BILATERAL VERSUS MULTILATERAL FUNDING IN MALARIA ENDEMIC COUNTRIES
The following is part of a training exercise for MSc Students in International Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford
* equal contribution from all co-authors
COUNTRIES MSc in International Health and Tropical Medicine Centre - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The following is part of a training exercise for MSc Students in International Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford * equal contribution from all co-authors BILATERAL VERSUS MULTILATERAL FUNDING IN MALARIA ENDEMIC COUNTRIES MSc in
The following is part of a training exercise for MSc Students in International Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford
* equal contribution from all co-authors
Recognized benefits of giving to multilateral agencies for coordination, leverage, accountability, and expertise but challenges regarding capacity and sustainability.
UK is the second largest international donor and is one of the premier financiers for malaria control and elimination initiatives.
Significant increase in financing for malaria is needed globally in order to meet future targets.
Increasing resistance to antimalarials and insecticide, plateau in overseas development aid, transnational nature of the disease,
Increase funding 15% GDP expenditure on health