COUNCI L ON I NST RUCT I ON T hur sday, July 19, 2018 9:00 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COUNCI L ON I NST RUCT I ON

Polic y Wor kshop

T hur sday, July 19, 2018 9:00 am – 3:30 pm Re ge nts Confe r e nc e Room State Re ge nts’ Offic e

Co nte nts

 PART

1: Syste m Ove rvie w a nd Re la te d I nfo rma tio n

 PART

2: Ac c re dita tio n, Admissio n, a nd Stude nt Re la te d Po lic ie s

 PART

3: Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t

 PART

4: Ma th Suc c e ss

 Pa rt 5: Adult De g re e Co mple tio n  Pa rt 6: Ac a de mic Pro g ra ms a nd Re la te d Po lic ie s

Ove r vie w

Wo rksho p Ma te ria ls

 Ma te ria ls

• Po we rPo int Pre se nta tio n
• OSRHE

Ac a de mic Affa irs Sta ff L isting

• OSRHE

Ac a de mic Affa irs Sta ff Pho to Dire c to ry

• “Who Ca n He lp” b y sub je c t a nd pe rso n
• AA Pro c e dure s Ha ndb o o k
• Ac a de mic Re po rts due to the Sta te Re g e nts
• OSRHE

Po lic y a nd Pro c e dure s Ma nua l, Cha pte r 3

• Upda te d COI

Me mb e rs Ro ste r

• F

a ll 2018 COI Me e ting Da te s

• OSRHE

F a ll 2018 Me e ting Da te s

 L

• c a tio n
• http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / a c a de mic -po lic y-wksp/
• T

his we b pa g e c a nno t b e na vig a te d to o n the o khig he re d.o rg we b site ; is ac c e ssible only thr

• ugh this link. T

he link is in the e ma il se nt a nno unc ing the Wo rksho p.

• Ple a se fe e l fre e to fo rwa rd the e ma il with the link to a ll o n yo ur

c a mpus who wa nt a c c e ss to the ma te ria ls. Ove r vie w

Sta te Re g e nts We b site

www.o khig he re d.o rg

 Po lic y Ma nua l  Ac a de mic F

• rms

 Admissio n Sta nda rds  Hig h Sc ho o l Appro ve d

Co urse L ist

 Co urse E

q uiva le nc y Pro je c t

 Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a  De g re e Pro g ra m Pro duc tivity

Re po rts

 F

ina nc ia l Aid

 Gra nt Oppo rtunitie s  Sta te Re g e nts’ Me e ting

Ag e nda s

 Studie s a nd Re po rts

Ove r vie w

Co nstitutio na lly E sta b lishe d

 Artic le XI

I I

• A: All institutio ns o f hig he r e duc a tio n sha ll

b e inte g ra l pa rts o f the Sta te Syste m o f Hig he r E duc a tio n

 T

he Okla ho ma Sta te Syste m o f Hig he r E duc a tio n is the le g a l struc ture fo r pro viding hig he r e duc a tio n in Okla ho ma

 T

he Okla ho ma Sta te Re g e nts fo r Hig he r E duc a tio n is the Co o rdina ting Bo a rd fo r the Sta te Syste m

Ove r vie w

T he Sta te Syste m

 25 Co lle g e s a nd Unive rsitie s

• 2 Re se a rc h Unive rsitie s
• 10 Re g io na l Unive rsitie s
• 1 Pub lic L

ib e ra l Arts Unive rsity

• 12 Co mmunity Co lle g e s
• 11 Co nstitue nt Ag e nc ie s
• 2 Hig he r E

duc a tio n Ce nte rs

Ove r vie w

T he Sta te Re g e nts

 E

sta b lishe d in 1941 b y a n a me ndme nt to the c o nstitutio n, Artic le XI I I

• A:
• Co nsists o f 9 me mb e rs
• Appo inte d b y the Go ve rno r
• Co nfirme d b y the Se na te
• Appo inte d to 9 ye a r te rms

Ove r vie w

Go ve rning Bo a rds

 OSU

• OSU
• L

a ng sto n

• OPSU
• NE

OA&MC

• CSC

 OU

• OU
• CU
• RSU

 RUSO

• E

CU

• NSU
• NWOSU
• SE

OSU

• SWOSU
• UCO

 I

nde pe nde nt Bo a rds

• USAO
• CASC
• E

OSC

• MSC
• NOC
• OCCC
• RCC
• RSC
• SSC
• T

CC

• WOSC

Ove r vie w

Bo a rds o f T ruste e s

 Unive rsity Ce nte r o f So uthe rn Okla ho ma  Unive rsity Ce nte r a t Po nc a City  Qua rtz Mo unta in Arts a nd Co nfe re nc e

Ce nte r a nd Na ture Pa rk

Ove r vie w

Co o rdina tio n v. Go ve rna nc e

I nstitutio na l Go ve rning Bo a rd

• Ma na g e me nt po lic y
• Pe rso nne l, sa la rie s, dutie s
• Co ntra c t fo r se rvic e s
• Re c o mme nd De g re e s

a nd Custo dy o f re c o rds

• Ac q uire / ho ld title to

pro pe rty

• Ac a de mic , stude nt a nd

b udg e t a dministra tio n

• Purc ha sing
• Ca pita l c o nstruc tio n
• Auxilia rie s

Sta te Re g e nts

• F

unc tio ns a nd Co urse s o f Study

• Pre sc rib e sta nda rds o f

e duc a tio n

• Gra nt de g re e s
• Re c o mme nd funding a nd

a llo c a te lump sum

• Allo c a te re vo lving funds
• De te rmine stude nt fe e s
• Co o rdina tio n, re se a rc h

pla nning

Ove r vie w

Othe r Adviso ry Gro ups

 Co unc il o n Stude nt Affa irs

• Dr. De b b ie Bla nke

 Stude nt Adviso ry Bo a rd

• Ms. De b b ie T

e rlip

 Co mmunic a to rs Co unc il

• Ms. Ang e la Ca dde ll

 F

a c ulty Adviso ry Co unc il

• Dr. Ra c he l Ba te s

 Co unc il o n I

nfo rma tio n T e c hno lo g y

• Mr. Vo n Ro ya l

 Co unc il o f Busine ss Offic e rs

• Ms. Ama nda Pa lio tta

Ove r vie w

Ac a de mic Po lic y Adviso ry Co unc ils

Ge ne ra l Pro c e ss fo r re vie w a nd a ppro va l o f a c a de mic a nd o the r re la te d po lic y issue s:

• Co unc il o n I

nstruc tio n Co mmitte e

• Co unc il o n I

nstruc tio n

• Co unc il o f Pre side nts’ Ac a de mic & Syste m

I nitia tive s Co mmitte e

• Co unc il o f Pre side nts
• Sta te Re g e nts

Ove r vie w

Co rre spo nde nc e

Offic ia l I nstitutio na l Sub missio ns

• Na ming de le g a te s
• Pro g ra mma tic re q ue sts o r pro po sa ls
• Pro te sts a nd/ o r c ha lle ng e s
• Po lic y e xc e ptio n re q ue sts

Must b e fro m Pre side nt to the Cha nc e llo r

Ove r vie w

Curre nt Ac a de mic Re po rts

Ove r vie w

Re port Da te Due

T e a c he r E duc a tio n Admissio n Study Ma rc h o r April L

• w Pro duc tivity Re po rt

April 30 Ac a de mic Pla n/ De g re e Co mple tio n Pla n June 30 Po st Audit Re po rt Se pte mb e r 15 Ac a de mic Ca le nda r De c e mb e r 1 Stude nt Asse ssme nt Re po rt De c e mb e r 1 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt Re po rt De c e mb e r 1 E ng lish L a ng ua g e Pro fic ie nc y fo r F a c ulty F a ll Po lic y Re po rting Re q uire me nts Surve y F a ll Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Re vie ws De c e mb e r 1 (5 ye a rs) I nte nsive E ng lish Pro g ra m Se lf-Study Va rie s

Curre nt Ac a de mic Re po rts

Ove r vie w

 L

ist o f a c a de mic re po rts due to Sta te Re g e nts is po ste d o n the Wo rksho p We b pa g e .

 L

ist c o nta ins

• De ta ile d due da te s
• T
• who m re po rts a re due
• Who m to c o nta c t with q ue stio ns
• Po lic y to whic h re po rt is re la te d

 L

ist is pro vide d fo r g e ne ra l info rma tio n purpo se s

• nly
• Ma y c ha ng e a t a ny time , inc luding re po rts due , da te s due , to

who m due .

• Cha ng e s will b e c o mmunic a te d pro mptly

Syste m Wide T a sk F

• rc e s/ I

nitia tive s

 Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a  Co o pe ra tive Ag re e me nt Pro g ra ms  T

a sk F

• rc e o n the F

uture o f Hig he r E duc a tio n

 Co unc il fo r Online L

e a rning E xc e lle nc e

 Ac a de mic Online Co nso rtium  F

unc tio n Cha ng e Mo ra to rium

Ove r vie w

Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a

 Go a l to inc re a se the numb e r o f de g re e s a nd c e rtific a te s

e a rne d in Okla ho ma b y 67 pe rc e nt b y 2023.

 Multiple initia tive s:

• I

nstitutio na l De g re e Co mple tio n Pla ns/ Ac a de mic Pla ns

• Co mple te to Co mpe te
• 15 to F

inish

• Ma th Suc c e ss I

nitia tive

• Re ve rse T

ra nsfe r

• Co o pe ra tive Ag re e me nt Pro g ra ms

 F

ive na tio na l fo unda tio ns pro viding multi-ye a r suppo rt:

• Ca rne g ie Co rpo ra tio n o f Ne w Yo rk
• Bill a nd Me linda Ga te s F
• unda tio n
• F
• rd F
• unda tio n
• W. K

. K e llo g g F

• unda tio n
• L

umina F

• unda tio n fo r E

duc a tio n

Ove r vie w

Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a Co nta c t I nfo rma tio n

 https:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / c o mple te -c o lle g e -a me ric a /  Dr. De b b ie Bla nke : db la nke @ o srhe .e du  Dr. Ra c he l Ba te s: rb a te s@ o srhe .e du  Mr. T

• ny Hutc hiso n: thutc hiso n@ o srhe .e du

 Mr. K

yle F

• ste r: kfo ste r@ o srhe .e du

Ove r vie w

Co o pe ra tive Ag re e me nt Pro g ra ms (CAP)

 Pa rtne rship b e twe e n the OSRHE

a nd Okla ho ma De pa rtme nt o f Ca re e r T e c hno lo g y E duc a tio n

 29 c a re e r te c hno lo g y c e nte rs pa rtne r with 18 c o lle g e s

a nd unive rsitie s to tra nsfe r c re dit to wa rds a n AAS de g re e a t the pa rtne r c o lle g e thro ug h a CAP

 Hig h sc ho o l stude nts c a n e a rn c o lle g e c re dit thro ug h a

CAP (c o ntra c t, PL A, te c h c o urse tra nsfe r)

 CAPs must:

• Be a ppro ve d b y the Sta te Re g e nts
• Co mply with sta te syste m a nd institutio na l po lic y

 Pro g ra m I

nve nto ry a nd Prio r L e a rning Asse ssme nt Ma trix

Ove r vie w

CAP Co nta c t I nfo rma tio n

 http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / a g re e me nts/ inde x.shtml  Dr. De b b ie Bla nke : db la nke @ o srhe .e du  Dr. Ste pha nie Be a uc ha mp: sb e a uc ha mp@ o srhe .e du  Mr. K

yle F

• ste r: kfo ste r@ o srhe .e du

Ove r vie w

T a sk F

• rc e o n

the F uture o f Hig he r E duc a tio n

 E

sta b lishe d Ma rc h 2017

 Me mb e rs inc lude d the Sta te Re g e nts, priva te c itize ns,

hig he r e duc a tio n a nd le g isla tive re pre se nta tive s.

 F

• ur a re a s o f fo c us: c o lle g e de g re e c o mple tio n a nd

wo rkfo rc e de ve lo pme nt; a c a de mic pro g ra m inno va tio ns a nd o nline e duc a tio n; syste m struc ture ; fisc a l so lutio ns, e ffic ie nc ie s, a ffo rda b ility a nd te c hno lo g y

 Re po rt a c c e pte d b y Sta te Re g e nts F

e b rua ry 2018

 Mo st re c o mme nda tio ns will re q uire le g isla tive a c tio n  https:/ / www.o khig he re d .o rg / future /

Ove r vie w

Co unc il fo r Online L e a rning E xc e lle nc e

Ove r vie w

 A Co unc il fo r a dva nc ing ke y pro je c ts a nd initia tive s tha t

suppo rt e xc e lle nc e in o nline a nd hyb rid le a rning

 Me mb e rs a re fa c ulty a nd sta ff fro m Okla ho ma

institutio ns

 Pro je c ts:

• De ve lo pme nt o f a ffo rda b ility stra te g ie s a nd c o nte nt
• Sha re d de sig n pa tte rns with c o nte nt using a c o mmo n

la ng ua g e fo r hig h impa c t c o urse s

• Okla ho ma Qua lity Summit Pro g ra m De ve lo pme nt

 Http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / c o le / pro je c ts.shtml  K

yle F

• ste r: kfo ste r@ o srhe .e du

Ac a de mic Online Co nso rtium

Ove r vie w

 A pla n to c re a te a c e ntra lize d a dministra tive hub fro m

whic h to suppo rt o nline le a rning a c ro ss the sta te syste m

 Sta te syste m b e ne fits

• L
• w o r no c o st pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt fo r fa c ulty
• Ope n e duc a tio na l re so urc e e xpa nsio n o ptio n
• Suppo rt fo r sta te syste m e xpe rtise Ma rke tpla c e / Cle a ring ho use
• Ce ntra lize d suppo rt fo r fa c ulty-drive n COL

E initia tive s

• I

nstitutio na l me mb e rship fo r g ro up purc ha sing po we r

• F
• unda tio n to se e k e xte rna l re so urc e s
• Co o rdina tio n o f inte rna l a nd e xte rna l c o nsulting se rvic e s

 Will b e suppo rte d b y One Ne t  I

nitia l imple me nta tio n suppo rte d b y institutio na l me mb e rship due s b a se d o n F T E

 Sub se q ue ntly funding pro vide d b y e xte rna l g ra nts a nd o the r

suppo rt

 Dr. De b b ie Bla nke : db la nke @ o srhe .e d u

F unc tio n Cha ng e Mo ra to rium

Ove r vie w

 I

nstitutio na l pro g ra m re q ue sts tha t c o nstitute a c ha ng e in func tio n will b e de fe rre d until June 30, 2019, unle ss a c tio n is ta ke n to e xte nd the mo ra to rium

 F

• llo wing re c o mme nda tio ns o f the T

a sk F

• rc e o n the F

uture o f Hig he r E duc a tio n a nd c o ntinuing ne e d fo r de ve lo ping ne w syste m e ffic ie nc ie s

 A sub c o mmitte e o f the Sta te Re g e nts’ Ac a de mic Affa irs

Co mmitte e wa s a ppro ve d a t the June 2018 Sta te Re g e nts’ me e ting to re vie w a nd a na lyze na tio na l tre nds, b e st pra c tic e s a nd T a sk F

• rc e re c o mme nda tio ns, a nd to de ve lo p

re c o mme nda tio ns a nd a c tio n ite ms

 Me mb e rship inc lude s institutio na l re pre se nta tio n fro m e a c h tie r.

 Dr. De b b ie Bla nke : db la nke @ o srhe .e du

Sta te Re g e nts’ Me e ting s F a ll 2018

 T

hursda y, Se pte mb e r 6

 T

hursda y, Oc to b e r 25

 T

hursda y, De c e mb e r 6

 Me e ting da te s a re a ppro ve d a t the

Oc to b e r me e ting a nd po ste d: http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / sta te - syste m/ me e ting -da te s.shtml

Ove r vie w

Daniel Archer Assistant Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs

Accreditation, Admission and Student Related Policies

Council on Instruction Policy Workshop

July 19, 2018

3.1 Institutional Accreditation & State Authorization policy

Policy Requirements

 This policy requires that all private degree granting institutions and

• ut-of-state public degree granting public institutions that have a

physical presence in Oklahoma seek authorization from the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (OSRHE) to operate in the state.  The policy requires private degree granting institutions and out-of- state degree granting public institutions to:

• Be regionally or nationally accredited by an agency that is recognized by

the United States Department of Education;

• Meet consumer protection standards for operation;
• Utilize an enrollment agreement; and
• Report data.

3.1 Institutional Accreditation & State Authorization policy

Policy Requirements

 The policy requires state system institutions to:

• Submit copies of self-study reports and final evaluation

reports in a timely manner;

• Have a student complaint process; and
• Ensure that its advertisements, brochures, catalogs, web

sites, or other publications are not misleading or deceptive.

 Institutions offering courses at physical locations out-of-state shall seek approval and gain authorization from the state agencies or accrediting associations in whose jurisdiction the courses are to be available.  Institutions delivering distance education out-of-state or conducting limited out-of-state activity shall:

3.17 Distance Education and Traditional Off-Campus Courses and Programs

OR **If not covered by SARA Seek State Regents’ approval to participate in the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement**

State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement

SARA Renewal Issues

 The renewal application must be signed by the chief executive officer or the chief academic officer of the institution.  Upon notice of an approved renewal application, the institution shall submit the renewal fee to NC-SARA within 30 days. A 30-day grace period beyond the institutional renewal date may be granted upon request; however, if renewal is not complete after the 30-day grace period, a late fee of 25% of the institution's renewal fee is applied.  If payment is not made to NC‐SARA within 5 business days after the expiration of the 30‐day grace period, the institution will be removed from the NC‐SARA list of participating institutions.  Institutions denied renewal or not complying with renewal policies within specified timelines may reapply to become a SARA institution 180 days after removal from the SARA participant list.

State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA)

Purpose

 This policy establishes minimum curricular requirements, criteria, and standards for admission to State System institutions, as well as retention standards. Students admitted into all associate and baccalaureate programs must meet these standards.  The admission process has two criteria:

• Curricular Requirements
• Performance Requirements/ Admission Standards

3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention policy

3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention policy

3.9.3 Admission of First-Time Freshman: Curricular Requirements

3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention policy

Note: OU and OSU are authorized to set higher admission scores when approved by the State Regents. Specific scores for institutions are located in the Academic Affairs Procedures Handbook.

3.9.4 Admission of First-Time Freshmen: Performance Requirements

3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention policy

Note: Scores for institutions are located in the Academic Affairs Procedures Handbook.

3.9.4 Admission of First-Time Freshmen: Performance Requirements

3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention policy

Minimum High School Performance Criteria for Admission of First-Time-Entering Students at Community Colleges and Technical Branches

 For students seeking admission to AA, AS, or baccalaureate degree programs, any individual who:

• Is a graduate of a high school accredited by the appropriate regional association or by an

appropriate accrediting agency of the home state or has achieved a high school equivalency certificate based on the GED;

• Has met the curricular requirements as set forth in part 3.9.3. of this policy; and
• Has participated in the ACT program or a similar acceptable battery of tests

is eligible for admission to any of the community colleges and technical branches in the State System.  The five institutions offering AAS degrees, CU, LU, OPSU, RSU, and SWOSU (Sayre) will continue offering these degrees with an open admission policy for students within their geographic service area. Students wishing to transfer from AAS to AS, AA or baccalaureate degree programs must formally apply and meet both the curricular and performance admission standards.

3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention policy

 Students admitted must meet curricular standards as defined in section 3.9.3 and must meet the high school performance criteria as defined in section 3.9.4. The only exceptions are students admitted in the following special admission categories:

A. Special Non-Degree Seeking Student B. Alternative Admission C. Adult Admission D. Home Study or Non-Recognized Accredited or Unaccredited High Schools E. Opportunity Admission Category F. Correspondence Study Enrollment G. Summer Provisional Admission Program (Research and Regional Universities) H. Summer Provisional Admission Program: Curricular Deficiencies (Regional Universities) I. Concurrent Enrollment of High School Students

3.9.6 Special Admission

3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention policy

 Retention GPA requirements:

• A student will be placed on academic probation if the following

standards are not met:  Credit Hours Attempted: GPA Required

• 0-30 semester credit hours

≥ 1.7

• Note: Students are put on academic notice

with a GPA of 1.7 to less than 2.0

• Greater than 30 semester credit hours

≥ 2.0

NOTE: Students dropping below 2.0 are placed on academic probation for one semester. If 2.0 is not achieved in regularly graded coursework (including repeats/academic reprieves), they are suspended.

3.9.8 Retention Standards

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment policy

General Information

 The concurrent enrollment policy criteria, which had not been substantively revised since the 90’s, was previously detailed within the OSRHE Institutional Admission and Retention policy.  The scope of concurrent enrollment extends beyond admission issues; thus, a new stand-alone Concurrent Enrollment policy was created in 2017.

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment policy

Permission

 Permission from Parent  All students must have a signed form from the high school principal or counselor stating that he/ she is eligible to satisfy requirements for graduation from high school (including curricular requirements for college admission) no later than the spring of the senior year.

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment Juniors and Seniors Admission

Research Universities Meet One of the Following: 1. National ACT, Pre-ACT (10th Grade), or Residual ACT* = 24 2. SAT or PSAT 10= 1160 3. 3.0 GPA (unweighted) and top 33% Regional Universities Meet One of the Following: 1. National ACT, Pre-ACT (10th Grade), or Residual ACT* = 20 2. SAT or PSAT 10= 1020 3. 3.0 GPA (unweighted) and top 50% Community College Meet One of the Following: 1. National ACT, Pre-ACT (10th Grade), or Residual ACT* = 19 2. SAT or PSAT 10= 980 3. 3.0 GPA (unweighted)

* Students can utilize one Residual ACT per year from November 1 to October 31

Recognized Accredited High Schools

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment Juniors and Seniors Admission

Research Universities Meet One of the Following: 1. National ACT, Pre-ACT (10th Grade), or Residual ACT* = 24 2. SAT or PSAT 10= 1160 Regional Universities Meet One of the Following: 1. National ACT, Pre-ACT (10th Grade), or Residual ACT* = 20 2. SAT or PSAT 10= 1020 Community College Meet One of the Following: 1. National ACT, Pre-ACT (10th Grade), or Residual ACT* = 19 2. SAT or PSAT 10= 980

* Students can utilize one Residual ACT per year from November 1 to October 31

Homeschool OR Unaccredited and Non-Recognized Accredited High Schools

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment Course Placement

Curricular Area National ACT, Pre-ACT, or Residual ACT* SAT or PSAT 10 Other English 19 English 480 Evidence Based Reading & Writing Satisfy an English assessment and course placement measure that is in accordance with the institution's State Regents’ approved assessment plan Math 19 Math 530 Math Satisfy a Math assessment and course placement measure that is in accordance with the institution's State Regents’ approved assessment plan Reading 19 Reading 480 Evidence Based Reading & Writing Satisfy a Reading assessment and course placement measure that is in accordance with the institution's State Regents’ approved assessment plan Science 19 Science N/A Satisfy an assessment and course placement measure that is in accordance with the institution's State Regents’ approved assessment plan

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment (Off-Campus Courses)

An institution wishing to offer off-campus concurrent enrollment will be required to meet the standards in policy section 3.10.6. These standards include:

 Specifying that the expectations in off-campus concurrent courses should be the same as on-campus courses;  Adhering to HLC’s faculty qualification requirements;  Providing an orientation and professional development for faculty;  Evaluating faculty; and  Creating an MOU between the higher education institution and the off-campus location.

