disclosures
play

Disclosures Antiretroviral Therapy Management: Brad Hare: None - PDF document

12/7/17 Disclosures Antiretroviral Therapy Management: Brad Hare: None Annie Luetkemeyer: Panel Discussion & Debate Research support from ViiV Susa Coffey: Medical Management of AIDS & Hepatitis None


  1. 12/7/17 Disclosures Antiretroviral Therapy Management: • Brad Hare: • None • Annie Luetkemeyer: Panel Discussion & Debate • Research support from ViiV • Susa Coffey: Medical Management of AIDS & Hepatitis • None December 8, 2017 • Vivek Jain: • Research grant support from Gilead Sciences for work Brad Hare, MD, 1 Annie Luetkemeyer, MD 2 in East Africa related to methods of ART care delivery Susa Coffey, MD, 2 Vivek Jain, MD 2 • Research grant support from NIH, CDC, PEPFAR 1 Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco & 2 Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases & Global Medicine San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco Goals/Format Patient 1 • Explore three cases in ART management • 38 year old man, no medical history • Being routinely tested for HIV every three months; • Elicit audience opinions last negative test 3 months ago, August 2017 • Expert panel reflections • In November 2017, HIV test is positive • CD4=640 cells/uL, HIV-1 RNA = 31,000 c/mL • HIV-1 genotype is sent, and still pending • Patient expresses desire to initiate ART immediately (and you agree) 1

  2. 12/7/17 Audience Preliminary Vote • Given the many options for ART, would you Case 1: initiate TAF/FTC (Descovy) + dolutegravir Susa Coffey (Tivicay)? Yes, comfortable initiating TAF/FTC + dolutegravir – (A) YES, I would give TAF/FTC + DTG. – (B) NO, I would recommend something else. Case 1: Starting DTG + TAF/FTC is appropriate Case 1: Starting DTG + TAF/FTC is appropriate . . Pt with early HIV, CD4=640, VL=31,000; genotype is pending. Pt Pt with early HIV, CD4=640, VL=31,000; genotype is pending. Pt • Mountains of data and experience with DTG + 2 NRTIs in • Assuming resistance to 1 NRTI, should still be initial ART; preferred regimen effective • If concern for transmitted resistance (R) • Data for DTG + 1 fully- active NRTI • How likely? • How likely to impact this regimen in NEXT 2-3 WEEKS? • Naives: • DTG + 3TC: • TDR present in ~15%, NRTI mutation ~7% • PADDLE, wk 48 VF in 1/20, no mutations DAWNING Study • K65R rare, M184V ~4-5% • ACTG 5353: wk 24 VL <50 in 90%; 89% if BL VL • Major INSTI mutations RARE >100,000. VF with R in 1/120 (adherence issues) • Treatment-experienced: • DTG + 2NRTIs • SAILING: subset on DTG + 2 NRTIs with resistance to 1-2 NRTIs-> Wk 48 NO VF if 0 or 1 fully-active NRTI (0/13) • DAWNING: DTG + 2NRTIs (vs LPV/r + 2NRTIs) after VF • Almost certainly has fully-active DTG and TAF, fully Mean BL VL 4.21 log; >100K with 1 st ART regimen-> 251 pts w/ 1 fully active NRTI, in 22% or perhaps partially effective FTC; this should be sufficient 84% w/ VL <50 at w k 48 (vs 73% of LPV/r ); no IN or new RT mutations Cahn et al. J IAS 2017. Taiwo BO, IAS 2017. Demaest J, IAS 2014. Aboud M, et al. IAS 2017. Abstract Menza TW et al, AIDS 2017. TUAB0105LB. 2

