DESIGN OF LOW POWER VOLTAGE REGULATOR FOR RFID APPLICATIONS Josip - - PDF document

design of low power voltage regulator for rfid
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DESIGN OF LOW POWER VOLTAGE REGULATOR FOR RFID APPLICATIONS Josip - - PDF document

10.12.2015. UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING DESIGN OF LOW POWER VOLTAGE REGULATOR FOR RFID APPLICATIONS Josip Mikulic Niko Bako Adrijan Baric MIDEM 2015, Bled Overview Introduction Voltage


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10.12.2015. 1

DESIGN OF LOW POWER VOLTAGE REGULATOR FOR RFID APPLICATIONS

Josip Mikulic Niko Bako Adrijan Baric

MIDEM 2015, Bled

UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB

FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING

Overview

♦ Introduction ♦ Voltage Regulator Design ♦ Post-Layout Simulation Results ♦ Experimental Results ♦ Performance Comparison ♦ Conclusion MIDEM 2015, Bled 2 of 19

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-2
SLIDE 2

10.12.2015. 2

Introduction

♦ Industry oriented to full on-chip solutions

<

Profit and production complexity ♦ Design of the voltage regulators affected

<

Cost production limits chip area

<

Low-power

<

Scalability to low voltages

<

Conventional solutions no longer usable

<

Fully compensated solutions take advantage ♦ Topic of this work is the design of voltage regulator which will fulfill the

mentioned requirements and will be useable in modern applications, such as RFID

MIDEM 2015, Bled 3 of 19

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

Voltage Regulator Design

♦ Conventional linear regulator topology

<

Pass device controled by the error amp

<

Stability ensured with large output capacitor

<

Area consuming (CL) ♦ Fully compensated linear regulator

topology

<

Miller compensation network included

<

CL no longer important for stability

<

Area efficient

=

Convinient for fully integrated solutions

MIDEM 2015, Bled 4 of 19

Topology Overview

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-3
SLIDE 3

10.12.2015. 3

Voltage Regulator Design

♦ RNMC (Reverse Nested Miller Compensation) error amplifier

<

1st stage – differential amplifier

<

2nd stage – common source

<

3rd stage – pass device

=

VF – direct implementation

  • f positive gain

<

RNMC topology

=

Suitable for driving large capacitive loads with low power

=

VF in a feedback branch

♦ Feedback network ♦ Decoupling capacitor MIDEM 2015, Bled 5 of 19

Proposed Topology for the LDO Voltage Regulator

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

Voltage Regulator Design

♦ DC gain

<

♦ Dominant pole

<

♦ GBW

<

♦ ULGF

< <

♦ Negative Zero

<

MIDEM 2015, Bled 6 of 19

Open-Loop Transfer Function Analysis

2 2 1 1

r g r g A

m m V

− =

( )

1 2 2 1 1

1 r r g C

m C p

⋅ = ω

1 1 1 C m p V GBW

C g A = ⋅ = ω ω

GBW ULG

FB ω ω ⋅ =

2 1 2 fb fb fb

r r r FB + =

1 C mVF z

C g = ω

♦ Nondominant poles (assuming real)

< <

♦ Nondominant complex poles

§

2 1 3 2 C C L m p

C C C g ⋅ = ω

2 1 1 2 3 m C mVF C m mVF p

g C g C g g + = ω               −         + ±         + = 1 1 4 1 1 2

2 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 3 , 2 m C L mVF m C m mVF m C m p

g C C g g C g j g g C g ω

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-4
SLIDE 4

10.12.2015. 4

Voltage Regulator Design

♦ LDO voltage regulator designed in 0.18 um CMOS technology

<

Biasing network and power enabling circuitry not shown

<

1st stage – differential amplifier

<

2nd stage – common source

<

3rd stage – voltage follower

=

Low threshold nMOS

=

LDO feature

=

500 µA <

RNMC topology

=

VF in the feedback branch <

Voltage reference

<

Feedback network

=

Diode connected transistors

=

Factor 1/3 <

Decoupling capacitor

=

100 pF

MIDEM 2015, Bled 7 of 19

LDO Voltage Regulator Implementation (I)

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

Voltage Regulator Design

MIDEM 2015, Bled 8 of 19

LDO Voltage Regulator Implementation (II)

Transistor Size (W/L) IQ M1a, M1b 1.2µm/1.8µm 0.25 µA M2 0.96µm/0.54µm 1 µA M3a 200µm/0.4µm 1.8 µA MVF 0.4µm/1.8µm 0.375 µA M2a, M2b 0.96µm/3.6µm 0.25 µA Md1, Md2, Md3 5.4µm/0.9µm 0.4 µA Mgp1 1.2µm/1.2µm 0.5 µA Mgp2 2.4µm/1.2µm 1 µA Mgn1 0.96µm/3.6µm 0.375 µA Mgn2 0.96µm/5.4µm 1.4 µA Capacitor Value CC1 1.8 pF CC2 0.18 pF CL 100 pF

♦ Nominal output voltage

VOUT: 1.455 V

♦ Nominal quiescent

current consumption IQ : 3.7 µA

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-5
SLIDE 5

10.12.2015. 5

Voltage Regulator Design

♦ Layout of the designed voltage regulator

<

Area : 0.065×0.085 mm2

=

0.0055 mm2 <

Output capacitor CL not shown

=

0.0129 mm2

MIDEM 2015, Bled 9 of 19

LDO Voltage Regulator Implementation (III)

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

CC1 CC2 M3

Post-Layout Simulation Results

♦ Simulated loop gain with

parameter IL

<

IL: 0 to 500 µA (log steps)

<

VDD = 1.6 V

<

GBW = 100 kHz

<

PM > 75 deg ♦ Poles and zeros

<

Dominant pole: 0.05 kHz

<

Nondominant complex poles

=

  • Abs. value: 320 kHz to 1.5 MHz

<

Negative zero: 500 kHz MIDEM 2015, Bled 10 of 19

Loop Gain AC Response

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-6
SLIDE 6

10.12.2015. 6

Post-Layout Simulation Results

♦ Simulated PSRR with the load current IL as a parameter

<

IL: 0 to 500 µA (log steps)

<

VDD = 1.8 V ♦ Low frequencies

<

  • 80 dB

♦ Intermediate frequencies

<

Worse for larger load currents

<

Influenced by the output resistance of the pass device ♦ High frequencies

<

Converges to the ratio of CL and CDS of the pass device MIDEM 2015, Bled 11 of 19

Power Supply Rejection Ratio

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

Post-Layout Simulation Results

♦ Simulated DC response of the output voltage VOUT to the supply

voltage VDD

<

VDD changing from 1.4 V to 1.8 V

<

IL = 500 µA ♦ Line regulation

< <

LiR = 1.25 mV/V MIDEM 2015, Bled 12 of 19

Line Regulation

MAX L I DD OUT

V V LiR

,

∆ ∆ =

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-7
SLIDE 7

10.12.2015. 7

Post-Layout Simulation Results

♦ Simulated DC response of the output voltage VOUT to the load

current IL

<

IL changing from 0 to 500 µA

<

Room temperature

<

Three voltages ♦ Load regulation

< <

LoR = 1.08 mV/mA for VDD = 1.6 V at 500 µA MIDEM 2015, Bled 13 of 19

Load Regulation

L OUT

I V LoR ∆ ∆ =

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

Post-Layout Simulation Results

♦ Simulated transient response of the output voltage VOUT to the step

load current IL

<

IL changing from 0 to 500 µA

=

Rise/fall time of tr/f = 1 µs <

VDD = 1.6 V

<

Settling time: 6 µs MIDEM 2015, Bled 14 of 19

Transient Simulations

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-8
SLIDE 8

10.12.2015. 8

Experimental Results

♦ Chip fabricated in UMC 0.18 um

<

Microphotograph and measurement PCB visible in the figures ♦ Results:

