COUNCI L ON I NST RUCT I ON Polic y Wor kshop Ove r vie w - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COUNCI L ON I NST RUCT I ON

Polic y Wor kshop

Wo rksho p Ma te ria ls

 Po we rPo int Pre se nta tio n  OSRHE

Ac a de mic Affa irs Sta ff L isting

 OSRHE

Ac a de mic Affa irs Sta ff Pho to Dire c to ry

 “Who Ca n He lp” b y sub je c t a nd pe rso n  AA Pro c e dure s Ha ndb o o k  OSRHE

Po lic y a nd Pro c e dure s Ma nua l, Cha pte r 3

 Ac a de mic Re po rts due to the Sta te Re g e nts  COI

Me mb e rs Ro ste r

 F

a ll 2019 COI Me e ting Da te s

 F

a ll 2019 OSRHE Me e ting Da te s

 Ac a de mic Re po rts Due to Sta te Re g e nts

Ove r vie w

Wo rksho p L

• c a tio n

 http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / a c a de mic -po lic y-wksp/  T

his we b pa g e c a nno t b e na vig a te d to o n the o khig he re d.o rg we b site ; it is a c c e ssib le o nly thro ug h this link.

 Ple a se fe e l fre e to fo rwa rd the e ma il with the link to a ll o n yo ur

c a mpus who wa nt a c c e ss to the ma te ria ls.

Ove r vie w

Sta te Re g e nts We b site

www.o khig he re d.o rg

 Po lic y Ma nua l  Ac a de mic F

• rms

 Admissio n Sta nda rds  Hig h Sc ho o l Appro ve d

Co urse L ist

 Co urse E

q uiva le nc y Pro je c t

 Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a  De g re e Pro g ra m Pro duc tivity

Re po rts

 F

ina nc ia l Aid

 Gra nt Oppo rtunitie s  Sta te Re g e nts’ Me e ting

Ag e nda s

 Studie s a nd Re po rts

Ove r vie w

Co nstitutio na lly E sta b lishe d

 Artic le XI

I I

• A: All institutio ns o f hig he r e duc a tio n sha ll

b e inte g ra l pa rts o f the Sta te Syste m o f Hig he r E duc a tio n

 T

he Okla ho ma Sta te Syste m o f Hig he r E duc a tio n is the le g a l struc ture fo r pro viding hig he r e duc a tio n in Okla ho ma

 T

he Okla ho ma Sta te Re g e nts fo r Hig he r E duc a tio n is the Co o rdina ting Bo a rd fo r the Sta te Syste m

Ove r vie w

T he Sta te Syste m

 25 Co lle g e s a nd Unive rsitie s

• 2 Re se a rc h Unive rsitie s
• 10 Re g io na l Unive rsitie s
• 1 Pub lic L

ib e ra l Arts Unive rsity

• 12 Co mmunity Co lle g e s
• 11 Co nstitue nt Ag e nc ie s
• 2 Hig he r E

duc a tio n Ce nte rs

Ove r vie w

T he Sta te Re g e nts

 E

sta b lishe d in 1941 b y a n a me ndme nt to the c o nstitutio n, Artic le XI I I

• A:
• Co nsists o f 9 me mb e rs
• Appo inte d b y the Go ve rno r
• Co nfirme d b y the Se na te
• Appo inte d to 9 ye a r te rms

Ove r vie w

Go ve rning Bo a rds

 OSU

• OSU
• L

a ng sto n

• OPSU
• NE

OA&MC

• CSC

 OU

• OU
• CU
• RSU

 RUSO

• E

CU

• NSU
• NWOSU
• SE

OSU

• SWOSU
• UCO

 I

nde pe nde nt Bo a rds

• USAO
• CASC
• E

OSC

• MSC
• NOC
• OCCC
• RCC
• RSC
• SSC
• T

CC

• WOSC

Ove r vie w

Bo a rds o f T ruste e s

 Unive rsity Ce nte r o f So uthe rn Okla ho ma  Unive rsity Ce nte r a t Po nc a City  Qua rtz Mo unta in Arts a nd Co nfe re nc e