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment policy

Retention Standards

 High school students concurrently enrolled in college courses may continue concurrent enrollment in subsequent semesters if they achieve a college GPA of 2.0 or above on a 4.0 scale.  Students falling below 2.0 GPA on a 4.0 scale are not eligible for subsequent semester concurrent enrollment.

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment Tuition Waiver (not academic policy)

Old Tuition W aiver Program Concurrent seniors receive a tuition waiver for six hours per term (Summer between junior and senior year and Fall and Spring semesters of the senior year). New Tuition W aiver Program Students are eligible for the waiver for the first 18 hours of concurrent enrollment

• ver the senior year

(Summer between junior and senior year and Fall and Spring semesters of the senior year).

Tuition Waiver Program Change: Effective July 1, 2018

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment Tuition Waiver (not academic policy)

Example of Senior Tuition Waiver  A concurrent senior student who took three hours in Summer, three hours in the Fall, and 12 hours in the Spring would have all of his/ her tuition waived because he/ she did not exceed the 18 hour limit.

3.10 Concurrent Enrollment Report: For Off-Campus Activity

First Report Due by December 1, 2018: Submit via email to darcher@osrhe.edu

3.12 Grading Policy

General Information

 Purpose: establish a uniform system of grading for State System Institutions.  Defines symbols and grading terms.  Outlines the transcript as the official document issued by an institution with student information that is a complete and accurate reflection of a student’s academic career.  Academic Forgiveness Provisions:

• Repeated
• Academic Reprieve
• Academic Renewal

 Reporting Academic Standing (retention standards/ requirements, cumulative GPA and retention/ graduation GPA). Note all academic probation/ suspensions.

3.14 Granting of Degrees policy

 The diploma shall bear the seal of the State Regents and shall contain the signatures of the chairman, the secretary, and the Chancellor (Diplomas awarded shall bear the names of officers

• f the State Regents serving in the current fiscal year).

 For the institution, the diploma shall bear the signatures of the chairman of the governing board, the president of the institution, and one academic officer.  A sample diploma shall be provided annually, by December 1 to the State Regents’ office. Please scan and email a sample diploma to darcher@osrhe.edu.

3.14.4 Diplomas

3.15 Undergraduate Degree Requirements policy

Establishes requirements for the following

 Associate in Arts or Associate in Science general education  Associate in Applied Arts general education  Baccalaureate general education  Baccalaureate requirements and standards  General education framework  Policy has tables with specific hours/ requirements

General Information

 This policy establishes definitions, principles, criteria, and guidelines to assist institutional officials in the classification of postsecondary students as in-state/ out-of-state students.  The policy details in-state/ out-of-state status issues concerning dependent and independent persons, documented foreign nationals, undocumented students, uniformed services and

• ther military service members, and full-time professional

practitioner/ workers.  Most recently, the State Regents recently approved revisions to the In state/ Out-of-State Status of Enrolled Students policy on April 20, 2017.

3.18 In-State/Out-of-State Status

• f Enrolled Students policy

Legislation

 Three years ago, changes were made to the OSRHE In-State Out-of-State Status of Enrolled Students policy to align with Senate Bill 138 and Section 702 of the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, which was codified in 38 U.S.C. 3679.  More recently, Congress passed Public Law 114-315, which modified 38 U.S.C. 3679(c). These amendments went into effect for courses, semesters, or terms beginning after July 1, 2017.

3.18 In-State/Out-of-State Status

• f Enrolled Students policy

Spouse or Dependent Child of an Active Duty Service Member (background before recent statutory updates):

 Members of the uniformed services, along with their dependent children and spouse, who provide evidence that they are full-time active duty status of more than thirty (30) days in the uniformed services stationed in Oklahoma or temporarily present through military orders.  Regardless of the residency of the student, the dependent children or spouse of a person who is currently serving as a member of the active uniformed services of the United States on full-time active duty status of more than thirty (30) days for whom Oklahoma is the home of record.

3.18 In-State/Out-of-State Status

• f Enrolled Students policy

New Requirement for a Spouse or Dependent Child of an Active Duty Service Member

To comply with the amendments to U.S.C. 3679(c):

 A person using transferred Post-9/ 11 G.I. Bill benefits (38 U.S.C. § 3319) who lives in Oklahoma (regardless of his/ her formal state

• f residence) and the transferor is a member of the uniformed

service who is serving on active duty (regardless of the transferor’s home of record) will be eligible for in-state status.

3.18 In-State/Out-of-State Status

• f Enrolled Students policy

Fry Scholarship (before recent statutory updates):

 A surviving spouse or child receiving the Fry Scholarship who resides in Oklahoma and enrolls at a state system institution within 5 years of an active duty service member’s death in the line of duty after serving 90 days or more (regardless of the student’s formal state of residence or the home of record of the deceased service member).

3.18 In-State/Out-of-State Status

• f Enrolled Students policy

New Requirement Fry Scholarship Recipients

To comply with the amendments to U.S.C 3679(c):  A surviving spouse or child receiving the Fry Scholarship who resides in Oklahoma and enrolls at a state system institution within 5 years of an active duty service member’s death in the line of duty after serving 90 days or more (regardless of the student’s formal state of residence or the home of record of the deceased service member).

3.18 In-State/Out-of-State Status

• f Enrolled Students policy

3.20.1 Purpose

Assessment of students fulfills two purposes: (1) improvement

• f teaching and learning; and (2) accountability and

institutional effectiveness.

 Course Placement  General Education  Program Outcomes  Student Satisfaction

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.4 Entry Level Assessment and Course Placement

 Students scoring below the ACT subject score minimum level will be reviewed with additional information, as approved by the State Regents, to determine the level of readiness for college- level course work. Another test is not required.  Institutional entry level assessment programs should include an evaluation of past academic performance, educational goals, study skills, values, self-concept and motivation. A test is not required.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.4.B Basic Academic Skills Requirements

 Students must begin remediation of basic academic skills deficiencies during the first semester and continue until prepared for college-level course work in the respective subject area.  Zero-level remediation courses are not required.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.5 General Education Assessment

 This assessment is designed to measure the student's academic progress and learning competencies in areas such as communication, critical thinking, mathematics, reading, and writing.  More than the general education course selection in the first half

• f the degree program.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.6 Program Learning Outcomes

 Select instruments to assess learning outcomes for each degree

• program. Should assess higher level thinking skills in applying

learned information. When available and appropriate, nationally standardized instruments will be used.  All findings will be reported in program reviews as indicated in Academic Program Review policy. Results from nationally standardized instruments will be reported in the Annual Student Assessment Report.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.7 Student Engagement and Satisfaction

 Student and alumni perceptions are important in the evaluation of academic and campus programs and services. Such perceptions are valuable because they provide an indication of the students' subjective view of events and services which collectively constitute their undergraduate experiences.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.7 Student Engagement and Satisfaction

 Evaluations of student satisfaction can be accomplished via surveys, interviews, etc. Resultant data will be used for the improvement of programs and services.  Current practices include NSSE, CCSSE, BCSSE, FSSE, SSI, SRI, IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction, SENSE.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.8 Assessment Plan and Reporting

 To achieve the purposes of this policy and to accomplish effective and innovative State System assessment, every institution will maintain a current assessment plan that includes a minimum of the assessments required in this policy.  The plan will be submitted to the State Regents for approval every five years or when substantive changes are made. Report all changes to staff to determine if substantive.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.20.8 Assessment Plan and Reporting

 Annually, institutions shall submit to the State Regents a student assessment report containing information related to this policy and the institution’s approved plan. Refer to the Academic Affairs Procedures Handbook for details regarding the reporting requirements.  Due December 1, 2018.

3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation policy

3.11 Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy

 This policy is designed to facilitate the transfer of students between and among community colleges and universities within the State System, and transfer of technical coursework for students through the Statewide Articulation Agreement with Oklahoma technology centers.  Required GPAs for admission of transfer students can vary across the system. Use the Academic Policies Procedures Handbook to review details.  Transcripts of records from colleges and universities accredited by HLC or other regional associations will be given full value.  Transcripts of record from degree granting institutions accredited by national association are subject to review and may transfer on a course-by-course basis.

General Issues

3.11 Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy

 The Course Equivalency Project (CEP) has been around since 1996 and includes over 8,000 courses.  While the CEP has been around for over 20 years, it has never been formally addressed in policy, so a new section that details the conditions of the CEP was recently incorporated into the OSRHE Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy.  This revision was approved by the State Regents at their April 26, 2018 meeting.

Policy Revision

3.11 Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy

Career Tech Transfer Option

 Last year, a new policy section was established that allows State System institutions to accept Oklahoma technology center transfer course work through a Statewide Articulation Agreement.  The Statewide Articulation Agreement includes a lot of technical courses which meet technical degree requirements at participating State System of Higher Education institutions, which will be accepted in transfer from Oklahoma technology centers towards a college technical certificate, an associate in applied science degree,

• r a technology baccalaureate degree.

3.11 Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy

Review Process for Career Tech Coursework

 An institution that wishes to have technical courses included in the Statewide Articulation Agreement shall have the president submit the proposal to the Chancellor for State Regents’ consideration.  State Regents staff will manage the content faculty review and evaluation process for the proposed technical courses to be inventoried in the Statewide Technical Course Articulation Agreement.  After review, staff will submit the faculty-recommended technical courses to the State Regents for approval.

3.11 Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy

Requirements for Career Tech Transfer Credit

 A student who successfully completes Oklahoma technology center courses and/ or programs listed on the Statewide Technical Course Articulation Matrix may earn college transfer credit in only those technical courses approved if he/ she:  Provides an official transcript from the technology center that includes all essential elements to document the completed technical course(s);  Achieves a minimum passing grade, as determined by the accreditation, licensure, or other programmatic requirements of the State System institution, for technical course work listed on the Statewide Technical Course Articulation Matrix, clearly documented

• n an official technology center transcript; and

 Has been admitted to the participating State System institution.

3.11 Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy

 The higher education institution will only post career technology center transfer coursework that is approved to accept through the Statewide Technical Course Articulation Agreement.  Career tech transfer courses may be applicable for technical degree major requirements or technical degree major electives, but not as general elective credit.  If a student transfers career tech coursework through the statewide articulation agreement into a technical degree and later changes his/ her major to a non-technical degree, the career tech coursework will remain on the transcript; however, such coursework will not apply towards meeting degree major requirements, degree major electives, or general elective credit in the non-technical degree.

Posting Career Tech Transfer Work on State System Transcripts

3.6 Contractual Arrangements Between Higher Education Institutions & Other Entities policy

Posting Career Tech Transfer Work on State System Transcripts

 The higher education institution will only post career technology center transfer credit awarded through the Statewide Technical Course Articulation Agreement as S or P. See the OSRHE Grading policy for more information.  All transfer credit awarded through the Statewide Articulation Agreement must be appropriately identified by source and method on the official college transcript.  The semester that is in session during the course end date will serve as the semester of transcription for transfer work awarded through the Statewide Technical Course Articulation Agreement. For example, if a student completes a career technology center course on April 1, 2019, the higher education institution will post it as a Spring 2019 transfer course.  All transfer credit awarded through the Statewide Articulation Agreement must be converted to credit hours. In accordance with 34 CFR §668.8(l)(1), one semester credit hour must include at least 37.5 clock hours of instruction.

