Distances with Supernovae Michael Wood-Vasey Alex Kim Peter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

distances with supernovae
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Distances with Supernovae Michael Wood-Vasey Alex Kim Peter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Distances with Supernovae Michael Wood-Vasey Alex Kim Peter Nugent on behalf of a community of others SN Ia Data at the Beginning of the LSST Era High-redshift: 5,000 Low-redshift: 2,000 DES SNfactory PS-1/PS-2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Michael Wood-Vasey Alex Kim Peter Nugent

  • n behalf of a community of others

Distances with Supernovae

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • DES
  • PS-1/PS-2
  • SNLS
  • SDSS-II
  • ESSENCE

SN Ia Data at the Beginning of the LSST Era

  • SNfactory
  • Palomar Transient Factory
  • La Silla Supernova Search
  • Carnegie Supernova Program
  • Center for Astrophysics
  • KAIT/LOSS survey
  • NOAO/WIYN NIR SNeIa
  • SkyMapper
  • Zwicky Transient Factory
  • YUFSS (Your Unjustly Forgotten

Supernova Survey)

High-redshift: 5,000 Low-redshift: 2,000 Optical+NIR Spectra

High-z: Confirmation Evolution studies Low-z: Indepth UV-NIR Spectrophotometry

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Current and Future SN Surveys

SuperNova Legacy Survey Pan-STARRS 1 Dark Energy Survey

photo: Rich Talcott photo: John Tonry photo: Tom Kerr

LSST

photo: LSST Corporation

+SkyMapper, DES, KAIT, PTF , ...

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Taking pictures is sufficient for measuring w in an ideal world.

Ti Grid Flexure

  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

  • 1.6
  • 1.4
  • 1.2
  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4

P(w) w 10,000 SNe Ia

Photo-z Spec -z

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 −1.4 −1.3 −1.2 −1.1 −1 −0.9 −0.8 −0.7 −0.6

w ΩΜ

LSST SNeIa alone constrain constant w in a flat Universe (LSST Science Book arXiv:0912.0201)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

50,000 SNeIa Constrain Evolving w in a Flat, Kind Universe

w w

a

−1.1 −1 −0.9 −0.8 −0.7 −4 −3 −2 −1 1 2

(LSST Science Book arXiv:0912.0201)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The three challenges are all focused on reducing systematics:

  • Photometric Calibration – largest limiting

factor in the use of SNe Ia today as cosmological probes. 80% of w-OM systematics area

  • Supernova Ia Calibration – determine the

best way (smallest statistical and systematic errors) to use SNe Ia to measure distances.

  • Spectroscopy – eliminate and constrain

non-SN Ia contamination. Learn physics.

What Do We Need to Achieve LSST Projection

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current State of SN Ia Cosmology

SNLS: Conley et al. (2011); Sullivan et al. (2011)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Current State of SN Ia Cosmology

SNLS: Conley et al. (2011); Sullivan et al. (2011)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Current State of SN Ia Cosmology

SNLS: Conley et al. (2011); Sullivan et al. (2011)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Astronomical Calibration

Instrumental transmission Extinction above the atmosphere “Metrology and Meteorology” Atmosphere Source

Historical Integral-constraint-approach insufficient Must now separately determine each component (Chris Stubbs)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

S-corrections

Spectrophotometry is Ideal: S(λ)

(SNfactory) Date Date Wavelength Wavelength

K-corrections

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Spectra Test z Evolution of S(λ)

(Ellis et al 2008; Maguire et al 2012; also Foley et al. 2008 Wavelength [Angstroms] Normalized Flux

slide-13
SLIDE 13

(Folatelli et al. (2010); also Goobar 2008; Amanullah & Goobar 2011)

RV = 3.1 RV ~ 1-2

NIR Helps Measure Dust: G(λ)

Wavelength Extinction [mag]

CCM+O Rv=3.1 CCM+O Rv=1.7+/-0.1 Goobar p=-2.4+/-0.1 CCM+O Rv=3.1 CCM+O Rv=1.6+/-0.1 Goobar p=-2.5+/-0.1 CCM+O Rv=3.1 CCM+O Rv=4.4+/-0.6 Goobar p=-0.7+/-0.2 CCM+O Rv=3.1 CCM+O Rv=1.1+/-0.8 Goobar p=-3.5+/-1.1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

12 14 16 18 20 mH PAIRITEL SNeIa literature SNeIa (M, L, h0) = (0.23, 0.77, 0.72) MH = -17.98 1000 10000 Velocity [km/s; CMB+Virgo]

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 mH - (MH+µCDM) RMS = 0.15 mag z = 150 km/s

Wood-Vasey et al. (2008) Barone-Nugent et al. (2012)

NIR SNeIa measure Distance to 5%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

WIYN CSP Gemini RAISINS HST

PAIRITEL PS1

du Pont

We are Obtaining more SNIa NIR Going to z>0.1 requires space[*]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Ground Sky is 100x brighter than Space in NIR: Ground Sky is not transparent in NIR: absorption due to water is very strong and extremely variable

z~1 NIR SNeIa Requires Space With Current Technology

(Courtesy Bob Kirshner)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ground Sky is 100x brighter than Space in NIR: Ground Sky is not transparent in NIR: absorption due to water is very strong and extremely variable

z~1 NIR SNeIa Requires WFIRST

(Courtesy Bob Kirshner)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.1xPWV(mm) + 0.36x(AM-1) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 τ

Blake and Shaw (2011)

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 Wavelength (µm) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Transmission O3 Aerosol Rayleigh H2O O2 i+z z y

  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Flux σ=1.5% 0.930 0.932 0.934 0.936 0.938 0.940 Wavelength (µm)

  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Flux σ=2.9%

Calibrate Atmosphere with GPS

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Atmospheric OH emission lines Zodiacal sky background – from space

Ellis & Bland-Hawthorn, MNRAS (2008) (Courtesy Saul Perlmutter)

Can We Peer Through Atmosphere? OH-Suppression

Deserves Sigificant R&D

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Kunlun Dark Universe Survey Telescope:

An Optical / IR Observatory

  • n The Antarctic Plateau

Cook’s Branch, April 12, 2012

The Site:

  • Elevation: 4091 meters
  • Turbulence Boundary Layer:

14.5 meters

  • Best Seeing

Free Atmospheric Seeing: 0.3”

  • Low Scintillation Noise: 0.5

mmag (m-2/3 s-1/2)

  • Observable Nights: > 90%
  • Coldest Point on Earth:

Lowest Thermal IR Background

  • Lowest Precipitable Water

Content

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Can we Look at Less Atmosphere? Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics

(UofA) (Gemini) Can we do both AO + OH-suppression?

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 2010-2020
  • SNIa Astrophysics (optical-NIR)
  • Astronomical Calibration
  • Photometric-only analyses
  • 2020-2030
  • LSST
  • +Euclid, +JWST
  • <1% metrology and meterology
  • 2025-Beyond
  • Ground-based AO+OH suppression
  • Space-based restframe NIR
  • Fundamental limits to SNe Ia?

Future of SNIa Cosmology