Ce nte r a nd Na ture Pa rk

Ove r vie w

Co o rdina tio n v. Go ve rna nc e

I nstitutio na l Go ve rning Bo a rd

• Ma na g e me nt po lic y
• Pe rso nne l, sa la rie s, dutie s
• Co ntra c t fo r se rvic e s
• Re c o mme nd De g re e s

a nd Custo dy o f re c o rds

• Ac q uire / ho ld title to

pro pe rty

• Ac a de mic , stude nt a nd

b udg e t a dministra tio n

• Purc ha sing
• Ca pita l c o nstruc tio n
• Auxilia rie s

Sta te Re g e nts

• F

unc tio ns a nd Co urse s o f Study

• Pre sc rib e sta nda rds o f

e duc a tio n

• Gra nt de g re e s
• Re c o mme nd funding a nd

a llo c a te lump sum

• Allo c a te re vo lving funds
• De te rmine stude nt fe e s
• Co o rdina tio n, re se a rc h

pla nning

Ove r vie w

Othe r Adviso ry Gro ups

 Co unc il o n Stude nt Affa irs

• Dr. De b b ie Bla nke

 Stude nt Adviso ry Bo a rd

• Ms. De b b ie T

e rlip

 Co mmunic a to rs Co unc il

• Ms. Ang e la Ca dde ll

 F

a c ulty Adviso ry Co unc il

• Dr. Ra c he l Ba te s

 Co unc il o n I

nfo rma tio n T e c hno lo g y

• Mr. Vo n Ro ya l

 Co unc il o f Busine ss Offic e rs

• Ms. She ri Ma uc k

Ove r vie w

Ac a de mic Po lic y Adviso ry Co unc ils

Ge ne ra l Pro c e ss fo r re vie w a nd a ppro va l o f a c a de mic a nd o the r re la te d po lic y issue s:

• Co unc il o n I

nstruc tio n Co mmitte e

• Co unc il o n I

nstruc tio n

• Co unc il o f Pre side nts’ Ac a de mic & Syste m

I nitia tive s Co mmitte e

• Co unc il o f Pre side nts
• Sta te Re g e nts

Ove r vie w

Co rre spo nde nc e

Offic ia l I nstitutio na l Sub missio ns

• Na ming de le g a te s
• Pro g ra mma tic re q ue sts o r pro po sa ls
• Pro te sts a nd/ o r c ha lle ng e s
• Po lic y e xc e ptio n re q ue sts

Must b e fro m Pre side nt to the Cha nc e llo r

Ove r vie w

Ca n b e sub mitte d to : a da de mic a ffa irsre q ue sts@ o srhe .e du

Curre nt Ac a de mic Re po rts

Ove r vie w

Report Due Date* Policy Reference Send Final Report To For more information

• r questions about the

report, contact Academic Calendar December 1: Annual 3.19 Academic Calendars Stephanie Beauchamp sbeauchamp@osrhe.edu Academic Plan/Degree Completion Plan June 15: Annual 3.7 Academic Program Review Chancellor* Stephanie Beauchamp sbeauchamp@osrhe.edu Academic Program Reviews December 1: Every 5 years

• r specialty accreditation

cycle 3.7 Academic Program Review Chancellor* Stephanie Beauchamp sbeauchamp@osrhe.edu English Language Proficiency for Faculty Fall: Annual 3.23 Instructor’s English Proficiency Stephanie Beauchamp sbeauchamp@osrhe.edu Intensive English Program Self-Study Depends on program’s current review status 3.5 Intensive English Program Approval and Review Stephanie Beauchamp sbeauchamp@osrhe.edu Low Productivity Report April 30: Annual

• r indicated by program

productivity as applicable 3.4 Academic Program Approval Stephanie Beauchamp sbeauchamp@osrhe.edu Policy Reporting Requirements Survey Fall 3.12 Grading; 3.9 Institutional Admission and Retention; 3.20 Remediation and Removal of High School Curricular Deficiencies; and 3.18 In- State/Out-of-State Status of Enrolled Students Data submitted by your UDS coordinator Kyle Foster kfoster@osrhe.edu Post Audit Report September 15: Annual

