French supervisor: Emmanuel de Langre
(LadHyX, Ecole Polytechnique)
- UK supervisor: Nigel Peake
Drag reduction by elastic reconfiguration Tristan Leclercq French - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Drag reduction by elastic reconfiguration Tristan Leclercq French supervisor: Emmanuel de Langre (LadHyX, Ecole Polytechnique) UK supervisor: Nigel Peake (DAMTP, University of Cambridge) The Oak and the Reed [...] the winds for me
French supervisor: Emmanuel de Langre
2
Jean de La Fontaine (1668)
“[...] the winds for me Are much less dangerous than for thee; I bend, but do not break.You have until now Against their terrible strikes Resisted without bowing your head. But let’s just wait till the end.” The wind redoubled his efforts So that finally it uprooted The oak whose head was reaching heavens And roots were touching the realms of the deads.
3
Flexibility correlated to the magnitude of the flow forces
4
1.
2.
3.
5
1.
2.
3.
6
Denny, M., & Cowen, B. J. Exp. Biol., 1997. Vogel, S. J. Exp. Bot., 1989.
Static drag reduction by reconfiguration
7
Vogel, S. J. Exp. Bot., 1989.
Static drag reduction by reconfiguration
8
Vogel, S. J. Exp. Bot., 1989.
Static drag reduction by reconfiguration
9
Vogel, S. J. Exp. Bot., 1989.
drag force F flow velocity U flexible rigid Frigid Fflexible
Static drag reduction by reconfiguration
10
Gosselin et al., JFM, 2010.
increasing U
Cantilever flat plate, transverse flow
Static drag reduction by reconfiguration
Steady flow
11
Does the self-induced dynamics prevent drag reduction by reconfiguration?
Tadrist et al., JFS, 2015 Gosselin et al., JFM, 2010.
Static drag reduction by reconfiguration
12
1.
2.
3.
13
Cantilever, slender, flat plate Clamped transverse to the uniform, steady flow D<<W<<L
x z y D W L
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
14
Deflection in the xz-plane 2D Euler-Bernoulli beam
Bending stiffness EI Lineic mass m
x z L reconfiguration
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
15 Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
16
Local models of flow forces
Resistive drag
x z s τ n
θ Relative velocity Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
17
Local models of flow forces
Resistive drag Reactive force
Relative velocity Added mass Curvature x z s τ n
θ Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
18
Cauchy number
resistive drag / restoring bending stiffness
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
19
Cauchy number
resistive drag / restoring bending stiffness
increasing
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
20
Cauchy number
resistive drag / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
21
Cauchy number
resistive drag / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
22
Cauchy number
resistive drag / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
23
Reduced velocity
reactive (added mass) force / restoring bending stiffness
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
24
Reduced velocity
reactive (added mass) force / restoring bending stiffness
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
25
Reduced velocity
reactive (added mass) force / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
26
Reduced velocity
reactive (added mass) force / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
27
Reduced velocity
reactive (added mass) force / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
Redundant flow parameters
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
28
Reduced velocity
reactive (added mass) force / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
added mass / total moving mass
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
29
Reduced velocity
reactive (added mass) force / restoring bending stiffness
resistive drag / reactive (added mass) force
added mass / total moving mass
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
30
Stable equilibrium:
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
31
Periodic limit cycle:
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
32
Periodic limit cycle:
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
33
Chaotic motion:
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
34
Chaotic motion:
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
Stable static equilibrium Periodic flapping Chaotic flapping
35 Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
Drag in the different regimes compared to rigid case ? Increasing flow velocity
36 Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
37 Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
STABLE UNSTABLE
38 Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
STABLE CHAOTIC PERIODIC
39 Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
STABLE CHAOTIC PERIODIC
40
Magnification of drag during « snapping » events
Short duration Rare Random
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
41
Flutter enhances the drag compared to static equilibrium Drag still drastically reduced by flexibility on average Magnification of drag due to flexibility during short,
Larger mass ratio or slenderness stabilizes the system
Larger domain of stability for the static reconfiguration Smaller amplitude of flapping Larger domain of periodic limit cycle
Self-induced dynamics in steady flow
42
1.
2.
3.
43
Uniform oscillatory flow
x z L
A
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
44
Uniform oscillatory flow
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
45
Uniform oscillatory flow
Neutrally buoyant flat plate
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
46
Uniform oscillatory flow
Neutrally buoyant flat plate
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
47
Uniform oscillatory flow
Neutrally buoyant flat plate
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
48
Uniform oscillatory flow
Neutrally buoyant flat plate
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 49
Mass ratio fixed
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 50
Mass ratio fixed Slenderness
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 51
Mass ratio fixed Slenderness Flow parameters
Amplitude L A
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 52
Mass ratio fixed Slenderness Flow parameters
Amplitude Frequency
53
Neglect geometrical non-linearities
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
x z L A
54
Neglect geometrical non-linearities
x z L A
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
55
Neglect geometrical non-linearities
x z L A
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Keulegan-Carpenter structural linear oscillator added mass resistive drag
56
Very small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
57
Very small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
58
Very small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
59
Moderately small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
60
Moderately small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
61
Moderately small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
62
Moderately small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
63
Moderately small amplitude
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 64
Geometric saturation
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 65
Geometric saturation
Reversal time
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 66
Geometric saturation
Reversal time Quasi-static reconfiguration out of reversal
A << W : modal regime
Inertia-dominated regime Linear oscillator response
W << A << L : convective regime
Drag-dominated regime Convection with the fluid particles + elastic BL
L << A : saturated regime
Drag-dominated regime Reversal time + QS reconfiguration
67 Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Drag in the different regimes compared to rigid case ? Increasing flow amplitude
68
Modal regime
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
69
Modal regime
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
70
Modal regime
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
71
Modal regime
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Convective regime
72 Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Convective regime
73 Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Convective regime
74 Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Convective regime
75 Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 76
Flow magnitude is minimum around reversal Maximum force is in the QS regime
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 77
Quasi-static reconfiguration out of reversal
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 78
Quasi-static reconfiguration out of reversal
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 79
Quasi-static reconfiguration out of reversal
Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow 80
Quasi-static reconfiguration out of reversal
81 Magnification of drag due to flexibility in the modal regime, at the resonances Drag proportional to characteristic bending length
Rigid case:
structural length
Modal regime:
wavelength
Convective regime:
boundary layer thickness
Saturated (or quasi-static) regime:
bending length Dynamic reconfiguration in oscillating flow
Increasing flow amplitude
82