development on property values
play

Development on Property Values Lucija Muehlenbachs Resources for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measuring the Impact of Shale Gas Development on Property Values Lucija Muehlenbachs Resources for the Future Beia Spiller Christopher Timmins Environmental Defense Fund Duke University M ANAGING THE R


  1. Measuring the Impact of Shale Gas Development on Property Values Lucija Muehlenbachs Resources for the Future Beia Spiller Christopher Timmins Environmental Defense Fund Duke University M ANAGING THE R ISKS OF S HALE G AS D EVELOPMENT Resources for the Future, June 27, 2013

  2. [Insert intro text here] • [Insert bullet text here] Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania. Photo: Scott Goldsmith, National Geographic. 2

  3. Groundwater concerns [Insert intro text here] • [Insert bullet text here] [Insert new paragraph here] gasland Photo: Rick Kintzel Photo: Pittsburgh Student Environmental Coalition 3

  4. Introduction Can impact property values: • (+) from economic growth/royalties • (-) from environmental risks/noise/landscape Impacts may differ by: • Proximity • Drinking water source (groundwater vs. piped) 4

  5. Objective Estimate the effect on property values: 1. Proximity to a drilled well 2. Proximity to a permitted well  Identify the effect groundwater contamination concerns have on property values. 5

  6. Strategy -Determine distance at which a well has an effect on property values -Measure difference in property values before and after a well is drilled -Compare the difference between piped- water homes and groundwater dependent homes 6

  7. Study Area: Washington County, PA 7

  8. All Properties Sold 2004-2009 8

  9. Finding Similar Properties 9

  10. Identifying Extent of Impact 10

  11. Findings from Washington County Properties closer than 2km (1.2 mi) to a well pad: • 10% increase • Unless the property depends on groundwater: 16% decrease  Groundwater concerns cost 26% of property value No effect from permitted, not drilled, wells 11

  12. Caveat Our identification strategy compares houses inside and outside 2 km of a well: • Impact is relative to overall changes in the county • Houses outside 2 km still exposed to shale gas 12

  13. Future Work  Overall impact on housing markets  Data provided by CoreLogic:  Marcellus and non-Marcellus Counties in PA and bordering NY  1994-2012 13

  14. Property Sales in PA and NY, 1994-2012

  15. Public Water Service Areas

  16. Summary  Use a combination of quasi-experimental techniques and detailed geographic information to recover the impacts of proximity to shale gas wells.  Significant positive impacts on piped-water households.  Significant negative impacts of shale gas development on groundwater dependent households.

  17. Thank you! muehlenbachs@rff.org

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend