Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources 1 st - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ecodesign preparatory study lot 8 9 19 light sources
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources 1 st - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources 1 st Stakeholder Meeting 5 February 2015 WELCOME ! Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek Van Holsteijn en Kemna Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1 st Stakeholder Meeting -


slide-1
SLIDE 1

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1st Stakeholder Meeting - VHK/VITO for EC 1

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources

1st Stakeholder Meeting

5 February 2015

Van Holsteijn en Kemna Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek

WELCOME !

slide-2
SLIDE 2

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 2

Agenda

9:30 h reception 10:00 h Welcome, amendment/approval of agenda and announcements 10:15 h Presentation: Introduction (History, Assignment, Study team, Project Schedule, MEErP) 10:45 h Presentation and Discussion: Scope of the study (Current scope, Need for Definitions, Special Purpose) 11:45 h Presentation and Discussion: Standards and Legislations (Europe in international context ) 13:00 h lunch break 14:00 h Presentation and Discussion: Markets (MELISA model, Sales, Lifetimes, Operating Hours, Installed Stock) 15:00 h Presentation and Discussion: Users (Efficacy, Lumen, Power, Energy, Costs, Dimming) 16:30 h Other topics 17:30 h thanks and good bye

slide-3
SLIDE 3

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1st Stakeholder Meeting - VHK/VITO for EC 3

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources

1st Stakeholder Meeting

5 February 2015

Van Holsteijn en Kemna Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek

INTRODUCTION

(Task 0 report) Leo Wierda

slide-4
SLIDE 4

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 4

Introduction

History of Ecodesign for Lighting Assignment for the current preparatory study → implica ons for the scope Structure for study and where we are now (MEErP) Project details and Study team Time schedule Parallel LOT 37 study on lighting systems → implications for the scope

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 5

History (1)

Date Document Short Description Non-directional Household Lighting

  • Oct. 2008

Preparatory Study Lot 19 part 1 (VITO) Ecodesign Preparatory Study on NDLS for domestic lighting

  • Mar. 2009

Full Impact Assessment (EC) EC document accompanying regulation 244/2009

  • Mar. 2009

Commission Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 Main lamp-types regulated: CFLi, HL, GLS

  • Sep. 2009

Commission Regulation (EC) No 859/2009 Amendment on 244/2009 for some UV-requirements

  • Feb. 2013

CLASP study Indication of main points for the review of regulation 244/2009

  • Jun. 2013

Stage 6 Review Study (VHK) Review of stage 6 requirements of 244/2009 for MV- HL lamps

  • Apr. 2014

Omnibus Study (VHK) (Preliminary) Review of regulation 244/2009 Tertiary Lighting

  • Jan. 2007

Preparatory Study Lot 9 (VITO) Ecodesign Preparatory Study on Public Street Lighting

  • Apr. 2007

Preparatory Study Lot 8 (VITO) Ecodesign Preparatory Study on Office Lighting

  • Mar. 2009

Full Impact Assessment (EC) EC document accompanying regulation 245/2009 Mar.2009 Commission Regulation (EC) No 245/2009 Main lamp-types regulated: LFL, CFLni, HID incl. related ballasts and luminaires

  • Apr. 2010

Commission Regulation (EU) No 347/2010 Amendments on regulation 245/2009

  • Feb. 2013

CLASP study Indication of main points for the review of regulation 245/2009

  • Apr. 2014

Omnibus Study (VHK) (Preliminary) Review of regulation 245/2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 6

History (2)

Date Document Short Description Directional Lighting

  • Nov. 2009

Preparatory Study Lot 19 part 2 (VITO) Ecodesign Preparatory Study on Directional lamps

  • Mar. 2011

Follow-up study (ECEEE, DEFRA) Support study for preparation of regulation on directional lamps

  • Dec. 2012

Impact Assessment (EC) EC document accompanying regulation 1194/2012

  • Dec. 2012

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1194/2012 Main lamp-types regulated: Directional lamps, LEDs and related equipment Labelling for Lighting

  • Sep. 1992

Directive 92/75/EEC Framework, legal basis for labelling of light sources (now repealed)

  • Jan. 1998

Directive 98/11/EC Labelling of household light sources (now repealed) May 2010 Directive 2010/30/EU Framework, legal basis for labelling of light sources (repealing 92/75/EEC)

  • Jul. 2012

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 874/2012 Labelling of electrical lamps and luminaires (repealing 98/11/EC)

  • Mar. 2014

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 518/2014 Amending 874/2012, information requirements and energy label display for sales on internet

Summaries provided in the Task 0 report

slide-7
SLIDE 7

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 7

Assignment (1)

  • Carry out a study on lighting products for the preparation of further and/or more advanced ecodesign

and/or labelling requirements.

  • Build upon and advance Commission Regulation (EC) No 244/2009, Commission Regulation (EC) No

245/2009, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1194/2012 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 874/2012, including all amendments and corrigenda thereof.

  • Fulfil the legal review requirements of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1194/2012 (directional lamps and

LEDs) and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 874/2012 (energy labelling).

  • Provide a detailed market assessment of directional mains voltage filament lamps, as required by

Regulation 1194/2012, Annex III 1.1.

  • Aim at setting more ambitious targets for all lighting products currently regulated under Ecodesign and

Energy Labelling, including luminaires (either with or without built-in light sources such as LED modules).

  • Lighting controllers previously not regulated, either as part of a luminaire or as an independent product,

should be included in the study.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 8

Assignment (2)

  • Carry out an analysis of the lighting products not yet regulated (e.g. lamps having a luminous flux above

12.000 lm), identifying other lighting products to be included into this study. → Scope !

  • Review the definitions of special purpose products should and propose updates with a view to minimise

the possible misuse while keeping otherwise regulated products for use in special applications exempt from ecodesign and/or labelling requirements. → Scope !

  • Explore the feasibility of unifying all four regulatory measures into one regulation (or only the three

ecodesign regulations into one if this has been identified as the only possible option).

  • Take into account the findings of the so-called “Stage-6 Review” and “Omnibus Review” studies.
  • Carry out the study following the MEErP, extended in scope if necessary to fulfil the review requirements.

In addition (from kick-off meeting):

  • The projections for past and future lighting energy use have to be harmonized between the Lots.

(Lot 8/9/19: Light Sources. Lot 37: Lighting Systems)

→ MELISA model

slide-9
SLIDE 9

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 9

MEErP structure used in study

Task 0 First product screening Task 1 Scope (define products, codifications, standards, legislation) Task 2 Markets (EU production/import/export, sales, lifetimes, installed stock, market trends, basic economic data) Task 3 Users (efficiency, usage parameters, light sources in system, interaction with space heating, end-of-life, infrastructure) Task 4 Technologies (existing products, BAT, BNAT, bill-of-material (BOM), packaging/distribution) Task 5 Environment & Economics (base cases, environmental impact assessment, life cycle costs for consumers) Task 6 Design Options (assess design improvement options, least life cycle costs (LLCC) ) Task 7 Scenarios (policy analysis, BAU and ECO scenarios, impact on industry and consumers) Draft report Draft report + Presentation Draft report + Presentation Draft report + Presentation (preliminary) Work in progress Future work Future work Future work

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 10

Project details and Study team

SPECIFIC CONTRACT No ENER/C3/2012-418 LOT1/07/SI2.668526 Implementing Framework Contract No ENER/C3/2012-418-Lot 1 Prepared for the European Commission, DG ENER.C.3, Project officer: Ruben KUBIAK Main contractor: Consortium of VITO NV, VHK BV, Viegand & MaagØe ApS, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, ARMINES, represented by VITO Technical Team Leader: René KEMNA (VHK) Contract Manager: Caroline LEMEIRE (VITO) Other Participants: Roy VAN DEN BOORN, Leo WIERDA (VHK) Task 0, 1, 2, 3 Stuart JEFFCOTT (external collaboration) International legislation and standards Lieven VANHOOYDONCK, Paul VAN TICHELEN (VITO) Task 4 Wai Chung LAM (VITO, Quality Control) Website: http://ecodesign-lightsources.eu/

slide-11
SLIDE 11

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 11

Planning

Month-Year Event January 2014 Start contract November 2014 Launch website December 2014/ January 2015 Publication Draft Task Reports 0, 1, 2, 3 5 February 2015 1st Stakeholder Meeting March 2015 Stakeholder comments reports (incl. written) 2nd edition of Draft Task Reports 0, 1, 2, 3 April 2015 Publication Draft Task Reports 4, 5, 6 and part of 7 May 2015 Consultation Forum on (amongst others) mains-voltage filament lamps; 2nd stakeholder meeting June 2015 / July 2015 Stakeholder comments reports (incl. written) October 2015 Final report (all tasks 0 to 7) Commission foresees a Consultation Forum in the second half of 2015.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 12

Lot 37: Lighting Systems

  • Lot 37 Lighting Systems preparatory study performed in parallel to the Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources study.
  • Lot 37 main topics (but not limited to):
  • Occupancy dependent lighting control
  • Daylight dependent lighting control and optimisation of daylight availability
  • Constant illuminance control (dimming in function of degradation with time)
  • Smart task lighting / interactive lighting controls / flexible luminaire systems
  • Design aspects of luminaires, controls, lighting systems
  • Same consortium, but: Technical lead by VITO; participation of VHK; collaboration by Paul Waide.
  • Longer running time than Light Sources study: Lot 37 final report by December 2016

Lighting systems, luminaires and controls NOT considered in the Light Sources study, except for some compatibility issues. → Scope !

slide-13
SLIDE 13

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 13

End of Introduction

History of Ecodesign for Lighting Assignment for the current preparatory study Structure for study and where we are now (MEErP) Project details and Study team Time schedule Parallel LOT 37 study on lighting systems Any questions so far ?? Next topic: Scope of the study

slide-14
SLIDE 14

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1st Stakeholder Meeting - VHK/VITO for EC 14

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources

1st Stakeholder Meeting

5 February 2015

Van Holsteijn en Kemna Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek

SCOPE

(Task 1 report) Leo Wierda, René Kemna

slide-15
SLIDE 15

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 15

Scope

Starting points (assignment) Definition of the Initial Scope Luminaires and Controls (Lot 37) Scope Reduction (Ecodesign Directive) Scope in relation to product Function Information provided in task 1 report Scope Decision Table Definition of lamps by elements

slide-16
SLIDE 16

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 16

Scope, starting points

  • In addition to all lighting products currently regulated under Ecodesign and Energy Labelling, the assignment

explicitly requests an analysis of the lighting products not yet regulated, and to identify other lighting products to be included into the study, and to review the definitions of special purpose products.

  • According to the assignment this also includes luminaires (either with or without built-in light sources such

as LED modules) and lighting controllers (either as part of a luminaire or as an independent product).

  • As clarified by the Commission’s comments on early drafts of the reports, at least in a first approach:

The scope and exemptions of the current regulations, and the wordings currently used to define them, have to be ignored for the purposes of establishing a scope for the study. This is also related to the Commission’s request to review the definitions of special purpose lamps and to propose updates.

  • In other words: the scope has to be redefined from scratch and is potentially (very) wide.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 17

Initial Scope

The study regards all light sources, lamps, ballasts, and lamp control gears according to the definitions provided below:

‘Light source’ means a surface or object designed to emit mainly visible optical radiation produced by a transformation of

  • energy. The term ‘visible’ refers to a wavelength of 380-780 nm.

‘Lamp’ means a unit whose performance can be assessed independently and which consists of one or more light sources. It may include additional components necessary for starting, power supply or stable operation of the unit or for distributing, filtering or transforming the optical radiation, in cases where those components cannot be removed without permanently damaging the unit. ‘Ballast’ means lamp control gear inserted between the supply and one or more discharge lamps, which, by means of inductance, capacitance or a combination of inductance and capacitance, serves mainly to limit the current of the lamp(s) to the required value. ‘Lamp control gear’ means a device located between the electrical supply and one or more lamps, which provides a functionality related to the operation of the lamp(s), such as transforming the supply voltage, limiting the current of the lamp(s) to the required value, providing starting voltage and preheating current, preventing cold starting, correcting the power factor or reducing radio interference. The device may be designed to connect to other lamp control gear to perform these

  • functions. The term does not include:
  • control devices
  • power supplies within the scope of Commission Regulation (EC) No 278/2009.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 18

Scope regarding Luminaires and Controls

The initial scope does NOT mention luminaires and controls. As expressed by the assignment, luminaires and lighting controllers should also be addressed in the study. However, aspects related to Lighting Systems and to Lighting Control are excluded from the current study because they will be handled in the parallel Lot 37 study. This does not exclude that some lighting control aspects are relevant for the current study, in particular as regards the integration of control devices in the lamps (smart lamps), and the compatibility of the lamps with certain types of dimmers or control devices. Luminaires will predominantly be handled in the Lot 37 study, but integrated LED-luminaires are included in the current study, and the compatibility of retrofit lamps with existing luminaires (lock-in effect) is also in the scope.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 19

Scope reduction (1)

According to the philosophy of the MEErP, the initial scope can be further restricted as the study proceeds and additional information is gathered. The reasons for further restriction have to be derived from the Ecodesign Directive 2009/125/EC, and in particular from article 15 of this directive that gives the conditions under which a product is eligible for ecodesign measures. Criteria of article 15.2: a) the product shall represent a significant volume of sales and trade, indicatively more than 200,000 units a year within the Community according to the most recently available figures; b) the product shall, considering the quantities placed on the market and/or put into service, have a significant environmental impact within the Community, as specified in the Community strategic priorities as set out in Decision No 1600/2002/EC; and c) the product shall present significant potential for improvement in terms of its environmental impact without entailing excessive costs, taking into account in particular: (i) the absence of other relevant Community legislation or failure of market forces to address the issue properly; and (ii)a wide disparity in the environmental performance of products available on the market with equivalent functionality. Red text : some information is already available for special lamps Blue text : would require further study for special lamps

slide-20
SLIDE 20

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 20

Scope reduction (2)

In addition, if a product is eligible for ecodesign measures according to the above criteria, an implementing measure shall meet the following criteria (article 15.5): a) there shall be no significant negative impact on the functionality of the product, from the perspective of the user; b) health, safety and the environment shall not be adversely affected; c) there shall be no significant negative impact on consumers in particular as regards the affordability and the life cycle cost of the product; d) there shall be no significant negative impact on industry’s competitiveness; e) in principle, the setting of an ecodesign requirement shall not have the consequence of imposing proprietary technology on manufacturers; and f) no excessive administrative burden shall be imposed on manufacturers. Article 1 sub 3 of the Ecodesign Directive explicitly excludes means of transport for persons or goods. However, this exclusion regards only the means themselves and not the products used inside or on those means. This implies that for example car-lights are not automatically excluded for this reason. Blue text : would require further study for special lamps

slide-21
SLIDE 21

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 21

Scope and Function

  • Ecodesign study based on: comparison of products that perform the same function.
  • Problem: lighting products in the initial scope have a large variety of functions:
  • ‘to make objects and scenes visible’, in general (used in existing regulations, typical functional parameter:

luminous flux (lumen) or maintained useful flux density (lux))

  • ‘to make objects and scenes visible’, in a special way (food display, theatres, microscopes),
  • ‘to make objects and scenes visible’, in a special environment (vibration resistant, ovens, explosion proof,

marine applications, car-headlights).

  • ‘to make themselves visible’ (traffic lights, exit signs, projector lamps, car-taillights, bill boards).
  • completely different function (grow lights, breeding lights, lamps for UV-treatments, IR lamps for heating,

decorative/mood lighting, data-transmission).

  • If maintained in the scope: each function requires a separate preparatory study (functional parameters, sales, energy

consumption, life, usage characteristics, base-case and BAT technology, availability of standards, scenario analysis, impact on consumers, impact on industry).

  • If implemented in a regulation: each function is likely to have its own minimum requirements and label

classes.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 22

Information for Scope decision

The Task 1 report provides:

  • review of the existing definitions

(no new definitions, some issues regarding LEDs).

  • survey of parameters used to characterise and distinguish lamps/light sources

(many, detailed).

  • review of the scope and the exemptions of the current regulations (which types, reasons for exemption)

→ list of lamp types for scope decision.

  • first analysis of all lamp types
  • discussion on inclusion in the scope
  • estimate of sales quantities and energy consumption for many types of special lamps.
  • Review highlights a lack of accurate definitions (practical for market surveillance).
  • The priority in this moment is to establish these definitions, rather than to decide if a certain type of non-

well-defined lamp should be in or out the scope of the current study.

  • Work initiated with Task 1 report; should now proceed in cooperation with the stakeholders.
  • Task 1 report gives information and considerations: the decision on the scope should be taken by the

Commission and by the stakeholders (but implications on amount of work for study team)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 23

List of lamp types for Scope decision (1)

Lamp type description (usually better definition required) Data for Ecodesign Directive article 15 (Task 1, annex D.15) (Momentary) Proposal for the scope of the current study Sales M units/y Energy TWh/y

  • ther

legislation included excluded

  • pen/

undefined Notes / comments Lamps covered by current regulations Linear Fluorescent (LFL) x

All lamps certainly covered by the existing regulations are included in the scope of the study.

Compact Fluorescent, external ballast (CFLni) x Compact Fluorescent, integrated ballast (CFLi) x Halogen Lamps, Mains Voltage (HL-MV) x Halogen Lamps, Low Voltage (HL-LV) x Incandescent Lamps, Mains Voltage (GLS-MV) x Incandescent Lamps, Low Voltage (GLS-LV) x High Intensity Discharge (HID) x Light Emitting Diode (LED, retrofit and dedicated) x Lamps for extreme physical environments 9.8 1.0 (exclusive ‘abused’ lamps) Shock resistant x Sales numbers and Environmental impact are

  • significant. No other regulation for energy
  • efficiency. Hence no reason to exclude based on

these aspects of Ecodesign Directive art. 15. Vibration resistant x Shatter resistant x Temperatures below -20˚C x Temperatures above +50˚C x Explosion proof x Non-white lamps (2.0) TWh: Christmas lighting, fairs, amusement parks Fixed or variable non-white colour x No well defined function. Depends on definition. Colour-changing-ability including white x Important for modern LED lighting Ultra-Violet lamps 16.7 2.5 Tanning 9.4 0.6 x Large variety of functions. Each function would have to be considered separately. Waste water treatment 0.6 0.5 x Industrial processes 0.5 1.0 x Other UV lamps 6.2 0.4 x

slide-24
SLIDE 24

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 24

List of lamp types for Scope decision (2)

Lamp type description (usually better definition required) Data for Ecodesign Directive article 15 (Task 1, annex D.15) (Momentary) Proposal for the scope of the current study Sales M units/y Energy TWh/y

  • ther

legislation included excluded

  • pen/

undefined Notes / comments Infrared and collagen lamps 24.4 33.2 IR lamps for imaging equipment 11.0 3.4 (yes) (x) study Variety of (heating) functions: each function would have to be considered separately, considering also non-light heating. Some lamps covered by other legislation, but further study required to check details. Collagen could be excluded for low impact, if confirmed; also depends on definition. IR lamps for electric hobs 0.8 5.4 (yes) (x) study Zootechnical (raising young animals) 5.0 2.5 x Counter-top heaters in restaurants 2.2 10.8 x IR for Industrial use 2.2 10.8 x Collagen lamps 0.4 0.05 (x) study Therapeutic & Comfort (Sauna’s) 2.8 0.2 x Signalling and signage lamps 18.2 6.4 Exit signs 5.0 4.1 x Sales numbers and Environmental impact are

  • significant. No other regulation for energy
  • efficiency. Hence no reason to exclude based on

these aspects of Ecodesign Directive art. 15. Traffic lights 8.3 1.0 x Neon and (static) billboards 0.3 0.9 x Other signalling and signage 4.6 0.4 x Appliance integrated lamps 134 9.9 Range hoods 12 0.3 yes x Excluded because other relevant legislation exists Aquaria 13 3.5 x At this stage, no reason to exclude based on Ecodesign Directive art. 15. Swimming pools 5.4 2.2 x Vending machines 6.9 2.6 x Other appliance integrated 97 1.3 x Large number of lamps, each with low energy Decorative and architectural Flood lights for buildings n/a n/a x NOT considered as Special Purpose: in scope Decorative 124 2.6 x Definition needed. Function when included ? Projection, microscopy, light guides 2.4 Lamps used in imaging equipment 110 0.9 yes x Excluded because other relevant legislation exists Other projection lamps 11 1.5 x Definition needed. Function when included ?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 25

List of lamp types for Scope decision (3)

Lamp type description (usually better definition required) Data for Ecodesign Directive article 15 (Task 1, annex D.15) (Momentary) Proposal for the scope of the current study Sales M units/y Energy TWh/y

  • ther

legislation included excluded

  • pen/

undefined Notes / comments Movie/TV or photo studio/theatre/event 163 2.5 Many > 12,000 lm: requested to be studied TV/video/film studio lamps 1.1 1.4 x Outdoor stadium lamps 0.6 0.2 x Photographic flash tubes 160 0.0 (x) (x) Could be excluded for low environmental impact Other in this category 1.3 0.9 x Backlighting for displays 1736 58.5 yes x Excluded because other relevant legislation exists Grow lights (greenhouses) 6.9 5.2 x No reason for exclusion. Definition! Function! Food display lights 27 1.1 x No reason for exclusion. Definition! Function! Scientific lights 0.02 0.01 x Excluded for low sales and low impact. Definition? Transport lights 956 12.7 Motor vehicles, categories M, N, O yes x Excluded because other relevant legislation exists (exception might be interior lights) Motor cycles, category L yes x Aeroplanes 0.3 0.02 x Excluded for low impact. Definition? Ships, specific lighting 0.08 0.0 x Excluded for low sales and low impact. Definition? Trains, specific lighting 0.1 0.04 x Excluded for low sales and low impact. Definition? Ships, trains, busses, interior lighting (11) (2) x Include also interior lighting for cars, trucks, vans ? Bicycles x Consider as battery-operated Other Mobile Lighting 25 0.03 x Not a well defined group, see battery and non-elec Data-communication and (other) lasers Definition ? Signal transmission between instruments some x (x) Consensus expected on exclusion. Exact reason? Dashboard and indicator lamps 2000 0.15 x Excluded for low impact? Definition? Industrial process lasers x (x) Consensus expected on exclusion. Exact reason? Laser-diodes for general lighting x Could be BAT, BNAT: do not exclude Emergency lighting x Light sources used in emergency are not specific Battery operated x No valid reason found for exclusion

slide-26
SLIDE 26

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 26

List of lamp types for Scope decision (4)

Lamp type description (usually better definition required) Data for Ecodesign Directive article 15 (Task 1, annex D.15) (Momentary) Proposal for the scope of the current study Sales M units/y Energy TWh/y

  • ther

legislation included excluded

  • pen/

undefined Notes / comments Non-electric lamps x Consensus expected on exclusion. Exact reason? (exception: self-luminous exit signs) Lamps with more than 12,000 lumen x study These lamps are now explicitly exempted from at least one of the regulations. The assignment for the study explicitly requests to reconsider this. Further information is needed to enable an inclusion/exclusion decision, but assistance by stakeholders is necessary. Lamps with less than 60 lumen x study Double capped fluorescent lamps with diameter 7 mm (T2) or less x study Double capped fluorescent lamps with diameter 16 mm (T5) and power ≤ 13 W x study Double capped fluorescent lamps with diameter 16 mm (T5) and power > 80 W x study Double capped fluorescent lamps with diameter 38 mm (T12) and special characteristics (see Task 1, par. 1.4.2.25) x study Double capped fluorescent lamps with diameter 38 mm (T12) and external ignition strip x study Single capped fluorescent lamps with diameter 16 mm (T5) and special characteristics (see Task 1, par. 1.4.2.27) x study HID lamps with Tc > 7000 K x study HID lamps not having lamp cap E27, E40, PGZ12 x study OLED lighting x Could be BAT, BNAT: do not exclude

slide-27
SLIDE 27

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 27

Scope: conclusions

  • Scope of the study is still very wide, including different functions; problem for the study team.
  • Ecodesign Directive → guidelines for scope reduc on.
  • Task 1 report

→ informa on/analysis useful for scope decision

  • Task 1 report

→ first scope reduction mainly based on existence of other relevant regulation

  • First: better definitions (Assistance by Stakeholders; practical for Market Surveillance)

Then: decision on inclusion/exclusion scope

  • Commission and Stakeholders → Indica ons regarding scope.

To conclude: ‘Lamp’ definition by elements, by René Kemna

(not in Task reports)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 28

Lamp elements (1)

Electricity source

  • El. converters

Connectors EM emitters Light conversion Safety & Longevity Light Spectrum Light Distribution Appearance

Envelope, Gas fill Coating, Heat sink Support wires Filament, electrodes & plasma (CC/HC, HI), diode Lamp sockets/caps, direct connect Transformers, ballasts, gears, drivers

Default 230V AC, 50 Hz

Fluorescents & pigments Reflectors, filters & optics Anti-glare: frosting & louvers, orientation, position

  • bject design

Controls: sensors, actuators, processing, orientation

slide-29
SLIDE 29

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 29

‘Lamp’: Definition by elements (2)

CFLi HL-LVi GLS- ‘Globe’ etc. CFLi-R LED lamp retrofit LFL HL-LV CFLni HID HID-R HL-LV-R LEDlinear HL-LVi-R LED lamp retrofit GLS-R HL-MV-R LED package GLS HL-MV LED module LED Lamp/ fixture (non- retrofit) CFLni ‘Globe’ etc. LED LED LED

slide-30
SLIDE 30

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1st Stakeholder Meeting - VHK/VITO for EC 30

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources

1st Stakeholder Meeting

5 February 2015

Van Holsteijn en Kemna Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek

STANDARDS and LEGISLATION

(Task 1 report) Stuart Jeffcott

slide-31
SLIDE 31

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 31

Standards and Legislation

Test methods Comparison Test methods under Development Other possible Problems with Test methods Outline of Mandates to ESO’s Legislative Comparison EU ↔ non-EU Labelling Regulation Comparison EU ↔ non-EU

slide-32
SLIDE 32

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 32

Standards and Legislation

The Task 1 report and annexes contain an extensive survey of both European and non-European lighting- related (testing) standards and legislation. Analysis of the current state of (and ongoing developments in) the international arena to highlight areas where amending current EU practice (or adopting new practice) may enhance the standards and regulatory processes within Europe, and where existing issues may remain. Analysis examines:

  • Primary differences between European and non-European test methods for lighting-related parameters,

and minimum (and other) performance requirements of those parameters.

