CREATING A POWERFUL SYLLABUS: DOING WHAT WORKS!
Christine Harrington Ph.D. Middlesex County College www.drchristineharrington.org charrington@middlesexcc.edu
CREATING A POWERFUL SYLLABUS: DOING WHAT WORKS! Christine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CREATING A POWERFUL SYLLABUS: DOING WHAT WORKS! Christine Harrington Ph.D. Middlesex County College www.drchristineharrington.org charrington@middlesexcc.edu Agenda Purpose Research Practical Applications WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A
Christine Harrington Ph.D. Middlesex County College www.drchristineharrington.org charrington@middlesexcc.edu
Turn and Talk
Contract
expectations
Communication Device
misunderstandings
Plan
Cognitive Map
important
Matejka, & Kurke, 1994
Encourage and Guide Students Course Learning Outcomes Support for Success
Teaching Philosophy Expectations Policies, Responsibilities
Grunert, O’Brien, Millis, & Cohen (2008)
How will students accomplish the learning outcomes?
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Immediate Delayed SSSS SSST STTT Roediger & Karpicke (2006)
9
www.drchristineharrington.org
10
Challenging Assignment First Draft
Feedback Second Draft or Attempt Feedback Final Product
How will you know if students achieved the learning outcomes?
students accountable for learning outside of class?
feedback opportunities for students?
WHAT’S IN A SYLLABUS?
Step 1
Teaching Resources
Step 2
components
Results
were identified by at least 50% of the resources
Doolittle & Siudzinski, 2010
Course Information Instructor Information Grading Information Policy Information
Themes from 24 Components
Reviewed 1000 Syllabi (Google)
Doolittle & Siudzinski, 2010
97 91 84 23 20 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percentage Included
Percentage Included Doolittle & Siudzinski, 2010
Perrine, R. M., Lisle, J., & Tucker, D. L. (1995). Effects of a syllabus offer of help, student age, and class size on college students' willingness to seek support from faculty. Journal of Experimental Education, 64(1), 41-52.
REACHING OUT FOR SUPPORT
Support Statement
“Please come and talk to me”
Seek help from instructor?
Perrine, Lisle, & Tucker, 1995
Potential Problem Supportive Neutral Trouble understanding textbook 4.7 3.7 Low grade on first exam 4.8 4.0 Hard to hear instructor's lectures 4.4 3.8 Study skills ineffective for course 4.7 3.6 Thinking about dropping course 4.9 3.8 Trouble understanding major topic 5.3 4.2
All significantly different!
Perrine, Lisle, & Tucker, 1995
your interest and willingness to work with students outside
information about supportive services (counseling, tutoring, etc.) on campus
Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., Brown, A. R., & Marchuk, K. A. (2010). Syllabus detail and students' perceptions of teacher effectiveness. Teaching Of Psychology, 37(3), 186-189. doi:10.1080/00986283.2010.488523
Saville, Zinn, Brown, & Marchuk, 2010
Brief Version- 2 pages
information
Assignments (ex. 6 exams)
Detailed Version- 6 pages
more detail
multiple choice and short answer questions
that would be covered
Teacher Characteristic Detailed Brief Approachable/personable 3.17 2.55 Creative/interesting 3.45 2.64 Effective communicator 3.05 2.47 Encouraging/cares for students 3.12 2.13 Enthusiastic 3.60 2.41 Flexible/open-minded 2.97 2.41 Knowledgeable 3.75 2.97 Prepared 3.38 2.81 Present current information 3.53 2.50 Promotes critical thinking 3.50 2.88 Realistic expectations/fair 3.06 2.16
All significantly different!
Saville, Zinn, Brown, & Marchuk, 2010
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Recommend Course? Take another course? Brief Detailed Saville, Zinn, Brown, & Marchuk, 2010
Long 61% Short 27% Neutral 12%
Student Preference
details to explain everything. Lengthy syllabi makes it boring for students to read and that is why some won’t even bother.”
look it up on the computer. While a long syllabus may be intimidating at first glance, it’s convenient and helpful to have all the course information in one place.”
insecure about the requirements for the course and makes me feel as though the professor is not organized
being looked at on the first day.”
about course schedule and assignments (i.e. rubrics)
place
instructor, setting a positive tone for course
syllabus but perhaps better!
Grigorovici, D., Nam, S., & Russill, C. (2003). The Effects of Online Syllabus Interactivity on Students' Perception of the Course and Instructor. Internet And Higher Education, 6(1), 41-52. Retrieved from ERIC.
ON-LINE SYLLABUS
49 Undergraduate Students Low Interactivity- 1 page Medium Interactivity- Main Page with 3 links High Interactivity- Main Page with 3 links, Three Pages with 3 more links
Student Perception
Grigorovici, Nam, & Russill, 2003
More negative impression of professor
High Interactivity
More positive impression of professor
Low or Medium Interactivity Grigorovici, Nam, & Russill, 2003
Use caution when considering hyperlinks
Smith, M. F., & Razzouk, N. Y . (1993). Improving classroom communication: The case of the course
215-222. Retrieved from Academic Search Premiere.
Completed Questionnaire On Syllabus Content and Use
Surveyed at 3 weeks or 7 weeks Smith & Razzouk, 1993
Smith & Razzouk, 1993
textbook author 8-48%
Smith & Razzouk, 1993
Course Objectives Percent Recalled One objective 60% Two objectives 8% More than 2 objectives 3% No objectives Almost 30%
Smith & Razzouk, 1993
First Day of Class
Overload- No Need to “Cover” Entire Syllabus
attention to what’s most important (i.e. learning
to the course learning
even more attention to important parts of your syllabus?
Harnish, R. J., & Bridges, K. (2011). Effect of Syllabus Tone: Students' Perceptions of Instructor and Course. Social Psychology Of Education: An International Journal, 14(3), 319-330. Retrieved from ERIC.
Students thought they were evaluating an adjunct.
Harnish & Bridges, 2011
Unfriendly
you may e-mail me….
participate in this course. This is the best way to engage you in learning….
Friendly
me outside of class and student hours. You may e-mail me….
participate in this course. I say this because I found it is the best way to engage you in learning….
Directly quoted from Harnish and Bridges (2011)
Topic Friendly Average Unfriendly Average Approachability 4.07 3.77 Faculty Level of Motivation to Teach 3.6 3.07 Difficulty 3.34 3.72
Harnish & Bridges, 2011
impression- especially if given
Tone
“students”
attitudinal shifts
class- student or faculty reviews plan for the day
Raymark, P. H., & Connor-Greene, P. A. (2002). The Syllabus Quiz. Teaching Of Psychology, 29(4), 286-288.
200 Students Invited to Participate; 125 Students did Participate 7 question syllabus quiz Average score 4.18
7 question quiz on human nature
21 Question True/False Test
Week 2
Raymark & Connor-Greene, 2002
Performance Must take it seriously- give credit for correct answers Does not replace faculty-student conversations
Raymark & Connor-Greene, 2002
Areas, Location/Times/Days, Textbooks, Supplemental Readings, Calendar, Due Dates
Statement/Teaching Philosophy, Campus Resources Available
Details/Rubrics, Course Outline with Due Dates and Learning Activities
Disability Policy
Organization and Clarity of Information
what is expected of you?
information and clearly communicate information?
Initial Reaction to Syllabus and Professor
syllabus?
professor?
course or take this professor?
better?