3/17/2015 Eberle ISHA 2015 1
Summary of Evidence Based Interventions for Treatment of Cognitive Impairments in People with Acquired Brain Injury
REBECCA D. EBERLE, M.A., CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS CLINICAL ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
April 25, 2015
DISCLOSURES
Rebecca D. Eberle, M.A., CCC-SLP, BC-ANCDS Has no financial or other interest to disclose Learning Objectives
- Define the acquisition, application and adaptation stages
- f cognitive rehabilitation
- Write specific short-term tactical goals for cognitive
rehabilitation clearly linked to long-term strategic goals and the ACRM evidence-based recommendations
- Employ a decision-tree to assist in determining the most
appropriate cognitive rehabilitation intervention to implement
- Identify the key intervention approaches for impairments
- f attention, memory, executive functions and social
communication, based on the literature of evidenced based practices.
Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Recommendations
Cicerone et al, Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2000, 2005 and 2011 Researchers (Cognitive Rehabilitation Task Force
- f ACRM BI-ISIG) pursued comprehensive and
methodical review of 370 articles (from 1971-2008) to derive 3 types of recommendations:
- Practice Standards
- Practice Guidelines
- Practice Options
- Did also state “Not recommended”
Classification of Level of Evidence
Class I/Ia (N = 65) Studies with well designed, prospective, randomized controlled trials Class II (N = 54) Prospective, nonrandomized cohort studies;
- r clinical series with well-designed controls
that permitted between subject comparisons
- f treatment conditions
Class III (N = 251) Clinical series w/o concurrent controls, or studies with results from 1 or more single cases w/ appropriate methods
Cicerone et al, 2000, 2005 & 2011 combined Recommendation Description – as to whether the treatment be specifically considered for persons with neurocognitive impairments and disability Practice Standard Based on at least 1 well-designed class I study with an adequate sample, with support from class II/III evidence; providing substantive evidence to support a recommendation. Practice Guideline Based on 1 or more class I studies with methodologic limitations, or well-designed class II studies with adequate samples; providing evidence for probable effectiveness to support a recommendation. Practice Option Based on class II or class III studies that directly address the effectiveness of a treatment, providing evidence of possible effectiveness to support a recommendation. Cicerone et al, 2000, 2005 & 2011