Dr M F Ishiyaku Researcher Making Crosses Inside Containment - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dr m f ishiyaku
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dr M F Ishiyaku Researcher Making Crosses Inside Containment - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dr M F Ishiyaku Researcher Making Crosses Inside Containment Facility Hybrid Pod of 709A & 499 Marker for Selecting presence of Bt in leaf samples Multilocation Evaluations Conducted at Bakura, Minjibir & Samaru (2013-2015) Selected


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dr M F Ishiyaku

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Researcher Making Crosses Inside Containment Facility

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Hybrid Pod of 709A & 499

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Marker for Selecting presence of Bt in leaf samples

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Multilocation Evaluations Conducted at Bakura, Minjibir & Samaru (2013-2015) Selected most Elite lines IT97KT & IT93KT NTO, EIA Trials

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

FARMER-MANAGED TRIAL IN CFF

Dr M F Ishiyaku

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FARMER-MANAGED TRIAL

❑ LOCATIONS: SAMARU, BAKURA & MINJIBIR ❑ FARMERS: SIX IN EACH LOCATION ❑ EACH FARMER: TESTS LOCAL, TRANSGENIC & NON TRANSGENIC ❑ EACH FARMER APPLY TWO INSECTICIDE SPRAYS ONLY ❑ EACH FARMER MANAGES CROP THEIR WAY

Dr M F Ishiyaku

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dr M F Ishiyaku

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Dr M F Ishiyaku

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Dr M F Ishiyaku

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Product Development: farmers-managed confined trials 6 farmers per sites Conducted the trial

in RCBD

Farmers constitute

the blocks

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Product Development: farmers-managed confined trials 6 farmers per sites Conducted the trial

in RCBD

Farmers constitute

the blocks

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Product Development: farmers-managed confined trials

Farmers’ ranking of the Cowpea varieties in Minjibir, Nigeria, 2017; percentage of farmers per rank and per variety

Varieties Rank IT97KT Sampe Local (check) 1 61.1 27.8 11.1 2 33.3 47.2 19.4 3 5.6 25.0 69.4 Farmers: n=36 Ranking scale (1-3): 1=most preferred 3=least preferred

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Product Development: farmers-managed confined trials

Farmers’ ranking of the Cowpea varieties in Zaria, Nigeria, 2017; percentage of farmers per rank and per variety

Varieties Rank IT97KT Sampea Local (check) 1 63.9 22.2 13.9 2 36.1 38.9 25.0 3 0.0 38.9 61.1 Farmers: n=36 Ranking scale (1-3): 1=most preferred, 3=least preferred

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Product Development: farmers-managed confined trials

Farmers’ ranking of the Cowpea varieties in Bakura, Nigeria, 2017; percentage of farmers per rank and per variety

Varieties Rank IT97KT Sampea Local (check) 1 63.8 22.2 16.7 2 30.6 41.7 25.0 3 5.6 36.1 58.3 Farmers: n=36 Ranking scale (1-3): 1=most preferred 3=least preferred

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Endorsed the PBR test lines

▪ Relative high yield under fewer sprays ▪ Earliness ▪ Quality ▪ Relative low cost of production

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Multiplication: Nucleus Material of Purified Seeds

slide-19
SLIDE 19

IS PBR COWPEA SAFE TO THE ENVIRONMENT? SAFE AS FOOD/FEED

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Distribution of non-target insects on Bt, non-Bt and wild cowpea under insecticide sprays and no sprays tested in Zaria, 2014

Line Insects Treatment L Beetle 1 L Beetle 2 Bees Spittle bug Locust Maruca Bt Insectic 7.3 2.3 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 Non Bt Insectic 9.5 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.3 Wild Insectic 6.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 3.0 Bt Water 8.8 2.3 0.3 0.8 0.3 Non Bt Water 10.3 1.3 2.0 0,3 16.5 Wild Water 6.8 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.8 34.4

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Harvested and cleared portion planted to Bt Cowpea Fallow for 6 years

Dr M F Ishiyaku

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Proximate: Grains, Leaves and fodder

▪ No significant difference between GM and non-GM (P >0.1)

Mineral Composition

▪ No significant difference between GM and non-GM (P> 0.1)

Phytic acid

▪ No significant difference between GM and non-GM (P> 0.7) ▪ The gene is not similar to any gene(s) known to cause

allergenicity

▪ Gene has long history of safe use in many crops (over 20

years)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

At least 20% yield increase per

  • hectare. Translates to forty-eight

billion naira (N48,000, 000,000.0) annually @ N120,000.0 per tonne

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Reduction of Insecticide spray requirement from 6-8 litre per hectare to 2-3 litre per hectare @ N1200.0 per litre = N5400.0 reduction in production cost per hectare planted with PBR Cowpea, if of the 3million hectares 1million is planted to PBR Cowpea the savings from cost of insecticide is sixteen billion and two hundred million naira (N16,200, 000,000.0) annually

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Healthier environment from reduced insecticide spray-Beneficial Insects and other

  • rganisms in the ecosystem

Reduced human health risk-more productive farming population

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Applications-Accreditation of Facilities Application-Confinement of transgene Application-Containment-Introgression Application-Multilocation Confinement Application-Farmer Confined Evaluation Application-Deregulation = Release

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Development of farmer-type Bt Cowpea accomplished in full compliance with regulatory requirement The Bt gene bred into Cowpea is very efficacious against Maruca Pod borer Farmer assessment of the new PBR variety reveals endorsement among participating farmers due to its benefits Over 48 Billion naira gain will be made by planting 1 out of every 3 hectares of cowpea as Bt Cowpea in Nigeria

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Thank you!!!