  3. 12/7/17 Real-World Risk of Virologic Failure in Pts Starting DTG-Based vs DRV-Based ART • Patients who initiated DHHS • DTG + TAF/FTC is a Case 1: Counterpoint: Recommended ART from 8/13- potent, simple, tolerable 3/17 at 8 CNICS sites (N = 5177) Brad Hare regimen • 1229 on DTG or DRV/r with ABC/3TC, TDF/FTC, or TAF/FTC • Likelihood of No, not comfortable initiating transmitted resistance is aHR* for VF † of DTG vs Pts TAF/FTC + dolutegravir… very low, and risk of VF DRV (95% CI) All pts Would initiate another regimen from transmitted § DRV § DTG 0.41 (0.30-0.55) resistance is even lower, Tx-naive pts (1229) esp. in next 2-3 weeks § DRV • Much clinical experience § DTG 0.32 (0.14-0.75) from SFGH RAPID ART † Virologic failure: HIV-1 RNA > 400 c/mL at ≥ 6 mos after initiating ART. *Cox models adjusted for age, CD4+ cell count, days from last HIV-1 RNA, CNICS site, sex, HBV, HCV, HIV risk factor, and race . Nance R, et al. IDWeek 2017. Abstract 1688. Modified from clinicaloptions.com Case 1 (BH) Case 1 (BH) Pa Patient diagnosed w/HIV in acute care setting, last tested negative 3 months ago, CD4=640, Patient diagnosed w/HIV in acute care setting, last tested negative 3 months ago, CD4=640, Pa VL VL=31, 31,000, 000, b but g genotype i is s sent a and p pending—do do no not ha have da data. VL VL=31, 31,000, 000, b but g genotype i is s sent a and p pending—do do no not ha have da data. Wo Would you start De Descovy DT DTG or something else Wo Would you start De Descovy DT DTG or something else • Transmitted drug resistance still • Transmitted drug resistance still occurs occurs • Clinical trials: ARV Drug % with Major Most Common Mutations • Participants always have Class IAS-USA baseline genotypes to enter Mutations • Reasonable clinical strategy: NRTI 8.9 A62V, M41L, M184V, K70R, • Start broad (still simple), wait for D67N the data, and refine NNRTI 7.8 K103N, K101E, L100I, V108I, Y188C/L • What’s worse: 2-4 weeks of one PI 3.2 M46I/L, V321, L90M, I84V, extra drug, or a lifetime of D30N generated resistance? Buchacz (CROI 2013, #615). HOPS Cohort 1999-2011 3

  4. 12/7/17 Final Audience Vote • Given the many options for ART, would you initiate TAF/FTC (Descovy) + dolutegravir (Tivicay)? – (A) YES, I would TAF/FTC + DTG. – (B) NO, I would recommend something else. Patient 2 Audience Preliminary Vote • 56 year old man, no medical co-morbidities • Would you recommend switching off the • Diagnosed with HIV in 2012; initially started protease inhibitor and switching to an TDF/FTC (Truvada) + ritonavir/darunavir and integrase inhibitor? Or stay with current achieved virologic suppression. protease inhibitor? • Switched Truvada to TAF/FTC (Descovy) in 2016; maintained RTV/DRV – (A) I would switch the PI to an INSTI. • Continuous virologic suppression – (B) I would continue the PI. 4

  5. 12/7/17 NO Protease inhibitors in Preferred initial ART DHHS guidelines 10/17 https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines Case 2: Annie Luetkemeyer NEAT-022: ≥ 50 yrs old or Framingham >10%, PI’s associated with: on PI/r + NRTI, suppressed x ≥ 6 months, no Would switch to integrase-based regimen Increase CVD (53% increase in D:A:D • documented resistance/virologic failure with DRV/r!) • Dyslipidemia Non-inferior to PI/r • • Metabolic derangement • Improved lipid AND NO current single pill formulation, profile to boot! • Improved Framingham score Ryom L, et al. CROI 2017. Abstract 128LB. (both ATZ and DRV) Gatell TUAB1012 IAS 2017 Ryom L, et al. CROI 2017. Abstract 128LB. Wha What if f pr preexi xisting ng resi sistanc nce? ? Ge Genosure Ar Archive: e: Us Usefu ful a application on • SPIRAL study: 282 patients suppressed on PI/r x > 24 weeks, 40% with prior virologic failure • RAL-based regimen equivalent to PI/r, virologic failure rare (1 vs. 3) • DTG more potent than RAL • DTG/3TC dual therapy thus far effective in several pilot switch studies and several pilot treatment initiation studies, thus: ü TAF should have efficacy with DTG even if M184 and 1-2 TAMs present ü Transmitted INSTI resistance still very rare. • Can get an Genosure Archive if worried Martinez AIDS 2010;24:1697, DOLAM Blanco EACS 2017, Taiwo EACS 2017, Figueroa IAS 2017, ACTG 5353 Taiwo IAS 2017 5

  6. 12/7/17 Co Concordance of f Ar Archive with GT Genos Ge osure Arch chive: Cautionary tale Genosure showed • RT T369 A/I/V • PR L10/I, D60E, 162V, L63 S/C/T Singh ID Week 2016 Abstract 1507 Historic genotype: • 48 paired samples, % concordance with historical GT was 92% for • RT M41L, D67N, Protease Inhibitor resistance and 88% for reverse transciptase. L210W, T215Y, V106I, Y181V Toma ICAAC 2015 • PR: L10I, M36I/M, M46L, I54V, L63S, I64V, V82A. Case 2 (BH) TAF/FTC + DRV/RTV, suppressed, and you don’t have any GT info TA 56y 56yo m man n no c co m morbidities, o on A ART x x7 y 7 years, g good a adherence à sw switch off PI PI to integr grase or stay on PI PI? • If it’s not broken, don’t fix it • Where are the data for DTG/TDF with M184V? ArchiveDNA test? • Want convenience? Symtuza is on the way Case 2: Counterpoint: Brad Hare Would stay with PI-based regimen 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend