Depletion and mineral modes Mineral modes of peridotite are 48% Oli - - PDF document

depletion and mineral modes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Depletion and mineral modes Mineral modes of peridotite are 48% Oli - - PDF document

Lecture III: Mantle garnets as lithosphere proxies a major-element and temporal perspective Herman Grtter UBC Lectures - Mantle Indicators in modern use 30 October 2013 Depletion and mineral modes Mineral modes of peridotite are 48%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Lecture III: Mantle garnets as lithosphere proxies – a major-element and temporal perspective Herman Grütter UBC Lectures - Mantle Indicators in modern use 30 October 2013

Slide 2

Depletion and mineral modes

Mineral modes of peridotite are related to extent of melt extraction (% broadly basaltic melt removed)

48% Oli 32% Opx 18% Cpx 2% Spl

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Slide 3

Peridotite solidus and degree of melting

Variation of assemblage and melt fraction at 15 kbar for peridotite PHN-1611 Kushiro (1994) J Geol Soc Japan 100: 103-110

Cpx-Out ~20% melt Ts +75°C Opx-Out ~40% melt Ts +190°C Ts 1235°C LHERZ HARZ DUN Ol-Out 100% melt 1890 °C Ts +655°C

Slide 4

Mantle peridotite whole rock data Major-element depletion trend

20% 30% 40%

Depletion => basaltic melt extracted Residual depleted mantle has

  • Higher Mg/Fe
  • Low Al/Cr
  • Low Ca
  • Low Ti

% depletion almost linear

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Slide 5

Why choose garnet ?

Garnet is the perfect proxy for mantle rocks

  • Occurs in a very wide range of mantle rock types (PER, PRX, ECL, MEG)
  • Wide P-T stability, including across graphite / diamond
  • Can retrieve major-element data and T (±P) at low unit cost

Garnet Formula: X3Y2Si3O12 X: Mg/(Mg+Fe) ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ reflects Olivine or WR Mg# X: Ca/(Ca+Mg+Fe) ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ reflects Opx and/or Cpx presence X: Minor Mn, Ni ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ mantle thermometry Y: Cr/(Cr+Al) ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ reflects Chromite or WR Cr#

Slide 6

4 8 12 16 3 6 9

CaO Cr2O3

Near-fertile mantle (0 to 5% melting)

Alkali basalt sources Thin, hot lithosphere Phanerozoic No diamonds

Pali-Aike, Antarctic, Vitim, China, Mongolia

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Slide 7

Marginal kimberlites < 150 km lithosphere Mid Proterozoic No diamonds

5 – 12% melt extracted (weak depletion)

4 8 12 16 3 6 9

CaO Cr2O3

Gibeon Also in Proterozoic Angola-Brazil, Kundelungu

Slide 8

5 – 20% melt extraction (Cpx still present)

4 8 12 16 3 6 9

CaO Cr2O3

55

Kimberlites Up to 220 km lithosphere Late Archean / Early Proterozoic L-dominant Some diamonds – mostly E ?

Sloan-Nix Also in Finland, Prairie Creek, Majghawan, Kundelungu

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Slide 9

5 – 30% melt extraction (“Cpx-Out” at 20% melting)

4 8 12 16 3 6 9

CaO Cr2O3

Kimberlites Up to 200 km lithosphere Archean H significant P ± E diamonds

55

Shandong, China Also in Botswana, Kuruman, Mbuji Mayi, Mali, South Slave

Slide 10

5 – 50% melt extraction (“Opx-Out” at 40% melting ?)

4 8 12 16 3 6 9

CaO Cr2O3

Kimberlites Up to 200 km lithosphere Early – Mid Archean H strong, D present P ± E diamonds

55

Grütter, H. S., Apter D. B. and Kong J. (1999) Crust-Mantle coupling: Evidence from mantle- derived xenocrystic garnets. Proc. Seventh International Kimberlite Conference Vol 1, 307-313.

Aikhal + Udachnaya, with added eclogite Also in West KV, Venetia, central Slave

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Slide 11

Extent of depletion through time

20% 30% 40%

Depleted residues Highest MgO (komatiite) melts

Francis (2003) Lithos 71: 135-152 Slide 12

Continents constant Growing continents 150K cooling since 3 Ga 240K cooling since 3 Ga

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Slide 13

Interpret the unknowns…….

Sources (ABAS, KIM etc) Lithosphere depth Extent of depletion Possible lithosphere age Diamond associations

Slide 14

Barometry and layering of depleted mantle……

Grütter, H., Latti, D. and Menzies, A. (2006) Cr-saturation arrays in concentrate garnet compositions from kimberlite and their use in mantle barometry. Journal of Petrology 47: 801-820.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Slide 15

Whole-rock Mg/(Mg+Fe) during melt extraction

Garnet and Olivine in Kaapvaal & Lesotho peridotite xenoliths (n = 888)

Eaton et al (2009) The elusive lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons. Lithos 109:1-22. 86 88 90 92 94 96 0.0 1.0 2.0 GAR TiO2 (wt%) FO OLIVINE 86 88 90 92 94 96 1 2 3 4 5 6 GAR CA_INT (wt%) FO OLIVINE G10 G9 86 88 90 92 94 96 0.0 1.0 2.0 GAR TiO2 (wt%) FO OLIVINE 86 88 90 92 94 96 1 2 3 4 5 6 GAR CA_INT (wt%) FO OLIVINE G10 G9

+ Ti, Fe & Ca melt-related metasomatism

Questions ?