Determination of the Mass Concentration of PCDDs/PCDFs (Stationary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

determination of the mass concentration of pcdds pcdfs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Determination of the Mass Concentration of PCDDs/PCDFs (Stationary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Determination of the Mass Concentration of PCDDs/PCDFs (Stationary Source Emissions ) Department of Environment Islamic Republic of Iran (DoE) Outline: Department of Environment (DoE)- Iran Dioxin / Furans (an overview) Dioxins /


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Department of Environment Islamic Republic of Iran (DoE) Determination of the Mass Concentration of PCDDs/PCDFs (Stationary Source Emissions )

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline:

Department of Environment (DoE)- Iran Dioxin / Furans (an overview) Dioxins / Furans toxicity Sources of Dioxins /Furans  Pathways of Human Exposures Principle of the sampling procedure (EPA 23 & EN

1948)

Sampling devices and materials Transportations and Storage, Sample Extraction and

Clean-up techniques

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The DoE has established in 1971 and it’s responsible for matters related to protect the environment. The DoE is located in Pardisan Park, that is covering more than 270 hectares in the Northwest

  • f

Tehran. Currently, 66 Governmental Laboratories under the DoE and 285 the DOE-Trusted Laboratories are available in Iran.

Department of Environment (DoE)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Dioxins have two chlorinated benzene connected through

a central ring with two oxygen atoms.

Furans have two chlorinated benzene connected through

a central ring with one oxygen atom.

The chlorine atoms can be attached in 8 different places

  • n the molecule.

Dioxin and Furans (PCDDS/PCDFS) Overview

75 pieces 135 pieces

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mono-, di-,tri- octa- chloro dioxins / furans show not really toxicity Most toxic of family are: 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorodibenzodioxin (PCDD) 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (PCDF)

Dioxins and Furans Toxicity

The toxicity of dioxins/ furans is calculated with the Toxicity Equivalence Factors (TEF). In the report, PCDDS/PCDFS are added together form the value Toxicity Equivalent (TEQ).

Cont.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PCCDs / PCDFs Toxic Equivalent Factors

PCDDs Congeners I-TEFs

Tetra-CDD 2,3,7,8 1.0 Penta-CDD 1,2,3,7,8 0.5 Hexa-CDD 1,2,3,4,7,8 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9 0.1 Hepta-CDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 0.01 Octa-CDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 0.001

TEF is a number assigned based on potency of the TCDD (the most toxic dioxin) .

PCDFS Congener I-TEFs

Tetra-CDF 2,3,7,8 0.1 Penta-CDF 1,2,3,7,8 0.05 2,3,4,7,8 0.5 Hexa-CDF 1,2,3,4,7,8 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9 0.1 2,3,4,6,7,8 0.1 Hepta-CDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 0.01 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 0.01 Octa-CDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 0.001

slide-7
SLIDE 7

As example: coal / oil and wood combustors, chlorine bleaching of paper, waste incinerators of all kinds, vehicle traffic, chemical production processes, accidental fires, most metal industries, specially sintering processes Anthropogenic Sources:

Sources of Dioxins /Furans

Natural Sources: As example: forest fires and volcano activities.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Three general physicochemical pathways:

  • 1. Contaminated feeding material
  • 2. Molecular re-arrangement of precursor compounds
  • 3. De-Novo- Synthesis of PCDDS/PCDFS

Emission of PCDDS/PCDFS from Combustion Processes

Cont.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The first process occurs when the feed material going to the incinerator contains PCDDS/PCDFS and a fraction of these compounds persist in thermal breakdown

  • mechanisms. This is not considered to account for a large

volume of PCDDS/PCDFS released to the environment.

  • 1. Contaminated Feeding Material

Cont.

  • 2. Molecular re-arrangement of Precursor Compounds

The second process is the formation of PCDDS/PCDFS from the thermal breakdown and molecular rearrangement of precursor compounds. The precursor compounds are such as chlorinated benzenes, chlorinated phenols and PCBs, which are resemblances to the PCDDS/PCDFS molecules.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The

third process called De-Novo-Synthesis

  • f

PCDDS/PCDFS . In this mechanism , inorganic chloride compounds such as NaCI or HCI will form to chlorine (CI2) in the presence of oxygen and subsequently, Cl2 reacts with aromatic components. Therefore destruction

  • f PCDD/PCDF depending on temperature and oxygen

concentration.  The De-Novo-Synthesis is most active in a temperature range of 200 - 500 °C with a maximum at approximately 350 ° C.

  • 3. De-Novo- Synthesis of PCDDS/PCDFS
slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Ingestion  Inhalation of vapors and particulates  Dermal contact

Pathways of Human Exposures Health Effects:

Acute symptoms/short term

  • skin darkening
  • liver dysfunction

Chronic symptoms/long term

  • diabetes
  • cancer
  • birth defects
  • physical deformities,
  • mental disabilities, etc.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Iran signed the Stockholm Convention in May 2001 and ratified it in February 2006. Iran as well as other countries agree to reduce or eliminate the production, use or release

  • f

the 12 persistent

  • rganic

pollutants (POPs) and PCDDS/PCDFS are in the list of POPs chemicals.

Stockholm Convention:

Commonly used devices for controlling Air Pollution:

Dry Scrubbers Cyclones, Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP), Fabric Filters (bag houses), Wet Scrubbers

slide-13
SLIDE 13

To perform isokinetic sampling, it is necessary that the velocity and direction of the gas entering the nozzle is the same as the velocity and direction of the stack gas at the sampling point. 𝑗𝑡𝑝𝑙𝑗𝑜𝑓𝑢𝑗𝑑 𝑠𝑏𝑢𝑗𝑝 % = (Velocity at the nozzle / Velocity of the stack gas) ∗100

Isokinetic ratio during the sampling differs by more than 5% to +15% the measurement is not valid.

Isokinetic Sampling

Principle of Sampling Procedure (EPA 23 & EN 1948)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1- Velocity Calculation

V = stack gas velocity (m/s) K = pitot tube velocity constant (34.97) C = velocity pressure coefficient (for S-type pitot=0.84) (dimensionless) ΔP = square root of differential pressure of stack gas (mmH20) T stack = stack temperature (ºC) M = molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis (g/g mole) P = absolute stack gas pressure (mm.Hg)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The dry weight component (CO2, O2, N2) of the stack gas is calculated by: Molecular Weight

M dry = dry molecular weight of stack gas (g/g mole) %CO2 = percentage CO2 in gas stream %O2 = percentage O2 in gas stream % N2= 100 – ( % CO2+ % O2 + % CO ) 44(g/g mole) = MW carbon dioxide 32(g/g mole) = MW oxygen 28(g/g mole) = MW carbon monoxide 28(g/g mole) = MW nitrogen

M= 0.44 (%CO2) + 0.32 (%O2) + 0.28 (%N2)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Minimum required number of traverse points for sampling sites which meet specified criteria Traverse Points 2- Volumetric flow rate in the stack

Volumetric flow rate (m3/s)= Duct area (m2) x average velocity of stack gases (m/s)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Platform access shall be safe and easy access to the work platform and provided via caged ladder, stairway, or other suitable ways. Location of Sampling Port Sampling ports shall be located at least 8 times stack diameter down stream (B) and 2 times up stream (A) from any flow disturbance.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

It’s possible to choose between three different methods:

Sampling Procedure (EN 1948)

Filter/Condenser Method Dilution Method Cooled Probe Method Gas is sampled isokinetically in the duct. The PCDDs/PCDFs, both adsorbed on particles and in the gas phase, are collected in the sampling train. The collecting parts can be

  • Filter
  • Condensate flask
  • Solid adsorbent
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Filter/Condenser Method (Sampling train) The sample gas is sucked through the nozzle, probe and filter (< 125 °C). Then the gas passes the condenser and the condensate flask and adsorbent by suction device. Initial Checks before Sampling

 Power Supply  Safe Platform  Sampling Ports (Correct Positions)  Gas Velocity

Temperature Profiles  Nozzle Selection  Gas Oxygen  Moisture Contents

slide-20
SLIDE 20

1) Cleaning of the sampling equipment in the laboratory. Normally rinsing with water and detergent, followed by rinsing with solvent and/or treatment in a muffle oven for several hour (around 400 C). 2) Rinsing with solvent prior to sampling (can be done either in the laboratory or at sampling site). 3) Rinsing the equipment being in contact with the stack gas with solvents after the sampling. This rinsing solution is an important part

  • f the sample (acetone or methanol followed by toluene or

dichloromethane

Cleaning Sampling Devices:

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Gas velocity
  • Temperature profile in duct
  • Pressure data
  • Flow rate

Record keeping (at least every 15 min)

  • Filter temperature (heated box)
  • Adsorbent temperature
  • Oxygen content

Leakage Test

A leak check shall be carried out before and after every sampling

  • procedure. The sampling train is plugged nozzle (inlet) and the volume

flow rate shall be less than 5 % of the normal flow rate.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Field Blank

  • The probe is not inserted into the stack
  • No gas is drawn through the sampling train
  • A leak check is performed

 A field blank procedure shall be performed at least before each measurement series.

The field blank is taken at the operator’s site according the following procedure:

 The value of this field blank shall not exceed 10 % of the emission limit value and shall be reported with the corresponding measured values

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • The glassware and connections are rinsed with 100 ml

each of acetone and dichloromethane

  • The rinsing solutions are combined with the condensate
  • The adsorbent (PU foam/ XAD2) is collected
  • All the parts are properly labelled

After Sampling Sample Storage The samples shall be stored in the dark not higher than room temperature (approx. 25°C).

slide-24
SLIDE 24

PCDDs/ PCDFs Sampling Train (EPA 23)

Front Half Back Half Front Half Probe Nozzle FH Filter Holder Back Half Filter Support BH filter Holder Condenser Transfer Line

Cont.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FH Acetone Rinse BH Acetone Rinse Impinger Acetone Rinse Combine contents for shipment to the Lab FH Toluene Rinse BH Toluene Rinse Impinger Toluene Rinse Combine contents for shipment to the Lab Glass fiber filter XAD-2 Shipment to the Lab

1 3 2

PCDDs/ PCDFs Sampling Train (EPA 23)

4 Cont.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Acetone Rinse Toluene Rinse Combine with condensate liquid Thimble filter XAD-2 Shipment to the Lab

PCDDs/ PCDFs Sampling Train (EN1948)

Cont.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

 Extraction is necessary to isolate the PCDDs/PCDFs from the sample and to collect them in an appropriate solvent volume.  Extraction procedures are normally based on soxhlet extraction of filters and adsorbents, and liquid/ liquid extraction of condensates.  Extraction method must be tested with a set of validation criteria. Sample Extraction

slide-28
SLIDE 28

13C12-labelled 2,3,7,8-chlorine substituted PCDDs/PCDFs,, added before GC injection. Recovery Standard Sampling Standard 13C12-labelled 2,3,7,8-chlorine substituted PCDDs/PCDFs,, added before sampling Calibration Standard 13C12-labelled 2,3,7,8-chlorine substituted PCDDs/PCDFs, added before extraction. These standards are also used for calculation of results. Extraction Standard Unlabelled 2,3,7,8-chlorine substituted PCDDs/PCDFs, used for calibration curve.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 Sample clean-up is usually carried

  • ut

by multi-column chromatographic techniques using a range of adsorbents.  The main purpose is to remove sample matrix components, which may disturb the quantification method

Sample clean-up Method Validation

Linearity Selectivity & Sensitivity (matrices without interference) Limit of Detection Limit of Quantification Limit of Quantification

Precision (Repeatability, Intermediate precision, Reproducibility)

Accuracy Robustness

slide-30
SLIDE 30

PCDD/PCDF Analytical Schematic Diagram

Container (liquid) Clean up Concentrated 5 ml (Hexan) Add internal standard Liquid /liquid Extraction XAD2 & Filters Clean up Concentrated 5 ml (Hexan) Add internal standard Soxhlet Extract 16 h Analysis DB5 DFS-GCHRMS Silica aluminium oxide sodium sulphate Silica aluminium oxide sodium sulphate

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Exp: The concentration in Toxic Equivalent (TEQ)

Measured PCDDs/PCDFs conc. ng/Nm3 TEF TEQ 2,3,7,8-TCDD 2 1 2 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 10 0.1 1 2,3,4,7,8-PCDF 12 05 6 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD 100 0.001 0.1 Unit: ng TEQ/Nm3 9.1 TEQ= ∑[PCDDi × TEFi] + ∑ [PCDFi × TEFi] The limit value of PCDDs/PCDFs concentrations in stack emission: 0.2 ng TEQ/Nm3

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Identification and Quantification

This standard is based on the use of High Resolution Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/HRMS) for separation and detection, combined with isotope dilution of samples at different levels for quantification

  • f

PCDDs/PCDFs in emission samples. At present, GC/HRMS is the only analytical technique that can provide sufficient selectivity for the determination of amounts

  • f

PCDDs/ PCDFs in emission samples. GC/HRMS is designed for ultra low detection by advance mass spectrometer detector.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

In mass spectrometer, ions are separated according to their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) in magnetic sector and a slit is used to select which mass-to-charge ratio reaches the

  • detector. In mass spectrometer Double Focusing Sector

(DFS) has two sectors (magnetic and electrostatic). GCHRMS- DFS

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF DFS-GCHRMS

HR is

  • btained

by decreasing the slit widths, and thereby decreasing the number of ions that reach the detector.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

EN 13284-1:2002 - Determination of low range mass concentration of dust – Part 1: Manual gravimetric method ISO 9096:2003 - Stationary source emissions — Determination of concentration and mass flow rate of particulate material in gas-carrying ducts — Manual gravimetric method. EPA Method 2 Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate. EPA method 5 Determination of particulate matter from stationary sources EPA method 17 Determination of particulate matter from stationary sources U.S EPA Method 23 (1998). Determination of polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated Dibenzofurans from municipal waste combustors, US Environmental Protection Agency U.S EPA Method 1613B (1994). Tetra- through Octa Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans by Isotope Dilution HRGC/HRMS, US Environmental Protection

References:

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Thank You