duality for the logic of quantum actions
play

Duality for the logic of quantum actions Jort Martinus Bergfeld - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Duality for the logic of quantum actions Jort Martinus Bergfeld Joint work with: A. Baltag, K. Kishida, J. Sack, S. Smets, S. Zhong Institute for logic, language and computation Universiteit van Amsterdam Saturday 30 November 2013 Whither


  1. Duality for the logic of quantum actions Jort Martinus Bergfeld Joint work with: A. Baltag, K. Kishida, J. Sack, S. Smets, S. Zhong Institute for logic, language and computation Universiteit van Amsterdam Saturday 30 November 2013 Whither Quantum Structures? J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 1 / 19

  2. Two approaches Piron lattices s Q ? P ? u t Dynamic quantum frames J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 2 / 19

  3. Two approaches Piron lattices ◮ Algebraic approach ◮ Every Piron lattice (with rank ≥ 4) is realizable by a generalized Hilbert space. s Q ? P ? u t Dynamic quantum frames J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 2 / 19

  4. Two approaches Piron lattices ◮ Algebraic approach ◮ Every Piron lattice (with rank ≥ 4) is realizable by a generalized Hilbert space. s Q ? P ? u t Dynamic quantum frames ◮ Spatial approach ◮ Based on Propositional Dynamic Logic J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 2 / 19

  5. Duality A category consists of objects and morphisms Dynamic Quantum Frame Piron Lattice Σ 1 L 1 f h Σ 2 L 2 J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 3 / 19

  6. Duality A category consists of objects and morphisms A functor acts on objects and morphisms F Dynamic Quantum Frame Piron Lattice Σ 1 L 1 f h Σ 2 L 2 G J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 3 / 19

  7. Duality A category consists of objects and morphisms A functor acts on objects and morphisms A duality means: G ◦ F ≃ Id DQF F ◦ G ≃ Id PL F Dynamic Quantum Frame Piron Lattice Σ 1 L 1 f h Σ 2 L 2 G J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 3 / 19

  8. Duality A category consists of objects and morphisms A functor acts on objects and morphisms A duality means: G ◦ F ≃ Id DQF F ◦ G ≃ Id PL F Dynamic Quantum Frame Piron Lattice Σ 1 P Σ 1 L 1 ⇐ ⇒ ⇐ ⇒ f − 1 f h Σ 2 P Σ 2 L 2 G J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 3 / 19

  9. References A. Baltag and S. Smets (2005), “Complete Axiomatization for Quantum Actions”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44 , 2267–2282. B. Coecke and D. Moore (2000), “Operational Galois Adjunction”, in B. Coecke, et al., eds., Current Research in Operational Quantum Logic , pp. 195–218, Kluwer. B. Coecke and I. Stubbe (2000), “State Transitions as Morphisms for Complete Lattices”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39 , 601–610. C.-A. Faure and A. Frölicher (1995), “Dualities for Infinite- Dimensional Projective Geometries”, Geom. Ded. 56 , 225–236. D. Moore (1995), “Categories of Representations of Physical Systems”, Helvetia Physica Acta 68 , 658–678. C. Piron (1976), Foundations of Quantum Physics , W. A. Benjamin. I. Stubbe and B. Van Steirteghem (2007), “Propositional Systems, Hilbert Lattices and Generalized Hilbert Spaces”, in K. Engesser, et al., eds., Handbook of Quantum Logic and Quantum Structures: Quantum Structures , Elsevier, pp. 477–524. J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 4 / 19

  10. Outline Introduction 1 Piron lattices 2 PL-morphisms Dynamic Quantum Frames 3 DQF-morphisms Duality 4 J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 5 / 19

  11. Outline Introduction 1 Piron lattices 2 PL-morphisms Dynamic Quantum Frames 3 DQF-morphisms Duality 4 J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 6 / 19

  12. Piron lattices A Piron lattice L = ( L , ≤ , ( · ) ′ , 0 , 1 ) is a complete, orthomodular, atomic and irreducible lattice satisfying the covering law. J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 7 / 19

  13. Piron lattices A Piron lattice L = ( L , ≤ , ( · ) ′ , 0 , 1 ) is a complete, orthomodular, atomic and irreducible lattice satisfying the covering law. ⇒ � X ∈ L complete: X ⊆ L = J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 7 / 19

  14. Piron lattices A Piron lattice L = ( L , ≤ , ( · ) ′ , 0 , 1 ) is a complete, orthomodular, atomic and irreducible lattice satisfying the covering law. ⇒ � X ∈ L complete: X ⊆ L = atomic: for all p > 0 there exists an atom a such that a ≤ p Definition a � = 0 is an atom if for all p ≤ a we have p = 0 or p = a . J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 7 / 19

  15. Piron lattices A Piron lattice L = ( L , ≤ , ( · ) ′ , 0 , 1 ) is a complete, orthomodular, atomic and irreducible lattice satisfying the covering law. ⇒ � X ∈ L complete: X ⊆ L = atomic: for all p > 0 there exists an atom a such that a ≤ p orthomodular: there is an orthocomplementation ( · ) ′ such that ( p ′ ) ′ = p 1 p ∧ p ′ = 0 and p ∨ p ′ = 1 2 ⇒ q ′ ≤ p ′ p ≤ q = 3 ⇒ q ∧ ( q ′ ∨ p ) = p weakly modular: p ≤ q = 4 J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 7 / 19

  16. Piron lattices A Piron lattice L = ( L , ≤ , ( · ) ′ , 0 , 1 ) is a complete, orthomodular, atomic and irreducible lattice satisfying the covering law. ⇒ � X ∈ L complete: X ⊆ L = atomic: for all p > 0 there exists an atom a such that a ≤ p orthomodular: there is an orthocomplementation ( · ) ′ such that ( p ′ ) ′ = p 1 p ∧ p ′ = 0 and p ∨ p ′ = 1 2 ⇒ q ′ ≤ p ′ p ≤ q = 3 ⇒ q ∧ ( q ′ ∨ p ) = p weakly modular: p ≤ q = 4 covering law: if a is an atom and p a proposition such that a ∧ p = 0, then ( a ∨ p ) ∧ p ′ is an atom J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 7 / 19

  17. Piron lattices A Piron lattice L = ( L , ≤ , ( · ) ′ , 0 , 1 ) is a complete, orthomodular, atomic and irreducible lattice satisfying the covering law. ⇒ � X ∈ L complete: X ⊆ L = atomic: for all p > 0 there exists an atom a such that a ≤ p orthomodular: there is an orthocomplementation ( · ) ′ such that ( p ′ ) ′ = p 1 p ∧ p ′ = 0 and p ∨ p ′ = 1 2 ⇒ q ′ ≤ p ′ p ≤ q = 3 ⇒ q ∧ ( q ′ ∨ p ) = p weakly modular: p ≤ q = 4 covering law: if a is an atom and p a proposition such that a ∧ p = 0, then ( a ∨ p ) ∧ p ′ is an atom irreducible if a 1 � = a 2 , then there exists an a 3 such that a 1 � = a 3 � = a 2 and a 1 ∨ a 2 = a 1 ∨ a 3 = a 2 ∨ a 3 J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 7 / 19

  18. Piron lattices A Piron lattice L = ( L , ≤ , ( · ) ′ , 0 , 1 ) is a complete, orthomodular, atomic and irreducible lattice satisfying the covering law. ⇒ � X ∈ L complete: X ⊆ L = atomic: for all p > 0 there exists an atom a such that a ≤ p orthomodular: there is an orthocomplementation ( · ) ′ such that ( p ′ ) ′ = p 1 p ∧ p ′ = 0 and p ∨ p ′ = 1 2 ⇒ q ′ ≤ p ′ p ≤ q = 3 ⇒ q ∧ ( q ′ ∨ p ) = p weakly modular: p ≤ q = 4 covering law: if a is an atom and p a proposition such that a ∧ p = 0, then ( a ∨ p ) ∧ p ′ is an atom irreducible if a 1 � = a 2 , then there exists an a 3 such that a 1 � = a 3 � = a 2 and a 1 ∨ a 2 = a 1 ∨ a 3 = a 2 ∨ a 3 J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 7 / 19

  19. Piron Lattice morphism Given two Piron lattices L 1 = ( L 1 , ≤ 1 , ( · ) ′ ) and L 2 = ( L 2 , ≤ 2 , ( · ) ∗ ) , a PL-morphism is a function h : L 1 → L 2 such that h ( � S ) = � p ∈ S h ( s ) for all S ⊆ L 1 . h ( p ′ ) = h ( p ) ∗ for all atoms b ∈ L 2 there exists an atom a ∈ L 1 such that b ≤ h ( a ) . J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 8 / 19

  20. Outline Introduction 1 Piron lattices 2 PL-morphisms Dynamic Quantum Frames 3 DQF-morphisms Duality 4 J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 9 / 19

  21. Dynamic quantum frame A dynamic quantum frame is a tuple F = (Σ , { P ? − →} P ∈L ) with: Σ a set of states L ⊆ P (Σ) a set of testable properties P ? − → represent projections that satisfies the following properties: J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 10 / 19

  22. Dynamic quantum frame A dynamic quantum frame is a tuple F = (Σ , { P ? − →} P ∈L ) with: Σ a set of states L ⊆ P (Σ) a set of testable properties P ? − → represent projections P ? → := � − → is non-orthogonality L that satisfies the following properties: J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 10 / 19

  23. Dynamic quantum frame A dynamic quantum frame is a tuple F = (Σ , { P ? − →} P ∈L ) with: Σ a set of states L ⊆ P (Σ) a set of testable properties P ? − → represent projections P ? → := � − → is non-orthogonality L ∼ P := { s ∈ Σ : s � t for all t ∈ P } that satisfies the following properties: J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 10 / 19

  24. Dynamic quantum frames intersection: if X ⊆ L , then � X ∈ L orthocomplement: if P ∈ L , then ∼ P ∈ L J.M. Bergfeld (ILLC) Duality for the logic of quantum actions 30 November ’13 11 / 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend