Duration of Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer Anthony F. Shields, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

duration of adjuvant therapy for colon cancer
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Duration of Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer Anthony F. Shields, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Duration of Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer Anthony F. Shields, M.D., Ph.D. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer Standard therapy after surgery for: Stage III with + nodes


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Duration of Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer

Anthony F. Shields, M.D., Ph.D. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Standard therapy after surgery for:

Stage III with + nodes Stage II with high risk features (T4, obstruction, perforation)

Also considered for:

Stage II without added risk factors Stage IV resected metastatic disease Options: FOLFOX, CAPOX, Capecitabine, 5FU

Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Observed 5-year Survival by TN Category

LL Gunderson, J Clin Oncol, 2010

slide-4
SLIDE 4

MOSAIC 2007: Stage III Adjuvant

  • Study now presented with > 5 years follow-up
  • 6.6% DFS benefit maintained HR = 0.8, p = 0.003

Prob OS 6 years

5FU FOLFOX p Overall 76% 78.6% 0.057 Stage II 86.8% 86.9% 0.996 Stage III 68.6% 73% 0.029

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MOSAIC 2009: Stage III Adjuvant

Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy

  • T. Andre et al., J Clin Oncol, 2009
slide-6
SLIDE 6

12 Weeks of ci 5-FU vs 6 Months

  • f 5-FU/LV

RFS OS

Chau et al., Ann Oncol 2005

5 Year (%) 12 wks Ci 5-FU 6 months 5-FU/ LV HR (95% CI) p-value RFS 73.3 66.7 0.8 (0.62-1.04) p=0.10 OS 75.7 71.5 0.79 (0.61-1.03) p=0.08

Likelihood of ci 5-FU being inferior: P<0.005

N=801

slide-7
SLIDE 7

– SCOT (UK, Denmark, Spain, Australia, Sweden, New Zealand), TOSCA (Italy), Alliance/SWOG 80702 (US, Canada), IDEA France, ACHIEVE (Japan), HORG (Greece)

  • Total of 12,834 patients with stage III disease included in analysis

Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

  • A. Grothey, A.F. Sobrero, A.F. Shields, T. Yoshino, J. Paul, J. Taieb, J. Souglakos, Q. Shi, R. Kerr, R. Labianca,

J.A. Meyerhardt, D. Vernerey, T. Yamanaka, I. Boukovinas, J.P. Meyers, L.A. Renfro, D. Niedzwiecki, T. Watanabe,*

  • V. Torri, M. Saunders, D.J. Sargent,* T. Andre, and T. Iveson
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Study Overview

  • Objective:

Reduce side-effects of therapy without giving up (too much) anti- cancer efficacy of therapy

  • Non-inferiority design:

As agreed upon by patient advocates and oncologists, shorter duration of therapy should not sacrifice more than 12% of benefit of adjuvant therapy In statistical terms: upper 95% confidence interval of Hazard Ratio (HR) of disease free survival (DFS) should not exceed 1.12

Stage III Colon Cancer Patients R

3 months 6 months FOLFOX*

  • r CAPOX*

*Investigator’s choice,

no randomization

12,834 patients

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Non-inferiority Hypothesis Testing

Hazard Ratio 1.12 3m TRT better 6m TRT better Superiority Non-inferiority Not proven Inferiority Piaggio et al. JAMA 2012;308(24):2594-2604 1.0 Non-Inferiority Margin

One-sided Type I Error Rate = 0.025 Power = 90% Require 3390 DFS Events

Statistical Conclusions Under Different Scenarios

TRT: treatment

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Patient Characteristics by Study

Patient Characteristics TOSCA (N=2402) SCOT (N=3983) IDEA France (N=2010) C80702 (N=2440) HORG (N=708) ACHIEVE (N=1291) Median Age, years 64 65 64 61 67 66 ECOG PS* 95% 71% 74% 71% 82% 96% 1 5% 29% 25% 28% 18% 4% T Stage T1-2 13% 12% 12% 18% 8% 15% T3 75% 59% 70% 67% 78% 57% T4 12% 29% 18% 15% 14% 28%

N Stage

N1 73% 69% 75% 73% 67% 74% N2 27% 31% 25% 27% 33% 26%

Chemotherapy CAPOX 35% 67% 10% 0% 58% 75% FOLFOX 65% 33% 90% 100% 42% 25% Median follow-up time, m 62 37 51 35 48 37

*1% of PS 2 in IDEA France and C80702 trials

T4 12% 29% 18% 15% 14% 28%

CAPOX 35% 67% 10% 0% 58% 75%

Median follow-up time, m 62 37 51 35 48 37

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 6424 5446 4464 3000 1609 826 321 6410 5530 4477 3065 1679 873 334

Primary Outcomes Analysis

Duration 3-yr DFS 3m 74.6 % 6m 75.5 %

3-yr DFS diff. = -0.9%, 95% CI, (-2.4 to 0.6%)

N Patients At risk

DFS HR = 1.07 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.15

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Adverse Events

FOLFOX CAPOX

Adverse Events 3m Arm 6m Arm p-value1 3m Arm 6m Arm p-value1

Overall G2 G3-4 32% 38% 32% 57%

<.0001

41% 24% 48% 37%

<.0001

Neurotoxicity

G2 G3-4 14% 3% 32% 16%

<.0001

12% 3% 36% 9%

<.0001

Diarrhea G2 G3-4 11% 5% 13% 7%

<.0001

10% 7% 13% 9%

0.0117

1Chi-squared test for trend; Total of 19 grade 5 events; adverse events only collected on first 617 patients enrolled to SCOT trial

slide-13
SLIDE 13

6 mo 3 mo Average PSN Grade Time from Randomization

Neuropathy (PSN) Time Course: Japanese Study

Ø At 36 mo: Ø Grade 2-3 2.8% in 6 mo arm 0% in 3 mo arm Ø ANY Grade 24.3% in 6 mo arm 9.7% in 3 mo arm

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 M 1 M 2 M 3 M 4 M 5 M 6 M 9 M 1 2 M 1 5 M 1 8 M 2 1 M 2 4 M 2 7 M 3 M 3 3 M 3 6 M

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Analysis of Risk Groups by Regimen

  • Large difference in overall prognosis observed

between (T1-3 N1) and (T4 or N2) cancers – 3 year DFS ∆ 20% ØAnalysis of 3m vs 6m adjuvant therapy for these groups

  • Two different adjuvant regimens used,

FOLFOX and CAPOX – Preplanned analysis of 3m vs 6m based on regimen

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 2554 2219 1903 1175 488 193 30 2517 2222 1844 1185 529 207 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 3870 3227 2561 1825 1121 633 291 3893 3308 2633 1880 1150 666 309

DFS Comparison by Regimen

Duration 3-yr DFS 3m 73.6 % 6m 76.0 %

3-yr DFS diff. = -2.4% 95% CI, (-4.3 to -0.5%)

Duration 3-yr DFS 3m 75.9 % 6m 74.8 %

3-yr DFS diff. = 1.1% 95% CI, (-1.3 to 3.5%)

FOLFOX CAPOX

Interaction p-value = 0.0051

N Pts At risk

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DFS Comparison by Risk Group and Regimen

2308 2030 1669 1215 745 433 203 2311 2013 1642 1198 751 411 195 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 2311 2013 1642 1198 751 411 195 2308 2030 1669 1215 745 433 203 1531 1242 937 648 396 228 103 1523 1189 900 612 360 216 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1523 1189 900 612 360 216 94 1531 1242 937 648 396 228 103 1419 1306 1119 734 336 133 18 1433 1300 1154 736 313 116 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1433 1300 1154 736 313 116 16 1419 1306 1119 734 336 133 18 1091 909 718 446 190 73 7 1111 910 740 432 171 76 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years from Randomization 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Without Event 6 Months 3 Months Duration 1111 910 740 432 171 76 13 1091 909 718 446 190 73 7

T4 or N2 FOLFOX T1-3, N1 FOLFOX T1-3, N1 CAPOX T4 or N2 CAPOX 3 yr DFS, 3 m Rx: -1.6 (-3.8 to 0.6) 3 m Rx: +1.9 (-0.8 to 4.6) 3 m Rx: -3.2 (-6.6 to 0.2) 3 m Rx: 0.1 (-3.9 to 4.1) HIGH RISK LOW RISK

slide-17
SLIDE 17

3 yr DFS rate (%) and HR by Regimen and Risk Group

Regimen

CAPOX FOLFOX CAPOX/FOLFOX Combined 3 yr DFS, % (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

3 yr DFS, % (95% CI) HR

(95% CI)

3 yr DFS, % (95% CI) HR

(95% CI)

3 m 6 m 3 m 6 m 3 m 6 m Risk Group

Low-risk (T1-3 N1) ~60% 85.0 (83.1-86.9) 83.1 (81.1-85.2) 0.85 (0.71-1.01) 81.9 (80.2-83.6) 83.5 (81.9-85.1) 1.10 (0.96-1.26) 83.1 (81.8-84.4) 83.3 (82.1-84.6) 1.01 (0.90-1.12) High-risk (T4 and / or N2) ~40% 64.1 (61.3-67.1) 64.0 (61.2-67.0) 1.02 (0.89-1.17) 61.5 (58.9-64.1) 64.7 (62.2-67.3) 1.20 (1.07-1.35) 62.7 (60.8-64.4) 64.4 (62.6-66.4) 1.12 (1.03-1.23) Risk Groups Combined 75.9 (74.2-77.6) 74.8 (73.1-76.6) 0.95 (0.85-1.06) 73.6 (72.2-75.1) 76.0 (74.6-77.5) 1.16 (1.06-1.26) P-value Interaction Test: Regimen: 0.0051 Risk Group: 0.11

Non-inferior Not Proven Inferior

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Predicted 5-yrs DFS with Surgery Alone, 5FU, Oxaliplatin x 3 or 6 months

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 T 1 N 1 a T 1 N 1 b T 1 N 2 a T 1 N 2 b T 2 N 1 a T 2 N 1 b T 2 N 2 a T 2 N 2 b T 3 N 1 a T 3 N 1 b T 3 N 2 a T 3 N 2 b T 4 N 1 a T 4 N 1 b T 4 N 2 a T 4 N 2 b OXA6 OXa3 Surg+FUFA Surgalone

  • A. Sobrero
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Stage III Colon Cancer Treatment Question 1:

  • For most patients with LOW risk stage III colon cancer (T1-3 N1)

which of the following is your preferred adjuvant treatment regimen?

– 1: FOLFOX for 3 months – 2: FOLFOX for 6 months – 3: CAPOX for 3 months – 4: CAPOX for 6 months

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Stage III Colon Cancer Treatment Question 2:

  • For most patients with HIGH risk stage III colon cancer

(T4 N1-2 or T any N2 ) which of the following is your preferred adjuvant treatment regimen?

– 1: FOLFOX for 3 months – 2: FOLFOX for 6 months – 3: CAPOX for 3 months – 4: CAPOX for 6 months

slide-21
SLIDE 21

If you only had FOLFOX, 3 or 6 months in low risk T1-3 N1? Red X for fighters, Blue X for fatalists

FOLFOX 3 FOLFOX 6 Sobrero I TOSCA X X Cervantes E ESMO X X Grothey US IDEA X X Iveson UK SCOT X X Andre F IDEA FRANCE X X Labianca I TOSCA X X Yoshino J ACHIEVE X X Shields US SWOG X X Souglakos G HORG X X Meyerhardt US Alliance X X Maughan UK

clinical discussant

X X

A Sobrero et al., Ann Oncol, 2018

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Now you are free to decide FOLFOX or CAPOX: What do you advise to high risk? Red X for fighters, Blue X for fatalists