  • Ongoing or new developments regarding standards and legislation

Core analysis limited to major trade partners and/or countries/regions/ organisations leading standards and/or technology developments (47 countries/standards organisations studied)

  • Australia, Canada, China, India Korea, Japan, Taiwan and USA

Inter-relationship/cross-over of test and regulatory issue varies between countries/regions – in discussion issues dealt with in most appropriate section

slide-33
SLIDE 33

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 33

Test methods comparison (1)

Primary and Secondary Functional Performance Parameters

Parameter Europe Outside Europe Additional Comment

Luminous flux (directional lamps) Measurement in angle of 90˚ or 120˚

  • Requires full goniophotometer test

= more expensive Measurement in angle of 180˚ (typical)

  • Allows use of integrating sphere

= cheaper Current EU approach = Higher cost for enforcement testing and barrier for SME development testing Lumen Maintenance (CFL) Lumen Maintenance for (LED) Ageing using cycles: 2h 45m on, 15 m

  • ff

IEC: ageing 6000 hours Ageing using cycles: 3h 00m on, 20 m off (North America) IES: ageing 6000 hours (but 3000 h for luminaires) ISA proposal: ageing 2000 hours with predictive algorithm No public data on effect of cycle- differences Not known which test is superior, trade-

  • ff between speed/cost and

uncertainty; discussion ongoing Colour related parameters CIE 15 (X/Y space) and CIE 13.3 (Colour Rendering Index, CRI) used everywhere Research ongoing for LEDs (with possible application to other light sources) Refer new test methods

slide-34
SLIDE 34

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 34

Test methods comparison (2)

Parameter Europe Outside Europe Additional Comment

Power/ Power Factor Well established, little variation geographically Recent IEC standard more sophisticated (split into displacement factor and distortion factor) IEC/EN approach leads the world Warm-up time (CFL) Time to reach 60% of initial flux Time to reach 80% of initial flux Current EU approach potentially less advantageous for consumer acceptance Rapid switching withstand (CFLi) Rapid switching withstand (LED) 1 min. on, 3 min. off 5 min. on, 5 min. off (US MEPS) LED: 2 min. on, 2 min. off (US Energy Star) Difference not obviously linked to consumer requirement Implications for testing time/costs. Research of cycle on (CFL) lifetime

  • ngoing – indications significant impact

UV-radiation Almost identical when applied Compatability/ Dimmability Subject of ongoing IEC US Energy Star recent introduction for some LED/dimming products Issues exist, especially for with newer lamp types. Limited testing solutions that are broadly applicable. Ballast efficiency Subtle differences in approach between EU/IEC and others EU adoption of alternative approach unlikely to yield benefits

slide-35
SLIDE 35

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 35

Test methods comparison (3)

Parameter Europe Outside Europe Additional Comment

Luminaire light

  • utput

Subtle differences in approach between EU/IEC and others EU adoption of alternative approach unlikely to yield benefits (Luminaire utilisation factor) Universally applied Resource use No lighting specific test methods (other than mercury content in CFLs) Potentially need for measurement methods for end of life “recyclability/re- usability” and non-mercury hazardous substances Safety (flammability, electrical, … etc.) IEC and CISPR are the key originators of safety and EMS standards globally (although some differences at national levels) EU adoption of alternative approach unlikely to yield benefits Noise & vibrations No requirement in EU Exists elsewhere (Energy Star) Simple adoption of ISO standard possible if required

slide-36
SLIDE 36

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 36

Test Methods Under Development (1)

Test Method Additional Comment

CIE for LED Lamps, Modules and Luminaires

  • Luminous flux, colour, CRI, colour uniformity,…
  • Guidance on tolerances for rated claims

Likely to become reference document for LEDs (and likely OLEDs) in the future. However, close cooperation between development bodies including IEC means likely little impact from EU perspective. CIE test method for CRI

  • CRI not well suited as a measure for LEDs
  • New proposed measures likely to be based on spectral

distribution analysis Proprietary issues may cause delay. CRI likely to remain a barrier to 'technology neutral' specifications. IEA-4E-SSL test method guidance for LEDs

  • Rationalises number of international test specifications under
  • ne umbrella (excluding light engines, modules and packages)
  • Rationalises tolerances to most stringent requirement

Not test method in its own right, but adoption of combined approach has potential benefits from cross-regional harmonisation Array of IEC standards for LEDs

  • Extensive development underway
  • Majority based on underlying CIE methods
  • Pass/fail requirements (on rated vs measured) has potential to

indirectly impact on EU regulation Potential caution required when adopted into EN standard to ensure intent of any technology neutral regulation is not undermined by the implicit pass/fail criteria defined in the IEC standards Array of North American (IES/NEMA/ANSI) standards for LEDs

  • Extensive development programme underway for suite of

products/components No apparent impact on EU as IEC/CIE likely to capture relevant requirements

slide-37
SLIDE 37

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 37

Test Methods Under Development (2)

Test Method Additional Comment

IEC standards for CFLi

  • Imminent revision of IEC 60969, likely to be referenced by EU

regulation

  • Revised version

extends parameters tested but also alters pass/fail criteria and tolerances Potential direct and indirect impact the EU regulatory framework Energy Star “Recommended Practice” for Flicker

  • Specific approach to dimmable lamps – limited applicability

Flicker not currently addressed by EU but potentially important area for consumer acceptance, No generic protocol across lamp types, particularly when paired with control devices – potential consumer acceptance issue

slide-38
SLIDE 38

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 38

Other Possible Problems with Test Methods

Issue Additional Comment

Lamp lifetime

  • Currently most methods use 50% survival rate (median life)
  • Addressed for CFLs in EU by regulation, but IEC 60969 test

softens requirement.

  • Test methods under ideal laboratory conditions (eg voltage,

temperature, …), real world likely to shorten lamp life (potentially considerably). Potential consumer dissatisfaction with claims verses actual performance. Use of IEC “type test” standards

  • Most IEC lamp performance standards state only suitable only

for 'type testing’ (typically production over an extended period). Under existing regime, potential issue of “non-compliant” manufacturers appealing compliance decisions based on statistical possibility. Alternative “zero-tolerance” regime risks (occasional) compliant manufacturer failing to meet requirement. IEC pass/fail requirements incorporated into test methods

  • IEC/EN standards typically include pass/fail requirements, eg

“initial reading of the luminous flux of a lamp shall be not less than 92% of the rated value." Effectively devolves some regulatory control to IEC/EN Standard. Issue potentially compounded by regulatory reference to “rated values” vs “tested values”. Network-connected smart lamps

  • Network connected lamps currently are not adequately

addressed for most of their functionality (colour adjustment, none peak power, “standby”) Has the potential to severely offset saving benefits if appropriate test methods not developed rapidly (possibility

  • f technology leading standards)
slide-39
SLIDE 39

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 39

Outlines of Mandates to the ESOs

  • Lamp luminous flux: address current situation for directional lamps which requires goniophotometer

testing of light output within 90° or 120° cone.

  • LED lumen maintenance: address differences in approach between the IEC and other test methods, and

across product types.

  • Lifetime: generate approaches to define lifetime in a consistent manner across product types and in line

with consumer understanding.

  • Rapid switching withstand: address differences in switching cycle times between the IEC and other test

methods, and across lamp types.

  • Warm-up (run-up) time: address subtle differences in run-up performance definitions within test methods

to ensure compatibility across lamp types.

  • Colour, in particular CRI: engage with the evolving measurements approaches for CRI to attempt to ensure

compatibility across lamp types.

  • Dimmability: continue to address testing for compatibility between dimmers and light sources.
  • Noise: potential adoption of existing international test methods, should noise be deemed appropriate for

EU regulation.

  • Consolidation of test methods: consider consolidating photometric (and colourimetric) testing methods

into a single standard for all lamp types with differing, lamp-specific, set-up requirements.

  • Network-connected “smart lamps”: devise appropriate test methods for functionality and network

standby power consumption.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 40

Legislative Comparison

MEPS for Selected Countries

EU Australia Canada China Korea Japan Taiwan USA

Incandescent lamps - non-directional X X X X X X X X Incandescent and tungsten halogen lamps - directional X X X

  • X

Compact fluorescent lamps with integrated ballast (CFLi) X X

  • X

X X X X Compact fluorescent lamps without integrated ballast (single-capped fluorescent lamps) X

  • X
  • X

X

  • LED lamps

X

  • X
  • X

planned

  • Linear fluorescent lamps

X X X X X X X X HID lamps X

  • X

planned

  • Linear fluorescent ballasts

X X X X X X X X HID ballasts X

  • X

X planned

  • X

Luminaires

  • X
slide-41
SLIDE 41

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 41

Legislative Comparison - Scope

Type Observations

Incandescent and Tungsten Halogen lamps

  • EU has broadest scope
  • Most countries have exemption for shockproof lamps
  • US definition very precise
  • US has a market monitoring system in place – exempted lamps can lose exemption status

CFLi

  • EU has broadest scope

CFL (non-integrated)

  • EU has similar scope

LED

  • EU has broadest scope

linear fluorescent lamp

  • EU has broader scope than most countries

HID lamps

  • China only other country with regulations (less broad scope than EU)
  • US eliminating mercury vapour technology using ballast regulations

Scope of “other” lamp types

  • EU may consider OLEDs
  • Induction lamps? Not clear if in scope currently

Fluorescent and HID Ballasts

  • EU has broadest scope

Luminaires

  • Building standards more widely used – allows more flexibility
  • EU, Canada and US do regulate HID luminaires (primarily the ballast installed)

Intent of analysis is not to imply that new EU legislation should be technology-specific.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 42

Legislative Comparison – Efficiency (1)

Type Observations

Non-directional incandescent and tungsten halogen lamps

  • Most countries MEPS effectively exclude incandescent but not tungsten halogen lamps
  • [New US regulations?]
  • Consider power ceiling to ensure increased efficacy results in lower power?

Directional incandescent and tungsten halogen lamps

  • Few countries have MEPS
  • US MEPS allows tungsten halogen directional lamps
  • Australia has power ceiling for 12V MR16 lamps (37W)

CFLi

  • Efficacy requirements of developed countries are similar
  • Potential to increase EU MEPS efficacy requirement for CFLs by 10+ lm/W

CFL (non-integrated)

  • EU has higher efficacy requirement

LED

  • EU has higher efficacy requirement

Linear fluorescent lamps

  • EU higher but described in terms of rated values
  • Lamps available with higher efficacies than current EU requirements
  • Consider power ceiling? (e.g. US has 25W lamps available to replace 32W)

Intent of the analysis is not to imply that new EU legislation should be technology-specific.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 43

Legislative Comparison – Efficiency (2)

  • HID lamps
  • EU efficacy requirements higher

than China

  • US phasing-out mercury vapour

(via ballasts) - EU could consider this mechanism

  • Could apply to other lamps types
  • Linear fluorescent ballasts
  • EU mandates B2 (ferromagnetic)
  • In 2017 EU will mandate electronic
  • (in line with US)
  • HID ballasts – see figure --->
  • EU lower than other countries
  • Corrected in stage 3 (2017)
  • (US/Canada

just cover metal halide)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 44

Legislative Comparison – Functionality

Type Observations

Non-directional incandescent and tungsten halogen lamps

  • EU requirements broadly in line with other countries
  • EU does not require CRI as does USA and Canada - EU adding requirement would not be onerous but of

questionable benefit given concerns over CRI as an appropriate measure CFLi

  • EU requirements typically more stringent than other countries
  • Exception is rapid cycle switching

LED

  • EU significantly more stringent

Linear fluorescent lamps

  • EU significantly more stringent

HID Lamps

  • EU significantly more stringent

Intent of the analysis is not to imply that new EU legislation should be technology-specific.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 45

Regulation comparison – labelling (1)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 46

Regulation comparison – labelling (2)

  • For mandatory energy labelling of lamps and ballasts
  • EU covers significantly more lamp types than other countries
  • EU labelling/information requirements are comparatively comprehensive
  • US voluntary LED Lighting Facts label presents
  • Graphical information about LED colour temperature
  • Lumen maintenance
  • Colour accuracy
  • Potential benefit for consideration by EU
slide-47
SLIDE 47

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 47

End of Standards and Regulations

Any questions or remarks on these topics ?? Test methods Comparison Test methods under Development Other possible Problems with Test methods Outline of Mandates to ESO’s Legislative Comparison EU ↔ non-EU Labelling Regulation Comparison EU ↔ non-EU

slide-48
SLIDE 48

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1st Stakeholder Meeting - VHK/VITO for EC 48

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources

1st Stakeholder Meeting

5 February 2015

Van Holsteijn en Kemna Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek

MARKETS

(Task 2 report) Leo Wierda

slide-49
SLIDE 49

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 49

Task 2 report (Markets), survey

EU-28 lamp sales (units) Average lamp prices

Model for European Light Sources Analysis (MELISA)

(what is this, and why ?)

→ EU-28 lamp sales (value) EU-28 lamp sales (units) Lamp lifetimes → EU-28 installed stock (units)

Stakeholders are invited to provide constructive comments on this model.

Eurostat sales data (one of the sources for MELISA) IEA 4E/GfK 2014 sales data (comparison with MELISA) McKinsey 2012 derived data (comparison with MELISA)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 50

MELISA, Introduction (1)

  • Model for European LIght Sources Analysis (MELISA)

Continuous development by study team

  • Now contains:
  • Sales volumes (units)
  • Life & use data (lifetimes, lumens, power, burning hours, efficacies, prices) (averages)
  • Stock for light sources (installed number of units)
  • Installed capacity in terms of lumen

(Blue: Task 2 report)

  • Total use in terms of operating hours

(Black: Task 3 report)

  • Energy consumption by light sources (TWh/a)
  • Economic data (sales value, industry revenue, energy cost, total consumer expense)
  • Data provided for:
  • all lamp technology types (LFL, CFL, HL, GLS, HID, LED, and some further breakdown)
  • period 1990-2013
  • EU-28 total, and split in residential and non-residential sector
  • Based on: Eurostat, LightingEurope, literature, study team experience
slide-51
SLIDE 51

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 51

MELISA, Introduction (2)

  • Aims:
  • Harmonise data used in various studies on light sources (Commission request).
  • Create a single stock model for light sources that is accepted by interested parties as the main reference.
  • Checks:

(mainly Task 3 report)

  • Input data have been checked for reasonability against literature sources
  • Output data have been checked for reasonability, e.g.:
  • Number of lamps installed per household
  • Annual lighting energy consumption per household (kWh/household/year)
  • Power density installed in non-residential buildings (W/m2)
  • Annual lighting energy density for non-residential buildings (kWh/m2/year, LENI)
  • Comparison with data from prEN15193 (lighting in buildings) and EN12464-1 (lighting requirements)
  • MELISA: use in Light Sources study in MEErP Task 7 for Scenario Analysis
  • MELISA: later use in Lighting Systems study, maybe in adapted/extended form.
  • Data are preliminary and may be updated as the study proceeds, and following stakeholders’ comments.
slide-52
SLIDE 52

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 52

MELISA, Example Table (Sales)

