Darren Klinck, President, CEO & Director Corporate Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

darren klinck president ceo director corporate
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Darren Klinck, President, CEO & Director Corporate Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Darren Klinck, President, CEO & Director Corporate Presentation Q2 2018 A leading natural resource company driving stakeholder value through responsible, sustainable, and innovative development Forward Looking Statements & Risk Factors


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Darren Klinck, President, CEO & Director Corporate Presentation Q2 2018

A leading natural resource company driving stakeholder value through responsible, sustainable, and innovative development

slide-2
SLIDE 2

This presentation contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that Bluestone Resources Inc. (“Bluestone” or the “Company”) believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future including, without limitation: statements about the Company’s plans for its mineral properties; Bluestone’s business strategy, plans and outlook; the future financial or operating performance of Bluestone; capital expenditures, corporate general and administration expenses and exploration and development expenses; expected working capital requirements; the future financial estimates of the Cerro Blanco Project economics, including estimates of capital costs of constructing mine facilities and bringing a mine into production and of sustaining capital costs, estimates of

  • perating costs and total costs, net present value and economic returns; proposed mine life, production timelines and rates; funding availability; resource estimates; metal or mineral recoveries; metal price assumptions;

and future exploration and operating plans are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based on information currently available to Bluestone and often use words such as “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “intends”, “may” or variations thereof or the negative of any of these terms. All forward-looking statements are made based on the Company’s current beliefs as well as various assumptions made by the Company and information currently available to the Company. Generally, these assumptions include, among others: the ability of Bluestone to carry on exploration and development activities; the price of gold, silver and other metals; there being no material variations in the current tax and regulatory environment; the exchange rates among the Canadian dollar, Guatemalan quetzal and the United States dollar remaining consistent with current levels; the presence of and continuity of metals at the Cerro Blanco Project at estimated grades; the availability of personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated prices and within estimated delivery times; metals sales prices and exchange rates assumed; appropriate discount rates applied to the cash flows in economic analyses; tax rates and royalty rates applicable to the proposed mining operation; the availability of acceptable financing; anticipated mining losses and dilution; success in realizing proposed operations; anticipated timelines for community consultations and the impact of those consultations on the regulatory approval process. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements and, even if such actual results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, Bluestone. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things: risks and uncertainties related to expected production rates, timing and amount of production and total costs of production; risks and uncertainties related to ability to obtain or maintain necessary licenses, permits, or surface rights; risks associated with technical difficulties in connection with mining development activities; risks and uncertainties related to the accuracy of mineral resource estimates and estimates of future production, future cash flow, total costs of production and diminishing quantities or grades of mineral resources; risks associated with geopolitical uncertainty and political and economic instability in Guatemala; risks and uncertainties related to interruptions in production; the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations; uncertain political and economic environments and relationships with local communities; risks relating to variations in the mineral content within the mineral identified as mineral resources from that predicted; variations in rates of recovery and extraction; developments in world metals markets; risks related to fluctuations in currency exchange rates; as well as those factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Amended and Restated Annual Information Form. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made, and except as may be required by applicable securities laws, Bluestone disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. Although Bluestone believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to their inherent uncertainty. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. All mineral resource information has been estimated and disclosed in accordance with the definition standards on mineral resources and mineral reserves of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum referred to in Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”), which requires disclosure of mineral resource information. U.S. reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Industry Guide 7, which sets forth substantially different guidelines than NI 43-101. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”) or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available. Compliance with NI NI 43 43-101 101 Certain information in this presentation is derived from the results of a preliminary economic analysis of the Cerro Blanco Project effective February 7, 2017, with a report date of March 20, 2017 and a revised report date of June 2, 2017 (the “PEA”) prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. A copy of the PEA is available on the SEDAR website under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com. The The PEA EA is is prel elimi minar ary in in nat ature, it it incl ncludes inf nferr erred ed mi miner neral al resou

  • urce

ces that at ar are co cons nsider ered ed too

  • o specu

eculat ative geol eologi

  • gical

cally to to have ave the he econo economi mic co cons nsiderat eration

  • ns ap

applied to to them hem that at wou would en enable them hem to to be be cat categor egorized as as mi miner neral al reserv erves es, and nd ther here is is no no cert certai aint nty that at the he PEA EA will be be rea ealized

  • ed. Miner

neral al resou

  • urces

ces that at are are not

  • t mi

minera eral reserve erves do do not not have ave demo emons nstrat ated ed econo economi mic vi

  • viability. The

he mi miner neral al res esou

  • urce

ces ma may be be aff affect cted ed by by subseq equen ent assessmen ent of

  • f mini

ning, g, envi vironm nment ntal al, proces cessing, ng, permitting, g, tax axat ation, n, socio-eco cono nomic and nd other her factors. The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by John Robins, Executive Chairman of Bluestone, a qualified person as defined in NI 43-101. Risk Factors As a mineral resource development company, Bluestone is engaged in a highly speculative business that involves a high degree of risk and is frequently unsuccessful. In addition to the information disclosed elsewhere in this presentation, readers should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described in the Company’s Amended and Restated Annual Information Form dated June 2, 2017 and its Final Short Form Prospectus dated June 15, 2017, both of which are available at www.sedar.com. These risk factors do not necessarily comprise all of the risks to which Bluestone is or will be subject.

Forward Looking Statements & Risk Factors

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cerro Blanco Highlights

High Grade

Resource of 1.2 Moz at 10.2 g/t gold (Indicated Category)

Permitted

Exploitation mining license with underground mining activities occurring

1st Quartile AISC1

AISC US$490/oz | Initial Capex US$171 M | Avg. Production of 138 koz/yr avg. in the first 4 years

Infrastructure

US$230 M spent to date on the project (includes US$60 M on the geothermal project), 3 km of underground development

Geothermal Power

50 year license for 50 MW of annual production, 19 geothermal wells in place

Proven Leadership Team

  • 1. Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Cerro Blanco Gold project as disclosed in the

Feb 7, 2017 press release.

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Corporate Structure

Capital Structure – April 2, 2018

Listing

TSXV:BSR | OTCQB:BBSRF

Share Price C$1.15 Shares Outstanding 63,815,560 Options 5,935,000 Warrants1 5,212,309 Cash2 ~C$38 M Cash Per Share2 ~C$0.60/share Enterprise Value ~C$35 M Major Shareholders

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 4

  • 1. Warrants: 3,679,162 @ $0.35 and 1,535,147 @ $2.00, Options @ $1.50
  • 2. As of year end December 31, 2017

Analyst Coverage

Lundin Family Trust, 36% CD Capital, 17%

  • Mgmt. , 9%

Goldcorp, 5% Retail, 12% Institutional, 21%

Tyron Breytenbach C$4.00 David Medilek C$2.25

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Proven Leadership

Executive Team

Darren Klinck, President, CEO & Director

Previously EVP at OceanaGold

Peter Hemstead, CFO

Capstone Mining, Sherwood Copper, PwC Canada

David Cass, VP Exploration

+25 years of experience, previous Exploration Manager of North America for Anglo American

David Gunning, VP Operations

+35 years of underground operational experience, previous COO at Starcore International Mines

Jeff Reinson, VP Project Development

+25 years of project management, Goldcorp, AngloGold Ashanti, Newmont, Rio Tinto

Stephen Williams, VP Corporate Development & Investor Relations

Canaccord Genuity, Freeport MacMoran

Board of Directors

John Robins, Executive Chairman

Kaminak, Stornoway, Grayd, Hunter Exploration

Zara Boldt, Director

Lucara, Kaminak, Stornoway

Leo Hathaway, Director

Lumina Copper, Anfield Gold, Lumina Capital

William Lamb, Director

Lucara Diamonds, De Beers

Paul McRae, Director

Lundin Mining, Lundin Gold, INCO, De Beers

James Paterson, Director

Kivalliq, Corsa Capital, Kaminak

Keith Peck, Director

Orezone, Centenario Copper, RBC, Haywood

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cerro Blanco Project Location

Mining Projects in Guatemala

Cunico | Guaxilan Open pit nickel mine ~1.2 mtpa throughput Status - Operating Solway | Fenix Open pit nickel mine Purchased for US$140 M in 2011 Invested US$600 M ~5.0 mtpa throughput Employees ~ 1,750 people Status - Operating Goldcorp | Marlin Open pit & underground gold mine ~1.6 mtpa throughput Operated 12 years Employed ~1,500 people Status - Reclamation Tahoe | Escobal Underground gold mine ~1.5 mtpa throughput Employees ~ 850 people Status - Operating

Source: Corporate disclosure.

Cemex | Arizona Cement plant ~545,000 tpa throughput

Cerro Blanco Project

 ~160 km by road east-southeast of

Guatemala City (2.5 hour drive)

 Connected by the Pan American Highway

(mine site is 7 km from the highway)

 Nearest town is Asuncion Mita with a population

  • f 15,000

 No relocation or land resettlement required for the project

 The population is ethnically "mestizo" (European

and non-indigenous)

 Natural resources account for 15% of

Guatemala’s exports

 On a local basis, the economy is primarily

derived from agriculture and ranching

 50% of the religious population practices

Evangelicalism, a contrast to the rest of Latin America

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Guatemala Overview

 January 2016, the country elected a new President – Jimmy Morales (4 yr term)  New US appointed Ambassador Luis E. Arreaga took office in October 2017, pro business

approach, influential  Bilateral investment treaty in place, the US is Guatemala’s largest trading partner

 ~34% of Guatemala’s exports by value are delivered to the US  Largest economy in Central America ($US72B 2017E) and one of the strongest performing

 Growing GDP per capita with stable growth rates in the range of 2% to 4% per year  Predominately agriculture based – vegetables, fruit and sugar make up the main exports

 Stable currency, exchanges rates have fluctuated between 7 and 8 Quetzals per USD over the

last 10 years

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 7

Guatemala City – Modern Infrastructure

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cerro Blanco PEA Highlights

Robust economics with first quartile cash costs Highlights Peak Production 144 koz/yr

  • Avg. Production 138 koz/yr1

Initial Capex US$171 M

  • Avg. AISC US$490/oz

NPV5% US$317 M IRR 44%

  • 1. Average production in the first four years of operations.

Source: Bluestone Resources’ press release dated February 7, 2017 disclosing results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Cerro Blanco Gold project.

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 8

Operating Summary

Mine Life 9 years Tonnes Milled 4.0 Mt LOM Avg. Grade 8.14 g/t Au | 27.95 g/t Ag Recovery 91% Au | 88% Ag

  • Avg. Throughput

1,250 tpd LOM Avg. Production 105 koz/yr Au Peak Production (Yr. 2) 144 koz Au

Cost Summary

LOM Avg. Cash Costs US$372/oz LOM Avg. AISC US$490/oz Initial Capex US$171 M Sustaining Capex US$105 M

Economics

After-Tax NPV5% US$317 M After-Tax IRR 43.8% Ater-Tax Pay-Back 1.8 years

slide-9
SLIDE 9

138 144 127 141 102 85 89 77 43 145 151 133 143 105 88 94 79 46 $0 $150 $300 $450 $600 $750 $900 $1,050 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 AISC (US$/oz ) Production (koz AuEq) Gold Production Silver Production AISC

Cerro Blanco PEA Production Profile

Expected average annual production in the first four years of 138 koz/yr at US$414/oz

Industry Cash Cost Curve

Production (%) 50% 75% 25% 0% Cerro Blanco Cash Cost Lowest Quartile Cash Costs

Source: SNL Metals and Bluestone Resources’ press release dated Feb 7, 2017 disclosing results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Cerro Blanco Gold project. All-in sustaining cash costs as defined per World Gold Council guidelines, less corporate general and administration costs. Note: Royalties include a 1% NSR to Goldcorp and a 1% royalty to Guatemala.

Production Goal – 140 koz/yr AuEq

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Existing Infrastructure

Infrastructure  2 portals, 2 declines, multiple Alimak vent raises  Operating water treatment facility  Secure explosives compound  Shop, warehouse, office and dry facilities  US$2.4 M of mine equipment purchased from Marlin, including: 12 MW generator sets, scoop trams, jumbos, bolters and underground drills  ~8 km to an under-utilized electrical substation

US$230 M invested to date, 2 portals & 3 km of underground development

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 10

Water Treatment Plant 3 km of Underground Development

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cerro Blanco Deposit Characteristics

 The Cerro Blanco Gold project is a classic

hot springs-related, low sulphidation gold- silver deposit, deposit sits within a low laying hill

 High grade veins are best developed

between the elevations of 200 m to 500 m, dipping up to 60°

 The deposit is currently dewatered to 417

masl with approx. 35% of the gold resource above that level; dropping one level (30 m) would represent approx. 52% of the gold resource dewatered

 Previous drilling focused on the main

deposit area, regional sampling and trenching returned highly-anomalous gold results – significant exploration potential in the larger land package

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 11

Cerro Blanco Project Site Exposed Veins in Underground Development

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cerro Blanco Deposit Characteristics

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 12

 Underground sampling continues to successfully

identify high-grade veins both within and outside

  • f the current PEA resource estimate validating

the geological model

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cerro Blanco Exploration Potential