3.11 Undergraduate Transfer and Articulation policy

 We have developed a career technology center transcript guidance document and a sample career technology center transcript to ensure that State System institutions have the data elements needed to post career technology center transfer work.

3.6.5.B Quality Assurance

 To ensure that institutions have the proper oversight to effectively administer such agreements with an unaccredited and/ or non-degree granting entity, an appropriately qualified full-time faculty must have direct control over the entirety of the program.  Institutions shall adhere to HLC standards for faculty to have

• ne degree level above the level teaching and be approved by

the academic officers; however, exceptions to degree level are allowed if the institution defines a minimum threshold and evaluation process to make such appointments.

3.6 Contractual Arrangements Between Higher Education Institutions & Other Entities policy

3.6.5.B. Quality Assurance

 An Institution can only offer degrees via a contractual arrangement in content areas in which it employs qualified full-time faculty and the institution must designate a full-time faculty to oversee the contract.  All contractual arrangements shall be included in the annual institutional program assessment activities.  Reporting Requirements:

• Annual list of programs in contract;
• Annual list of contractual courses; and
• Annual summary report including enrollment, retention and

graduation, student and program assessment, financial arrangements, marketing, costs, and accomplishments.

3.6 Contractual Arrangements Between Higher Education Institutions & Other Entities policy

Overview

 The purpose of the policy is to provide a framework to evaluate learning that takes place outside of the formal higher education structure.  The framework provides a systematic and comparable means through which students might be awarded credit for prior learning.  Credit for prior learning must be validated by successful completion of 12 or more credit hours at the awarding institution before being placed on the student’s official transcript.  Credit for prior learning, once recorded at a State System institution, is transferable on the same basis as if the credit had been earned through regular study at the awarding institution.

3.16 Credit for Prior Learning policy

Academic Affairs Procedures Handbook

Handbook Overview

 Other Helpful Information:

• Definitions
• Reports and due dates
• Accreditation Procedures for Recognition
• Closed schools/ record information
• Intensive English Program list
• Forms and Reference Information
• ACT/ SAT Concordance Table

 Procedures Handbook is updated annually or as necessary through the COI.  Your input is needed if helpful information is missing or something needs to be changed/ corrected – please contact Daniel Archer.

Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t

Mr . Kyle F

• ste r

Assistant Dir e c tor , Ac ade mic & Stude nt Affair s De gr e e Comple tion Initiative s

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n F a ll Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 19, 2018

Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t



T he Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t (CE P) wa s e sta b lishe d in 1995.



F a c ulty a ppo inte d b y the pre side nts re vie w c o urse e q uiva le nc ie s in disc ipline s se le c te d b y the COI a nnua lly. T he sta te tra nsfe r ta b le s a re upda te d a fte r fina l ve rific a tio n a nd a ppro va l b y the Sta te Re g e nts.



Additio ns, de le tio ns a nd mo dific a tio ns o f c o urse wo rk ta ke pla c e a t Se pte mb e r F a c ulty Me e ting s. COI me mb e rs ma y sub mit c ha ng e s fo r disc ipline s tha t do no t me e t in pe rso n tha t ye a r.



Priva te institutio ns ma y o nly a dd the ir c o urse s if the y a tte nde d tha t disc ipline ’ s F a c ulty Me e ting .

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t



8,104 c o urse s/ 50 disc ipline s o n the 2018-19 sta te ma trix ta b le



E a c h me e ting re q uire s a COI fa c ilita to r a nd se le c tio n o f a c ha ir fro m the fa c ulty g ro up



T ra ditio na l sta nda rd: 75% c o mmo n c o urse c o nte nt



Adde d 2017-18: Stude nt L e a rning Outc o me s fo r CE P Co urse s—Must me e t 100% fo r inc lusio n



www.OK Co urse T ra nsfe r.o rg

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

CE P Cyc le Ove rvie w

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

Institution Review May-August Faculty Review September Institution 2nd Review October-December Council on Instruction Approval February State Regents Approval March Matrix Posted Online April

We a re he re !

Que stio ns, c o mme nts, o r sug g e stio ns?

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

 K

yle F

• ste r

 Assista nt Dire c to r  Ac a de mic & Stude nt Affa irs De g re e

Co mple tio n I nitia tive s

 kfo ste r@ o srhe .e du | (405) 225-9163

Ma th Suc c e ss I nitia tive s

Mr . Kyle F

• ste r

Assistant Dir e c tor , Ac ade mic & Stude nt Affair s De gr e e Comple tion Initiative s

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n F a ll Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 19, 2018

Histo ry o f Ma th Suc c e ss I nitia tive

Jo ine d Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a

I nc re a se the numb e r o f de g re e s a nd c e rtific a te s b y 67 pe rc e nt y 2023

Re me dia l Re fo rm Summit Ma the ma tic s F a c ulty Co nfe re nc e Ma th Suc c e ss Gro up Pla nning Me e ting

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Oc to b e r 2011: April 2012: Se pte mb e r 2012: Se pte mb e r 2013:

Go a ls

1. I mpro ve ma the ma tic s pre pa ra tio n o f stude nts e nte ring c o lle g e 2. Re fo rm ma the ma tic s re me dia tio n to b e mo re e ffe c tive 3. Stre ng the n ma the ma tic s pre pa ra tio n fo r a ll ma jo rs

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Histo ry o f Ma th Suc c e ss I nitia tive

http://www.o khig he re d.o rg /c o mple te -c o lle g e -ame ric a/math-suc c e ss.shtml

No ve mb e r 2014: Ma the ma tic s Suc c e ss Gro up Stra te g ic Pla n I mple me nta tio n Me e ting

ST RAT E GIC PRIORIT IE S

1. I mpro ve tra nsitio n fro m hig h sc ho o l to c o lle g e 2. Re fo rm re me dia tio n to b e mo re e ffe c tive 3. I mpro ve c o urse pla c e me nt b y using multiple a sse ssme nts 4. Cre a te multiple pa thwa ys tha t a re sta nda rdize d b y disc ipline No ve mb e r 2015: I nvite d to jo in Da na Ce nte r Ma the ma tic s Pa thwa ys

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Histo ry o f Ma th Suc c e ss I nitia tive

MAT H PAT HWAYS PROJE CT

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Pa thwa ys T a sk F

• rc e Go a ls

1. I mpro ve stude nt c o urse c o mple tio n, c o lle g e re te ntio n, a nd de g re e c o mple tio n b y o ffe ring multiple g a te wa y ma the ma tic s o ptio ns 2. I nc re a se re le va nc e o f g a te wa y ma the ma tic s c o urse s to de g re e pro g ra ms 3. E nsure tra nsfe ra b ility a nd a pplic a b ility o f ma the ma tic s c o urse s with c o mmo n la ng ua g e 4. I nc re a se a ppre c ia tio n o f ma the ma tic s fo r a ll stude nts 5. I nc re a se c o lla b o ra tio n with pa rtne r disc ipline s a nd e mplo ye rs

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Pa thwa ys T a sk F

• rc e

Re c o mme nda tio ns

Appro ve d a t F e b rua ry 2, 2017 Sta te Re g e nts’ Me e ting

1. I nc re a se stude nt e ng a g e me nt a nd the te a c hing o f a pplic a tio ns in g a te wa y ma th c la sse s 2. I nc re a se suppo rt fo r impo rta nt a c a de mic suc c e ss skills in g a te wa y ma th c la sse s 3. Pro vide fa c ulty a nd a dviso r pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt a nd re so urc e s 4. I mpro ve stude nt pre pa ra tio n, inc luding e ffo rts in K

• 12

e duc a tio n a nd re me dia tio n re fo rm 5. E sta b lish sta te wide de g re e c luste rs a nd c o rre spo nding ma th pa thwa ys, e nsuring tra nsfe ra b ility a c ro ss institutio ns.

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Pa thwa ys T a sk F

• rc e

Ac tivitie s

April 2017: Ong o ing 2017: F e b rua ry 2018: June 2018: Ong o ing : Ma th Pa thwa ys Wo rksho p Ga te wa y Ma th Co urse De ve lo pme nt Advising Wo rksho p De g re e Cluste rs Me e ting Wo rk with pa rtne r disc ipline s

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Ga te wa y Co urse s

 Co lle g e Alg e b ra / Pre -Ca lc ulus  Qua ntita tive Re a so ning / Ge ne ra l E

duc a tio n Ma th

 E

le me nta ry Sta tistic s

 F

unc tio ns a nd Mo de ling

CORE QUI SI T E RE ME DI AT I ON

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Okla ho ma Da ta

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Mo st re me dia tio n is in Ma th – Ma ny stude nts re q uire b o th re me dia l Ma th a nd E ng lish

55% 43% 66% 63% 52% 57% 69% 24% 24% 40% 32% 18% 26% 32%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% All Stud e nts Asia n Bla c k Hispa nic White All Othe r Ra c e s Pe ll Stude nts Ma th E ng lish Ma th a nd E ng lish

2-ye a r Co lle g e Stude nts

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Mo st re me dia tio n is in Ma th – Ma ny stude nts re q uire b o th re me dia l Ma th a nd E ng lish

45% 73% 50% 39% 48% 56% 19% 43% 26% 13% 20% 25%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% All Stud e nts Bla c k Hispa nic White All Othe r Ra c e s Pe ll Stude nts Ma th E ng lish Ma th a nd E ng lish

4-ye a r No n-F la g ship Stude nts

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

T

• o ma ny re me dia te d stude nts a re no t pa ssing

the Ga te wa y c o urse , e spe c ia lly so me g ro ups o f stude nts

13% 33% 7% 15% 15% 10% 12%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% All Stud e nts Asia n Bla c k Hispa nic White All Othe r Ra c e s Pe ll Stude nts Ma th E ng lish Ma th a nd E ng lish

Ga te wa y Co urse Co mple tio n in 2 ye a rs 2-ye a r Co lle g e Re me dia l Stude nts

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

T

• o ma ny re me dia te d stude nts a re no t pa ssing

the Ga te wa y c o urse , e spe c ia lly so me g ro ups o f stude nts

16% 12% 15% 19% 14% 16%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% All Stud e nts Bla c k Hispa nic White All Othe r Ra c e s Pe ll Stude nts Ma th E ng lish Ma th a nd E ng lish

Ga te wa y Co urse Co mple tio n in 2 ye a rs 4-ye a r No n-F la g ship Re me dia l Stude nts

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Sta te Re g e nts’ Co mmitme nt to Sc a le b y F a ll 2017

1.

90% o f a ll re me dia l stude nts a tte nd a n institutio n tha t o ffe rs a c o re q uisite mo de l

2.

Ove r 75% o f re me dia l stude nts e nro ll in c o re q uisite re me dia tio n

3.

Ga te wa y c o mple tio n ra te s impro ve 100- 150% o ve r b a se line b y ra c e , a g e a nd Pe ll sta tus

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Sta te Re g e nts’ Surve y F a ll 2015

 27 Sta te Syste m institutio ns ha d o r

we re pla nning c ha ng e s in Ma th re me dia tio n a nd 24 in E ng lish re me dia tio n.

 T

his inc lude d mo re tha n 80% c o nside ring a c o re q uisite mo de l.