EU-28 SALES, TOTAL, All Sectors, million units 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LFL T12 80 47 29 16 14 12 10 8 6 5 3 1 T8 halophosphor 95 119 154 176 165 154 143 113 68 26 4 2 T8 tri-phosphor 71 83 100 121 131 142 153 175 216 254 261 245 T5 new (14 - 80w) including circular 23 31 39 47 57 68 76 81 76 All others (including T5 old types 4 - 13w and special FL) 23 28 36 40 39 38 37 34 32 27 23 19 LFL (total) 269 276 318 376 380 385 389 387 390 387 372 344 CFL Retrofit - CFLi 28 68 109 220 313 420 467 506 480 431 345 271 Non-retrofit - CFLni 23 31 44 62 67 73 79 84 87 83 78 72 CFL (total) 51 99 154 282 381 493 545 589 567 514 422 342 TUNGSTEN (HL) Single ended, mirrored (low voltage) [M16, M25 etc.] 20 54 93 130 136 140 144 148 150 151 154 164 Linear (high voltage) [R7s] 15 90 90 90 80 67 54 47 45 41 40 38 LV halogen capsule [G4, GY6.35] 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 53 52 49 45 42 HV halogen capsule [G9] 10 23 47 60 70 70 70 70 67 Mains halogen (substitute for GLS and reflector)[E14, E27] 3 27 81 141 172 196 244 303 Other mains halogen - PAR 16/20/ 25/30 Hard glass reflectors, GU10 etc. 5 32 69 82 101 122 144 162 172 174 158 Tungsten-HL (total) 88 201 268 352 377 433 514 603 650 678 726 772 GLS Reflector 173 163 155 144 140 134 115 94 72 61 54 36 GLS (Including clear/pearl, candles, coloured & decorative) 1514 1468 1421 1375 1365 1356 1174 874 624 400 245 123 GLS (total) 1688 1631 1576 1519 1506 1490 1290 968 697 461 299 159 HID All mercury lamps (including mixed) 8 9 9 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 3 2 All sodium lamps 7 8 9 12 13 14 16 16 15 14 14 14 Metal halide lamps 2 4 7 12 14 15 17 19 22 23 20 16 HID (total) 17 21 25 32 34 36 38 40 42 41 37 33 LED LED directional 1 3 6 11 18 41 LED non-directional 1 1 3 6 13 41 LED (total) 2 4 8 17 31 82 GLS stock 75 112 168 228 267 Tungsten stock 90 140 140 130 TOTAL 2112 2228 2341 2560 2677 2836 2777 2592 2354 2099 1889 1731 Not real sales: seem to come to the market from household stocks. Lamp type subdivision reflects sales data availability from LightingEurope

slide-53
SLIDE 53

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 53

MELISA, Sales (units)

Residential Non-Residential

  • Sales in 2007: peak of 2.8 billion units
  • Sales in 2013: down to 1.7 billion units
  • 39% in 6 years, CAGR -8%
  • Longer lifetimes -> lower sales volumes

In 2013:

  • 59% of sales units is for residential
  • average 7.1 lamps/household/year
  • Residential sales (2008 -> 2013):

HL 23% -> 61% CFL 17% -> 18% GLS 58% -> 13% LED 0% -> 7% LFL 1% -> 2%

  • Non-residential sales (2008 -> 2013):

LFL 36% -> 45% CFL 24% -> 22% HL 10% -> 22% HID 4% -> 5% GLS 26% -> 4% LED 0% -> 2%

slide-54
SLIDE 54

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 54

MELISA, Average prices

LFL CFL TUNGSTEN GLS HID MELISA, unit lamp prices in euro/unit fixed euros 2010

T12 T8 Halophosphor T8 tri-phosphor T5 new (14 - 80w) including Circular All others (including T5 old types 4 - 13w and Special Fl.) Retrofit - CFLi Non-Retrofit - CFLni Single Ended, Mirrored (Low voltage) [M16,M25etc] Linear (High voltage) [R7s] LV halogen Capsule [G4, GY6.35] HV halogen Capsule [G9] Mains halogen (Substitute for GLS and Reflector)[E14, E27] Other Mains halogen - PAR 16/ 20/25/30 Hard glass reflectors, GU10 etc. Reflector GLS (Including clear/pearl, candles, coloured & decorative) All Mercury Lamps (including mixed) All Sodium Lamps Metal Halide Lamps Reference power (W) 35 32 30 25 12 9.5 12 35 250 35 35 36 35 54 54 250 140 160 Reference efficiency (lm/W) 70 75 80 91 86 55 55 14 12 14 12 12 12 9.5 9.5 40 95 82

Price/unit residential € (incl. VAT) 10.10 10.10 10.10 9.50 9.50 5.26 5.26 3.79 3.16 3.16 3.79 2.63 14.21 1.37 0.84 20.40 32.40 32.40 Price/unit non-residential € (excl. VAT) 8.42 8.42 8.42 7.92 7.92 4.39 4.39 3.16 2.63 2.63 3.16 2.19 11.84 1.14 0.70 17.00 27.00 27.00 LED price/unit (fixed euros 2010) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

lm / W (for sales in year) 25 30 40 60 80 watt @ 500 lm 20.0 16.7 12.5 8.3 6.3 euro / lumen (source: LightingEurope 2013) 0.056 0.048 0.042 0.034 0.020

euro @ 500 lm (excl. VAT) 28.00 24.00 21.00 17.00 10.00

Residential incl. 20% VAT Non-residential excl. VAT

Sales (units) * Average Prices = Sales (value) = Consumer Acquisition Cost

slide-55
SLIDE 55

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 55 Non-Residential

  • Expense 2010: peak of 11.8 billion euros
  • Expense 2013: down to 10.9 billion euros

In 2013:

  • 52% of consumer expense is residential
  • average 28.3 euros/household/year
  • Residential expense (2008 -> 2013):

HL 47% -> 59% CFL 31% -> 17% LED 0% -> 17% (incl. VAT) LFL 5% -> 4% GLS 18% -> 2%

  • Non-residential expense (2008 -> 2013):

LFL 53% -> 51% HID 17% -> 16% CFL 18% -> 13% (excl. VAT) HL 9% -> 13% LED 0% -> 6% GLS 3% -> 0%

(lamp acquisition cost only, excl. energy cost)

MELISA, Sales (value) = Consumer acquisition cost

Residential

slide-56
SLIDE 56

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 56 Non-Residential

LFL, HID: revenue is 66% of consumer price CFL, HL, GLS, LED: 38% (comments!)

  • Revenue 2010: peak of 5.7 billion euros
  • Revenue 2013: down to 5.2 billion euros

In 2013: 42% of industry revenue is from residential sales

  • Residential revenue (2008 -> 2013):

HL 45% -> 58% CFL 30% -> 17% LED 0% -> 17% LFL 8% -> 7% GLS 17% -> 2%

  • Non-residential revenue (2008 -> 2013):

LFL 60% -> 59% HID 19% -> 19% CFL 12% -> 9% HL 6% -> 9% LED 0% -> 4% GLS 2% -> 0%

MELISA, Industry Revenue

Residential

slide-57
SLIDE 57

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 57

MELISA, Installed Stock, calculation

Stock in year N = { ∑ } + DEClife * −

where INTlife = integer part of the lamp life in years DEClife = decimal part of the lamp life in years

For example, if the year considered is N=2014 and the life in years for the lamp type has been computed as 3.2 years (INTlife=3 and DEClife=0.2): Stock (2014) = Sales(2014)+Sales(2013)+Sales(2012)+0.2*Sales(2011)

Installed Stock = Sum of Sales over X preceding years, where X = lamp lifetime Lamp lifetime in years depends on:

  • lamp life time in hours
  • annual operating hours for the lamp

( ) = ( ) MELISA contains assumptions for Lamp Life (hours) and for Annual Operating Hours (hours/year) (Operating Hours are assumed to be full-power equivalent hours) Stock = Number of light sources installed in EU-28 in a given year (it is NOT the quantity in warehouses)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 58

MELISA, Lifetimes

LFL CFL TUNGSTEN GLS HID Lifetime (hours), operating hours (hours/year) and life (years) per type of light source

T12 T8 Halophosphor T8 tri-phosphor T5 new (14 - 80w) including Circular All others (including T5 old types 4 - 13w and Special Fl.) Retrofit - CFLi Non-Retrofit - CFLni Single Ended, Mirrored (Low voltage) [M16,M25etc] Linear (High voltage) [R7s] LV halogen Capsule [G4, GY6.35] HV halogen Capsule [G9] Mains halogen (Substitute for GLS and Reflector)[E14, E27] Other Mains halogen - PAR 16/20/25/30 Hard glass reflectors, GU10 etc. Reflector GLS (Including clear/pearl, candles, coloured & decorative) All Mercury Lamps (including mixed) All Sodium Lamps Metal Halide Lamps

Life (hours) 8000 8000 13000 20000 11000 6000 10000 2000 1000 2000 1500 1500 1500 1000 1000 8000 12000 8000 Operating (h/a) residential 700 700 700 700 700 500 700 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 700 700 700 Operating (h/a) non-residential 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 500 1600 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 4000 4000 4000 Life (years) residential 11.4 11.4 18.6 28.6 15.7 12.0 14.3 4.4 2.2 4.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.2 2.2 11.4 17.1 11.4 Life (years) non-residential 3.6 3.6 5.9 9.1 5.0 12.0 6.3 4.4 2.2 4.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.2 2.2 2.0 3.0 2.0

Assumed Lamp Life(hours) and Annual Operating Hours (hours/year): For LED lamps in 2013:

  • Life in hours

20,000 h

  • Operating hours (residential)

500 h (450 h + rebound)

  • Operating hours (NDLS, non-residential)

1500 h (mix of 2200 and 450 h)

  • Operating hours (DLS, non-residential)

984 h (mix of DLS and NDLS substituted) Major uncertainty: average EU-28 Annual Operating Hours in Non-Residential sector

slide-59
SLIDE 59

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 59 Non-Residential

MELISA, Installed Stock

Residential

  • 1990: stock of 5.6 billion units
  • 2013: stock of 11 billion units
  • Almost doubled in 23 years

In 2013:

  • 59% of stock is in residential sector
  • average ≈ 33 lamps/household

(≈ 13 CFL, ≈ 13 HL)

  • Residential stock (2008 -> 2013):

CFL 28% -> 40% HL 22% -> 38% GLS 44% -> 15% LFL 5% -> 5% LED 0% -> 2%

  • Non-residential stock (2008 -> 2013):

LFL 42% -> 42% CFL 31% -> 42% HL 8% -> 11% HID 2% -> 2% GLS 16% -> 2% LED 0% -> 0%

slide-60
SLIDE 60

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 60

End of presentation on MELISA sales/stock

Any questions or remarks on this ?

To follow: Sales data from Eurostat (one of the bases for MELISA) Comparison of MELISA sales data with GfK / IEA 4E (2014) data Comparison of MELISA sales data with McKinsey (2012) data Later, Task 3 presentation: other data from MELISA and comparison with literature data.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 61

Eurostat trade data (1)

  • Eurostat data = one of the sources for the MELISA model
  • Sales = Apparent Consumption = Production + Import – Export
  • Details on coding systems (Task 1 report)
  • Comments on reliability of data and interpretation difficulties (Task 2 report)
  • Extensive reporting of Eurostat data (tables, graphs) in Annex C of the Task 2 report
  • Only some examples are presented here, as an illustration of the available data
slide-62
SLIDE 62

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 62

Eurostat (2), example of data per lamp type

GLS MV <200W EU-15 EU-28 year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Production Quantity (mln units) 1040 1085 969 1263 1171 939 867 806 1067 1192 1610 1303 1500 1130 1051 1012 751 407 352 Import Quantity (mln units) 426 502 607 738 725 788 799 784 186 212 248 295 344 313 301 367 311 343 350 Export Quantity (mln units) 193 272 256 267 237 348 350 291 542 525 568 516 576 423 391 522 534 439 509 Apparent Sales (mln units) 1272 1316 1320 1734 1659 1379 1316 1299 711 878 1290 1082 1269 1020 961 857 528 311 192 Production Value (mln euro) 354 340 357 380 365 320 325 313 289 314 377 293 331 346 342 325 221 210 200 Import Value (mln euro) 100 123 142 169 185 204 201 193 49.7 47.7 53.6 61.1 65.7 60.3 62.1 88.4 79.9 83.8 75.3 Export Value (mln euro) 71.1 89.4 99.0 97.9 93.2 117 129 99.1 134 134 116 112 113 95.0 83.8 101 99.3 94.1 104 Apparent Sales (mln euro) 383 374 400 451 457 407 398 407 204 227 315 243 284 311 320 312 202 199 172 Production Value (euro/unit) 0.34 0.31 0.37 0.30 0.31 0.34 0.38 0.39 0.27 0.26 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.31 0.33 0.32 0.29 0.51 0.57 Import Value (euro/unit) 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.27 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.24 0.22 Export Value (euro/unit) 0.37 0.33 0.39 0.37 0.39 0.34 0.37 0.34 0.25 0.26 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.20 Apparent Value (euro/unit) 0.30 0.28 0.30 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.31 0.33 0.36 0.38 0.64 0.89

Incandescent MV lamps < 200W:

  • clear downward trend from 2007
slide-63
SLIDE 63

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 63

Eurostat (3), example of data per lamp type

Halogen MV lamps :

  • clear upward trend from 2009

Compact Fluorescent Lamps :

  • Peak around 2008-2009
  • Decrease in sales in recent years
slide-64
SLIDE 64

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 64

Eurostat (4), example of cumulative totals

  • Data available in:
  • units
  • euros
  • Same graphs available for:
  • production
  • import
  • export
  • ‘Difficult’ groups for modelling:
  • Filament Other (GLS LV, GLS MV > 200W)
  • Discharge Other (HID, but also many CCFL’s)
  • Sealed Beam (PAR)
  • no group for LEDs
slide-65
SLIDE 65

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 65

Eurostat (5), example of distributions

From 2003 (first year with EU-28 data) to 2013 (last year with EU-28 data):

  • Total apparent sales decrease from 3.5 to 2.8 billion units (includes all Eurostat lamp types)
  • Strong decrease in share of incandescent lamps (GLS MV < 200W + Filament other)
  • Strong increase in share for Halogen MV, CFL, LFL
  • Share of Halogen LV lamps more or less stable
slide-66
SLIDE 66

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 66

IEA 4E / GfK data (1)

  • Gesellschaft für Konsumforschung (GfK), research on domestic lamp sales
  • Countries covered (average coverage estimated 70%):

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Netherlands (2007-2013), Poland, Spain (2011-2013).