 Significant exploration potential in

the larger district, the current resource is confined to a 400 m by 800 m area

 Highly prospective targets ~1 km

north of the main deposit – underexplored to date

 Gold bearing structures extend at

least 2 km northwest and 1 km south of the deposit; resources are wide open at depth

 Geothermal well No.7 ~0.5 km

southeast of the deposit encountered a 27 m zone averaging 6.3 g/t Au and 22 g/t Ag Exploration Potential

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cerro Blanco Geothermal Potential

 Economic geothermal resource located east of the Cerro Blanco Gold project with

potential to reduce costs or be monetized

 US$60 M spent on exploring and advancing the Mita Geothermal project  50-year license to build and operate a 50 MW geothermal plant granted  Flow testing program underway to upgrade the confidence level in the geothermal

resource US$60 M spent to date, 19 geothermal wells drilled and a feasibility study completed

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 14

Geothermal Flow Testing (April 2018) Geothermal Flow Testing (April 2018)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sustainability

Social Responsibility

 Guiding principles: respect, transparency,

accountability & sustainability

 Excellent relationship with local stakeholders  Continual involvement of local communities in

the decision-making process, to design, plan and carry out local sustainable development

 Active initiatives for the past 10 years in the

areas of education, health, sociocultural sports and community infrastructure

 Updated social and health baseline studies are

being developed to identify community needs and to help prioritize them

 Strong support from local authorities (local

municipality)

 Bolstering efforts with a focus on building

sustainable capacity, local employment and local procurement

Environmental Protection

 The project has 26 monitoring points for water

quality  13 surface, 5 ground, 4 fresh water springs, 2 hot springs, and the entrance and discharge

  • f the water treatment plant

 Continuous regional water testing has been conducted since 2004

 Water monitoring results are reported to the

MARN and MEM in compliance with local and international standards and the environmental impact study approval

 Independent community team – AMAR monitor

water quality around the project’s area of influence in conjunction with Bluestone

 Environmental technicians monitor air quality,

noise levels and terrestrial biology as well

Active engagement with the community for the last decade

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

11.6 10.8 10.2 9.6 8.9 8.7 8.4 7.5 5.9 2.7 Dalradian Continental Bluestone Lundin Pure Gold Harte Osisko Auryn Sabina Atac

Peers

M&I Resource Grade

Cerro Blanco is one of the highest grade deposits amongst its peers, and it is permitted for construction

Sources: Capital IQ, Analyst research, Corporate disclosure as of April 2, 2018.

  • 1. Osisko Mining and Sabina grades represent Windfall Project and Back River

Project, respectively.

Mkt. Cap.(US$)

1 1

P/NAV

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 16 0.71x 0.58x 0.51x 0.48x 0.48x 0.44x 0.43x 0.41x 0.31x 0.21x Lundin Continental Sabina Pure Gold Harte Auryn Osisko Dalradian Bluestone Atac $521 $541 $328 $110 $208 $103 $651 $267 $61 $59

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Harte Orla Continental Midas Sabina Lundin Gold Victoria Gold Dalradian IDM Orezone Pure Gold West African Equinox Belo Sun Almaden Atacama $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Capital Intensity ($US/oz Annual Production) After-tax IRR (%)

Peers

Capital Intensity Vs. IRR

Cerro Blanco generates a robust after-tax IRR with low capital intensity1

Sources: Corporate disclosure, technical reports and company websites.

  • 1. Bluestone initial capex and IRR as disclosed in the Preliminary Economic.

Assessment press release dated February 7, 2017. Bubble size represents market cap in US$M, as of April 2, 2018.

Higher IRR Lower Capital Intensity Bubble size Represents Mkt. Cap.

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Peers

Cerro Blanco would potentially generate, approximately the same pre-tax cashflow as a project producing 200 koz/yr at US$700/oz AISC1

Cerro Blanco has one of the lowest LOM avg. AISC profiles amongst its peers at US$490/oz

Sources: Corporate disclosure, margin based on a gold price of US$1,250/oz Note: Bluestone average production based on the first four years of operations as disclosed in the Preliminary Economic Assessment press release dated February 7, 2017. AISC as defined per World Gold Council guidelines, less corporate G&A costs.

  • 1. Cash flow is calculated as the difference between the AISC and US$1,250/oz gold price,

multiplied by the avg. annual production profile. Mkt Cap. (US$M)

AISC vs. Margin

  • Avg. LOM AISC (net credits)

Margin based on US$1,250/oz

LOM Avg.