<

VOUT = 1.49 V

=

35 mV higher than nominal <

ΔV = 60 mV

<

IQ = 4.2 µA

=

Including the voltage reference and biasing circuitry <

LiR = 3.5 mV/V

<

LoR = 2.4 mV/mA at 500 µA

<

PSRR: -49 dB at DC and -16 dB at 1MHz MIDEM 2015, Bled 15 of 19

VDD IBIAS VOUT GND

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

Experimental Results

♦ Measured transient response of the output voltage VOUT to the step

load current IL

<

IL changing from 0 to 500 µA

=

rise/fall time of tr/f = 100 ns <

VDD = 1.6 V

<

Simulation results for the comparison ♦ Comparison

<

Very good correspondence between the simulations and measurements MIDEM 2015, Bled 16 of 19

Transient Measurement

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-9
SLIDE 9

10.12.2015. 9

Performance Comparison

♦ Comparison with other

low-power voltage regulators

<

Good static and dynamic behaviour for the invested power

<

LDO feature

<

Fully compensated

<

Suitable for full on-chip solutions ♦ References:

<

[5] L. Lijun, K.D. Gannes, K. Fricke, S. Senjuti, and R. Sobot, „Low–power CMOS voltage regulator architecture for implantable RF circuits,“ in RFID Technology (EURASIP RFID), 2012 Fourth International EURASIP Workshop on, pp. 99-106, 28-27 Sep. 2012.

<

[6] J. Guo and K.N. Leung, „A CMOS voltage regulator for passive RFID tags ICs,“ International Journal of Circuit Theory and Application, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 329-340, April 2012.

<

[7] C.C. Liu. Chia-Chin, C. Chen „An ultra-low power voltage regulator for RFID application,“ in Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), IEEE 56th International Midwest Symposium on, p.p. 780-783, 4-7 Aug. 2013.

MIDEM 2015, Bled 17 of 19

[5] [6] [7] This work Technology 0.13µm 0.18µm 65nm 0.18µm Chip area (mm2) NA 0.2236 NA 0.0184 Input voltage (V) >1.4 1.6 to 2 1.1 to 2.5 1.55 to 1.8 Nominal output voltage (V) 1 1.45 1.013 1.455 Referent voltage (V) 0.462 0.505 0.5078 0.485 Supply capability (µA) 4000 50 50 500 Quiescent current (µA) 11.6 0.7 0.064 3.7 (4.2) Load regulation (mV/mA) 0.29 @4mA 400 @50µA 130 @50µA 1.08 (2.4) @500µA Line regulation (mV/V) 3.1 22 4.06 1.25 (3.5) PSRR @DC PSRR @1MHz

  • 51dB
  • 12dB

NA NA

  • 45dB
  • 62dB
  • 80dB (-49dB)
  • 20dB (-16dB)

Settling time (µs) 7.9 20 NA 6 Load capacitance (pF) 50 1200 NA 100 Compensated YES NO NO YES

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

Conclusion

♦ Topology based on RNMC, suitable for low-power full on-chip voltage

is proposed

<

The topology was proposed based on analytic calculations ♦ LDO voltage regulator is designed by using the proposed topology

<

Circuit is implemented in 0.18 um technology

<

Layout was drawn

<

Post-layout static and dynamic simulations are performed ♦ The designed regulator is fabricated in UMC 0.18 CMOS process

<

Performed silicon measurements show high correspondence with the simulations MIDEM 2015, Bled 18 of 19

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10.12.2015. 10

Acknowledgement

This work has been partly supported by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund under the project „Wirelessly powered microelectronic circuits for distributed sensor networks,” project code RC.2.2.08-16, contracted through the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of Croatia.

MIDEM 2015, Bled 19 of 19

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric

THE END

Thank you for you attention!

MIDEM 2015, Bled 20 of 19

  • J. Mikulic, N. Bako, A. Baric