  • Data reported by IEA in “4E Mapping Document, European Union, Domestic Lighting” (2014)
  • Data extrapolated by study team to EU-28
  • Outcome compared with data in the MELISA residential model
  • GfK/IEA 4E data also include:

Distribution of the sales over various wattage ranges -> estimate of average lamp powers. Sales-weighted average efficacies (lm/W) These aspects are further explored in the Task 3 report. Here: focus on sales

  • See Annex D of Task 2 report for results extrapolated to EU-28
slide-67
SLIDE 67

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 67

IEA 4E / GfK data (2)

GfK/IEA 4E data confirm MELISA trends:

  • A strong decrease in the sales
  • f incandescent lamps (GLS)
  • An increase in the sales of

mains voltage halogen lamps (MV-HL)

  • An

initial increase and following decrease of CFLi sales with a peak around the year 2010.

  • A general decrease in the
  • verall quantity of lamp sales.

Lamp sales per lamp type, estimate for EU28 based on GfK 2014 data (millions of units) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 TOTAL all lamp types 1125 1068 1149 1031 959 916 873

slide-68
SLIDE 68

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 68

IEA 4E / GfK data (3)

GfK/IEA 4E extrapolated EU-28 lamp sales compared to MELISA (residential):

  • Good match for GLS
  • Good match for MV-HL (single-ended)
  • Good match for CFLi
  • Good match for LED
  • Good match for total lamp sales
  • No good match for HL-LV: GfK sales

are lower than LightingEurope sales and LE has only a share of the market, but LE sales are for all sectors; GfK sales only for residential.

  • Moderate match for MV-HL (double-

ended, R7s), but low sales quantities

  • CFLni and LFL: are not typical lamps

for residential use; low quantities.

Relative values: GfK-derived data / MELISA residential data (%) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 MV incandescent lamps 65% 65% 88% 86% 112% 117% 87% MV halogens (single ended) 65% 49% 48% 60% 69% 89% 109% MV halogens (double ended) 57% 71% 70% 57% 60% 61% 68% LV (12V) halogens 44% 47% 45% 46% 42% 44% 42% MV pin based CFLs (CFLni) 9% 9% 10% 9% 13% 15% 17% MV self-ballasted CFLs (CFLi) 54% 58% 67% 81% 71% 71% 82% MV LFL tubes (all types) 64% 62% 64% 61% 57% 63% 69% LED total 262% 193% 152% 110% 108% 89% TOTAL all lamp types 61% 60% 71% 72% 78% 83% 86%

Conclusions:

  • MELISA residential sales are compatible with GfK/IEA 4E data
  • MELISA HL-LV residential sales may be too high: consider

moving a part of HL-LV sales to non-residential sector

slide-69
SLIDE 69

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 69

Data derived from McKinsey (1)

  • McKinsey’s report “Lighting the Way ….” (2012) (update of similar 2011 report)
  • annual sales volumes (quantities) and market values
  • for new installations (fixtures, containing light sources) and for replacement of light sources
  • subdivided per sector (residential, office, industrial, shop/retail, hospitality, outdoor, architectural)
  • subdivided per light source technology type (incandescent, halogen, HID, LFL, CFL, LED retrofit, LED full)
  • data provided for years 2011 and 2012 with forecasts for 2016 and 2020
  • most data are provided on a global level, i.e. for the entire world.
  • Regional breakdown only in terms of market value (not in quantities)
  • McKinsey’s ‘Europe’ not exactly defined, but larger than EU-28
  • > data elaboration performed to convert to EU-28 market value (assumptions)
  • Light sources value: part is explicit (retrofit), part hidden (light sources sold with luminaires)
  • > market value conversion from ‘general lighting’ to ‘light sources only’ (assumptions)
  • McKinsey’s ASP’s (global average €/unit) not exactly defined and not representative for EU-28
  • > assumed €/unit for EU-28 to convert market value to quantities (assumptions)
  • Details in Task 2 report Annex E
slide-70
SLIDE 70

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 70

Data derived from McKinsey (2), Entire lighting market

Share of market value per lamp type, comparison 2012->2020

  • LED 15% -> 73%
  • Retrofit

18% -> 9%

  • Controls 4% -> 13%

Estimate for EU-28 2011 2012 2016 2020 2011 2012 2016 2020 total general lighting market m € 12964 13730 15696 16308

  • excl. lighting control systems

m € 12434 13102 14508 14141 incandescent m € 1914 1533 303 15% 12% 2% 0% halogen m € 2039 2148 1952 893 16% 16% 13% 6% HID m € 1859 1958 1608 669 15% 15% 11% 5% LFL m € 3053 3026 2559 1787 25% 23% 18% 13% CFL m € 2421 2420 1292 521 19% 18% 9% 4% LED m € 1149 2017 6793 10272 9% 15% 47% 73% Luminaire market m € 10107 10655 12246 12637 78% 78% 78% 77% Light Source replacement market m € 2327 2447 2263 1504 18% 18% 14% 9% Control system market m € 530 629 1188 2166 4% 5% 8% 13% Estimate for EU-28 2011 2012 2016 2020 2011 2012 2016 2020 m € 12964 13730 15696 16308 Residential m € 6360 6547 7135 7225 49% 48% 45% 44% Hospitality m € 878 941 1035 1078 7% 7% 7% 7% Outdoor m € 1242 1354 2008 2080 10% 10% 13% 13% Office m € 1686 1872 2219 2582 13% 14% 14% 16% Architectural m € 556 594 654 729 4% 4% 4% 4% Shop/retail m € 1123 1243 1380 1303 9% 9% 9% 8% Industrial m € 1122 1179 1264 1309 9% 9% 8% 8%

Share of market value per sector, comparison 2012->2020

  • Residential 49% -> 44%
  • Outdoor

10% -> 13%

  • Office 13% -> 16%
slide-71
SLIDE 71

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 71

Data derived from McKinsey (3), Light sources, value

Industry revenue 2012 from light sources (million euros):

  • McKinsey (derived) 3576
  • Eurostat

2415 - 2865

  • MELISA 5439

Only residential (not in table):

  • McKinsey (derived)

1769

  • MELISA 2268

EU-28 market for light sources/lamps/modules, as derived by the study team from McKinsey data. Sum of all sectors. Values in million euros EU-28 Light Sources Market 2011 2012 2016 2020 Based on McKinsey, All Sectors m € 3237 3576 3940 3439 incandescent m € 502 420 82 halogen m € 536 591 531 204 HID m € 461 507 423 181 LFL m € 820 859 736 493 CFL m € 643 675 357 123 LED m € 275 523 1809 2439 Light source NEW m € 909 1128 1678 1935 Light source REPLACEMENT m € 2328 2447 2262 1504

Industry revenue conclusion:

  • MELISA value (5439 mln euros) is much higher than value derived from McKinsey data (3576 mln euros)
  • This is mainly due to differences in the non-residential sector
  • Value reported by LightingEurope is less than the other sources because LE covers only part of market,

but their value could be compatible with value derived from McKinsey.

  • For MELISA, consider reducing the part of consumer price that is industry revenue (stakeholders ?)
slide-72
SLIDE 72

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 72

Data derived from McKinsey (4), Light sources, units

EU-28 sales quantities for light sources/lamps/modules, as derived by the study team from McKinsey market value data and for two sets of assumed unit prices. Sum of all sectors, in million units. Light Source unit price (€/unit) High price set Low price set 2011 2012 2016 2020 2011 2012 2016 2020 incandescent 0.28 0.28 0.31 0.33 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.25 halogen 1.00 1.03 0.98 0.83 0.88 0.91 0.86 0.73 HID 9.67 9.44 8.27 7.10 7.31 7.14 6.25 5.37 LFL 1.30 1.27 1.16 1.07 0.87 0.85 0.78 0.72 CFL 2.01 1.92 1.57 1.28 1.60 1.53 1.25 1.02 LED 11.67 9.06 5.53 4.79 7.85 6.10 3.72 3.22 Light Sources sold in EU-28 (million units / year) 3351 3211 2045 1336 4431 4248 2749 1875 incandescent 1789 1497 261 2377 1989 347 halogen 538 573 544 245 612 651 618 279 HID 48 54 51 25 63 71 68 34 LFL 633 678 634 460 943 1010 944 685 CFL 320 351 228 96 402 441 286 121 LED 24 58 327 510 35 86 486 757 Light sources NEW 926 997 853 733 1223 1318 1144 1022 Light sources REPLACEMENT 2426 2214 1192 603 3208 2930 1605 853

Sales quantities 2012 of light sources (million units):

  • McKinsey (derived) 3211 - 4248
  • Eurostat

2883 - 2937

  • MELISA 1889

Sales quantity conclusion (2012):

  • The MELISA total sales quantity is far

less than the quantity derived from McKinsey data.

  • The difference derives for a large part

from GLS sales:

  • McKinsey (derived)

1497 - 1989

  • MELISA & Eurostat ≈300
  • LightingEurope data for GLS are in line

with MELISA and Eurostat data. → McKinsey (derived) sales quantities for GLS are much too high.

slide-73
SLIDE 73

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 73

End of presentation of Task 2 report

Any questions or remarks on sales/stock ?

Task 3 presentation will follow: Other data from MELISA and comparison with literature data Compatibility between light sources and dimmers

slide-74
SLIDE 74

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1st Stakeholder Meeting - VHK/VITO for EC 74

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources

1st Stakeholder Meeting

5 February 2015

Van Holsteijn en Kemna Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek

USERS

(Task 3 report) Leo Wierda

slide-75
SLIDE 75

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 75

Task 3 report (Users), survey 1st part

EU-28 installed stock Average lamp power

MELISA continued:

→ EU-28 total installed power

Stakeholders are invited to provide constructive comments on this model.

EU-28 installed stock Average lamp lumen → EU-28 total installed lumen EU-28 installed stock Average lamp hours → EU-28 total operating hours Average lamp efficacy EU-28 total hours Average lamp power → EU-28 total lighting energy EU-28 lighting energy Electricity costs → EU-28 total energy cost

At each step: MELISA inputs ↔ Literature data MELISA outcomes ↔ Literature data Quantities/household Quantities/m2 Task 3, 2nd part: Heat aspects of Lighting Health aspects End-of-Life aspects Dimming

slide-76
SLIDE 76

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 76

MELISA Power (1), Average lamp power

Average lamp power (W) LFL CFL HL GLS HID For LEDs see later presentation sheet

T12 T8 halophosphor T8 tri-phosphor T5 new (14 - 80w) including circular All others (including T5 old types 4 - 13w and special FL) Retrofit - CFLi Non-retrofit - CFLni Single ended, mirrored (low voltage) [M16, M25 etc.] Linear (high voltage) [R7s] LV halogen Capsule [G4, GY6.35] HV Halogen capsule [G9] Mains halogen (substitute for GLS and reflector)[E14, E27] Other mains halogen - PAR 16/20/ 25/30 hard glass reflectors, GU10 etc. Reflector GLS (including clear/pearl, candles, coloured & decorative) All mercury lamps (including mixed) All sodium lamps Metal halide lamps

MELISA 35 32 30 25 12 9.5 12 35 250 35 35 36 35 54 54 250 140 160 CLASP 2013 35 32 28-30 25 12 13 9.5- 11.5 35 100 35 52 52 52 60 60 250 120- 140 150- 225 VITO 2009 13 30 300 30 40 40 40 54 54 GfK/IEA 4E 2013 33-35 ≈14 ≈35 200- 240 ≈35 38-40 40-45

Main conclusions:

  • MELISA CFLi power seems on the low side (Swedish measurements: 9.5W; implications for lumen!)
  • MELISA HL R7s power seems slightly high (small influence)
  • MELISA MV-HL power seems slightly low
  • MELISA GLS power seems too high (phase out: (1) high powers phased out first (2) less relevant for future)

MELISA assumptions on average lamp powers, compared with CLASP 2013, VITO 2009, GfK/IEA 4E (2013)

slide-77
SLIDE 77

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 77 Non-Residential

  • Power 2007: peak of 354 GW
  • Power 2013: down to 304 GW

In 2013:

  • 63% of power installed in residential
  • average 966 W/household

(of which 521 W for halogen lamps)

  • Residential power (2008 -> 2013):

HL 30% -> 54% GLS 60% -> 28% CFL 7% -> 13% LED 0% -> 1% LFL 4% -> 5%

  • Non-residential power (2008 -> 2013):

LFL 37% -> 47% HL 14% -> 20% CFL 10% -> 17% HID 12% -> 12% GLS 27% -> 5% LED 0% -> 0%

MELISA, Power (2), Total installed in EU-28

Residential

slide-78
SLIDE 78

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 78

MELISA Residential 2013:

  • 33 lamps / household
  • 966 W installed / household
  • Average 11 W/m2

Values seem reasonable considering comparison with literature sources

MELISA Power (3), Residential

Source Number of lamps per household Average installed lighting power per household (W) Lighting power density for households (W/m2) MELISA 2013 33 966 11 MELISA 2007 28 1198 MELISA 2000 23 1184 MELISA 1990 21 1062 United Kingdom 2012 34 1362 24 Sweden 2009, houses apartments 55 31 1618 829 13 11 REMODECE 2008 (12 countries) 26 1060 IA 2009, data for 2007 19 JRC, Bertoldi, 2006 22 IEA, 2006 (7 countries) 10 - 40 6 - 16 France 2003 28 1578 15 EURECO 2002 (4 countries) 10 - 24 675 - 883 6 – 9 Delight, 1994-1997 24 GPP Indoor Residential 9 - 11 Residential communal spaces 5 - 6 prEN15193, standard (15 lm/W) 920 - 1380 15 - 17

  • ptimised (60 lm/W)

330 - 535 ≈ 6

Comparison of installed powers for lighting in residential buildings between the MELISA model and various literature sources.

slide-79
SLIDE 79

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 79

MELISA Non-Residential 2013 (exclusive

  • utdoor lighting):
  • Average 8.7 W/m2installed power

(on entire EU-28 heated building area) Value seems reasonable considering comparison with literature sources Large variability in data due to different building types, to different uses of the spaces, and to different degrees

  • f

lighting optimisation. Further research in Lot37 study.

MELISA Power (4), Non-Residential

Comparison of installed power densities (W/m2) for lighting in non-residential buildings between the MELISA model and various literature sources.