CAPOX 3 FOLFOX 3 CAPOX 6 FOLFOX 6

Sobrero I TOSCA X X Cervantes E ESMO X X Grothey US IDEA X X Iveson UK SCOT X X Andre F IDEA FRANCE X X Labianca I TOSCA X X Yoshino J ACHIEVE X X Shields US SWOG X X Souglakos G HORG X X Meyerhardt US Alliance X X X Maughan UK

clinical discussant

X X X X

A Sobrero et al., Ann Oncol, 2018

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Clinical Decision Making in Stage III Colon Cancer

  • FATALIST

– always 3 months of CAPOX (11/11), even high risk

  • FIGHTERS:

– low risk (T1-3 N1): always 3 months of CAPOX (11/11) – high risk N2: usually 3 months CAPOX (8/11); 6 months (3/11) – high risk T4: usually 6 months CAPOX (8/11) or FOLFOX (2/11); 3 mo (1/11)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Clinical Decision Making Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Roles of Age, Gender, and Performance Status (PS)

  • Cox proportional hazard models used with

IDEA cohort by age (< 70 or > 70), gender, and PS (0 v 1/2)

  • Overall age, gender, and PS didn’t modify the

comparison of 3 v 6m Rx.

  • Subgroups of note:

– Patients < 70 on FOLFOX – High-risk males

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Age and 3 vs. 6 Months

  • f Adjuvant Therapy
  • Age ≤ 70 CAPOX: 3m Rx is as good as 6m
  • Age ≤ 70 FOLFOX: 6m Rx is required
  • Age>70 Either regimen: 6m may be needed

Events/Total HR (3 vs. 6m) 95% CI Pi 2-way Age <=70 FOLFOX 1439/5845 1.16 1.05-1.29 0.0022 CAPOX 917/3759 0.9 0.79-1.03 Age>70 FOLFOX 505/813 1.12 0.94 -1.33 0.701 CAPOX 380/1290 1.19 0.97 – 1.46 AF Shields et al.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Gender and 3 vs. 6 Months

  • f Adjuvant Therapy

Events/Total HR (3 vs. 6m) 95% CI Pi 2-way Male T1-3N1 789/4220 0.94 0.82-1.08 0.015 T4 or N2 1126/2964 1.18 1.05-1.33 Female T1-3N1 523/3247 1.09 (0.91 – 1.29) 0.738 T4 or N2 809/2290 1.04 (0.91 – 1.20) AF Shields et al.

  • Low risk male:, 3m Rx is as good as 6m
  • High risk males: 6m Rx is required
  • Any risk Women: 3m Rx is as good as 6m
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Capecitabine Issues

  • Patients who are poor capecitabine candidates:
  • Unable to swallow pills
  • Concerns about compliance
  • Capecitabine available in 500 mg and 150 mg tablets
  • Do we use only 500 mg tabs?
  • Cost responsibility for patient (5FU vs. capecitabine)
  • Poor renal function (estimated clearance < 30 mL/min)
  • PPI use may interfere with absorption
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Capecitabine Dosing Issues: US vs Other Countries

  • Retrospective analysis of randomized trials with

fluoropyrimidines

  • N=1864 receiving adjuvant treatment
  • Overall grade 3/4 AEs RR 1.47 in US vs. non-US
  • CAPOX Grade 3/4 GI (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting,

stomatitis) – 37% in US; 23% rest of the world

  • D. Haller et al., J Clin Oncol 2008

Suggest start Capecitabine 1500 – 1700 mg/m2/d

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Stage III Colon Cancer Treatment Summary

  • IDEA data provides a framework for discussions on risks and

benefits of individualized adjuvant therapy approaches

  • Shorter duration of therapy associated with remarkable

reduction in (neuro)toxicity

  • For low-risk cancers (~60% of stage III) 3 months duration of
  • xaliplatin-based therapy is adequate
  • Yet unexplained finding that shorter duration of CAPOX is

adequate, whereas for FOLFOX a longer duration might be required, in particular, in high-risk cancers

  • The roles of age and gender, along with tumor size and other

factors need further examination

slide-31
SLIDE 31