Gilead’s ATLAS trial (ASK1-i; FXRa)

Also awaited: CVOTs, as for antidiabetics

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Current management – recommendations and considerations

  • Diet (caloric restriction, coffee++, alcohol --), exercise
  • Weight loss 7-10%; glucose control; CVRM
  • GLP1-agonists, pioglitazone, vitamin E
  • Bariatric surgery
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Sizeable epidemic; enormous drug development Yet: limited awareness! No guideline Multidisciplinary approaches have started in NL; Belgium & UK ahead!

  • Earlier case detection

Awareness amongst internists needs to improve

  • endocrinology, vascular medicine, general internal medicine rotations; GPs

Sceptic standpoint that screening is not warranted since most patients have mild NAFLD and since there is no treatment → holds no longer:

  • Aging obese and diabetic population → more and more severe NASH, warrants awareness
  • Future drugs will likely change clinical practice soon - fascinating yet major challenge

Dialogue hepatologist - diabetologist

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • 4. Care for NASH patients in Amsterdam UMC

Since May 2018: outpatient NAFLD clinic

  • - MetSy → NAFLD
  • - fibroscan @ internal medicine
  • - close collaboration with hepatology Beuers/Takkenberg

Since March 2019: Multidisciplinary outpatient clinic at VUmc Together with Sandjai Ramsoekh, dietician, lifestyle coach In touch with NHV Amsterdam; platforms AUMC @ Internal medicine, endocrinology, vascular medicine: All DM2 patients:

  • Retinopathy
  • Nefropathy
  • Neuropathy
  • Hepatopathy – NAFLD-NASH
  • screen infrequently;
  • with a low threshhold
slide-40
SLIDE 40

NAFLD-NASH in Amsterdam UMC: research

  • ANCHOR study: Amsterdam NAFLD NASH cohort
  • LITMUS: EU NAFLD registry
  • CRISTINA: exercise intervention in NASH
  • NILE: NAFLD in Helius multiethnic study Amsterdam ZO

Fundamental work

  • Intrahepatic lipid storage – lipophagy defects
  • completed Veni → Amsterdam UMC Fellowship 750 k€
  • TKI-PPP grant 400 k€ for probiotics in NAFLD mouse models
  • IEMs - iHeps – CRISPR-edited mouse models
slide-41
SLIDE 41

ANCHOR: Amsterdam NAFLD-NASH cohort

Detect rapid progressors and better biomarkers – includes fecal samples

  • systems biology: hierarchy of driving mechanisms
  • validate fibroscan against biopsy - gold standard

Witjes, Holleboom, Ramsoekh, Stols-Goncalves, Zwirs, Verheij, Beuers, Nieuwdorp

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • Data collected:

✓ Questionnaire: sociodemographics, ethnicity, lifestyle, dietary habits, health, physical activity ✓ Physical examination: anthropometric measurements, clinical measurements, blood draw, medications, DNA, urine samples, vaginal and oral swabs for microbiome analyses ✓ Morning feces samples > 6000 subjects ✓ Detailed Food Frequency Questionnaires

Multiethnic HELIUS cohort (Healthy Life in an Urban Setting) in Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • 22,165 participants (18-70 years) included between 2011

and 2016 ✓ 6 ethnic groups in similar proportions: Dutch, Surinamese (African and South-Asian descent), Turkish, Moroccan and Ghanaian ✓ Preferably 3 generations from one family (grandparents-children-grandchildren) included ✓ Otherwise healthy (at baseline visit 30-50% obese with signs of metabolic syndrome)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Take home message NAFLD-NASH: a progressive cardiometabolic disease

You have NAFLD patients in your practice! Some will have progressive fibrosis! Major asCVD Call:

  • MetSy / mixed dyslipidemia:

→ take the liver perspective

  • Do ALAT

, ultrasound, Fibroscan

  • Have coffee with your hepatologist
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Key points

  • NAFLD-NASH: progressive cardiometabolic liver disease
  • Strongly related to DM2 and MetSy
  • You have NAFLD patients in your practice!
  • obesity, mixed dyslipidemia, hypertension
  • Some will have advanced fibrosis
  • Please contact us for advice / referral:

a.g.holleboom@amsterdamumc.nl

slide-45
SLIDE 45

NAFLD-NASH in Amsterdam UMC

  • Current clinical practice falls short is improving
  • Distinction between NAFLD and NASH
  • Pathophysiology & drug targets
  • NAFLD-NASH in AMC
  • Patient care
  • ANCHOR study & LITMUS registry