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ga te wa y Co mple tio n Ra te s Okla ho ma Ba se line (F a ll 2015)

Community Colle ge s 1- ye ar 2- ye ar

Ma th 10% 22% E ng lish 26% 32%

Re gional Colle ge s 1- ye ar 2- ye ar

Ma th 19% 38% E ng lish 27% 37%

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Mo ving F

• rwa rd

 6,955 stude nts e nro lle d in c o re q uisite

re me dia tio n during the 2016-17 a c a de mic ye a r

 Da ta a re pe nding fo r 2017-18  All Sta te Syste m institutio ns ha ve

imple me nte d so me fo rm o f c o re q uisite re me dia tio n

 Co ntinuing suppo rt fo r institutio ns

imple me nting a nd sc a ling this initia tive

12th GRADE MAT H

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Co lle g e Ca re e r Ma th Re a dy

 F

• c use d o n 12th g ra de stude nts who ne e d

Ma th re me dia tio n

 Okla ho ma hig h sc ho o l te a c he rs tra ine d in

pa rtne rship with So uthe rn Re g io n E duc a tio n Bo a rd (SRE B)

 K

e e ps stude nts in a fo urth ye a r o f ma th in hig h sc ho o l

 Suc c e ssful c o mple tio n c o uld re pla c e

re me dia tio n a t the c o lle g e o r unive rsity

• Curre nt pilo t pro g ra ms

Ma th Suc c e ss Initia tive s

Ma th Suc c e ss Que stio ns o r Co mme nts

Dr . Rac he l Bate s

Asso c ia te Vic e Cha nc e llo r fo r E duc a tio na l Pa rtne rships rb a te s@ o srhe .e du (405) 225-9168

Mr . Kyle F

• ste r

Assista nt Dire c to r Ac a de mic & Stude nt Affa irs De g re e Co mple tio n I nitia tive s kfo ste r@ o srhe .e du (405) 225-9163

Adult De g re e Co mple tio n

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 19, 2018

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

• Ms. She lia Smith

Re a c h Hig he r Ma na g e r

Are a s to b e Co ve re d

Ba c kg ro und Curre nt Sta tus Po lic y I

ssue s fo r Asso c ia te De g re e Pro g ra ms

Po lic y I

ssue s fo r Ba c c a la ure a te De g re e Pro g ra ms

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Ba c kg ro und

 T

he Re a c h Hig he r initia tive pro vide s a dult de g re e c o mple tio n pro g ra ms in fle xib le , no n- tra ditio na l fo rma ts

 Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e in Org a niza tio n L

e a de rship

 Asso c ia te in Arts in E

nte rprise De ve lo pme nt

 Asso c ia te in Sc ie nc e in E

nte rprise De ve lo pme nt

 Ava ila b le a t e ig ht unive rsitie s a nd 14

c o mmunity c o lle g e s a nd te c hnic a l b ra nc he s a c ro ss the sta te

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Curre nt Sta tus

5,477 Pro g ra m Gra dua te s thro ug h Spring 2018 fo r 2-a nd 4-ye a r institutio ns

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Po lic y I ssue s Asso c ia te De g re e Pro g ra ms

 Re side nt Cre dit

 Ge ne ra l E

duc a tio n re q uire me nts (37 c re dit ho urs) c a n b e sa tisfie d b y c re dit e a rne d a t a n Okla ho ma institutio n pa rtic ipa ting in the Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t (CE P). Co urse s ta ke n fro m the CE P listing s will fulfill re side nt c re dit re q uire me nts.

 Co re c o urse s/ ma jo r re q uire me nts (23 c re dit ho urs) must

inc lude 15 o f the fina l c re dit ho urs fro m Okla ho ma institutio ns pa rtic ipa ting in the Re a c h Hig he r a sso c ia te de g re e c o mple tio n pro g ra m inc luding the 12 Okla ho ma c o mmunity c o lle g e s a nd 2 Okla ho ma te c hnic a l b ra nc he s a c c re dite d b y the Hig he r L e a rning Co mmissio n.

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Po lic y I ssue s Asso c ia te De g re e Pro g ra ms

 Co urse Sub stitutio n

 I

nstitutio ns ma y a llo w c o urse sub stitutio ns within a c o nte nt a re a if the c o urse is e q ua l to o r hig he r in rig o r a nd c o nsiste nt with institutio na l pra c tic e fo r c o urse sub stitutio ns in suc h c o nte nt a re a s fo r o the r de g re e pro g ra ms a t the institutio n.

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Po lic y I ssue s Ba c c a la ure a te De g re e Pro g ra ms

 Re side nt Cre dit

 All 10 c o re c o urse s in the Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e in

Org a niza tio na l L e a de rship (775) pro g ra m a re c o nside re d re side nt c re dit re g a rdle ss o f the institutio n o f re c o rd fo r the instruc tio n.

 Co urse Sub stitutio n

 No ne o f the c o re c o urse s ma y b e sub stitute d fo r o the r

c o urse s o r thro ug h prio r le a rning a sse ssme nt.

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Re a c h Hig he r Dire c t Comple te

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

• Ms. Ang ie Willits

Adult De g r e e Comple tion Ma na g e r

Are a s to b e Co ve re d

 Ba c kg ro und  Stude nt Re fe rra ls  Pa rtne rs a nd Asse ts  Upc o ming Visits a nd T

ra ining

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Ba c kg ro und

 Built o n Re a c h Hig he r F

• unda tio n.

 Okla ho ma re c e ive d infra struc ture g ra nt in 2017 fo r a n

Adult Pro mise type imita tive .

 De g re e pro g ra ms tha t le a d to c ritic a l o c c upa tio ns liste d

• n OK

Wo rks’ 100 Critic a l Oc c upa tio ns L ist.

 F

unding fro m multiple e ntitie s le ve ra g e d to c o ve r a dult stude nts’ c o sts to c o mple te de g re e tha t le a ds to e mplo yme nt in a Critic a l Oc c upa tio n.

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Stude nt Re fe rra ls

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

 Co ming So o n:

 Curre ntly in De ve lo pme nt: Stude nt will g o to the Re a c h

Hig he r we b site to c o mple te a stude nt inte re st fo rm a t www.re a c hhig he ro k.o rg

 Dire c t no tific a tio n will g o to na vig a to r fro m the institutio n o f

c ho ic e . Na vig a to r will c o nta c t the m within 3 b usine ss da ys.

 Pa rtne rship pa g e with the lo g o s o f o ur pa rtne rs a nd

info rma tio n fo r b e c o ming a pa rtne r (PDF do wnlo a d o f c o mmitme nt fo rm).

 E

sta b lishe d pa rtne rs will ha ve a n individua l pa g e with info rma tio n a b o ut the ir b usine ss o r institutio n a nd c o nta c t info rma tio n fo r the ir RHDC na vig a to r o r HRM.

Stude nt Re fe rra ls

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

 Ava ila b le No w:

 Dire c t Co mple te Info rma tio n pa g e ha s b e e n a dde d to the

www.re a c hhig he ro k.o rg

 Ma ilb o x ha s b e e n se t up a t RHDire c tCo mple te @ o srhe .e du  Ang ie Willits c he c ks ma il b o x da ily a nd e ma ils o r c a lls the

po te ntia l stude nt

 Stude nts a lso ma y c o mple te surve y unde r “Re g iste r fo r mo re

Info rma tio n” a t Re a c h Hig he r ho me pa g e : a n a uto me ssa g e is se nt to the ir e ma il a b o ut RHDC, a nd a n e ma il c o me s dire c tly to RHDire c tCo mple te inb o x, Ang ie Willits fo llo ws up with c o nta c t.

 L

a unc h Okla ho ma we b site ha s URL link to Re a c h Hig he r we b site .

Pa rtne rs a nd Asse ts



Arra ng e d pa rtne r me e ting s with re g io na l WDBs



Re c e ive d sc ho la rship info rma tio n fro m Sc huste rma n fo und a tio n: $40,000, T ulsa re g io n o nly



Re c e ive d pro mise o f up to 20 stud e nts pe r ye a r a t OU, fro m Co lle g e o f Pro fe ssio na l & Co ntinuing Stud ie s



Re c e ive d c o mmitme nt fro m Co lle g e o f Musc o g e e Na tio n, So uthwe ste rn Okla ho ma Sta te Unive rsity, T ulsa Co mmunity Co lle g e , a nd Okla ho ma Sta te Unive rsity – T ulsa



Re c e ive d c o mmitme nt fro m K io wa a nd Co ma nc he Na tio ns: the ir T rib a l E d uc a tio n Dire c to rs will a lso b e the RHDC na vig a to rs

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Upc o ming Visits a nd T ra ining

 Me e ting in Co nc ho with Che ye nne -Ara pa ho

E duc a tio n Co unc il

 Me e ting in T

ulsa with I nte r-T rib a l Co unc il: E duc a tio n Co mmitte e Me e ting (F ive Civilize d T rib e s)

 No rthe a st Wo rkfo rc e Pa rtne rship me e ting in

Cla re mo re

 Me e ting a t Unive rsity o f Sc ie nc e a nd Arts o f

Okla ho ma with the T rib a l E duc a tio n De pa rtme nts Na tio na l Asse mb ly

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Dr . Ste phanie Be auc hamp Assoc iate Vic e Chanc e llor for Ac ade mic Affair s

Ac a de mic Pro g ra ms Po lic y

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 19, 2018

Po lic ie s to b e Co ve re d



3.4 Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Appro va l



3.4 Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Re vie w



3.8 Cha ng e s in Ac a de mic Struc ture a nd No me nc la ture



3.19 Ac a de mic Ca le nda rs



Ac a de mic Pla n/ De g re e Co mple tio n Pla n



Othe r

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Appro va l Pro c e ss



I nstitutio n sub mits L OI to Cha nc e llo r



L OI is e ma ile d to Pre side nts syste m wide



I nstitutio ns ha ve 45 c ale ndar da ys to re q ue st a c o py o f the pro po sa l

• Co pie s MAY b e re q ue ste d b y Pre side nt o r Chie f

Ac a de mic Offic e r (fo llo w institutio na l pro to c o l)



I nstitutio ns ha ve 30 c ale ndar da ys to no tify Sta te Re g e nts’ o ffic e o f pro te st

• Pro te st MUST

c o me fro m Pre side nt



I f no pro te st, at le ast 5-6 mo nth pro c e ss



I f the re is a pro te st, the re q ue st will no t mo ve fo rwa rd until the pro te st is re so lve d

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

E ar lie st Age nda De c e mbe r

L OI re c e ive d fro m institutio n Syste m-wide L OI se nt to Pre side nts Pro po sa l re c e ive d fro m inst. Re q ue ste d? YE S NO Be g in a g e nda pre pa ra tio n Se nd re spo nse to institutio n Re c e ive c o unte r- re spo nse Re spo nse re c e ive d? YE S NO Be g in a na lysis I nstitutio ns have 30 days to sub mit a le tte r o f c o nc e rn I nstitutio ns have 45 days to re q ue st a c o py o f the pro po sal. I nstitutio ns have 30 days to re spo nd to c o nc e rn Co py o f pro po sa l se nt L OI must b e re c e ive d at le ast 30 days b e fo re pro po sal is sub mitte d.

E maile d to Pr e side nts August 1 E ar lie st Date to Submit Se pte mbe r 1 DL to r e que st c opy Se pte mbe r 15 (45 days fr

• m L

OI) Oc tobe r 1 Oc tobe r 30

Be g in a g e nda pre pa ra tio n

E ar lie st Age nda De c e mbe r (maybe ) Januar y/ F e br uar y

T his time line is a n e stimate o f the le ng th o f time it ta ke s fo r a ne w pro g ra m to b e pre se nte d to the Sta te Re g e nts’ sta ff. T he time line is NOT

GUARANT E E D a nd a ssume s the pro po sa l c o nta ins a ll

info rma tio n re q uire d b y po lic y a nd tha t Sta te Re g e nts’ sta ff d o e s no t ha ve q ue stio ns re g a rd ing the pro po sa l.

Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• val F

low Cha r t

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts



L e tte rs o f I nte nt (L OI ) a re re q uire d fo r a ll:

• Ne w Pro g ra ms
• E

mb e dde d Ce rtific a te s

• Re q ue sts fo r o nline de live ry o f e xisting pro g ra ms
• 100% o f the ma jo r c o urse wo rk d e live re d e le c tro nic a lly OR
• Ad ve rtise d a s a va ila b le o nline



L OI s:

• Must b e se nt fro m Pre side nt to Cha nc e llo r
• Must inc lude :
• Na me o f pro g ra m
• L
• c a tio n o f de live ry
• De live ry me tho d (tra ditio na l, o nline , b o th)

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 L

OI s:

• Must b e re c e ive d a t le a st 30 da ys b e fo re sub mitting

pro po sa l

• Sub mitting pro po sa l with L

OI will no t spe e d up the pro c e ss

 Pro po sa ls must b e sub mitte d fro m Pre side nt

to Cha nc e llo r to b e o ffic ia l

Do NOT se nd pr

• posal with L

OI

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 T

hing s tha t ma y DE

L AY pro g re ss o f yo ur pro po sa l’ s

a ppro va l:

• Insuffic ie nt o r inc o mple te info rma tio n
• Omissio n o f re q uire d info rma tio n
• Disc re pa nc y b e twe e n L

OI a nd pro po sa l

• Use o f no n-c urre nt fo rms
• Curre nt fo rms c a n b e lo c a te d he re :

http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / a dmin-fa c / a c a d e mic -fo rms/

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

L e ve l II L e ve l III L e ve l IV L e ve l I

L e ve l I

Ove ra rc hing de g re e de sig na tio n

L e ve l I I

Spe c ific de g re e de sig na tio n

L e ve l I I I

Pro g ra m na me (ma jo r)

L e ve l I V

Optio n

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

L e ve l I

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

 Ove ra rc hing de g re e de sig na tio n  Co de d the SAME in De g re e I

nve nto ry fo r AL

L

institutio ns

Ce rtific a te , Asso c ia te in Arts, Asso c ia te in Sc ie nc e , Asso c ia te in Applie d Sc ie nc e , Ba c he lo r o f Arts, Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e , Ba c he lo r o f (Spe c ia lty), Gra dua te Ce rtific a te , Ma ste r o f Arts, Ma ste r o f Sc ie nc e , Ma ste r o f (Spe c ia lty), Do c to r o f Philo so phy, Do c to r o f (Spe c ia lty), F irst Pro fe ssio na l

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

Level I Codes

Level I Title Code Certificate 01 Associate in Arts 02 Associate in Science 03 Associate in Applied Science 04 Bachelor of Arts 05 Bachelor of Science 06 Bachelor of (Specialty) 07 Master of Arts 08 Master of Science 09 Master of (Specialty) 10 Educational Specialist) 11 Doctor of Philosophy 12 Doctor of (Specialty) 13 First Professional 14 Graduate Certificate 15

L e ve l II

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

Ce rtific a te , Ba c he lo r o f Arts, Ba c he lo r o f E duc a tio n, Ma ste r o f Sc ie nc e , Ma ste r o f Busine ss Administra tio n, Do c to r o f Philo so phy, Do c to r o f E duc a tio n

 Spe c ific de g re e de sig na tio n  Co de d DIF

F E RE NT L Y fo r e a c h institutio n

 De g re e de sig na tio n ma y b e the sa me a s L

e ve l I b ut this is whe re spe c ia lty de g re e s a re de fine d

L e ve l III

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

 Pro g ra m na me  De fine s ma jo r c o urse wo rk c o nte nt

Ac c o unting , E ng lish, Bio lo g y, Music , E le me nta ry E duc a tio n

L e ve l IV

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

 Optio n

 Co nc e ntra tio n within ma in pro g ra m  Stude nts spe c ia lize in a n a re a unde r a b ig g e r

umb re lla

 Optio ns a re no t re q uire d

A Ba c he lo r o f Arts in E ng lish c o uld ha ve the fo llo wing

• ptio ns:

 Cre a tive Writing 

British L ite ra ture



Ame ric a n L ite ra ture

L e ve l II L e ve l III L e ve l IV L e ve l I

 L

e ve l I

 Ba c he lo r o f (Spe c ia lty)

 L

e ve l I I

 Ba c he lo r o f F

ine Arts

 L

e ve l I I I

 Art

 L

e ve l I V



Studio Art



Pho to g ra phic Arts



3-Dime nsia l Studio

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

L e ve l II L e ve l III L e ve l IV L e ve l I

 L

e ve l I

 Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e

 L

e ve l I I

 Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e

 L

e ve l I I I

 Bio lo g y

 L

e ve l I V



E nviro nme nta l Bio lo g y



Ce llula r Bio lo g y



Pla nt Bio lo g y

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

L e ve l II L e ve l III L e ve l IV L e ve l I

 L

e ve l I

 Ma ste r o f Sc ie nc e

 L

e ve l I I

 Ma ste r o f Sc ie nc e

 L

e ve l I I I

 Ge o lo g y

 L

e ve l I V

Pr

• g r

a m L e ve ls

Oklaho ma State Re ge nts fo r Highe r E duc atio n NE W PROGRAM RE QUE ST F ORM F OR T RADIT IONAL AND ONL INE PROGRAMS State University Institution Submitting Proposal Bachelor of (Specialty) Formal Degree (Level I) (e.g. Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of (Specialty), Master of Arts, Doctor of Philosophy) Bachelor of Fine Arts Degree Designation as on Diploma (Level II) in Art Title of Proposed Degree Program (Level III) With options (Level IV) in: 3-Dimentional Studio Photographic Arts Studio Art Delivery method Traditional____X___ Electronic________ Both ________

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts



CI P Co de s

• Curre nt CI

P c o de s c a n b e fo und a t http:/ / nc e s.e d .g o v/ ipe ds/ c ipc o de / De fa ult.a spx? y=55



Sug g e ste d I nstruc tio na l Pro g ra m Co de

• Ca n le a ve b la nk (ne xt a va ila b le c o de will b e a ssig ne d)
• Ca n re q ue st spe c ific ne ve r b e fo re use d c o de



Co mple te a ll re q ue ste d info rma tio n o n c o ve r pa g e

• MUST

inc lude da te o f g o ve rning b o a rd a ppro va l

• MUST

inc lude Pre side nt’ s sig na ture

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts



Unde rg ra dua te de g re e re q uire me nts

• Bre a kd o wn o f re q uire me nts sho uld ma tc h d e ta ile d c urric ulum

pro vid e d in pro po sa l



Pro vide spe c ific c urric ula r info rma tio n

• Inc lud e AL

L

g e ne ra l e d uc a tio n c o urse s

• Inc lud e c o urse title s – no t just c o urse pre fix a nd c o urse numb e r
• AST

E RISK a ll ne w c o urse s

• Pre -re q uisite c o urse s must b e liste d a s pa rt o f the c urric ulum



F a c ulty q ua lific a tio ns

• L

ist a ll pro g ra m spe c ific fa c ulty a nd c re d e ntia ls (c a n sub mit CV/ Re sume – no t re q uire d )

• F

a c ulty sho uld me e t HL C a ssume d pra c tic e s q ua lific a tio ns



I nc lude de ta ils re g a rding suppo rt re so urc e s

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts



Purpo se o f pro g ra m

• Wha t c a n stud e nts d o with the d e g re e ?



Stude nt a nd e mplo ye r de ma nd

• Stud e nt surve y d a ta , sta te / lo c a l e mplo yme nt d a ta , a d viso ry

b o a rd / e mplo ye r suppo rt

• http:/ / www.o e sc .o k.g o v/



Addre ss 5 wo rkfo rc e e c o syste ms (if a pplic a b le )

• Ae ro spa c e / De fe nse
• E

ne rg y

• Ag ric ulture / Bio sc ie nc e s
• Info rma tio n a nd F

ina nc ia l Se rvic e s

• T

ra nspo rta tio n a nd Distrib utio n

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 E

stima te d Stude nt De ma nd – first 5 ye a rs

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 F

ina l a ppro va l c rite ria MUST

c o me fro m sa me

a c a de mic ye a r using 5-ye a r e stima te d stude nt de ma nd

 Must me e t po lic y minimum a s sta te d in 3.7.5.B.3

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 Online de live ry

• Must ha ve b e e n inc lud e d in L

OI

• 100% o f ma jo r d e live re d e le c tro nic a lly OR
• Ad ve rtise d a s a va ila b le o nline

 I

nstitutio n tha t ha ve no t b e e n a ppro ve d fo r o nline de live ry must c o mple te a ll se c tio ns sta rting o n pa g e 9 o f the re q ue st fo rm

 De sc rib e de live ry me tho d

• Wha t le a rning pla tfo rm? (D2L

, Bla c kb o a rd )

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 F

unding a nd E xpe nse s

• All a mo unts pro vide d MUST

inc lude e xpla na tio n

• F

unding MUST e q ua l o r e xc e e d e xpe nse s

• Use o f e xisting re so urc e s
• I

nc lude c a lc ula tio n/ fo rmula use d to de te rmine tuitio n

• F

a c ulty sa la rie s sho uld a lwa ys b e inc lude d

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Year of Program

• A. Funding Sources

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year Total Resources Available from Federal Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Resources Available from Other Non-State Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Existing State Resources $28,566 $31,691 $30,816 $31,441 $31,566

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above reflect current funds within the College of Arts and Sciences already budgeted to support programmatic expenses.

Resources Available through Internal Allocation and Reallocation $15,488 $15,488 $0 $0 $0

Narrative/Explanation: In years 1 and 2, funds from the deleted Associate of Arts in Anthropology (111) will be reallocated to the proposed Associate of Science in Astronomy.

Student Tuition $22,770 $30,360 $41,745 $49,335 $56,925

Narrative/Explanation and Calculations: The amounts above were calculated based on resident tuition of $126.50 per credit hour. State Community College anticipates students completing 30 credit hours per academic year and enrollment of 6, 8, 11, 13, and 15 students in years 1 through 5.

TOTAL $66,824 $77,539 $72,561 $80,776 $88,491

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Year of Program

• B. Breakdown of Budget Expenses/Requirements

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year Administrative/Other Professional Staff $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above represent a portion of administrative staff salary that will support the program

Faculty $12,360 $12,360 $12,360 $12,360 $12,360

Narrative/Explanation: Current faculty will teach the existing courses required for the proposed program. The amounts above represent a percentage of faculty salary used to teach students in the proposed program.

Graduate Assistants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Student Employees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment and Instructional Materials $500 $550 $600 $650 $700

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above will cover costs associated with classroom instructional materials such as charts and models.

Library $100 $125 $150 $175 $200

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above will cover costs of subscription to discipline specific journals needed for student research.

Contractual Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Year of Program

• B. Breakdown of Budget Expenses/Requirements

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year Other Support Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Commodities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Printing $400 $450 $500 $550 $600

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above are budgeted for printing course syllabi and exams.

Telecommunications $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Travel $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above will be used for faculty to travel to regional conferences.

Awards and Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL

$28,566 $31,691 $30,816 $31,441 $31,566

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Year of Program

• A. Funding Sources

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year TOTAL $66,824 $77,539 $72,561 $80,776 $88,491 Year of Program

• B. Breakdown of Budget

Expenses/Requirements 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year

TOTAL

$28,566 $31,691 $30,816 $31,441 $31,566

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 E

mb e dde d Ce rtific a te s

 Must a de q ua te ly a ddre ss stude nt/ e mplo ye r de ma nd  Curric ulum sho uld b e sub se t o f ma in pro g ra m  Pre fe ra b ly a sta c ka b le c re de ntia l  Ma in pro g ra m must b e c urre nt with pro g ra m re vie w

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Po st Audit

• Only fo r pro g ra ms unde r pro visio na l a ppro va l
• Crite ria to b e me t we re pro po se d b y institutio n a nd

a ppro ve d b y Sta te Re g e nts

• No tific a tio n o f re vie w se nt in spring
• Re po rt due in Se pte mb e r
• Numb e rs re po rte d a re fo r spe c ific fa ll a nd spe c ific

a c a de mic ye a r – pro vide d in no tific a tio n le tte r.

Ba c he lor of Sc ie nc e in Anthropolog y (203)

T his pro g ra m re c e ive d pro visio na l a ppro va l a t the April 19, 2012 Sta te Re g e nts’ me e ting with c o ntinua tio n o f the pro g ra m b e yo nd F a ll 2015 de pe nde nt upo n me e ting the fo llo wing c rite ria :

• Ma jo rs e nro lle d:

a minimum o f 25 stude nts in F

a ll 2014; a nd

• Gra dua te s:

a minimum o f 15 stude nts in 2014- 2015.

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Po st Audit

 BOT

H c rite ria me t = F

ina l Appro va l

 Only one o r ne ithe r c rite ria me t = Re vie w Sc he dule

E xte nsio n

• Pro vide e xpla na tio n o n why pro duc tivity wa s no t me t
• Ste ps to b e ta ke n to me e t pro duc tivity
• Ne xt re vie w da te (no mo re tha n 3 ye a rs fo r e xte nsio n)

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Mo dific a tio ns a re c ha ng e s to pro g ra m re q uire me nts

a nd ma y inc lude b ut a re no t limite d to :

• Co urse re q uire me nts
• Admissio n c rite ria
• Gra dua tio n c rite ria
• Cre dit ho ur c ha ng e s

 All mo dific a tio n re q ue sts/ no tific a tio ns must b e fro m

Pre side nt to Cha nc e llo r to b e c o nside re d o ffic ia l

 F

• r sub sta ntive mo dific a tio ns to b e c o nside re d, the

pro g ra m must b e fully in c o mplia nc e with po lic y – c urre nt pro g ra m re vie w c yc le

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Mo dific a tio ns a re e ithe r sub sta ntive o r no n-

sub sta ntive

 Sub sta ntive mo dific a tio ns re q uire Sta te Re g e nts’

a ppro va l a t a Sta te Re g e nts’ me e ting

 No n-sub sta ntive mo dific a tio ns re q uire o nly to b e

re po rte d to the Sta te Re g e nts’ o ffic e

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Sub sta ntive Mo dific a tio ns

• Cha ng e s in wha t stude nts must c o mple te to

g ra dua te (3.4.2)

• Cha ng e s in numb e r o f c re dit ho urs stude nts must

c o mple te to g ra dua te

• De le ting a re q uire d c o urse
• Adding a re q uire d c o urse
• Cha ng ing pro g ra m a dmissio n re q uire me nts
• Cha ng ing c re dit ho urs re q uire d fo r g uide d e le c tive s (i.e .

fro m 12 to 15)

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 No n-Sub sta ntive Mo dific a tio ns

• Adding o r re mo ving c o urse s fro m a list o f e le c tive s

b ut c re dit ho urs re q uire d fo r e le c tive s re ma in unc ha ng e d

• Cha ng ing c o urse pre fix o r title
• Cha ng ing c o urse numb e r, I

F c re dit ho urs re ma in the sa me

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 T

ype s o f pro g ra m mo dific a tio ns

• Pro g ra m De le tio n
• Pro g ra m Suspe nsio n
• Cha ng e o f Pro g ra m Na me a nd/ o r De g re e De sig na tio n
• Optio n Additio n
• Optio n De le tio n
• Optio n Na me Cha ng e
• Pro g ra m Re q uire me nt Cha ng e
• Othe r De g re e Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio n

 I

nc o mple te info rma tio n ma y DE

L AY pro c e ssing re q ue st

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 All re q ue sts must inc lude a c o ve r pa g e

• Use ONE c o ve r pa g e pe r pro g ra m (c a n inc lude multiple

re q ue sts)

• I

nc lude Pre side nt’ s Sig na ture

• I

nc lude da te o f g o ve rning b o a rd’ s a ppro va l

• Atta c h AL

L

ne c e ssa ry fo rms

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 De le tio ns

• Pro g ra ms CAN b e de le te d with stude nts e nro lle d
• Must e xpla in te a c h-o ut pla n fo r re ma ining stude nts
• I

ndic a te numb e r o f c o urse s b e ing de le te d

• Re a llo c a tio n o f funds
• Why is pro g ra m b e ing de le te d

 Suspe nsio ns

• No ne w stude nts a nd no a dve rtising
• Ho w lo ng is the suspe nsio n? 1, 2, o r 3 ye a rs
• Why is pro g ra m b e ing suspe nde d? Wha t will ha ppe n?

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Pro g ra m Na me / De g re e De sig na tio n Cha ng e s

• Pro g ra m Na me (L

e ve l I I I ) – Bio lo g y to Bio lo g ic a l Sc ie nc e

• De g re e De sig na tio n (L

e ve ls I a nd I I )

• L

e ve l I Ba c he lo r o f Arts to Ba c he lo r o f (Spe c ia lty)

• L

e ve l I I Ba c he lo r o f Arts to Ba c he lo r o f F ine Arts  Optio n Additio n

• MUST

sha re a n a ppro xima te 50% c o mmo n c o re o f re la te d c o urse re q uire me nts e xc luding g e ne ra l e duc a tio n

• Co urse s c a n sha re the sa me two -dig it CI

P Co de

• Stude nts c o uld se le c t b e twe e n diffe re nt (re la te d) b io lo g y

c o urse s

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Optio n De le tio n

• Optio ns CAN b e de le te d with stude nts e nro lle d
• Must e xpla in te a c h-o ut pla ns fo r re ma ining stude nts
• I

ndic a te numb e r o f c o urse s b e ing de le te d

• Re a llo c a tio n o f funds
• Why is o ptio n b e ing de le te d

 Optio n Na me Cha ng e

 (L

e ve l I V) – F a mily Sc ie nc e to Huma n Sc ie nc e

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Pro g ra m Re q uire me nt Cha ng e

• Curric ula r c ha ng e s
• Admissio n/ g ra dua tio n re q uire me nt c ha ng e s
• Cle a rly de line a te b e twe e n de le te d c o urse s a nd re mo ve d c o urse s
• De le te d = re mo ve d fro m c o lle g e c a ta lo g
• Aste risk a ll ne w c o urse s
• Ne w = ne wly de ve lo pe d c o urse s
• Cle a rly indic a te c ha ng e s – side b y side c o mpa riso n
• I

nc lude b rie f na rra tive fo r o ve ra ll c ha ng e s

• E

XAMPL E

• T

he pro po se d c ha ng e s a re re c o mme nda tio ns fro m the pro g ra m a dviso ry b o a rd to a lig n c o urse s with c urre nt a c c re dita tio n sta nda rds

• E

XAMPL E – T he pro po se d c ha ng e s upda te s c o urse s to inc lude c o nte nt tha t will b e tte r pre pa re stude nts fo r e mplo yme nt

• No ne e d fo r e xpla na tio n o f e a c h c ha ng e

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Ma y sub mit c urre nt a nd pro po se d de g re e she e t o r use

te mpla te o n fo rm

Attach current and proposed degree program requirements and degree program objectives (on no more than three pages). Indicate the changes clearly. Note any courses deleted from the course inventory. Asterisk any courses new to the course inventory. Please list the current curriculum requirements in the left column and the proposed curriculum requirements in the right column.

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Othe r De g re e Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

• Cha ng e s no t a ddre sse d b y o the r fo rms
• No n-sub sta ntive c ha ng e s – ma y inc lude b ut a re no t limite d to :
• Cha ng e s in c o urse pre fix
• Co urse numb e r c ha ng e (if c re dit ho urs re ma in the sa me )
• Co urse title c ha ng e s

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

He lpful I nfo rma tio n

 Curre nt CI

P Co de s (6 dig its)

• http:/ / nc e s.e d.g o v/ ipe ds/ c ipc o de / De fa ult.a spx? y=55

 I

nte rna l de a dline s fo r Sta te Re g e nts’ a g e nda ite ms a re 6 we e ks b e fo re me e ting

 Do no t upda te c a ta lo g o r we b site s until c ha ng e s a re

a ppro ve d b y Sta te Re g e nts

 Do no t a dve rtise ne w pro g ra ms until a ppro ve d b y Sta te

Re g e nts

• Using Pe nding State Re g e nts’ appro val is disc o ura g e d

 I

nfo rma tio na l Re po rts c a n b e fo und a t: http:/ / www.o srhe .e du/ o e is/ Pro duc tivityRe po rt/ Ma in.a spx

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Re vie w

 All a c tive pro g ra ms re q uire a pro g ra m re vie w e ve ry 5

ye a rs

• In-de pth re vie w o f pro g ra m
• Ce rtific a te s e mb e dde d within a pro g ra m a re re vie we d a lo ng

with the ma in pro g ra m

• Ce rtific a te s no t e mb e dde d within a pro g ra m must b e

re vie we d inde pe nde ntly

 I

nstitutio ns ma y re q ue st to use e xte rna l a c c re dita tio n in lie u o f 5-ye a r pro g ra m re vie w

• http:/ / www.o srhe .e du/ o e is/ Pro duc tivityRe po rt/ Re vPa ra ms.a spx

 Must b e sub mitte d fro m Pre side nt to Cha nc e llo r (ha rd

c o py o r e le c tro nic a lly)

 Due b y e nd o f c a le nda r ye a r

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 Pro g ra ms tha t do no t me e t minimum pro duc tivity c rite ria

• utline d in po lic y (3.7.5.B.3)

De g re e s c o nfe rre d Ma jo rs e nro lle d AA/ AS 5 AA/ AS 25 AAS 5 AAS 17 Ba c he lo r’ s 5 Ba c he lo r’ s 12 Ma ste r’ s 3 Ma ste r’ s 3 Do c to ra te 2 Do c to ra te 2  Pro g ra ms e xc lude d fro m L

• w Pro duc tivity re po rting :
• Pro g ra ms in Po st-Aud it
• Re c e ive d a n e xc e ptio n within the pa st 5 ye a rs
• Suspe nd e d pro g ra ms

 No tific a tio n se nt to Chie f Ac a de mic Offic e r  Re po rt due in Ma rc h-April  Pro c e ss must b e c o mple te d b y June Sta te Re g e nts’ me e ting

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 No t a s c o mpre he nsive a s a 5-ye a r pro g ra m

re vie w

 Co ntinua tio n o f pro g ra m

• Pro vide b rie f e xpla na tio n o f why pro duc tivity wa s no t me t
• Wha t ste ps will b e ta ke n to inc re a se pro duc tivity
• Pro vide ra tio na le fo r c o ntinua tio n

 De le tio n o r suspe nsio n o f pro g ra m

• F
• llo w-up with Re q ue st fo r Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio n a nd

de le tio n o r suspe nsio n re q ue st

• Must ha ve g o ve rning b o a rd a ppro va l

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

L

• w Pro duc tivity

1) Ne w Pro g ra m 2) L ib e ra l Arts a nd Sc ie nc e s Pro g ra ms 3) Offline Pro g ra ms 4) Re struc ture d Pro g ra ms 5) Spe c ia l Purpo se Pro g ra ms 6) Da ta Disc re pa nc ie s 7) No Co st/ Justifia b le Co st Pro g ra ms

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 De le te d pro g ra ms T hre e o f the lo w pro duc ing pro g ra ms (4.41 pe rc e nt) ha ve b e e n de le te d o r a re sc he dule d fo r de le tio n.  Suspe nde d pro g ra ms T hre e o f the lo w pro duc ing pro g ra ms (4.41 pe rc e nt) ha ve b e e n suspe nde d o r a re sc he dule d fo r suspe nsio n. Suspe nsio ns a llo w institutio ns to study a nd a sse ss the via b ility o f a pro g ra m, ke e ping it a va ila b le fo r stude nts c urre ntly in the pro g ra m to c o mple te , b ut no ne w stude nts a re a llo we d to e nro ll. I t is unde rsto o d tha t the suspe nde d pro g ra ms will b e re a c tiva te d o r de le te d within thre e ye a rs o f the suspe nsio n da te .

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 Re struc ture d o r justifie d pro g ra ms

Sixty-two (91.17 pe rc e nt o f the 68 lo w pro duc ing pro g ra ms) ha ve b e e n re struc ture d o r justifie d. Re struc ture d pro g ra ms a re re vise d to me e t c urre nt stude nt o r industry de ma nds, a nd a re e xpe c te d to me e t the minimum pro duc tivity sta nda rds within a g ive n time pe rio d. Justifie d pro g ra ms with lo w- pro duc tivity a re no t e xpe c te d to a c hie ve minimum pro duc tivity sta nda rds. Ho we ve r, the institutio n ha s ma de a c o mpe lling c a se re g a rding the c o ntinua tio n o f suc h pro g ra ms, a nd the pro g ra ms will b e pla c e d o n the re g ula r five -ye a r re vie w sc he dule . F

• r e xa mple , a n institutio n ma y ha ve

se ve ra l huma nitie s de g re e pro g ra ms tha t pro vide e xc e lle nt lib e ra l a rts c o urse s tha t a re inhe re nt to the institutio n’ s o ffe ring s with little sa ving if the y we re de le te d. So me justifie d pro g ra ms se rve a uniq ue a nd so me time s sma ll po pula tio n, a nd pro vide a n impo rta nt pro g ra m to the lo c a l c o mmunity. I t is unde rsto o d tha t e a c h pro g ra m’ s lo w-pro duc tivity will b e a ddre sse d, a nd c o ntinua tio n, if re c o mme nde d b y the institutio n, must b e justifie d. Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 Co de d in de g re e inve nto ry a c c o rding to e xc e ptio n

re q ue st

 Re ma in o n L

• w Pro duc tivity re po rt fo r 5 ye a rs

 I

f still lo w pro duc ing a fte r 5 ye a rs – pro g ra m will a ppe a r

• n the re po rt

 E

xa mple

• AS in E

ng lish – re q ue ste d in 2013 fo r c o ntinua tio n b a se d o n b e ing a L ib e ra l Arts a nd Sc ie nc e s Pro g ra m

• Re g a rdle ss o f pro duc tivity, pro g ra m do e s no t a ppe a r o n

re po rt fo r 5 ye a rs

• In 2018, if AS in E

ng lish still do e s no t me e t pro duc tivity c rite ria , a no the r re q ue st fo r c o ntinua tio n must b e sub mitte d

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Pro to c o l

 Pre side nt to Cha nc e llo r

• Ne w pro g ra m re q ue sts
• Co mme nts/ pro te sts o f ne w pro g ra ms
• All pro g ra m mo dific a tio n re q ue sts
• Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Re vie ws
• Ac a de mic Pla ns/ De g re e Co mple tio n Pla ns

 I

f initial re q ue st c o me s fro m Vic e Cha nc e llo r – re spo nse c a n b e se nt dire c tly to Ac a de mic Affa irs

• Po st Audit re po rts
• L
• w Pro duc tivity re po rts

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Cha ng e s in Ac a de mic Struc ture a nd No me nc la ture

 Cha ng e s tha t re q uire Sta te Re g e nts’ a ppro va l

• Cre a tio n o f ne w instruc tio na l unit whe re no ne e xiste d

(de pa rtme nt, sc ho o l, c o lle g e )

• Divisio n o f a sing le instruc tio na l unit into two o r mo re
• Upg ra ding a n instruc tio na l unit to a hig he r le ve l sta tus

(de pa rtme nt to sc ho o l)

 Cha ng e s tha t re q uire no tific a tio n o nly

• Cha ng e in na me o f instruc tio na l unit (ma inta in sta tus

le ve l)

• Mo ve instruc tio na l unit fro m o ne c o lle g e / sc ho o l to

a no the r

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ac a de mic Ca le nda r

 F

• rm is upda te d in July a nd a va ila b le o nline b y Aug ust

 Due in De c e mbe r  Ma y b e se nt e le c tro nic a lly to Ac a de mic Affa irs sta ff

• Must inc lude Pre side nt’ s sig na ture

 Co mpile d into 2 E

xc e l do c ume nts

• http:/ / www.o srhe .e du/ a dmin-fa c / a c a de mic -c a le nda r/
• Re g ula r se me ste r sc he dule
• Sho rt/ inte rim c o urse s sc he dule

 Ava ila b le o n we b site e nd o f Ja nua ry  Re vie w da te s c a re fully

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Spring b re a k sho uld e nc o mpa ss the third We dne sda y in Ma rc h

Ho use Bill No . 2727, Se c tio n 22, e xpre sse s le g isla tive inte nt tha t the thre e o f us "sha ll c o o rd ina te spring b re a k d a te s fo r the pub lic sc ho o ls, a re a vo c a tio na l-te c hnic a l sc ho o ls, a nd institutio ns within T he Okla ho ma Sta te Syste m o f Hig he r E d uc a tio n" b e g inning with the 2001- 2002 sc ho o l ye a r. I a m e nc lo sing a c o py o f the la w. Co lle g e s a nd unive rsitie s a re c urre ntly wo rking o n spring c a le nd a rs fo r spring 2002 fo r inc lusio n in c o lle g e c a ta lo g s, printe d c a mpus sc he d ule s, e tc . Wo rk is b e g inning

• n yo ur sc ho o l c a le nd a rs fo r spring 2002 a s we ll.

My sug g e stio n is tha t we d isc uss the fe a sib ility o f e sta b lishing the se c o nd we e k o f Ma rc h 2002 a s o ur c o mmo n spring c a le nd a r.

Spr ing Br e a k

Spring b re a k sho uld e nc o mpa ss the third We dne sda y in Ma rc h

SE CT I ON 22. NE W L AW A ne w se c tio n o f la w to b e c o difie d in the Okla ho ma Sta tute s a s Se c tio n 24-151o f T itle 70, unle ss the re is c re a te d a duplic a tio n in numb e ring , re a ds a s fo llo ws:

• A. I

t is the inte nt o f the L e g isla ture tha t the Sta te Supe rinte nde nt

• f Pub lic I

nstruc tio n, the Dire c to r o f the Sta te De pa rtme nt o f Vo c a tio na l a nd T e c hnic a l E duc a tio n, a nd the Cha nc e llo r fo r Hig he r E duc a tio n sha ll c o o rdina te spring b re a k da te s fo r the pub lic sc ho o ls, a re a vo c a tio na l-te c hnic a l sc ho o ls, a nd institutio ns within T he Okla ho ma Sta te Syste m o f Hig he r E duc a tio n b e g inning with the 2001-2002 sc ho o l ye a r

Spr ing Br e a k

Spring b re a k sho uld e nc o mpa ss the third We dne sda y in Ma rc h

Spr ing Br e a k

Supe rinte nd e nt Ga rre tt, tha nk yo u fo r no tifying K

• 12 o ffic ia ls tha t the first

c o o rd ina te d spring b re a k fo r a ll Okla ho ma e d uc a tio na l institutio ns will b e Ma rc h 18-22, 2002. T his me e ts the le g isla tive inte nt tha t spring b re a k d a te s b e c o o rd ina te d fo r the pub lic sc ho o ls, a re a vo c a tio na l-te c hnic a l c e nte rs, a nd hig he r e d uc a tio n institutio ns. T he c o o rd ina te d spring b re a k d a te s b e yo nd 2002 still ne e d to b e e sta b lishe d . T

he we e k e nc ompa ssing the thir d We dne sda y of Ma r c h of e a c h ye a r is hig he r e duc a tion's sug g e ste d time line . Ple a se c o nta c t this

• ffic e to ind ic a te if yo u c o nc ur with the pro po se d c o o rd ina te d spring

b re a k sc he d ule .

Spring b re a k sho uld e nc o mpa ss the third We dne sda y in Ma rc h

Spr ing Br e a k

T his le tte r is to c la rify the sta nd ing d a te o f c o o rd ina te d spring b re a k a mo ng the pub lic sc ho o ls, c a re e r a nd te c hno lo g y c e nte rs, a nd hig he r e d uc a tio n institutio ns, a s inte nd e d b y sta te le g isla tio n. Co rre spo nd e nc e fro m Cha nc e llo r Ha ns Brisc h d a te d No ve mb e r 6, 2000 re c o mme nd e d tha t c o o rd ina te d spring b re a k b e he ld d uring the we e k e nc o mpa ssing the third We d ne sd a y o f Ma rc h e a c h ye a r. Afte r the le tte r wa s se nt, o ur o ffic e re c e ive d no tific a tio n fro m Supe rinte nd e nt Ga rre tt's o ffic e ind ic a ting he r c o nc urre nc e with the time line sug g e ste d b y the Cha nc e llo r….

Ac a de mic Pla n & De g re e Co mple tio n Pla n

 No tific a tio n se nt to Pre side nts (e ma il to Chie f Ac a de mic

Offic e r)

 Due in June  Sub mit to Cha nc e llo r (ha rd c o py o r e le c tro nic a lly)

• E

le c tro nic c o py in MS Wo rd se nt to Ac a de mic Affa irs

 Se pa ra te d a nd c o mpile d into 2 do c ume nts  Re turne d to Chie f Ac a de mic Offic e r fo r re vie w  Sub mitte d to Sta te Re g e nts fo r a ppro va l  Ac a de mic Prio ritie s a re use d in ne w pro g ra m re q ue st

a g e nda ite ms

• Sho uld inc lude ne w pro g ra m pla ns

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Ac a de mic Pla n & De g re e Co mple tio n Pla n

• 12th Gra d e Ma th
• Co nc urre nt E

nro llme nt

• Co -Re q uisite Re me d ia tio n
• Co urse Pla c e me nt
• Re ve rse T

ra nsfe r

• Co o pe ra tive

Ag re e me nts/ Co ntra c ts

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y  Ac a de mic Pla n upda te s



Re o rd e r se c tio ns to mirro r sub missio n to Sta te Re g e nts



Ad d e d o nline le a rning a c tivitie s/ initia tive s

 Upda te s to De g re e Co mple tio n Pla n



Spe c ific initia tive s liste d :

• Prio r L

e a rning Asse ssme nt

• Re a c h Hig he r/ F

le x F inish/ Dire c t Co mple te

• 15 to F

inish

• De g re e Aud it Pro g ra m
• Ad vising
• Ma th Initia tive s

De g re e Co mple tio n Pla n

 Upda te s to De g re e Co mple tio n Pla n

• Imple me nta tion: L

ist the a c tivitie s with time line s tha t will b e use d to imple me nt this stra te g y. Wha t sho rt- a nd lo ng -te rm time line s ha ve b e e n e sta b lishe d fo r imple me nta tio n o f the hig h impa c t stra te g ie s?

• Re sponsible Pa rty: L

ist the pe o ple , o ffic e s o r func tio ns re spo nsib le fo r imple me nting this stra te g y o r e a c h a c tivity. Who / wha t a re the ke y pe o ple o r o ffic e s re spo nsib le fo r de ve lo pme nt, imple me nta tio n, a nd a sse ssme nt?

• Me a sure s of E

ffe c tive ne ss: De sc rib e the me tric s use d to e va lua te

the e ffe c tive ne ss o f e a c h a c tivity.

• Re sults to Da te : De sc rib e the c urre nt sta tus a nd re sults o f the

a c tivity.

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Que stio ns

• Dr. Ste pha nie Be a uc ha mp

sb e a uc ha mp@ o srhe .e du (405) 225-9399

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y