De Deco coher herence ence
Flavio Auer
25th July 2017
De Deco coher herence ence Flavio Auer 25 th July 2017 World is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
De Deco coher herence ence Flavio Auer 25 th July 2017 World is Quantum! Why does it look classical? Decoherence Overview 1. Superposition and Interference 2. Entanglement 3. Density Matrices 4. Von Neumann Measurements 5.
25th July 2017
Bibliography
Linear combinations of states correspond to new quantum states. |ψ = 𝑑𝑜|ψ𝑜
𝑜
Example: spin-
1 2 particle with states |0 , |1
→ superposition: |ψ =
1 2 (|0 + |1 )
Double-slit experiment with electrons:
at slits: |ψ =
1 2 (|ψ1 + |ψ2 )
density at screen: 𝜍 𝑦 = 1
2 ψ1 + ψ2 2 = 1 2 ψ1 2 + 1 2 ψ2 2 + 1 2 (ψ∗ 1ψ2 + ψ1ψ∗ 2)
interference terms
wikimedia.org
Combine two systems A and B with Hilbert spaces ℋ
𝐵 and ℋ𝐶:
1) direct product state: |ψ 𝐵𝐶 = |0 𝐵 ⊗ |0 𝐶 ≡ |0 𝐵|0 𝐶 2) entangled state: |ψ 𝐵𝐶 =
1 2 (|0 𝐵|0 𝐶 + |1 𝐵|1 𝐶)
(cannot be factorised)
= |ψ ψ|
𝑜
: 𝜍 = |ψ ψ| = 𝑑𝑜𝑑𝑛| ψ𝑜
𝑜,𝑛
ψ𝑛|
= 𝑞𝑗| ψ𝑗
𝑗
ψ𝑗|
𝐵 ≔ 𝑢𝑠
𝐶 𝜍
initially: |ψ𝑗
𝑇 = 𝛽|0 + 𝛾|1 ; |ψ𝑗 𝐸 = |𝑒𝑠
→ composite system: |Φ𝑗 = |ψ𝑗
𝑇 |ψ𝑗 𝐸 = (𝛽|0 + 𝛾|1 )|𝑒𝑠
interaction: |Φ𝑔 = α|0 |d0 + β|1 |d1 (entangled)
Scattering of photons, air molecules etc. leads to coupling between system (ψ) and environment (E): initially: |ψ |𝐹0 =
1 2 (|ψ1 + |ψ2 ) |𝐹0
→ von Neumann evolution:
1 2 (|ψ1 |𝐹1 + |ψ2 |𝐹2 )
Schlosshauer (2008)
1 2 (|ψ1 |𝐹1 + |ψ2 |𝐹2 ) → reduced density matrix: 𝜍 =
1 2 (|ψ1 ψ1| + |ψ2 ψ2| + |ψ1 ψ2| 𝐹2|𝐹1 + |ψ2 ψ1| 𝐹1|𝐹2 )
If the environment has recorded sufficient information, |𝐹1 and |𝐹2 will be approximately orthogonal, i.e. 𝐹1|𝐹2 ≈ 0. → interference is suppressed: 𝜍 ≈
1 2 (|ψ1 ψ1| + |ψ2 ψ2|)
interference terms
(Environment-Induced Superselection)
Problem of Preferred Basis: Basis of von Neumann measurement is arbitrary. What singles out the states |ψ1 and |ψ2 as those between which interference is suppressed? Solution: Environment-Induced Superselection The preferred states of the system emerge dynamically as those states that are most robust to interaction with the environment and thus immune to decoherence.
Aspects of the Measurement Problem (Schlosshauer 2008):
→ einselection
→ environmental monitoring
→ decoherence can explain why there are definit outcomes, ..........but not which ones
2014, 277-310
Heidelberg³ 2008
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370, 4576–4593, 2011
packet collapse? Physical Review D, 24 (6), 1516-1525, 1981
1862-1880, 1982
Los Alamos Science 27, 86-109 (2002)