e x 2 dx why can t we do
play

e x 2 dx ? Why cant we do Non impeditus ab ulla scientia K. P. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e x 2 dx ? Why cant we do Non impeditus ab ulla scientia K. P. Hart Faculty EEMCS TU Delft Delft, 10 November, 2006: 16:0017:00 e x


  1. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx ? � Why can’t we do Non impeditus ab ulla scientia K. P. Hart Faculty EEMCS TU Delft Delft, 10 November, 2006: 16:00–17:00 e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  2. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities Outline Integration in finite terms 1 Formalizing the question 2 Differential fields Elementary extensions The abstract formulation Applications 3 Liouville’s criterion e − z 2 dz at last � Further examples Sources 4 Technicalities 5 e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  3. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx ’ mean? � What does ‘do � To ‘do’ an (indefinite) integral f ( x ) dx , means to find a formula, F ( x ), however nasty, such that F ′ = f . e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  4. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx ’ mean? � What does ‘do � To ‘do’ an (indefinite) integral f ( x ) dx , means to find a formula, F ( x ), however nasty, such that F ′ = f . What is a formula? e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  5. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx ’ mean? � What does ‘do � To ‘do’ an (indefinite) integral f ( x ) dx , means to find a formula, F ( x ), however nasty, such that F ′ = f . What is a formula? Can we formalize that? e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  6. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx ’ mean? � What does ‘do � To ‘do’ an (indefinite) integral f ( x ) dx , means to find a formula, F ( x ), however nasty, such that F ′ = f . What is a formula? Can we formalize that? e − x 2 dx cannot be done? � How do we then prove that e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  7. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? We recognise a formula when we see one. e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  8. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? We recognise a formula when we see one. e − x 2 dx does not count, because � E.g., Maple’s answer to e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  9. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? We recognise a formula when we see one. e − x 2 dx does not count, because � E.g., Maple’s answer to 1 √ π erf( x ) 2 e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  10. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? We recognise a formula when we see one. e − x 2 dx does not count, because � E.g., Maple’s answer to 1 √ π erf( x ) 2 is simply an abbreviation for ‘a primitive function of e − x 2 ’ e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  11. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? We recognise a formula when we see one. e − x 2 dx does not count, because � E.g., Maple’s answer to 1 √ π erf( x ) 2 is simply an abbreviation for ‘a primitive function of e − x 2 ’ (see Maple’s help facility). e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  12. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? A formula is an expression built up from elementary functions using only e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  13. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? A formula is an expression built up from elementary functions using only addition, multiplication, . . . e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  14. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? A formula is an expression built up from elementary functions using only addition, multiplication, . . . other algebra: roots ’n such e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  15. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? A formula is an expression built up from elementary functions using only addition, multiplication, . . . other algebra: roots ’n such composition of functions e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  16. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities What is a formula? A formula is an expression built up from elementary functions using only addition, multiplication, . . . other algebra: roots ’n such composition of functions Elementary functions: e x , sin x , x , log x , . . . e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  17. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities Can we formalize that? Yes. e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  18. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities Can we formalize that? Yes. Start with C ( z ) the field of (complex) rational functions and add, one at a time, e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  19. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities Can we formalize that? Yes. Start with C ( z ) the field of (complex) rational functions and add, one at a time, algebraic elements e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  20. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities Can we formalize that? Yes. Start with C ( z ) the field of (complex) rational functions and add, one at a time, algebraic elements logarithms e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  21. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities Can we formalize that? Yes. Start with C ( z ) the field of (complex) rational functions and add, one at a time, algebraic elements logarithms exponentials e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  22. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx cannot be done? � How do we then prove that We do not look at all functions that we get in this way and check that their derivatives are not e − x 2 . e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  23. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx cannot be done? � How do we then prove that We do not look at all functions that we get in this way and check that their derivatives are not e − x 2 . We do establish an algebraic condition for a function to have a primitive function that is expressible in terms of elementary functions, as described above. e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  24. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Applications Sources Technicalities e − x 2 dx cannot be done? � How do we then prove that We do not look at all functions that we get in this way and check that their derivatives are not e − x 2 . We do establish an algebraic condition for a function to have a primitive function that is expressible in terms of elementary functions, as described above. We then show that e − x 2 does not satisfy this condition. e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  25. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Differential fields Applications Elementary extensions Sources The abstract formulation Technicalities Outline Integration in finite terms 1 Formalizing the question 2 Differential fields Elementary extensions The abstract formulation Applications 3 Liouville’s criterion e − z 2 dz at last � Further examples Sources 4 Technicalities 5 e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  26. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Differential fields Applications Elementary extensions Sources The abstract formulation Technicalities Definition A differential field is a field F with a derivation , that is, a map D : F → F that satisfies e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  27. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Differential fields Applications Elementary extensions Sources The abstract formulation Technicalities Definition A differential field is a field F with a derivation , that is, a map D : F → F that satisfies D ( a + b ) = D ( a ) + D ( b ) e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

  28. Integration in finite terms Formalizing the question Differential fields Applications Elementary extensions Sources The abstract formulation Technicalities Definition A differential field is a field F with a derivation , that is, a map D : F → F that satisfies D ( a + b ) = D ( a ) + D ( b ) D ( ab ) = D ( a ) b + aD ( b ) e − x 2 dx ? K. P. Hart Why can’t we do R

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend