District Assessments 0 WIDA Access 2.0 (ELL Students K-8) 0 PARCC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

district assessments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

District Assessments 0 WIDA Access 2.0 (ELL Students K-8) 0 PARCC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

District Assessments 0 WIDA Access 2.0 (ELL Students K-8) 0 PARCC (ELA and Math 3-8) 0 NJSLA-Science (Grade 5 and Grade 8) ***Year 1:Baseline / Data has not been reported to date. PARCC New Jerseys Statewide Assessments Programs 0 2018 marks


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

District Assessments

0WIDA Access 2.0 (ELL Students K-8) 0PARCC (ELA and Math 3-8) 0NJSLA-Science (Grade 5 and Grade 8)

***Year 1:Baseline / Data has not been reported to date.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PARCC New Jersey’s Statewide Assessments Programs

02018 marks the 4th administration of the

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)

0Students took PARCC English Language Arts

and Literacy Assessments in Grades 3-11

0 Students took PARCC Mathematics

Assessments in Grades 3-8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PARCC Levels

0 Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations 0 Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations 0 Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations 0 Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations 0 Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations 0 Please Note: Level 4 and Level 5 are passing.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Comparison of Little Ferry’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Percentages

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comparison of Little Ferry’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Comparison of Little Ferry’s 2016 to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations English Language Arts– Percentage Changes

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Comparison of Little Ferry’s 2016 to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations Mathematics– Percentage Changes

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Comparison of Little Ferry’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Comparison of Little Ferry’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Comparison of Little Ferry’s

Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy to New Jersey Percentages for 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Comparison of Little Ferry’s

Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics to New Jersey Percentages for 2018

slide-13
SLIDE 13

English Language Arts/ Literacy PARCC Assessment Comparison-Spring 2018

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ELA 3 ELA 4 ELA 5 ELA 6 ELA 7 ELA 8

40.8 44.2 42.9 40.9 46.9 43.9 51.7 58 58 56.2 62.7 60.4 57.6 61.5 55.7 48.5 72.1 46.2

Cross State State District % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Performance of Subgroup Race in ELA PARCC Spring 2018

20 40 60 80 100 ELA 3 ELA 4 ELA 5 ELA 6 ELA 7 ELA 8

52.3 60 52.2 41.9 67.5 34.4 76.5 72.2 54.5 69.2 94.7 68.8 50 66.7 57.1 66.7 50 50 60 75 100 66.7 47.4 58.1 60.7 51.3 60 50

Hispanic or Latino Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White

% Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Subgroup Performance of Non-Economically Disadvantaged vs. Economically Disadvantaged Students on ELA/L PARCC Assessments – Spring 2018

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ELA 3 ELA 4 ELA 5 ELA 6 ELA 7 ELA 8

57.1 73 58.9 57.4 72.9 50.9 58.1 43.9 51.2 38.8 71.1 38.2

Non-Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Subgroup Performance of Students with Disabilities

  • n ELA/L PARCC Assessments – Spring 2018

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ELA 3 ELA 4 ELA 5 ELA 6 ELA 7 ELA 8

15.4 9.1 9.1 38.5 64.6 67.6 61.6 52.6 76.9 48.8 57.1 66.7 10 50

IEP-Yes IEP-No 504 % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Performance of ELL Subgroup on ELA/L PARCC Assessments – Spring 2018

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ELA 3 ELA 4 ELA 5 ELA 6 ELA 7 ELA 8

58.6 63.6 58.2 50 75 47.7 40 20 16.7

Non-ELL ELL % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Mathematics PARCC Assessment Comparison- Spring 2018

20 40 60 80 100 Math 3 Math 4 Math 5 Math 6 Math 7 Math 8

  • Alg. 1

42.8 37.7 37.3 32.1 32.9 25.8 39.1 53 49.4 48.8 43.5 43.4 28.2 45.8 56.5 50 55.1 34.6 39.4 12.1 93.1

Cross-State State District % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Performance of Subgroup Race in Mathematics PARCC Spring 2018

20 40 60 80 100 Math 3 Math 4 Math 5 Math 6 Math 7 Math 8

  • Alg. 1

45.5 34.8 46.8 27.9 37.5 10 75 82.4 78.9 81.8 76.9 57.9 33.3 100 50 33.3 42.9 50 50 80 25 100 100 100 52.6 54.8 57.1 32.5 22.9 4.3 100

Hispanic or Latino Asian Black or African American Native American or Other Pacific Islander White

% Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Subgroup Performance of Non-Economically Disadvantaged vs. Economically Disadvantaged Students on Mathematics Assessments – Spring 2018

20 40 60 80 100 Math 3 Math 4 Math 5 Math 6 Math 7 Math 8 Alg 1

64.6 62.5 57.1 46.3 45.8 10.5 95 47.7 31 52.4 22 31.1 14.3 88.9

Non-Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Subgroup Performance of Students with Disabilities Students on Mathematics Assessments – Spring 2018