• r specified by State

Regents’ action as applicable 3.4 Academic Program Approval Stephanie Beauchamp sbeauchamp@osrhe.edu Student Assessment Report December 1: Annual 3.20 Student Assessment and Remediation Rachel Bates rbates@osrhe.edu Concurrent Enrollment December 1: Annual 3.10 Concurrent Enrollment Rachel Bates Kyle Foster rbates@osrhe.edu kfoster@osrhe.edu Teacher Education Admission Study Data April: Annual 3.21 Teacher Education Data submitted by your UDS coordinator Sylvia Bryant sbryant@osrhe.edu

* Ca n b e se nt to : a c a de mic a ffa irsre q ue sts@ o srhe .e du

Sta te Re g e nts’ Me e ting s F a ll 2019

 T

hursda y, Se pte mb e r 5

 T

hursda y, Oc to b e r 24

 T

hursda y, De c e mb e r 5

 Me e ting da te s a re a ppro ve d a t the

Oc to b e r me e ting a nd po ste d: http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / sta te - syste m/ me e ting -da te s.shtml

Ove r vie w

• Dr. Ste phanie Be auc hamp

Assoc iate Vic e Chanc e llor for Ac ade mic Affairs

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 11, 2019

Po lic ie s to b e Co ve re d

 3.4 Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Appro va l

• Pro c e ss
• Pro po sa l
• Po st Audit
• Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 3.6

Co ntra c tua l Arra ng e me nts Be twe e n Hig he r E duc a tio n I nstitutio ns a nd Othe r E ntitie s

 3.7 Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Re vie w

• 5-ye a r pro g ra m re vie w
• L
• w-Pro duc tivity

 3.8 Cha ng e s in Ac a de mic Struc ture a nd No me nc la ture  3.15 Unde rg ra dua te De g re e Re q uire me nts  3.19 Ac a de mic Ca le nda rs

Pro g ra m Appro va l Pro c e ss



I nstitutio n sub mits L OI to Cha nc e llo r



L OI is e ma ile d to Pre side nts syste m wide



I nstitutio ns ha ve 45 c ale ndar da ys to re q ue st a c o py o f the pro po sa l

• Co pie s MAY b e re q ue ste d b y Pre side nt o r Chie f

Ac a de mic Offic e r (fo llo w institutio na l pro to c o l)



I nstitutio ns ha ve 30 c ale ndar da ys to no tify Sta te Re g e nts’ o ffic e o f pro te st

• Pro te st MUST

c o me fro m Pre side nt



I f no pro te st, at le ast 5-6 mo nth pro c e ss



I f the re is a pro te st, the re q ue st will no t mo ve fo rwa rd until the pro te st is re so lve d

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

E ar lie st Age nda De c e mbe r

L OI re c e ive d fro m institutio n Syste m-wide L OI se nt to Pre side nts Pro po sa l re c e ive d fro m inst. Re q ue ste d? YE S NO Be g in a g e nda pre pa ra tio n Se nd re spo nse to institutio n Re c e ive c o unte r- re spo nse Re spo nse re c e ive d? YE S NO Be g in a na lysis I nstitutio ns have 30 days to submit a le tte r o f c o nc e rn I nstitutio ns have 45 days to re que st a c o py o f the pro po sal. I nstitutio ns have 30 days to re spo nd to c o nc e rn Co py o f pro po sa l se nt L OI must be re c e ive d at le ast 30 days be fo re pro po sal is submitte d.

E maile d to Pr e side nts August 1 E ar lie st Date to Submit Se pte mbe r 1 DL to r e que st c opy Se pte mbe r 15 (45 days fr

• m L

OI) Oc tobe r 1 Oc tobe r 30

Be g in a g e nda pre pa ra tio n

E ar lie st Age nda De c e mbe r (maybe ) Januar y/ F e br uar y

T his time line is a n e stimate o f the le ng th o f time it ta ke s fo r a ne w pro g ra m to b e pre se nte d to the Sta te Re g e nts’ sta ff. T he time line is NOT

GUARANT EED a nd a ssume s the pro po sa l c o nta ins a ll

info rma tio n re q uire d b y po lic y a nd tha t Sta te Re g e nts’ sta ff d o e s no t ha ve q ue stio ns re g a rd ing the pro po sa l. T ime line doe s not ta ke into c o nsid e ra tio n the numb e r o f ne w pro po sa ls in the q ue ue .

Pr

• gr

am Appr

• val F

low Char t

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l



L e tte rs o f I nte nt (L OI ) a re re q uire d fo r a ll:

• Ne w Pro g ra ms
• E

mb e dde d Ce rtific a te s

• Re q ue sts fo r o nline de live ry o f e xisting pro g ra ms
• 100% o f the ma jo r c o urse wo rk d e live re d e le c tro nic a lly OR
• Ad ve rtise d a s a va ila b le o nline



L OI s:

• Must b e se nt fro m Pre side nt to Cha nc e llo r
• Ca n b e se nt to a c a de mic a ffa irsre q ue sts@ o srhe .e du
• Must inc lude :
• Na me o f pro g ra m
• L
• c a tio n o f de live ry
• De live ry me tho d (tra ditio na l, o nline , b o th)

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 L

OI s:

• Must b e re c e ive d a t le a st 30 da ys b e fo re sub mitting

pro po sa l

• Sub mitting pro po sa l with L

OI will no t spe e d up the pro c e ss

 Pro po sa ls must b e sub mitte d fro m Pre side nt to

Cha nc e llo r to b e o ffic ia l

 Pro po sa ls c a n b e se nt to

a c a de mic a ffa irsre q ue sts@ o srhe .e du

Do NOT se nd pr

• posal with L

OI

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

 T

hing s tha t ma y DE

L AY pro g re ss o f yo ur pro po sa l’ s

a ppro va l:

• Insuffic ie nt o r inc o mple te info rma tio n
• Omissio n o f re q uire d info rma tio n
• Disc re pa nc y b e twe e n L

OI a nd pro po sa l

• Use o f no n-c urre nt fo rms
• Curre nt fo rms c a n b e lo c a te d he re :

http:/ / www.o khig he re d.o rg / a dmin-fa c / a c a d e mic -fo rms/

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts



CI P Co de s

• Curre nt CI

P c o de s c a n b e fo und a t http:/ / nc e s.e d .g o v/ ipe ds/ c ipc o de / De fa ult.a spx? y=55



Sug g e ste d I nstruc tio na l Pro g ra m Co de

• Ca n le a ve b la nk (ne xt a va ila b le c o de will b e a ssig ne d)
• Ca n re q ue st spe c ific ne ve r b e fo re use d c o de



Co mple te a ll re q ue ste d info rma tio n o n c o ve r pa g e

• MUST

inc lude da te o f g o ve rning b o a rd a ppro va l

• MUST

inc lude Pre side nt’ s sig na ture

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts



Unde rg ra dua te de g re e re q uire me nts

• Bre a kd o wn o f re q uire me nts sho uld ma tc h d e ta ile d c urric ulum

pro vid e d in pro po sa l



Pro vide spe c ific c urric ula r info rma tio n

• Inc lud e AL

L

g e ne ra l e d uc a tio n c o urse s

• Inc lud e c o urse title s – no t just c o urse pre fix a nd c o urse numb e r
• AST

ERISK a ll ne w c o urse s

• Pr

e -r e quisite c o ur se s must be liste d as par t o f the c ur r ic ulum



F a c ulty q ua lific a tio ns

• L

ist a ll pro g ra m spe c ific fa c ulty a nd c re d e ntia ls (c a n sub mit CV/ Re sume – no t re q uire d )

• F

a c ulty sho uld me e t HL C a ssume d pra c tic e s q ua lific a tio ns



I nc lude de ta ils re g a rding suppo rt re so urc e s

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts



Purpo se o f pro g ra m

• Wha t c a n stud e nts d o with the d e g re e ?



Stude nt a nd e mplo ye r de ma nd

• Stud e nt surve y d a ta , sta te / lo c a l e mplo yme nt d a ta , a d viso ry

b o a rd / e mplo ye r suppo rt

• http:/ / www.o e sc .o k.g o v/
• https:/ / www.o khig he re d .o rg / e c o n-d e v/ da shb o a rd s/



Addre ss 5 wo rkfo rc e e c o syste ms (if a pplic a b le )

• Ae ro spa c e / De fe nse
• E

ne rg y

• Ag ric ulture / Bio sc ie nc e s
• Info rma tio n a nd F

ina nc ia l Se rvic e s

• T

ra nspo rta tio n a nd Distrib utio n

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 E

stima te d Stude nt De ma nd – first 5 ye a rs

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 F

ina l a ppro va l c rite ria MUST

c o me fro m sa me

a c a de mic ye a r using 5-ye a r e stima te d stude nt de ma nd

 Must me e t po lic y minimum a s sta te d in 3.7.5.B.3

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 Online de live ry

• Must ha ve b e e n inc lud e d in L

OI

• 100% o f ma jo r d e live re d e le c tro nic a lly OR
• Ad ve rtise d a s a va ila b le o nline

 I

nstitutio n tha t ha ve no t b e e n a ppro ve d fo r o nline de live ry must c o mple te a ll se c tio ns sta rting o n pa g e 9 o f the re q ue st fo rm

 De sc rib e de live ry me tho d

• Wha t le a rning pla tfo rm? (D2L

, Bla c kb o a rd )

• Ad d itio na l so ftwa re o r pla tfo rms b e ing use d (Zo o m, Go T
• Me e ting )

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

 F

unding a nd E xpe nse s

• All a mo unts pro vide d MUST

inc lude e xpla na tio n

• F

unding MUST e q ua l o r e xc e e d e xpe nse s

• Use o f e xisting re so urc e s
• I

nc lude c a lc ula tio n/ fo rmula use d to de te rmine tuitio n

• F

a c ulty sa la rie s sho uld AL

WAYS b e inc lude d

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Year of Program

• A. Funding Sources

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year Total Resources Available from Federal Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Resources Available from Other Non-State Sources $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Existing State Resources $28,566 $31,691 $30,816 $31,441 $31,566

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above reflect current funds within the College of Arts and Sciences already budgeted to support programmatic expenses.

Resources Available through Internal Allocation and Reallocation $15,488 $15,488 $0 $0 $0

Narrative/Explanation: In years 1 and 2, funds from the deleted Associate of Arts in Anthropology (111) will be reallocated to the proposed Associate of Science in Astronomy.

Student Tuition $22,770 $30,360 $41,745 $49,335 $56,925

Narrative/Explanation and Calculations: The amounts above were calculated based on resident tuition of $126.50 per credit hour. State Community College anticipates students completing 30 credit hours per academic year and enrollment of 6, 8, 11, 13, and 15 students in years 1 through 5.

TOTAL $66,824 $77,539 $72,561 $80,776 $88,491

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Year of Program

• B. Breakdown of Budget Expenses/Requirements

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year Administrative/Other Professional Staff $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above represent a portion of administrative staff salary that will support the program

Faculty $12,360 $12,360 $12,360 $12,360 $12,360

Narrative/Explanation: Current faculty will teach the existing courses required for the proposed program. The amounts above represent a percentage of faculty salary used to teach students in the proposed program.

Graduate Assistants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Student Employees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment and Instructional Materials $500 $550 $600 $650 $700

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above will cover costs associated with classroom instructional materials such as charts and models.

Library $100 $125 $150 $175 $200

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above will cover costs of subscription to discipline specific journals needed for student research.

Contractual Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Year of Program

• B. Breakdown of Budget Expenses/Requirements

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year Other Support Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Commodities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Printing $400 $450 $500 $550 $600

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above are budgeted for printing course syllabi and exams.

Telecommunications $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Travel $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

Narrative/Explanation: The amounts above will be used for faculty to travel to regional conferences.

Awards and Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL

$28,566 $31,691 $30,816 $31,441 $31,566

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Year of Program

• A. Funding Sources

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year TOTAL $66,824 $77,539 $72,561 $80,776 $88,491 Year of Program

• B. Breakdown of Budget

Expenses/Requirements 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year

TOTAL

$28,566 $31,691 $30,816 $31,441 $31,566

 E

mb e dde d Ce rtific a te s

 Must ade quate ly addr

e ss stude nt/ e mploye r de mand

• Wha t c a n a stud e nt d o with pro po se d c e rtific a te
• No t use d a s a “mo tiva to r” fo r c o mple tio n

 Curric ulum sho uld b e sub se t o f ma in pro g ra m  Pre fe ra b ly a sta c ka b le c re de ntia l  Ma in pro g ra m must b e c urre nt with pro g ra m re vie w

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Ne w Pro g ra m Re q ue sts

Que stio ns o n Ne w Pro g ra m Pro po sa ls o r Pro g ra m Appro va l Pro c e ss

Po st Audit

 Only fo r pro g ra ms unde r pro visio na l a ppro va l  Crite ria to b e me t we re pro po se d b y institutio n a nd

a ppro ve d b y Sta te Re g e nts

 No tific a tio n o f re vie w se nt in spring  Re po rt due in Se pte mb e r  Numb e rs re po rte d a re fo r spe c ific fa ll a nd spe c ific

a c a de mic ye a r – pro vide d in no tific a tio n le tte r.