Source Room/zone type Lighting power density for non- residential buildings (W/m2) MELISA 2013 Average of all buildings 8.7 EL-Tertiary project 2008 (3 values are 25%, 50%, 75% quartiles) Offices (82) 6 – 13 – 21 Conference rooms (20) 12 – 14 – 18 Classrooms (40) 5 – 8 – 12 Toilets, sanitary (40) 7 – 12 – 18 Circulation areas (108) 4 – 7 – 13 Service, tech, archives (42) 6 – 8 – 12 Gymnasium, sports (14) 6 – 7 – 12 Office buildings (FR,2005) (average of 49 buildings) Entire building, original 19 After proposed improvements 10 Office building (FR,2005) (1 large building) Corridors 15 Offices (ceiling lamps) 13 Entrance hall 7 Conference rooms 32 Offices (desk lamps) 5 IEA, 2006 commercial buildings 15-16 GPP Indoor Various building types 7 - 14 prEN15193-2 Circulation areas 29 (existing), 8 (standard) Personal offices 35-43 (existing), 12-14 (efficient) Conference room 12 (efficient) Open floor office 27 (existing), 11 (efficient) Kitchen in non-residential building 33 (existing), 12 (efficient) Manufacturing hall 34 (existing), 7-13 (efficient)

slide-80
SLIDE 80

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 80

MELISA Lumen (1), Average lamp lumen

Main conclusions:

  • MELISA CFLi lumen seems on the low side (power was also low; are 500 lm GLS replaced by 800 lm CFLi ?)
  • MELISA HL R7s lumen seems low (power was slightly high -> efficacy difference, small impact)
  • MELISA MV-HL lumen seems low (power was also slightly low; lower lumen lamps replaced by LEDs ?)
  • MELISA GLS lumen seems slightly high (power was also slightly high)

Average Flux (lm) LFL CFL HL GLS HID For LEDs see later presentation sheet

T12 T8 halophosphor T8 tri-phosphor T5 new (14 - 80w) including circular All others (including T5 old types 4 - 13w and special FL) Retrofit - CFLi Non-retrofit - CFLni Single ended, mirrored (low voltage) [M16, M25 etc.] Linear (high voltage) [R7s] LV halogen Capsule [G4, GY6.35] HV Halogen capsule [G9] Mains halogen (substitute for GLS and reflector)[E14, E27] Other mains halogen - PAR 16/20/ 25/30 hard glass reflectors, GU10 etc. Reflector GLS (including clear/pearl, candles, coloured & decorative) All mercury lamps (including mixed) All sodium lamps Metal halide lamps

MELISA 2450 2400 2400 2275 1032 523 633 490 3000 490 420 432 420 513 513 10000 13300 13120 CLASP 2013 2450 2400 2352- 2400 2275 1032 617- 632 10000 13300 13500- 14625 VITO 2009 559 392 5177 435 480 (DLS:315) 258 572- 594 GfK/IEA 2013 min-max 2200- 3600 790- 860 430- 630 3800- 4500 430- 630 530-600 380-490

MELISA assumptions on average lamp lumens, compared with CLASP 2013, VITO 2009, GfK/IEA 4E (2013)

slide-81
SLIDE 81

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 81 Non-Residential

  • 1990: 5.6 Tlm; 2013: 10.8 Tlm

(sun, zenith, clear, on same area: 3200 Tlm) In 2013:

  • 37% of lumen installed in residential
  • average 20200 lm/household

(7000 lm CFL, 6700 lm HL)

  • Residential lumen (2008 -> 2013):

CFL 24% -> 34% HL 23% -> 33% LFL 18% -> 18% GLS 35% -> 13% LED 0% -> 2%

  • Non-residential lumen (2008 -> 2013):

LFL 61% -> 63% HID 19% -> 16% CFL 11% -> 15% HL 4% -> 4% GLS 5% -> 1% LED 0% -> 0% Residential 190 lm/m2 Non-Residential 500 lm/m2 see Lot37

(light source level, not task level)

MELISA, Lumen (2), Total in EU-28

Residential

slide-82
SLIDE 82

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 82

MELISA Efficacy

Main conclusions:

  • MELISA CFLi efficacy seems on the low side
  • MELISA HL R7s efficacy seems too low
  • MELISA LV-HL efficacy seems too low; MV-HL seem slightly low
  • MELISA GLS efficacy seems slightly low (less important for future scenarios)

Average Efficacy (lm/W) LFL CFL HL GLS HID For LEDs see later presentation sheet

T12 T8 halophosphor T8 tri-phosphor T5 new (14 - 80w) including circular All others (including T5 old types 4 - 13w and special FL) Retrofit - CFLi Non-retrofit - CFLni Single ended, mirrored (low voltage) [M16, M25 etc.] Linear (high voltage) [R7s] LV halogen Capsule [G4, GY6.35] HV Halogen capsule [G9] Mains halogen (substitute for GLS and reflector)[E14, E27] Other mains halogen - PAR 16/20/ 2 5/30 hard glass reflectors, GU10 etc. Reflector GLS (including clear/pearl, candles, coloured & decorative) All mercury lamps (including mixed) All sodium lamps Metal halide lamps

MELISA 70 75 80 91 86 55 55 14 12 14 12 12 12 9.5 9.5 40 95 82 CLASP 2013 70 75 80-84 91 86 55-65 40 95-110 65-90 VITO 2009 43 10 17 14 12 5 11 GfK/IEA 4E 2013 77-80 89-91 60 70-76 17.8 18.9 17.8 14.2 10.7-11.5

MELISA assumptions on average lamp efficacy, compared with CLASP 2013, VITO 2009, GfK/IEA 4E (2013)

slide-83
SLIDE 83

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 83

MELISA, Power, Lumen, Efficacy of LEDs (1)

LEDs in MELISA for 2013:

  • General for LEDs: 80 lm/W

implies: 6.25 W for 500 lm lamp

  • Basic principle: lumens of LED lamps

should match the lumens of the lamps that they replace + some rebound (‘Lumen-to- Fit’). This gives different values for Residential and Non-Residential, for NDLS and DLS.

  • Lumen-to-Fit / (80 lm/W) -> Watt-to-Fit
  • Efficacy changes with years -> in a given

year the average efficacy of the installed stock is smaller than the average efficacy of the lamps sold in the same year

Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LED General lm/W (for sales in year) 25 30 40 60 80 Watt @ 500 Lm 20.00 16.67 12.50 8.33 6.25 LED-NDLS Residential Use Lumen to Fit (NDLS) 500 550 600 600 600 lm/W (average for stock) 25 28 35 49 68 Watt to Fit (avg. NDLS stock) 20.00 19.37 17.03 12.13 8.83 LED-NDLS Non-Residential Use (incl. LFL replacement) Lumen to Fit (NDLS) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 lm/W (average for stock) 25 30 40 49 76 Watt to Fit (avg. NDLS stock) 72.00 60.00 45.00 36.38 23.58 LED- DLS Residential Use Lumen to Fit (DLS) 600 600 600 600 600 lm/W (average for stock) 25 28 35 47 63 Watt to Fit (avg. DLS stock) 24.00 21.15 17.34 12.83 9.55 LED- DLS Non-Residential Use Lumen to Fit (DLS) 600 600 600 600 600 lm/W (average for stock) 25 30 40 53 74 Watt to Fit (avg. DLS stock) 24.00 20.00 15.00 11.33 8.08

slide-84
SLIDE 84

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 84

MELISA, Power, Lumen, Efficacy of LEDs (2)

Retrofit LED Lamps average estimated wattage (W) Efficacy (lm/W) average estimated lumen Countries AT, BE, FR, DE, UK, IT, NL MAX MIN MAX MIN 2007 1.7 1.2 37.2 62 45 2008 1.6 1.2 40.9 67 48 2009 1.8 1.3 45.5 82 58 2010 2.2 1.7 50.9 114 85 2011 3.2 2.5 57.4 184 141 2012 5.0 3.9 64.9 324 254 2013 6.5 5.2 72.6 473 381 Countries ES, PL 2011 3.6 2.7 57.4 206 158 2012 4.3 3.3 63.7 274 212 2013 5.8 4.6 71.7 419 333 Dedicated LED Lamps average estimated wattage (W) Efficacy (lm/W) average estimated lumen Countries AT, BE, FR, DE, UK, IT, NL MAX MIN MAX MIN 2007 1.6 1.1 46.3 73 52 2008 1.6 1.2 51.0 83 60 2009 1.8 1.3 56.9 105 76 2010 2.4 1.8 63.2 150 112 2011 2.9 2.2 70.6 207 156 2012 4.1 3.1 79.5 327 249 2013 4.9 3.7 88.4 430 330 Countries ES, PL 2011 3.7 2.8 71.5 262 199 2012 3.9 3.0 78.9 311 238 2013 4.8 3.7 88.0 419 322

Derived by study team from GfK/IEA 4E data (RESIDENTIAL)

  • Average LED power, efficacy, and thus

lumen, are rapidly increasing each year

  • Dedicated LED lamps (integrated LED

luminaires) are more efficient than LED retrofit lamps. In 2013:

  • retrofit LED 73 lm/W
  • dedicated LED 88 lm/W

In MELISA Residential for 2013:

  • 80 lm/W
  • > in agreement with GfK/IEA 4E
  • 600 lm, 7.5 W (2013 sales)
  • > high compared to GfK/IEA 4E
  • > LEDs are currently replacing the lower

lumen HL and GLS, while for higher lumen people still buy HL ? Could explain why average lumen for sold HL is higher than expected.

slide-85
SLIDE 85

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 85

MELISA, Operating Hours (1) Residential

MELISA:

  • HL and GLS: 450 h/a
  • LFL and CFLi: 700 h/a
  • LED:

500 h/a

  • Average all types: 492 h/a (2013)

MELISA residential annual operating hours seem reasonable considering literature reference data.

Residential Measurement campaign Operating hours per year United Kingdom 2012 394 Sweden 2009 houses apartments 515 567 REMODECE 2008 average 12 countries nordern countries southern countries France 459 637-752 209-529 295 France 2003 224 EURECO 2002 3 countries (excl. PT) 425 – 576

Reference information from literature:

slide-86
SLIDE 86

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 86

MELISA, Operating Hours (2) Non-Residential

MELISA: HID: 4000 h/a LFL: 2200 h/a CFLni: 1600 h/a CFLi: 500 h/a HL, GLS: 450 h/a Reference information from literature:

Non-Residential Measurement campaign Type of building or room/zone type Operating hours per year EL-Tertiary project 2008 (3 values are 25%, 50%, 75% quartiles) Offices (60) 750 – 850 – 1080 Conference rooms (16) 150 – 200 – 250 Classrooms (20) 480 – 870 – 2000 Toilets, sanitary (32) 150 – 280 - 600 Circulation areas (80) 180 – 800 - 1370 Service, tech, archives (42) 50 -80 -100 Gymnasium, sports (11) 650 – 1350 - 1550 Supermarket (FR, 2001) Entire building 3984 High-school (FR, 2003) Entire building 1018 Office building (FR, 2005) Entire building 2226 IEA 2006 (data 2000) Commercial buildings 1781 Non-Residential Measurement campaign Type of building or room/zone type Operating hours per year Office buildings (FR, 2005) (average of 49 buildings) Single offices 1155 Open offices 2513 Floor lamps near desks 767 Desk lamps 489 Corridors 2740 Stairs 1125 Archives 1053 Printing/copying rooms 1970 Service rooms 1443 Canteens/restaurants 1653 Kitchen zones 538 Conference rooms 530 Sanitary, toilets 669-711 Sanitary, washbasins 1084 Entire building (average) 1383

Difficult to judge if MELISA non-residential average annual operating hours (1360) are reasonable, but corresponds well to FR,2005 average of 49 office buildings (1383). MELISA (2013): LED NDLS: 1500 h/a LED DLS: 984 h/a Average all types (2013): 1360 h/a

slide-87
SLIDE 87

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 87 Non-Residential

  • 1990: 4.7 Th; 2013: 9.3 Th

(9.3 TeraHours ≈ 1 billion years) In 2013:

  • 34% of hours made in residential
  • average 44 lamp-hours/household/day
  • average 1.3 hours/household lamp/day
  • Residential hours (2008 -> 2013):

CFL 31% -> 42% HL 20% -> 35% LFL 8% -> 7% GLS 41% -> 14% LED 0% -> 2%

  • Non-residential hours (2008 -> 2013):

LFL 68% -> 68% CFL 17% -> 22% HID 7% -> 6% HL 3% -> 4% GLS 5% -> 1% LED 0% -> 0% MELISA hours are Full-Power Equivalent Hours

MELISA, Operating Hours (3), EU-28 totals

Residential

slide-88
SLIDE 88

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 88

End of MELISA, Power, Lumen, Efficacy, Hours

Any questions or remarks on this part ?