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Math 3 Math 4 Math 5 Math 6 Math 7 Math 8 Alg 1

21.4 9.1 18.2 7.7 62.8 54.7 59.8 37.5 44 13.1 93.1 71.4 10 100

IEP - Yes IEP - No 504 % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Performance of ELL Subgroup on Mathematics PARCC Assessments – Spring 2018

20 40 60 80 100 Math 3 Math 4 Math 5 Math 6 Math 7 Math 8 Alg 1

55.8 51.5 58.2 36 41 11.9 93.1 66.7 28.6 14.3 14.3

Non-ELL ELL % Met/Exceeded Expectations

slide-23
SLIDE 23

District Plan to Increase Student Achievement

0 Continue one to one coaching (literacy and math) 0 Increase collaboration within departments using data and criteria to make

informed decisions about student learning.

0 Restructure assessments given to students to promote application over

mastery.

0 Continuous re-evaluation of materials and curriculum pacing guides 0 District Benchmarks to monitor instruction and place students in the

Afterschool Learning Academy.

0 Added 2 Inclusion Support teachers to address the needs of at-risk learners. 0 Expansion of BSI program providing implicit instruction of foundational

skills K-4

0 Restructuring periods to maximize instructional time and consistency. 0 Share-time counselor with RP to monitor grades 6- 8 at-risk students as well

as transition Grade 8 to Grade 9 (HS).

0 Web-based supplemental resources in Reading and Math for skill practice.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

District Focus

To improve student achievement, the district must create a culture that provides support and challenge based on student needs. As a district, we must begin to teach the way students learn best in the 21st Century to prepare them for College and Career Readiness.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

WIDA Access for ELL’s 2.0

Proficiency Levels

0 Entering: minimal social language with visual and graphic support 0 Emerging: knows and uses some social English and general

academic language with visual and graphic support

0 Developing: knows and uses social English and specific

academic language with visual and graphic support

0 Expanding: knows and uses social English and some

technical academic language

0 Bridging: knows and uses social and academic language

working with grade level material

0 Reaching: knows and uses social and academic language

at the highest level measured by this test

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results focus on…

0Listening 0Speaking 0Reading 0Writing 0Oral Language 0Literacy 0Comprehension

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Overall Score Reflects:

035% Reading 035%Writing 015% Listening 015% Speaking

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Overall Score by Grade Level

Entering (Level 1) Emerging (Level 2) Developing (Level 3) Expanding (Level 4) Bridging (Level 5) Reaching (Level 6) Grade K (16 tested)

0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0%

Grade 1 (7 tested)

29% 43% 29% 0% 0% 0%

Grade 2 (10 tested)

10% 10% 70% 10% 0% 0%

Grade 3 (5 tested)

0% 0% 40% 60% 0% 0%

Grade 4 (7 tested)

14% 0% 29% 57% 0% 0%

Grade 5 (7 tested)

0% 14% 29% 43% 14% 0%

Grade 6 (4 tested)

0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0%

Grade 7 (4 tested)

0% 25% 75% 0% 0% 0%

Grade 8 (6 tested)

0% 33% 33% 33% 0% 0%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

# of Students Testing Out of ESL

0 For students in grades K through 12, an ACCESS for ELLs 2.0

proficiency level of 4.5 or higher is recommended for exiting a program if multiple criteria support the decision. (Multi-criteria includes teacher recommendations, district benchmarks and grades.)

0 Total Tested: 66 students

Grade Level Reached Proficiency

K-1 11 2-3 10 4-5 9 6-8 2

slide-30
SLIDE 30

ESL Program and Instruction

0 Inclusion opportunities to support grade level academic

content and vocabulary

0 Pull out opportunities to target specific needs identified

through assessments and district benchmarks.

0 Grading modifications based on proficiency level on WIDA 0 Collaboration with classroom teachers and sharing of

lesson plans for pacing

0 Comprehensive afterschool skill support 0 Materials translated for school and at-home 0 Parent support opportunities to learn strategies when

assisting with HW/projects.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

NJSLA-Science and NGSS

0 Year 1: Baseline (Data has not be released to date) 0 Rigorous standards 0 Performance based tasks 0 Content learning and hands on tasks 0 STEM opportunities 0 Open Response Questions 0 Application of skills and strategies taught 0 State Assessment will be given in Grade 5 and Grade 8

slide-32
SLIDE 32

How can parents help?

0 Stay informed. Visit understandthescore.org . 0 Access practice tests with your child at home. 0 Review your child’s school assignments. 0 Communicate and partner with teachers to support

learning.

0 ELL Parents can refer to the WIDA Website

https://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS20.aspx (listed on the district website)