Dam Decommissioning: The Klamath Project Meghan Mallouk, Adam - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Dam Decommissioning: The Klamath Project Meghan Mallouk, Adam - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Dam Decommissioning: The Klamath Project Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla Overview Overview What Is Dam Removal What Is Dam Removal Background on Klamath Project Background on Klamath Project Stakeholders
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Overview Overview
- What Is Dam Removal
What Is Dam Removal
- Background on Klamath Project
Background on Klamath Project
- Stakeholders
Stakeholders
- Resources at Stake
Resources at Stake
- Current Situation in the Klamath Basin
Current Situation in the Klamath Basin
- Connections
Connections
- Further Discussion
Further Discussion
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
What Is Dam Decommissioning? What Is Dam Decommissioning?
- The removal of a dam or a part of a dam in
The removal of a dam or a part of a dam in
- rder to restore the river to its natural condition.
- rder to restore the river to its natural condition.
- Levels of decommissioning:
Levels of decommissioning:
- Dismantling
Dismantling
- Decommissioning
Decommissioning
- Modification
Modification
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Background on Klamath Project Background on Klamath Project
- Location: southern Oregon
Location: southern Oregon and northern California and northern California
- Klamath Project Part of US
Klamath Project Part of US Bureau of Reclamation Mid Bureau of Reclamation Mid-
- Pacific Project irrigating
Pacific Project irrigating western states. western states.
http://www.usbr.gov
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Background Background Con Con’ ’t t
- Built by California Oregon Power Company (known
Built by California Oregon Power Company (known today as PacifiCorp) between 1905 and 1921 today as PacifiCorp) between 1905 and 1921
- PacifiCorp transferred ownership to the Bureau of
PacifiCorp transferred ownership to the Bureau of Reclamation in 1917, but retained operational Reclamation in 1917, but retained operational
- bligations (contract renewed in 1956)
- bligations (contract renewed in 1956)
- Purpose of the dams:
Purpose of the dams:
- Provide electricity
Provide electricity
- Water for irrigation
Water for irrigation
http://www.nexusenergy.com/images/PacifiCorp-Logo.gif
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Stakeholders Stakeholders
- PacifiCorp
PacifiCorp
- PacifiCorp Customers
PacifiCorp Customers
- Farmers
Farmers
- Fishermen
Fishermen
- Native American Tribes:
Native American Tribes:
- Hoopa Valley Tribe
Hoopa Valley Tribe
- Yurok Tribe
Yurok Tribe
- Karuk Tribe
Karuk Tribe
- Klamath Tribes
Klamath Tribes
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Resources at Stake Resources at Stake
- Cheap electricity
Cheap electricity
- Irrigation water
Irrigation water
- Fish
Fish
- Recreation
Recreation
- Flood prevention
Flood prevention
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Current Situation in the Klamath Current Situation in the Klamath Basin Basin
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Ecological Considerations Ecological Considerations
- Two threatened/endangered species of fish:
Two threatened/endangered species of fish:
- Coho salmon
Coho salmon
- Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
- Spawning runs
Spawning runs
- Sedimentation down river after dam removal
Sedimentation down river after dam removal
- Flooding
Flooding
Chinook Salmon
http://www.usbr.ogov
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Economic Considerations Economic Considerations
- Cost of fish ladders: $300 million
Cost of fish ladders: $300 million
- Cost to PacifiCorp to Restore the Dams:
Cost to PacifiCorp to Restore the Dams: $223 million to $415 million $223 million to $415 million
- Decommissioning the dams is less costly to
Decommissioning the dams is less costly to energy customers: saving $285 million energy customers: saving $285 million
- Cost of Energy Subsidy: $9.95 million annually
Cost of Energy Subsidy: $9.95 million annually (paid by the public) (paid by the public)
- Upper Klamath River Basin: $0.007/kWh
Upper Klamath River Basin: $0.007/kWh
- Others: $0.055/kWh (8 times more)
Others: $0.055/kWh (8 times more)
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Institutional Arrangements Institutional Arrangements
- Creation of Civil Society and Social Capital:
Creation of Civil Society and Social Capital:
- Klamath Water Users Association
Klamath Water Users Association
- Klamath basin Rangeland Trust
Klamath basin Rangeland Trust
- Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Klamath Basin Water Crisis
- Friends of the River
Friends of the River
- California Trout
California Trout
- Klamath Inter
Klamath Inter-
- Tribal Fish and Water Commission
Tribal Fish and Water Commission
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Institutional Arrangements Institutional Arrangements
- Government:
Government:
- Bureau of Reclamation
Bureau of Reclamation
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
- State Governments
State Governments
- Irrigation Districts
Irrigation Districts
- Other Legislation:
Other Legislation:
- Clean Water Act
Clean Water Act
- Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species Act
- National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Interactions among Actors Interactions among Actors
- Who has power? It
Who has power? It’ ’s a Closed Door System s a Closed Door System
- State governments and Bureau of Reclamation set
State governments and Bureau of Reclamation set the groundwork: decision the groundwork: decision-
- making power (Klamath
making power (Klamath River Basin Compact) River Basin Compact)
- PacifiCorp: bargaining power
PacifiCorp: bargaining power
- Influence?
Influence?
- Klamath Water Users Association
Klamath Water Users Association
- Other groups are more advocacy groups; with little
Other groups are more advocacy groups; with little power in the decision power in the decision-
- making process
making process
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla
Conclusion Conclusion
- Root of the problem: ecological impacts of dams
Root of the problem: ecological impacts of dams
- Mainly on salmon
Mainly on salmon
- Alternative ways to save fish other than dam
Alternative ways to save fish other than dam decommissioning decommissioning
- Current water rights arrangements don
Current water rights arrangements don’ ’t charge users for the t charge users for the quantity of water they take/use from the river quantity of water they take/use from the river
- People extracting too much water
People extracting too much water
- River water temperatures rise correlated with recent fish kill
River water temperatures rise correlated with recent fish kill
- What about regulating water extraction and use instead of
What about regulating water extraction and use instead of decommissioning the dams? decommissioning the dams?
NatRes331 Policy Brief by Meghan Mallouk, Adam Rifaat, and Ileana Sevilla