  • Prod. (Au koz/yr)

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 18

64% 63% 61% 61% 51% 50% 50% 49% 47% 46% 46% Harte Orla Continental Bluestone Midas Sabina Lundin Gold Victoria Gold IDM Orezone Dalradian Pure Gold West African Equinox Belo Sun Almaden Atacama $445 $459 $489 $490 $616 $620 $623 $638 $658 $673 $674 $714 $725 $754 $779 $862 $941 Harte Orla Continental Bluestone Midas Sabina Lundin Gold Victoria Gold IDM Orezone Dalradian Pure Gold West African Equinox Belo Sun Almaden Atacama 46% 43% 42% 40% 38% 31% 25% Harte Orla Continental Bluestone Midas Sabina Lundin Gold Victoria Gold IDM Orezone Dalradian Pure Gold West African Equinox Belo Sun Almaden Atacama 66 79 259 138 340 198 345 190 81 117 130 66 149 136 205 148 228 $208 $180 $541 $61 $136 $328 $869 $136 $22 $106 $267 $110 $167 $385 $119 $85 $42

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Key Deliverables

Fully financed to a construction decision

Structural Geology Work Hydrology Work +5,000 m Infill Drill Program Geothermal Well- Flow Testing Results Infill Drill Results Resource Estimate Update Start Exploration Drill Program Exploration Drill Results Exploration Drill Results FEASIBILITY STUDY Financing/ Construction Production

Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 2019 Late 2020

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 19

Haul Truck at the South Portal

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Appendix

Additional Information

Cerro Blanco Gold Project from the East

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Resource Summary

Cerro Blanco Gold Project mineral resource statement, effective February 7, 2017:

Notes on Resource Estimate: (1) Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues. (2) The mineral resources in this presentation were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council. (3) Mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 3.75 gpt gold assuming: metal price of US$1,250 per ounce of gold and US$16 per ounce of silver, mining cost of US$49 per tonne, G&A cost of US$17 per tonne, processing cost of US$26 per tonne, process recovery of 91% Au. (4) All figures have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates.

Grade Resource Tonnes (000s t) Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t) Gold Eq (g/t) Gold (Moz) Silver (Moz) Gold Eq Moz) Indicated Resource 3,731 10.2 36.5 10.7 1.24 4.47 1.3 Inferred Resource 243 6.0 4.2 6.1 0.05 0.03 0.05

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Legal and Regulatory Framework

Mining Laws Provide a Clear Framework

 Guatemalan mining law provides for three types of

licenses for reconnaissance, exploration and exploitation  Reconnaissance license (rarely used, can be skipped) for a 6 month term, renewable for an additional six month period  Exploration license covering an area up to 100 km2; three-year term, extendable for two additional two-year terms  Exploitation license; 25 year term, extendable for a second 25 year term

 Covers a maximum of 20 km2  Guatemala does not have a specific law on water

rights  Mining projects have the right to responsible use

  • f water as long as this resource is not

contaminated

 Easements and road access are obtained through

civil agreements with the legal owners and local authorities

Attractive Tax & Royalty Regime

 Current Guatemalan royalty 1% on precious

metals mining revenues (Marlin and Escobal both pay an additional voluntary 4% royalty)

 Mining companies may choose how to pay income

tax, either;  (i) 7% gross revenue tax or  (ii) 25% tax on operating profits

 VAT of 12% payable on purchase of in-country

goods; recoverable by mining companies

 Stamp tax of 5% is payable on dividends to

shareholders paid out of retained earnings

Government support for the Cerro Blanco Gold project

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Additional Information

Acquisition Terms of Cerro Blanco

 Deal closed May 31, 2017  Cash payment of US$18 M upon close

  • f transaction

 US$2 M for the purchase of Marlin

equipment

 1% net smelter royalty to Goldcorp  Cash payment of US$15 M within six

months of commercial production – Offset by country VAT receivable of US$15 M

 Goldcorp retains a 4.9% equity interest

in Bluestone

TSXV:BSR OTCQB:BBSRF | 23

Technical Advisory Committee

Alf Hills (Chair) Mining, Placer Dome, CIM Scott Donald Hydrogeologist, Golder Allan Moss Mining & Geo-technical, SRK, Golder, Rio Tinto Roger Nendick Operations, Sherritt, Fluor, Glamis Robert Sim Resource Estimation, SIM Geological, Inmet Ward Wilson Mine Waste Management, University of Alberta

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Darren Klinck President, CEO & Director Contact: Stephen Williams, P.Eng., MBA Vice President Corporate Development & Investor Relations Email: stephen.williams@bluestoneresources.ca Phone: +1 (604) 646-4534