Development on Property Values Lucija Muehlenbachs Resources for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development on property values
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development on Property Values Lucija Muehlenbachs Resources for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measuring the Impact of Shale Gas Development on Property Values Lucija Muehlenbachs Resources for the Future Beia Spiller Christopher Timmins Environmental Defense Fund Duke University M ANAGING THE R


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Measuring the Impact of Shale Gas Development on Property Values

Lucija Muehlenbachs Resources for the Future Beia Spiller Christopher Timmins Environmental Defense Fund Duke University

MANAGING THE RISKS OF SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT Resources for the Future, June 27, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

[Insert intro text here]

  • [Insert bullet text here]

Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania. Photo: Scott Goldsmith, National Geographic.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

[Insert intro text here]

  • [Insert bullet text here]

[Insert new paragraph here]

Groundwater concerns

gasland

Photo: Rick Kintzel Photo: Pittsburgh Student Environmental Coalition

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Introduction Can impact property values:

  • (+) from economic growth/royalties
  • (-) from environmental risks/noise/landscape

Impacts may differ by:

  • Proximity
  • Drinking water source (groundwater vs. piped)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Objective

Estimate the effect on property values:

1. Proximity to a drilled well 2. Proximity to a permitted well

  • Identify the effect groundwater

contamination concerns have on property values.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Strategy

  • Determine distance at which a well has an

effect on property values

  • Measure difference in property values

before and after a well is drilled

  • Compare the difference between piped-

water homes and groundwater dependent homes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Study Area: Washington County, PA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

All Properties Sold 2004-2009

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Finding Similar Properties

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Identifying Extent of Impact

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Findings from Washington County Properties closer than 2km (1.2 mi) to a well pad:

  • 10% increase
  • Unless the property depends on groundwater: 16%

decrease

  • Groundwater concerns cost 26% of property value

No effect from permitted, not drilled, wells

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Caveat Our identification strategy compares houses inside and outside 2 km of a well:

  • Impact is relative to overall changes in the

county

  • Houses outside 2 km still exposed to shale gas
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Future Work  Overall impact on housing markets  Data provided by CoreLogic:

  • Marcellus and non-Marcellus Counties in PA

and bordering NY

  • 1994-2012
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Property Sales in PA and NY, 1994-2012

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Public Water Service Areas

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Summary  Use a combination of quasi-experimental techniques and detailed geographic information to recover the impacts of proximity to shale gas wells.  Significant positive impacts on piped-water households.  Significant negative impacts of shale gas development on groundwater dependent households.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank you! muehlenbachs@rff.org