Next topics of 1st part of Task3: MELISA, Lighting energy consumption Lighting energy cost

slide-89
SLIDE 89

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 89

For non-special lamps (as presented so far): Energy =

Control gear efficiency:

  • 80% (T12, T8 halophosphor)
  • 83% (T5old, other LFL, HID)
  • 91% (T8 triphosphor, T5, CFLni, LED)
  • 94% (HL-LV)
  • 100% (HL-MV, GLS, CFLi)

MELISA, Energy Consumption (1)

Energy of Special Purpose Lamps:

  • as presented in Task 1 report (Scope)
  • without automotive and backlighting
  • estimated 56 TWh in 2013

Energy of Controls and Standby:

  • preliminary rough estimate
  • to be detailed in Lot 37 study
  • estimated 16 TWh in 2013

+

Note: average lamp power does NOT include control gear power, unless integrated in lamp (CFLi)

slide-90
SLIDE 90

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 90 Non-Residential

1990: 276 TWh (225 excl. SPL, Control & SB) 2010: 403 TWh (328 excl. SPL, Control & SB) 2013: 383 TWh (322 excl. SPL, Control & SB) In 2013:

  • 24% of energy used in residential
  • average 467 kWh/household/year

(240 kWh for HL; 120 kWh for GLS)

  • Residential energy (2008 -> 2013):

HL 29% -> 51% GLS 57% -> 26% CFL 8% -> 14% LFL 7% -> 8% LED 0% -> 1%

  • Non-residential energy (excl. SPL, Control &

SB) (2008 -> 2013): LFL 54% -> 58% HID 31% -> 29% CFL 5% -> 7% HL 4% -> 5% GLS 7% -> 1% LED 0% -> 0%

MELISA, Energy Consumption (2)

Residential

slide-91
SLIDE 91

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 91

MELISA, Energy Consumption (3), Residential

Source Annual energy consumption for lighting per household (kWh/hh/year) Lighting energy density for households (kWh/m2) MELISA 2013 467 4.3 MELISA 2007 565 MELISA 2000 553 MELISA 1990 494 United Kingdom 2012 537 10 The Netherlands 2011 464 Sweden 2009, houses apartments 646-937 240-691 6.7 REMODECE 2008 (12 countries) 487 JRC, Bertoldi, 2006 (EU-28) 498 IEA, 2006 (7 countries) 375-775 3.3-9.3 France 2003 354 3.7 EURECO 2002 (4 countries) 375-426 3.3-4.0 France 2000, CIEL 500 Delight, 1994-1997 (19 countries) 569 3.4-12.1

Reference information from literature: MELISA Residential 2013:

  • 467 kWh/household/year
  • 966 W installed / household
  • Average 4.3 kWh/m2

(on entire EU-28 heated residential area) Values seem reasonable considering comparison with literature sources

Comparison of energy consumption for lighting in residential buildings between the MELISA model and various literature sources.

slide-92
SLIDE 92

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 92

MELISA, Energy Consumption (4), Non-Residential

Reference information from literature: MELISA Non-Residential 2013: Average 13.4 kWh/m2 (LENI) (on entire EU-28 heated non-residential area) (not considering Outdoor, SPL, Controls, SB) Comparison of energy consumption for lighting in non-residential buildings between the MELISA model and various literature sources.

Source Building type or Room/zone type Lighting energy density (kWh/m2/year) EL-Tertiary project 2008 (buildings: 2 values are median – average) (rooms: 3 values are 25%, 50%, 75% quartiles) Office buildings (10) 21 - 25 School buildings (11) 5 - 10 Hotel buildings (4) 28 Offices (82) 7 – 20 – 30 Conference rooms (20) 3 – 6 – 9 Classrooms (40) 0 – 4 – 12 Toilets, sanitary (40) 1 – 5 – 25 Circulation areas (108) 4 – 13 – 22 Service, tech, archives (42) 1 – 2 – 7 Gymnasium, sports (14) 1 – 5 – 15 Office buildings (49) (FR, 2005) Average of 49 buildings Original -> Optimised 26.7 -> 17.6 Office building (1) (FR,2005) Entire building (1) Original -> Optimised 28.1 -> 6 IEA, 2006 commercial buildings 27.7 Recent office building (FR,2009) Entire building (1) Original -> Optimised 6.2 -> 3.9 Source Building type or Room/zone type Lighting energy density (kWh/m2/year) IWU (Germany 2014) 93 non-residential buildings 23 (average), 15 (median) 10 public buildings 13 (average), 7 – 24 (range) 140 offices (single & open) 19 50 class rooms 15 13 hotel rooms 12 128 circulation areas 11 prEN15193-2 Circulation areas 26 (existing), 4.3-6.8 (standard) Personal offices 31-39 (existing), 6-13 (efficient) Conference room 10-15 (efficient) Open floor office 58 (existing), 19-23 (efficient) Kitchen in non-residential building 68 (existing), 19-24 (efficient) Manufacturing hall, with roof lights without roof lights 8.5 (existing), 1.8-3.3 (efficient) 132 (existing), 27-51 (efficient)

Large variability in reference values: difficult to judge if MELISA values are reasonable

slide-93
SLIDE 93

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 93

MELISA, Lighting Energy Cost (1)

For residential these prices are based on Eurostat tariff group Dc: “annual consumption

  • f 3 500 kWh among which 1 300 kWh
  • vernight (standard dwelling of 90m²)”.

For non-residential the reference was tariff group Ie: “annual consumption of 2 000 MWh, maximum demand of 500kW and annual load of 4 000 hours”. These tariff group definitions are according to the old (2007) methodology.

Residential prices of electricity (fixed euros 2010), in euros/kWh, incl. VAT

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

0.178 0.188 0.195 0.188 0.188 0.181 0.176 0.173 0.168 0.163

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0.162 0.158 0.156 0.155 0.153 0.153 0.158 0.167 0.169 0.167

2010 2011 2012 2013

0.170 0.177 0.184 0.191

Cost of electricity:

Non-residential prices of electricity (fixed euros 2010), in euros/kWh, excl. VAT

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

0.119 0.119 0.118 0.112 0.110 0.103 0.095 0.092 0.088 0.085

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

0.084 0.083 0.079 0.083 0.082 0.087 0.097 0.099 0.105 0.107

2010 2011 2012 2013

0.106 0.110 0.115 0.119

slide-94
SLIDE 94

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 94 Non-Residential

1990: 32 billion euros 2013: 44 billion euros (0.33% of EU-28 GDP) (excl. SPL, Control & SB) In 2013:

  • 40% of expenses made for residential
  • average 89.3 euros/household/year
  • Residential energy cost (2008 -> 2013):

HL 29% -> 51% GLS 57% -> 26% CFL 8% -> 14% LFL 7% -> 8% LED 0% -> 1%

  • Non-residential energy cost (excl. SPL,

Control & SB) (2008 -> 2013): LFL 54% -> 58% HID 31% -> 29% CFL 5% -> 7% HL 4% -> 5% GLS 7% -> 1% LED 0% -> 0% Residential: almost constant since 1992 Non-residential: increase after 2004

MELISA, Lighting Energy Cost (2)

Residential

slide-95
SLIDE 95

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 95 Non-Residential

Light source Acquisition + Energy cost

1990: 36 billion euros ( 5 acq + 32 nrg) 2013: 55 billion euros (11 acq + 44 nrg) (excl. SPL, Control & SB) In 2013:

  • 43% of expenses made for residential
  • average 117.6 euros/household/year
  • Residential expense (2008 -> 2013):

HL 33% -> 53% GLS 48% -> 20% CFL 13% -> 15% LFL 6% -> 7% LED 0% -> 5%

  • Non-residential expense (excl. SPL, Control

& SB) (2008 -> 2013): LFL 54% -> 57% HID 28% -> 27% CFL 7% -> 8% HL 5% -> 6% GLS 6% -> 1% LED 0% -> 1%

MELISA, Total Consumer Expense

Residential

slide-96
SLIDE 96

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 96

Non-residential buildings: different method to estimate Power, Lumen, Hours and Energy

(work performed in the context of the Lot37 study; NOT in Task 3 report)

  • Report Building Heat Demand (VHK,2014) -> EU-28 heated floor area per type of non-residential building
  • Building areas further subdivided per room/activity types (circulation areas, offices, toilets, ….)
  • Multiplied these areas with corresponding lighting requirement (lux) from EN-12464-1 (indoor lighting)
  • > 3648 Glm at task level

MELISA: 5660 Glm at lamp level (implied average utilization factor of 64% could be reasonable)

  • Multiplied Glm at task level with Pjlx (W/task-lm) values from prEN-15193 (lighting in buildings)

(assumptions on average room index, upward flux fraction, mix of lamp types, MF=0.8, reflections)

  • > 111 GW installed power

MELISA: 106 GW installed power (surprisingly close match)

  • From prEN-15193: Default Potential Operating Hours + estimate of daylight factors + occupancy dependent

factors -> 2200 - 2500 hours (full-power equivalent) MELISA: 1467 hours (are EN-15193 hours too high or MELISA hours too low ??)

Main uncertainty: non-residential operating hours

MELISA, Additional verification

slide-97
SLIDE 97

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 97

  • MELISA input parameters have been verified against data from literature.

In general the input parameters seem reasonable, even if adjustments could be made on some points.

  • MELISA outcomes for the residential sector are compatible with data from literature.
  • MELISA outcomes for the non-residential sector seem reasonable as regards installed power and installed

lighting capacity (lumen).

  • Largest uncertainty are operating hours for the non-residential sector (and consequently energy).
  • The study team explicitly invites the stakeholders to comment on the MELISA model.
  • Following the presented data and the comments from stakeholders the MELISA model will be adjusted

before its use in the scenario analyses of MEErP Task 7.

MELISA, Conclusions

Any questions or remarks on this part ?

slide-98
SLIDE 98

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 98

Task 3 report (Users), survey 2nd part

Heat aspects of lighting Health aspects End-of-Life aspects Dimming

slide-99
SLIDE 99

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 99

  • Light sources emit heat as a by-product → energy-related products for HVAC equipment

(heat produced by lighting must be taken into account when dimensioning such equipment).

  • Energy efficient light sources use less power → emit less heat → impact on HVAC dimensioning.
  • “Internal gain is the space heating contribution of people, pets and energy-using products in the household”.

Heat aspects of Lighting products

  • Total internal heat gain → +2.3 °C on household temperature.
  • Lighting contributes for ≈20% to the ‘internal heat gain’ (2010)
  • If for example 50% decrease in lighting energy use

→ ≈10% on ‘internal heat gain’ → ≈ 0.23˚ C deficit in temperature, to compensate by hea ng

Internal gain in heating season EU 2010 In kWh per residential dwelling, total 2500 kWh

Source: Building Heat Demand report, VHK 2014

slide-100
SLIDE 100

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 100

  • Statements of Stage 6 review report (SCENHIR and SCHER reports) still valid.
  • September 2014, IEA 4E report on health aspects of Solid State Lighting (i.e. LEDs):
  • Electrical safety appropriately addressed by existing safety standards.
  • Human exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by SSL products is not a critical issue.
  • Glare can be a critical issue; recommended to report maximum luminance for finished SSL products.
  • Recommendation: perform a photobiological safety assessment for all SSL devices according to the

existing standards.

  • Manufacturers to report the risk group for their product.
  • Use warning labels in certain cases (make general public iaware of potential risks).
  • IEC 62471 to take into account the sensitivity of certain specific population groups.
  • Particular attention asked for white LEDs based on violet and UV chips: potential for blue light/UV hazard.
  • Unacceptable that there are no clear requirements to limit light flickering.
  • SSL products do not have more negative non-visual effects than other light sources.

However, LED technology → more lighting points → increase in exposure to artificial light.

Health aspects

slide-101
SLIDE 101

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 101

  • Discharge lamps, LEDs, and non-household luminaires covered by Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment

(WEEE) Directive 2012/19/EU -> have to be collected separately.

  • Excluded from the WEEE directive: GLS, HL, household luminaires -> general waste stream.
  • Main concern at end-of-life: avoid mercury contained in FL- and HID-lamps is released to environment.
  • Responsibility for handling of WEEE: producers.
  • Producers finance the collection and treatment of their WEEE.
  • Producers will shift payments to the consumers ('polluter pays’). No cost for tax payer.
  • Cost of collection and recycling of lamps is 25-100% of the cost price of a lamp.

Other WEEE product categories: only a few per cent of the cost price or even a positive value The average collection and recycling fee is 0.14 euros/lamp

(source: Philips).

  • In 2003, European lamp manufacturers decided to found not-for-profit Collection & Recycling Service

Organizations (CRSO’s). Now present in 22 EU member-states. Market share of 75-95%.

End-of-Life aspects (1)

slide-102
SLIDE 102

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 102

  • Eurostat publishes data on WEEE collection and recycling.

Data present gaps: use with caution. As regards lighting:

  • lighting equipment (all except discharge lamps)
  • discharge lamps.
  • Discharge lamps:
  • Fraction recycled or re-used is close to the target of 80% (of the collected items)
  • Fraction collected is around 30%
  • No significant change from 2008 to 2012.
  • Main problem in waste management of discharge lamps seems to be the collection phase.

End-of-Life aspects (2)

slide-103
SLIDE 103

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 103

Heating, Health, End-of-Life

Any questions or remarks ?

Next topic (last): Dimming

slide-104
SLIDE 104

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 104

Relevance in this study: compatibility between light sources and dimmers (other controls) Important to understand some of the backgrounds of the problems (Task 3 report).

Dimming, survey

Importance of dimming and current problems Dimming between Control Gear and LED (PWM, CCR) Dimming between Dimmer and Control Gear (phase-cut, 0-10V, wireless) Power supply for dimmers (2-wire, 3-wire case) How many dimmers in EU-28 will have problems? Dimming curves: what is ‘dimmable’ ? Ongoing standardization work

slide-105
SLIDE 105

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 105

  • Future lighting energy savings expected from:

1- Use of energy efficient light sources: LEDs 2- Daylight dependent and occupancy dependent dimming

  • However, there are still problems related to dimming of LEDs.

→ potential to disturb market introduction of LEDs → potential to slow down the use of LEDs in controlled lighting systems → potential to disturb the further introduction of dimming

  • Now: main problem is the compatibility of LED lighting products with existing control components (dimmers).
  • already installed
  • designed to operate on other types of lamps (incandescent, halogen, fluorescent, HID)
  • those lamps have completely different electrical characteristics than LEDs.

→ characteristics of existing dimmers are a given fact (even if often not well known…..) → design dimmable LED control gears accordingly to guarantee compatibility (as far as possible…..).

  • Future issue: guarantee that any new LED and any new control will operate satisfactorily together.

Development of standards ongoing. Requirements prescribed both for LED control gears and for the dimmers (or other control components).

Dimming (1)

slide-106
SLIDE 106

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 106

Problems encountered with dimming:

  • Flicker (on/off of lamps, at a frequency that is perceived by the consumer).
  • Shimmer (variations in light intensity, at a frequency that is perceived by the consumer).
  • Stroboscopic effects (when objects are moving fast with respect to the light source).
  • Dead travel (changes in dimmer position do not lead to perceived changes in light intensity).
  • Pop-on (raising the dimmer from the off-position, the light suddenly pops on at an unexpected high intensity).
  • Popcorn (different lamps on same dimmer will pop-on at different dimming levels)
  • Drop-out (lowering the dimmer, light suddenly shuts off while consumer expected further intensity decrease,

impossible to reach low dimming levels).

  • Colour change when dimming (this may be desirable or undesirable).
  • Non-linear dimming curve (the (perceived) light intensity does not vary linearly with the dimmer position; this

may be desirable or undesirable).

  • Reduced light intensity at maximum dimmer setting (the consumer does not want to dim, but the emitted light

is (far) less than the rated maximum output of the light source).

  • Noise, buzzing (from the dimmer, the control gear or the lamp itself)
  • Ghosting (the lamp continues to glow in the off-position)
  • Reduced lifetime or abrupt failure of one of the system components (dimmer, control gear or LED-module).
  • Higher energy consumption than expected (low efficiency when lights are on, and/or high standby

consumption).

Dimming (2)

slide-107
SLIDE 107

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 107

Components involved in dimming:

Dimming (3)

Dimmer

Voltage Transformer

Control Gear LED board

Dimming information: Control signals OR Voltage, Current Dimming information: Current Specific problems: see Task 3 report LV-AC MV-AC MV-AC LV-DC

Unlike filament lamps that have some thermal inertia, LEDs react very quickly to presence / absence of current

  • > prone to flicker

Light up only when current in correct direction -> DC The Control gear determines if a LED lamp is dimmable at all, and down to which level (specifically designed). Constant voltage gears (10 V, 12 V, 24 V) OR Constant current gears (350 mA, 700 mA, 1050 mA)

Dimming results from the cooperation of 3 or more components

Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) Constant Current Reduction (CCR) Acting on power supply: Phase-cut dimming (2-wire, 3-wire) Emitting control signals: 0-10 V dimming 4 wire digital control wireless control

slide-108
SLIDE 108

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 108

Dimming (4)

Dimmer Control Gear LED board

Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) Constant Current Reduction (CCR) Maintains current level, switches on/off Ratio on/off -> % dimming

  • High frequency required (otherwise flicker)
  • > high cost when need for low dimming levels
  • Risk stroboscopic effect when fast moving objects
  • More precise, down to 1% (importance for colour mix)
  • Higher EMI risk due to up/down currents
  • May have difficulties in presence of long wires
  • No change in current level -> constant light colour
  • Both for constant voltage or constant current drivers
  • More widely used (at least in USA; in Europe ?)

Reduces current level, constant in time Current level -> % dimming

  • Less risk of flicker
  • Potentially cheaper
  • Suitable in fast moving environments
  • Less precise, dimming level down to 10%
  • Suitable for EMI-sensitive environments
  • Suitable also when long wires gear-to-board
  • Changes current level -> change in CCT (desired ?)
  • Only for constant current drivers
  • More efficient (?) (contrasting information)
slide-109
SLIDE 109

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 109

Dimming (5)

Dimmer Control Gear LED board

Phase-cut, Leading-edge (LE)

Forward phase-, TRIAC- , SCR- , Incandescent dimming

Phase-cut, Trailing-edge (TE)

Reverse phase dimming, ELV dimming

Does NOT transmit part

  • f sine-wave AFTER

zero crossing. Average voltage transmitted varied by conduction angle

  • > dimming level

Does NOT transmit part of sine-wave BEFORE zero crossing. Average voltage transmitted varied by conduction angle

  • > dimming level

Originally developed for filament lamps (resistive load). Later for lamps with magnetic low voltage transformer (resistive/inductive loads). Now some specifically designed to operate LED lamps.

  • Cheapest type of phase-cut dimmer
  • Installed base in Europe 60% (of phase-cut dimmers)
  • Even more widespread in USA

Originally developed for lamps with electronic low voltage (ELV) transformer (capacitive loads). Most LED control gears use ELV-type transformer.

  • More expensive than LE-dimmers
  • Installed base in Europe 30% (Germany, Scandinavia)
  • Better control to lower dimming levels than LE
  • Longer lifetime, less noisy than LE
slide-110
SLIDE 110

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 110

Dimming (6)

Dimmer Control Gear LED board

  • Universal dimmers: capable both of LE phase cut dimming and TE phase cut dimming. Manual or automatic choice

between LE and TE operation. Installed base in Europe ≈ 10% of phase-cut dimmers. More expensive.

  • Sine-wave dimmers: instead of cutting away part of the sine, reduce the amplitude of the sine.
  • 0-10 V analogue control dimming: Power supply is switched (on/off) by the dimmer, but not ‘dimmed’. Instead, the

dimmer sends low-voltage signals to the control gear, varying from 0 V (off), 1 V (minimum light) to 10 V (maximum light) that have to be translated by the control gear in an associated dimming level. This implies a total

  • f 4 wires arriving at the control gear (2 MV power, 2 LV control). Widespread especially in non-residential
  • applications. 0-10 V systems should work with LED retrofit lamps that have drivers able to interpret these signals.

This type of dimming control is defined in IEC standard 60929 Annex E. May have problems if wires are long.

  • 4-wire digital control dimming: Dimmer and Control Gear (and other control components) exchange digital signals
  • ver the low voltage wires. Increased functionality (also colour control, moveable fixtures, individual addressing).

Bi-directional signals: feedback from control gear to dimmer. Communication protocols: DMX, DALI (IEC 62386). Expensive and specific installer and operator knowledge required -> mainly in non-residential applications. Other types of dimmers:

slide-111
SLIDE 111

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 111

Dimming (7)

Dimmer Control Gear LED board

  • Wireless control dimming:
  • Wireless Radio Frequency (RF) technology is increasingly used for the control of LED lighting products.
  • The LED lamps themselves can have built-in RF receivers/transmitters (smart lamps).
  • Alternatively: implement RF transceivers in separate interface devices, using one of the other technologies

(phase-cut dimming, analogue 0-10 V signals, digital signals) to control the dimming of LED lamps.

  • Several RF communication protocols, not compatible with each other → requiring special interfaces, bridges or

gateways to function together.

  • RF used for lighting control may interfere with RF for other applications (e.g. WiFi, Bluetooth). While this is

‘just’ annoying for some applications as mobile phones, the reliability of lighting control can be essential, considering that light can be a life safety system. Other types of dimmers (continued):

slide-112
SLIDE 112

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 112

Dimming (8), Power supply for phase-cut dimmers

  • Control devices such as dimmers, switches, time-clocks and sensors, can be connected to the mains power supply

in a 2-wire configuration or in a 3-wire configuration (figure below).

  • Essentially the difference is if the neutral wire is present at dimmer level.
  • In most European houses the neutral wire is not normally distributed to the controls.
  • The absence of the neutral wire implies that the dimmer has to receive its power supply through the load

(lamp/control gear) and also that it has to sense the phase through this load (i.e. to detect the zero crossings in the sine wave, required for correct phase-cutting).

Lamp + control gear Dimmer

  • r
  • ther

control device Line wire Neutral wire

!

slide-113
SLIDE 113

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 113

Dimming (9), Power supply for phase-cut dimmers

  • Some trailing-edge phase-cut dimmers require neutral wire (3-wire) for acceptable dimming performance →

means pulling an additional wire in most houses.

  • Dimmers that work in the 2-wire configuration, without neutral, have to receive their power supply through the

load, also during the short periods where the phase is cut and the control gear (or lamp alone) is not powered, and also when the control gear/lamp is switched off for longer periods, but the dimmer has to remain in standby.

  • For resistive loads as incandescent and halogen lamps, this does not present particular problems, because at the

current levels needed for the dimmer (less than 50 mA) these lamps will not emit any light.

  • LED lamps however operate at much lower currents, and the current drawn by the dimmer might make the LED

lamp light up even when it is supposed to be switched off. This is called ‘ghosting’.

  • In addition, differently from filament lamps, the small current required by the dimmer will normally not pass

through the LED lamps and control gears, unless special ‘bleeder circuits’ are implemented.

  • 110 - 120 million phase-cut dimmers installed in Europe
  • 75% installed in the residential sector
  • 3% are 3-wire installations; bulk are 2-wire installations → face problem of power supply through load.
  • 80% of the installed base of dimmers will face issues when loaded with new energy saving lamps.

(source: CECAPI)

slide-114
SLIDE 114

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 114

Dimming (10), Dimming curves

 Conduction angle of the phase-cut dimmer

(source: CECAPI)

‘Dead travel’: light intensity does not change when operating dimmer  Measured light output (perceived is different) Linear dimming curve Non-Linear dimming curve ‘Drop-out’, ‘Pop-on’: Some curves disappear at low levels

Can all these lamps be declared ‘dimmable’ ? (definition needed !)

slide-115
SLIDE 115

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 115

Dimming (11), Dimming curves

 Conduction angle of the phase-cut dimmer

(source: CECAPI)

 Measured light output (perceived is different) Conduction angles higher than 130˚ may be difficult to reach by future dimmers. The question is which percentage of the maximum rated light output the lamps should at least emit at this conduction angle. Discussed values currently vary from 75 to 90%. Dimmers usually have a minimum setting that could be a conduction angle of 60˚ for CFLi or 45˚ for LEDi. On some dimmers this minimum may be settable by the user, but anyway it would not be expected to go below 35˚. Here the discussion is on the highest light output that the lamps are allowed to have at this minimum conduction angle. The discussed values are around 20-30% of the maximum rated output.

slide-116
SLIDE 116

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 116

Dimming (12)

LightingEurope and CECAPI: It is impossible to develop (LED) lamps that are compatible with all types of dimmers now installed in Europe. The installed base of dimmers is to disparate and often characteristics are not well known. LED lamp manufacturers:

  • list of dimmers that have been tested to be compatible.

Valuable information, but:

  • disclaimers and warnings: laboratory tests might not correspond to real situation
  • not available for many older dimmer types

In many literature sources it is recommended to test each specific combination dimmer – control gear – LED board; currently it is often a matter of ‘hit and miss’ if dimming will work properly.

slide-117
SLIDE 117

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 117

Dimming (13), Standardisation work

  • Commission mandate 519 → IEC standardization Joint Adhoc Group (JAHG)

(experts on light sources/control gears (TC34) + experts on dimmers (SC23B)).

  • Purpose: prepare technical reports on:
  • “requirements and tests for dimmable LEDs to be used with phase-cut dimmers”
  • “requirements and tests for phase-cut dimmers to be used with dimmable LEDs”.
  • Now: work on Power Supply and Synchronization; other issues still to be handled.
  • Timeline:

June 2015 Technical reports ready 2017/2018 Implementation in standards 2020 First effects on market

  • These efforts should ensure compatibility between new dimmers and new LED lamps that are conform to

the standard.

  • This does NOT imply that these new conform LED lamps will work with all old existing dimmers: there will

still be the risk that consumers have to buy new dimmers.

slide-118
SLIDE 118

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, VHK/VITO for EC 118

Dimming (14), Standardisation work

  • USA, April 2013, NEMA SSL 7A-2013 “Phase Cut Dimming for Solid State Lighting: Basic Compatibility”.
  • deals only with compatibility issues, not with performance issues for dimming.
  • limited to leading-edge phase-cut dimming (by far the most widespread technology in the USA).
  • defines dimming range only from 50% to 80% of maximum light output.
  • CECAPI: American standard would be insufficient for the European situation.
  • IEC SC 77a, WG 1, TF8: new document (77A_847e_DC):
  • manufacturers shall not produce leading-edge dimmers > 100 W for LEDs due to high electromagnetic

disturbances induced by integrated electronic control gear when dimmed in phase cut

  • if dimming is operated in trailing-edge up to 200 W are allowed, due to lesser perturbations.
slide-119
SLIDE 119

5 February 2015 Lot 8/9/19 Ecodesign Light Sources, 1st Stakeholder Meeting - VHK/VITO for EC 119

Ecodesign Preparatory Study Lot 8/9/19 Light Sources

1st Stakeholder Meeting

5 February 2015

Van Holsteijn en Kemna Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek

Thanks for your Attention !

Any questions or remarks ?

slide-120
SLIDE 120

Source: VHK 2011-2015 (own calculation)

slide-121
SLIDE 121

Office lighting, illustrative energy flows. (source VHK)

Based on existing traditional single office with 4 ceiling-based fixtures each containing two 2x36W T8 tri-phosphate linear fluorescent lamps (h=2,7m). Reflectance of ceiling, walls and floor are 0.7, 0.5, 0.3

  • respectively. Manual on/off light switches are used. Office hours are

from 7.00 to 18.00h (250 days/yr.). Figures in the diagram are illustrative, i.e. not necessarily representative of the existing average EU situation. Efficiency electricity generation (including acquisition of energy resources) and electricity distribution to the building are in accordance with the MEErP 2011 indicator (η=40%). ‘Wiring’ indicates the resistive losses in the building wiring plus (negligible, CosPhi=0,96) extra resistive losses caused by the power factor, calculated throughout the whole electricity distribution chain. Lamp losses are taken from [Kane, H., Sell, H., Revolution in lamps, The Fairmont Press, 2001]: ballast (η=90%), electrode losses (η=92%), discharge of non-visible radiation (η=85%), phosphor UV protons lost (η=86%), quantum efficiency at ratio 5.5 eV UV to 2.5 eV visible (η=45%). Lamp output is 80-90 lm/W. Low-cost fixtures with Light Output Ratio (LOR) η=55% are assumed (compare www.olino.org measurements). For ‘over-lighting’, i.e. lighting levels beyond requirement in parts of the office space, the existing lay-out is compared to a single-lamp suspended direct/indirect luminaire (downward flux 70-75%/upward flux 25-30%), one above the workspace (h=ca. 1,4-1,6m) one above meeting area (L-shaped desk h=0,75 m) and a switchable task light in or near the archive- cupboard, resulting in ca. 60% saving. As regards unused opportunities for daylight-contribution, daylight supply factors for Lyon (F) in EN 15193:2007 were taken into account, corrected for ambient (window transmission values, dirt, overhangs, etc.). It is estimated, in line with industry claims for daylight sensor controls, that ca. 30-35% could be saved in an office space with large windows

  • n one wall (common situation). For the occupancy of a single
  • ffice, it is assumed that the ‘building code’ lighting can be

reduced by 30-35%. Controls (daylight sensors, occupancy sensors, dimmers) are not part of the example. If they were included they would reduce unused daylight and non-occupancy lighting, but they also use energy; EN 15193 gives a default electricity use for automatic controls of 5 kWh/m2.yr (if no data are available). Dimmers influence lamp light efficacy (e.g. ca. 70 lm/W at 50% dimmed instead of 80 lm/W undimmed).