Drivetrains of conventional and electric vehicles Auke Hoekstra - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

drivetrains of conventional and electric vehicles
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Drivetrains of conventional and electric vehicles Auke Hoekstra - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Drivetrains of conventional and electric vehicles Auke Hoekstra - Senior Advisor Electric Mobility, Eindhoven University of Technology @aukehoekstra SparkCity.org Internal Combustion Engine Global warming Particulate matter (PM)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Drivetrains of conventional and electric vehicles

Auke Hoekstra - Senior Advisor Electric Mobility, Eindhoven University of Technology @aukehoekstra – SparkCity.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Internal Combustion Engine

  • Global warming
  • Particulate matter (PM)
  • 75% of energy lost
  • Noise pollution
  • Motor is heavy and expensive
  • Lots of maintenance required
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Biofuel is inefficient compared to EVs

Photosynthesis 0,38% Refining, transport and fuelling 0,16% ICE & car 0,03%

100% 100%

PV 20% Transport + charge 17% EV 14%

Image source: Auke Hoekstra

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV)

  • Electric motor is not only used

to start the gasoline engine but also to support it at short stops and low speeds

  • Less brake wear and other

maintenance.

  • Up to 20% fuel savings.
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV)

Advantages

  • Range not limited by the battery
  • Most energy can come from

electricity with relatively small (<100 km range) battery Disadvantages compared to FEV

  • Drive train cost and maintenance
  • Less energy and emission savings
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Full Electric Vehicle (FEV)

  • Electricity only power source
  • Runs entirely on cheap, small

and efficient electric motor

  • Low maintenance
  • One pedal driving with

regeneration

  • Big battery for long range
  • Fast charging capability
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Full Electric Vehicle (FEV) cost comparison

Cost type Gasoline FEV 2000 FEV 2030 Drive train $15k $20 $5 Battery $0 $100k $10k Fuel $17k – 40k $6k – 10k $6k – 10k Maintenance $18k $12k $6k Total $50k – 73k DISADVANTAGE $65K – 92K ADVANTAGE $19K – 46K

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Full Electric Trucks (like the Tesla Semi)

  • Bullet

Image source: Wikipedia

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Full Electric Trucks (like the Tesla Semi)

  • More energy use means bigger

cost savings

  • More TCO focus means quicker

adoption

  • My prediction: electric heavy

truck adoption will be faster than normal car adoption

  • But only if we roll out fast-

charging infrastructure

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Full Electric Trucks: economics

Information source: http://bit.ly/eTrucksblog

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (FCEV)

  • Electric vehicle with hydrogen

range extender

  • Small battery but long range
  • Refuelling is very fast
  • Efficiency is lower than FEV
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Hydrogen is inefficient compared to EVs

Image source: Auke Hoekstra

Transport & charging 17% left Full EV 14% left Electrolysis 16% left Compression & distribution 12% left Fuel cell 7% left Hydrogen EV 5% left 20% 20%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (FCEV)

  • Electric vehicle with hydrogen

range extender

  • Small battery but long range
  • Refuelling is very fast
  • Efficiency is lower than FEV
  • Future depends on price

developments in fuel cells, storage and electrolysis

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • Hybrids are more complex than both ICE and FEV
  • Possible that we skip PHEVs and go directly for FEV
  • The internal combustion engine is on the way out
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thank you for your attention