Division of Student Affairs Non-Academic Evaluation Non-Academic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

division of student affairs non academic evaluation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Division of Student Affairs Non-Academic Evaluation Non-Academic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Division of Student Affairs Non-Academic Evaluation Non-Academic Assessment Review Committee Dec. 5, 2018 9-10 a.m. Pocatello Meridian Idaho Falls Twin Falls Agenda Why Evaluate Evaluation Process Three Strengths


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Division of Student Affairs Non-Academic Evaluation

Non-Academic Assessment Review Committee

  • Dec. 5, 2018

9-10 a.m.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Why Evaluate
  • Evaluation Process
  • Three Strengths
  • Three Recommendations
  • Conclusion

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why Evaluate Non-Academic Orgs?

  • Why is it important to conduct a formal evaluation?
  • Allows programs to highlight the engagement,

support and opportunities they provide students

  • Provides a clear picture of the organization by

illuminating strengths and weaknesses

  • Supports continuous organization and process

improvement

  • Required by our accreditor

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Evaluation Process

  • Three evaluators reviewed all of the submitted documents
  • Ann Hackert- Special Assistant to AA: Program Review & Assessment
  • Cody Fitch- AA Financial Analyst
  • Darren Blagburn- IE Project Manager and Strategic Planner
  • For the review the team used
  • CAS self-evaluation docs
  • Student Affairs leadership documents,
  • financial reports
  • interviews

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Evaluation Process

  • Student Affairs chose to evaluate its subordinate units

using the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS).

  • The Non-Academic Assessment Review Committee

looked at the subordinate units’ trends to evaluate Student Affairs as a whole.

  • Referenced CAS & Northwest Commission on Colleges

and Universities’ accreditation standards

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Evaluation Process

  • Reviewed the following CAS Areas
  • 1- Mission
  • 2- Program
  • 3- Organization & Leadership (Strategic Planning)
  • 9- Financial Resources
  • 12- Assessment

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Three Strengths

  • 1. The Division’s units have established an internal

assessment committee to review its progress toward measuring mission fulfillment and student achievement and learning outcomes.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Three Strengths

  • 2. Most of the Division’s units have established mission

statements and goals that support continuous improvement of existing organizational structures in place that assist in focusing resources allocation and support.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Three Strengths

  • 3. Student Affairs units are effectively doing more with
  • less. The Division has effectively conducted its day-

to-day operations as funding, which is directly tied to enrollment, has been reduced over the past three years.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Three Recommendations

  • 1. The evaluation committee recommends that the

Division of Student Affairs update its strategic framework (vision, mission, and values), define mission fulfillment for the division, and create a new strategic plan.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Three Recommendations

  • 2. The evaluation committee recommends that SA

create an assessment plan by first developing

  • bjectives that align with the mission and core
  • themes. SA should develop and assess indicators

measuring student learning outcomes and student achievement at the division and unit level.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Three Recommendations

  • 3. The evaluation committee recommends that SA

develop a process and set of standards to collect evidence that more effectively supports unit

  • evaluation. Data and evidence should be documented

and reliable.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusions

  • Student Affairs did an exceptional job of creating their unit

evaluations demonstrating their “Why.”

  • Next steps

 Use documents to support making changes in planning,

  • rganizational, and financial processes and incorporate

assessment of student learning and achievement.  Align priorities with the University’s strategic goals and core themes to attain mission fulfillment.  Provide the NAARC an update 12/01/19 to demonstrate progress in areas identified as recommendations.

Pocatello – Meridian – Idaho Falls – Twin Falls