Dr. Justen D. Parker 16 NOV 17 LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dr justen d parker
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dr. Justen D. Parker 16 NOV 17 LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

N N S A P r o t e c t i v e F o r c e P r o g r a m ORAL PRESENTATION TRAINING QUALITY ANALYSIS Dr. Justen D. Parker 16 NOV 17 LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS LEADERSHIP OUTCOMES - PERFORMANCE Transformational leadership Idealized


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TRAINING QUALITY ANALYSIS

N N S A P r o t e c t i v e F o r c e P r o g r a m

16 NOV 17

ORAL PRESENTATION

  • Dr. Justen D. Parker
slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS

  • Transformational leadership
  • Idealized Influence (Attributed)
  • Idealized Influence (Behavior)
  • Inspirational Motivation
  • Intellectual Stimulation
  • Individualized Consideration
  • Student Outcomes
  • Extra Effort
  • Effectiveness
  • Satisfaction
  • Moderate to strong correlations
  • Outcomes mediate higher levels of performance

LEADERSHIP – OUTCOMES - PERFORMANCE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • Times captured during training observations
  • Also captured instructor numbers, student numbers, topics,
  • ther venues available, actions while not engaged, and

comments.

  • Need to spend more time in Physical “deliberate practice” or

active discussions.

Physical Discussion Listening Prep Time Engaged Time NOT Engaged 1567 321 1396 616 3900 1141 31% 6% 28% 12% 77% 23%

TIME ENGAGED RESULTS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • Instructors should train/deliberately practice
  • Rehearse student training events “with excellence”
  • Use the same equipment as students
  • Improve performance
  • Provides experience for student training
  • Determine how and when to use transformational leadership

characteristics

  • Determine how to maximize resources during the training day
  • Test the training plan – will students meet the objectives

INSTRUCTOR TRAINING

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

  • Were objectives understood prior to training?
  • Students – “Agree”
  • Instructors – “Agree”
  • Were objectives met by the conclusion of training?
  • Students – “Agree”
  • Instructors – “Strongly Agree”
  • Objectives were never specifically communicated
  • Daily schedules were misinterpreted as training objectives
  • Objectives come from EMETL assessments
  • Focus on the specific need for mission performance

TRAINING OBJECTIVES

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

QUESTIONS?

  • Dr. Justen D. Parker

Justen.parker@nnsa.doe.gov