Developing monitoring techniques and management tools to understand - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

developing monitoring techniques and management tools to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Developing monitoring techniques and management tools to understand - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Developing monitoring techniques and management tools to understand the conflict between the blue crab ( Callinectes sapidus ) fishery and diamondback terrapin ( Malaclemys terrapin macrospilota ) populations in Florida Ryan Gandy , Eric Suarez


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ryan Gandy , Eric Suarez and Bill Turner

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research institute Saint Petersburg, Florida

Developing monitoring techniques and management tools to understand the conflict between the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) fishery and diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin macrospilota) populations in Florida

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Investigation into the interaction between terrapins and blue crab traps in Florida

2011

  • Investigated the interaction between blue crab traps

and a known terrapin colony on Lanark Reef.

  • Developed search methodologies, standardized to

habitat, for terrapin population assessments.

  • Developed terrapin ‘hot spot’ maps for management

and targeted research.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Investigate the interaction between blue crab traps and a known terrapin colony on Lanark Reef

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introducing the TUBA trap

Terrapin/Crab Trap Interactions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methodology

Fall Trapping Study

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fall Results

 0 terrapins in 930 trap days  187 terrapins captured by hand on the island during this

time

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methodology

Spring Trapping Study

 Submerged Traps

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Methodology

Spring Trapping Study

 Intertidal traps  Placed in vegetation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results

Submerged traps

 2 terrapins in 1995 trap days  First female (104 mm CL)  44 m from shore in 1.83 m water depth  Second female (120 mm CL)  136 m from shore in 1.71 m water depth

Intertidal traps

 65 terrapins in 330 trap days

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Discussion

Submerged Traps

 It is rare for Terrapins at Lanark Reef to enter crab

traps, which was unexpected.

 Habitat type, trap type, crab trapping history

may be a factor.

Intertidal Traps

 Catch of terrapins in traps set in the vegetated

intertidal zone was high.

 This is not a zone where crab traps are placed for

fishing.

 Ghost pots that wash up onto intertidal areas

can potentially be harmful to terrapin populations.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Developed search methodologies, standardized to habitat, for terrapin population assessments

Search Methods

 Tide Levels  Low  Medium  High  Weather Patterns  Clear  Partly Cloudy  Cloudy  Habitat Types  Open sand  Water near shore  Vegetation  Vegetation with

tidal wrack

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results

Tide Total Captures Man Minutes CPUE Low 273 1020 0.27 (1 terrapin every 3.7 minutes) Medium 107 540 0.20 (1 terrapin every 5.0 minutes) High 126 900 0.14 (1 terrapin every 7.1 minutes)

 Kruskal-Wallis Test – H=5.94, DF=2, p = 0.05

A B B

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results

Weather Total Captures Man Minutes CPUE Clear 215 900 0.24 (1 terrapin every 4.2 minutes) Partly Cloudy 191 600 0.33 (1 terrapin every 3.1 minutes) Cloudy 100 760 0.13 (1 terrapin every 7.6 minutes)

 Kruskal-Wallis Test – H=18.62, DF=2, p<0.001

A B A

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results

Habitat Total Captures Open Sand Open water near shore 1 Vegetation 147 Vegetation with tidal wrack 353

 Chi-square test: X2 = 84.87, p < 0.001

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Discussion

Best time to search for terrapin’s is during low tide

  • n clear or partly cloudy days.

Terrapins used habitat associated with some form

  • f vegetative structure

 Primary prey plentiful within vegetation  Escape from heat  Escape from predators

Very difficult to compare technique to other studies.

 Different sampling and trapping techniques

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Lanark Terrapin population assessment

Methods

 Individually marked and PIT tagged each terrapin  Upon capture we gathered various morphometric measurements

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lanark Terrapin population assessment

We captured a total of 442 new individuals (800 total captures) in 8 months of sampling. Population structure – 5.3 % juveniles (includes yearlings), 53.4 % males, and 41.3 % females. Population estimate for Lanark Reef = 1,124 ± 127 terrapins

 A closed model that assumed different mark-recapture

probabilities.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Terrapin ‘hot spot’ maps for management and targeted research

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Marine Fisheries Trip Ticket Fishing Area Code

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Databases for Terrapin Populations

Source Terrapin # % of Total Big Bend Survey 63 4.5% Herpetological Atlas 1928-2012 186 13.3% Lanark Reef Study 2011 507 36.3% FWRI FIM Monitoring 2000-2012 641 45.9%

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

These maps, data and metadata are available to the public for review and download:

http://atoll.floridamarine.org/Quickmaps/KMZ_download.htm