Development and Testing of an Unmanned Aircraft Safety Beacon for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development and testing of an unmanned aircraft safety
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development and Testing of an Unmanned Aircraft Safety Beacon for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Development and Testing of an Unmanned Aircraft Safety Beacon for Aerial Application Safety Wayne Woldt, Ph.D., P.E., and Jacob Smith Biological Systems Engineering and School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2016 NAAA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Development and Testing of an Unmanned Aircraft Safety Beacon for Aerial Application Safety

Wayne Woldt, Ph.D., P.E., and Jacob Smith Biological Systems Engineering and School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln

2016 NAAA Convention December 4-7, 2016 – Longbeach, CA ASABE Special Session

slide-2
SLIDE 2

∗ Unmanned Aircraft

∗ Emerging technology ∗ Disruptive innovation

∗ Example Agricultural Applications

∗ Crop scouting ∗ Irrigation management ∗ Livestock stress detection ∗ Drainage systems

Overview

Acknowledgments: Nebraska Aviation Trades Association University of Nebraska - Extension

slide-3
SLIDE 3

∗ Unmanned aircraft are legal for commercial flight ∗ Agriculture projected to be 70% of UAS market ∗ New sUAS rules were finalized on August 29, 2016 ∗ Aerial view offers a strategic advantage

∗ Over the next 10 years, worldwide UAS production will rise from $4 billion annually to $14 billion annually.1

Motivation

1 Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, www.crs.gov, September 2015

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Single Engine – Fixed Wing

Types of (small) unmanned aircraft

Fixed wing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Multi-rotor

Types of (small) unmanned aircraft

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Airframe

Flaps Ailerons Rudder Elevator 2.3 horsepower motor Tempest by UASUSA

  • 11 foot wingspan
  • 10 to 15 pound payload
  • 40 mph cruise
  • 1.5 hour flight duration
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ground Station and Autopilot

Blackswift Technologies

  • 3 axis IMU
  • GPS with WAAS
  • Static pressure
  • Indicated Air Speed

Blackswift Technologies

  • Altitude (msl)
  • In-flight limits
  • Orbiting capable
  • Dynamic waypoints
slide-8
SLIDE 8

∗ FLIR Tau 2 thermal sensor ∗ Mica-sense multi-spectral ∗ 3-D printed sensor mount

The Aircraft / Sensors

* Mention of any product or trade name does not constitute endorsement

  • Early detection
  • Crop stress
  • Pest management
slide-9
SLIDE 9

∗ Define the mission

∗ Purpose, Area, Strategy, Preflight

Overview of UAS Flight Operations

180 feet 390 feet agl 180 feet

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Onboard Mission Sensor -> Image

Mosaic to field level NDVI 8 cm resolution 22 GB per 160 acres

slide-11
SLIDE 11

∗ Recreation/Hobby

∗ Non-commercial ∗ Registration is required ∗ Community standards (AMA)

∗ Commercial / Civil

∗ Part 107 ∗ Remote Pilot with small UAS rating

∗ Public Aircraft Statues

∗ Certificate of Authorization

Unmanned Aircraft: Regulatory

slide-12
SLIDE 12

∗ Agriculture projected to be 70% of UAS market

∗ If true - there will be a large number of UAS deployed across the agricultural landscape ∗ Operating in low altitude airspace

∗ Aerial application industry

∗ High velocity / high value aircraft ∗ With human(s) on board!

∗ Operating in the same airspace

Aviation “Perfect Storm”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Background

∗ Need to understand more about the risk of collision between low flying aircraft and UAS! ∗ But UAS have been illegal to fly

∗ Lack of data to understand risk

∗ Use collisions with birds as analog

∗ Based on report for period 1990 to 2014

* Dolbeer, R.A., Wright, S.E., Weller. J.R., Anderson. A.L., and M.J.

  • Begier. (2015). Wildlife strikes to civil aircraft in the United States,

1990-2014. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airport Safety and Standards, Serial Report No. 21. Washington, D.C., USA. 120 pages.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Background

∗ Need to understand more about the risk of collision between aircraft and UAS! ∗ 11 bird strikes resulting in 25 fatalities ∗ 198 bird strikes resulting in 353 injuries ∗ 23,000 bird strikes with reported damage ∗ 72% of bird strikes occur below 122 m. ∗ $193 million dollars in damage per year ∗ $163,883 per bird strike

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Background

∗ Need to understand more about the risk of collision between low flying aircraft and UAS! ∗ General agreement (*NAAA): ∗ Collision with an unmanned aircraft system will be worse than collision with a bird ∗ Carbon fiber, LiPo batteries, and metal parts ∗ Up to 25 kg!

*NAAA. (2015). Study Shows Toy Drone Collisions Riskier to Aircraft than Bird Strikes. National Agricultural Aviation Association, eNewsletter, November 25, http://news.agaviation.org/naaa/issues/2015-11- 24/2.html.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

∗ Aircraft separation ∗ 91.111 - prohibits operation so close to another aircraft so as to create a collision hazard ∗ 91.113 – lays out structure of right-of-way priorities in the air ∗ 91.113(b) – vigilance shall be maintained by each person

  • perating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft

Federal Aviation Regulations

* paraphrased

slide-17
SLIDE 17

∗ Freeman, J., and S. Wiggins. 2015. “Think Before You Launch executes Drone visibility testing at the CoAAA Operation S.A.F.E. Fly-In”, AgAir Update, November.

∗ “The results of the test show that UAS are indeed difficult to see. What I heard from a majority of the pilots was that we knew UAVs would be difficult to see, but it turns out they’re more difficult to see than we thought. It’s clear that it will take a cultural change on both

  • ur parts [ag aviators and UAS operators] if we’re going to work

cooperatively in the airspace… operating line-of-sight isn’t enough to mitigate safety issues.” [Sam Rogge, CoAAA Board President]

Visibility of Unmanned Aircraft

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Need a Safety Solution

∗ Deploy at ground control station ∗ Place beacon on top of field operations vehicle

Whelen M-9 Red White Green

slide-19
SLIDE 19

∗ Extremely bright ∗ Strobe provide directional cues ∗ Beacon elevated on vehicle or tripod for visibility ∗ Relatively low cost for commercial operators ∗ Easy to set up and store ∗ Or permanent mount

Safety Beacon

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Video of Beacon

Safety Beacon

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Flight Test

∗ Methodology

∗ Five flights ∗ Cessna 172 at 120 kts ∗ Pilot and student volunteer ∗ Both with tablet computers

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Flight Test

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Flight Test

Tap tablet upon visual acquisition

  • f beacon
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Visual Acquisition plot

Safety Beacon: Performance

Minimum = 0.45 mile Average = 1.4 miles Maximum = 3.1 miles

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Summary

∗ Established motivation for safety beacon ∗ Introduced NU-AIRE Safety Beacon ∗ Initial flight test results look promising ∗ Part of a “layered” approach to safety

∗ TBYL, mapping, aircraft, electronic, etc. ∗ Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Agriculture ∗ www.learnUASag.org

Acknowledgments: Nebraska Aviation Trades Association University of Nebraska - Extension

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Thoughts? Ideas? Questions?

Thank you!