Bac he lor of Sc ie nc e in Anthropology (203)

T his pro g ra m re c e ive d pro visio na l a ppro va l a t the April 19, 2012 Sta te Re g e nts’ me e ting with c o ntinua tio n o f the pro g ra m b e yo nd F a ll 2015 de pe nde nt upo n me e ting the fo llo wing c rite ria :

• Ma jo rs e nro lle d:

a minimum o f 25 stude nts in F

all 2014; a nd

• Gra dua te s:

a minimum o f 15 stude nts in 2014- 2015.

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Po st Audit

 BOT

H c rite ria me t = F

ina l Appro va l

 Only one o r ne ithe r c rite ria me t = Re vie w Sc he dule

E xte nsio n

• Pro vide e xpla na tio n o n why pro duc tivity wa s no t me t
• Ste ps to b e ta ke n to me e t pro duc tivity
• Ne xt re vie w da te (no mo re tha n 3 ye a rs fo r e xte nsio n)

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Que stio ns o n Po st Audit

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 All re q ue sts must inc lude a c o ve r pa g e

• Use ONE c o ve r pa g e pe r pro g ra m (c a n inc lude multiple

re q ue sts)

• A sing le c o ve r pa g e ma y inc lud e pro g ra m mo d ific a tio n c ha ng e s,
• ptio n d e le tio n, o ptio n na me c ha ng e , a nd pro g ra m na me

c ha ng e

• Inc lude Pre side nt’ s Sig na ture
• Inc lude da te o f g o ve rning b o a rd’ s a ppro va l

 All mo dific a tio n re q ue sts/ no tific a tio ns must b e fro m Pre side nt to

Cha nc e llo r to b e c o nside re d o ffic ia l

 F

• r sub sta ntive mo dific a tio ns to b e c o nside re d, the pro g ra m

must b e fully in c o mplia nc e with po lic y – c urre nt pro g ra m re vie w c yc le

 Atta c h AL

L

ne c e ssa ry fo rms

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 T

ype s o f pro g ra m mo dific a tio ns

• Pro g ra m De le tio n
• Pro g ra m Suspe nsio n
• Cha ng e o f Pro g ra m Na me a nd/ o r De g re e De sig na tio n
• Optio n Additio n
• Optio n De le tio n
• Optio n Na me Cha ng e
• Pro g ra m Re q uire me nt Cha ng e
• Othe r De g re e Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio n

 I

nc o mple te info rma tio n ma y DE

L AY pro c e ssing re q ue st

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 De le tio ns

• Pro g ra ms CAN b e de le te d with stude nts e nro lle d
• Must e xpla in te a c h-o ut pla n fo r re ma ining stude nts
• Indic a te numb e r o f c o urse s b e ing de le te d
• Re a llo c a tio n o f funds
• Why is pro g ra m b e ing de le te d
• If de le tio n o f pro g ra m impa c ts a c o o pe ra tive a g re e me nt

pro g ra m – must c o mple te a dditio na l fo rm

 Suspe nsio ns

• No ne w stude nts a nd no a dve rtising
• Ho w lo ng is the suspe nsio n? 1, 2, o r 3 ye a rs
• Why is pro g ra m b e ing suspe nde d? Wha t will ha ppe n?

