Design of a static spectropolarim imeter Bogdan Vasilescu - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

design of a static spectropolarim imeter
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Design of a static spectropolarim imeter Bogdan Vasilescu - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Design of a static spectropolarim imeter Bogdan Vasilescu Supervisor: Prof. Jrme Loicq The objective To improve the technique for the massive stars observation Massive stars: o Masse > 10 o Luminosity: 10 5 10 6


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Design of a static spectropolarim imeter

Bogdan Vasilescu Supervisor: Prof. Jérôme Loicq

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The objective

  • To improve the technique for the massive stars observation

➢Massive stars:

  • Masse > 10𝑁⨀
  • Luminosity: 105 − 106𝑀⨀ (UV max.)
  • Masse loss rate (strong stellar winds):

10−7 − 10−4𝑁⨀𝑧𝑠−1

  • 10% strong, inclined magnetic field

(∼ ℎ𝐻 − 𝑙𝐻)

eso.org R136a1 ∼ 256𝑁⨀

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The measurement

𝑇𝑗𝑜 = 𝐽𝑗𝑜 𝑅𝑗𝑜 𝑉𝑗𝑜 𝑊

𝑗𝑜

𝑇𝑝𝑣𝑢 = 𝐽𝑝𝑣𝑢 𝑅𝑝𝑣𝑢 𝑉𝑝𝑣𝑢 𝑊

𝑝𝑣𝑢

= 𝑁𝑇𝑗𝑜 𝑁: the Mueller matrix

  • f the system

𝑦: spatial modulation (beam splitting) : LARGE VOLUME 𝑢: temporal modulation (rotation; piezo-elastic modulation) : FAILURE, HIGH VOLTAGE

Retarding plate (modulator) Φ Polarizer (analyzer) 𝜄 𝐽𝑝𝑣𝑢 = 𝑁00(𝐽𝑗𝑜 + ℎ1(𝑦; 𝑢) ∙ 𝑅𝑗𝑜 + ℎ2(𝑦; 𝑢) ∙ 𝑉𝑗𝑜 + ℎ3(𝑦; 𝑢) ∙ 𝑊

𝑗𝑜)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The new principle

𝜊 2𝜊 𝑁𝑕𝐺2 modulator Fast axis y z x O

Incoming ray Polarizer 𝜄 Spectrometer

𝑇 = [1, 0.4, 0.3, 0.5]𝑈

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Preli liminary ry study

  • Outgoing signal:

𝐽𝑝𝑣𝑢=

1 2(𝐽 + 𝑅 ∙ 𝑛 𝑧, λ + 𝑉 ∙ 𝑜 𝑧, λ + 𝑊 ∙ 𝑞 𝑧, λ )

m 𝑧, λ =cos 2𝜄 cos(∆𝜒2) n 𝑧, λ =sin 2𝜄 cos(∆𝜒1)+cos 2𝜄 sin(∆𝜒1) sin(∆𝜒2) p 𝑧, λ =cos 2𝜄 cos ∆𝜒1 − sin 2𝜄 sin (∆𝜒1)

𝐽𝑝𝑣𝑢 = 𝑁00(𝐽𝑗𝑜 + ℎ1(𝑦; 𝑢) ∙ 𝑅𝑗𝑜 + ℎ2(𝑦; 𝑢) ∙ 𝑉𝑗𝑜 + ℎ3(𝑦; 𝑢) ∙ 𝑊

𝑗𝑜)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

𝑇 = [1, 0.4, 0.3, 0.5]𝑈

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Objectives

I. Ideal conditions II. The presence of noise Functioning in:

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Preli liminary ry results

❑Behaviour in ideal conditions: unicity of the solution

𝜊 2𝜊 𝑁𝑕𝐺2 modulator Fast axis y z x O

𝑇1

Polarizer 𝜄

𝑇2 𝑇

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Preli liminary ry results

❑Behaviour in simulated real conditions: SNR dependent ➢Optimization of the analyzer (minimization of the 𝜓2 distribution)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Preli liminary ry results

❑ Efficiency of the modulation (after Toro Iniesta, 2003)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Preli liminary ry results

❑Behaviour in simulated real conditions: SNR dependent ➢Relative error & standard deviation (𝜄 = 109°, 𝑇 = [1, 0.4, 0.3, 0.5]𝑈)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Preli liminary ry results

❑Behaviour in simulated real conditions: oblique rays (𝜄 = 90°, 𝑇 = [1, 0.4, 0.3, 0.5]𝑈)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Thank you for your attention!