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Pro g ra m Na me / De g re e De sig na tio n Cha ng e s

• Pro g ra m Na me (L

e ve l I I I ) – Bio lo g y to Bio lo g ic a l Sc ie nc e

• De g re e De sig na tio n (L

e ve ls I a nd I I )

• L

e ve l I Ba c he lo r o f Arts to Ba c he lo r o f (Spe c ia lty)

• L

e ve l I I Ba c he lo r o f Arts to Ba c he lo r o f F ine Arts  Optio n Additio n

• MUST

sha re a n a ppro xima te 50% c o mmo n c o re o f re la te d c o urse re q uire me nts e xc luding g e ne ra l e duc a tio n

• Co urse s c a n sha re the sa me two -dig it CI

P Co de

• Stude nts c o uld se le c t b e twe e n diffe re nt (re la te d) b io lo g y

c o urse s

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Optio n De le tio n

• Optio ns CAN b e de le te d with stude nts e nro lle d
• Must e xpla in te a c h-o ut pla ns fo r re ma ining stude nts
• I

ndic a te numb e r o f c o urse s b e ing de le te d

• Re a llo c a tio n o f funds
• Why is o ptio n b e ing de le te d

 Optio n Na me Cha ng e

• (L

e ve l I V) – F a mily Sc ie nc e to Huma n Sc ie nc e

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Pro g ra m Re q uire me nt Cha ng e

• Curric ula r c ha ng e s
• Admissio n c rite ria
• Gra dua tio n c rite ria
• Co urse c ha ng e s

 Mo dific a tio ns a re e ithe r sub sta ntive o r no n-sub sta ntive

• Sub sta ntive mo dific a tio ns re q uire Sta te Re g e nts’ a ppro va l a t a

Sta te Re g e nts’ me e ting

• No n-sub sta ntive mo dific a tio ns re q uire o nly to b e re po rte d to the

Sta te Re g e nts’ o ffic e

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Sub sta ntive Mo dific a tio ns

• Cha ng e s in wha t stude nts must c o mple te to

g ra dua te (3.4.2)

• Cha ng e s in numb e r o f c re dit ho urs stude nts must

c o mple te to g ra dua te

• De le ting a re q uire d c o urse
• Adding a re q uire d c o urse
• Cha ng ing pro g ra m a dmissio n re q uire me nts
• Cha ng ing c re dit ho urs re q uire d fo r g uide d e le c tive s (i.e .

fro m 12 to 15)

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 No n-Sub sta ntive Mo dific a tio ns

• Adding o r re mo ving c o urse s fro m a list o f e le c tive s

b ut c re dit ho urs re q uire d fo r e le c tive s re ma in unc ha ng e d

• Cha ng ing c o urse pre fix o r title
• Cha ng ing c o urse numb e r, I

F c re dit ho urs re ma in the sa me

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 T

ips fo r no ting mo dific a tio ns

• Cle a rly de line a te b e twe e n de le te d c o urse s a nd re mo ve d c o urse s
• De le te d = re mo ve d fro m c o lle g e c a ta lo g
• Aste risk a ll ne w c o urse s
• Ne w = ne wly de ve lo pe d c o urse s
• Cle a rly indic a te c ha ng e s – side b y side c o mpa riso n
• Cle a rly no te whe n c o urse pre fix/ numb e r is c ha ng e d b ut c o urse c o nte nt

re ma ins the sa me

• I

nc lude b rie f na rra tive fo r o ve ra ll c ha ng e s

• E

XAMPL E

• T

he pro po se d c ha ng e s a re re c o mme nda tio ns fro m the pro g ra m a dviso ry b o a rd to a lig n c o urse s with c urre nt a c c re dita tio n sta nda rds

• E

XAMPL E – T he pro po se d c ha ng e s upda te s c o urse s to inc lude c o nte nt tha t will b e tte r pre pa re stude nts fo r e mplo yme nt

• No ne e d fo r e xpla na tio n o f e a c h spe c ific c ha ng e

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Ma y sub mit c urre nt a nd pro po se d de g re e she e t o r use

te mpla te o n fo rm

Attach current and proposed degree program requirements and degree program objectives (on no more than three pages). Indicate the changes clearly. Note any courses deleted from the course inventory. Asterisk any courses new to the course inventory. Please list the current curriculum requirements in the left column and the proposed curriculum requirements in the right column.

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

 Othe r De g re e Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

• Cha ng e s no t a ddre sse d b y o the r fo rms
• No n-sub sta ntive c ha ng e s – ma y inc lude b ut a re no t limite d to :
• Cha ng e s in c o urse pre fix
• Co urse numb e r c ha ng e (if c re dit ho urs re ma in the sa me )
• Co urse title c ha ng e s

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

He lpful I nfo rma tio n

 Curre nt CIP Co de s (6 dig its)

http:/ / nc e s.e d .g o v/ ipe d s/ c ipc o d e / De fa ult.a spx? y=55

 Inte rna l de a dline s fo r Sta te Re g e nts’ a g e nda ite ms a re 6 we e ks

b e fo re me e ting

 Do no t upda te c a ta lo g o r we b site s until c ha ng e s a re a ppro ve d b y

Sta te Re g e nts

 Do no t a dve rtise ne w pro g ra ms until a ppro ve d b y Sta te Re g e nts

• Using Pe nding S

tate Re ge nts’ appro val is d isc o ura g e d

 Info rma tio na l Re po rts c a n b e fo und a t:

http:/ / www.o srhe .e du/ o e is/ Pro duc tivityRe po rt/ Ma in.a spx

 Offic ia l pro g ra m re q ue sts c a n sub mitte d b y ha rdc o py OR

e le c tro nic a lly (no ne e d fo r b o th)

a c a d e mic a ffa irsre q ue sts@ o srhe .e d u

• Must b e fro m Pre sid e nt’ s o ffic e to Cha nc e llo r
• CC c o py is no t ne c e ssa ry

Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a ms Polic y

Que stio ns o n Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio ns

3.4 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Appr

• va l

Co ntra c tua l Arra ng e me nts Be twe e n Hig he r E duc a tio n I nstitutio ns & Othe r E ntitie s A c o ntra c tua l a rra ng e me nt is o ne in whic h a n institutio n e nte rs into a n a rra ng e me nt fo r re c e ipt o f c o urse s o r pro g ra ms o r po rtio ns o f c o urse s o r pro g ra ms (i.e ., c linic a l tra ining inte rnships, e tc .) de live re d b y a no the r institutio n, se rvic e pro vide r, o r e ntity.

• An una c c re dite d, de g re e -g ra nting institutio n o r e ntity
• An una c c re dite d, no n-de g re e -g ra nting institutio n o r

e ntity

• An institutio n o r e ntity no t a c c re dite d b y a USDE

re c o g nize d a c c re diting a g e nc y

• A c o rpo ra tio n o r o the r e ntity

3.6 Contr a c tua l Ar r a ng e me nts



An Institutio n c a n o nly o ffe r d e g re e s via a c o ntra c tua l a rra ng e me nt in c o nte nt a re a s in whic h it e mploys qua lifie d full-time fa c ulty a nd the institutio n must d e sig na te a full-time fa c ulty to o ve rse e the c o ntra c t.



Institutio ns sha ll a d he re to HL C sta nd a rd s fo r fa c ulty to ha ve o ne d e g re e le ve l a b o ve the le ve l te a c hing a nd b e a ppro ve d b y the a c a d e mic o ffic e rs; ho we ve r, e xc e ptio ns to d e g re e le ve l a re a llo we d if the institutio n d e fine s a minimum thre sho ld a nd e va lua tio n pro c e ss to ma ke suc h a ppo intme nts.



All c o ntra c tua l a rra ng e me nts sha ll b e inc lud e d in the a nnua l institutio na l pro g ra m a sse ssme nt a c tivitie s.



Re po rting Re q uire me nts:

• Annua l list o f pro g ra ms in c o ntra c t;
• Annua l list o f c o ntra c tua l c o urse s; a nd
• Annua l summa ry re po rt inc luding e nro llme nt, re te ntio n a nd g ra dua tio n,

stude nt a nd pro g ra m a sse ssme nt, fina nc ia l a rra ng e me nts, ma rke ting , c o sts, a nd a c c o mplishme nts.

3.6 Contr a c tua l Ar r a ng e me nts

Co ntra c tua l Arra ng e me nts Be twe e n Hig he r E duc a tio n I nstitutio ns & Othe r E ntitie s

Co ntra c tua l Arra ng e me nts Be twe e n Hig he r E duc a tio n I nstitutio ns & Othe r E ntitie s

• Ca re e r te c hno lo g y c e nte r tra nsfe r c re dit a wa rde d c a n o nly b e

po ste d a s S o r P. Se e the OSRHE Gra ding po lic y fo r mo re info rma tio n.

• All tra nsfe r c re dit a wa rde d must b e a ppro pria te ly ide ntifie d b y

so urc e a nd me tho d o n the o ffic ia l c o lle g e tra nsc ript.

• T

he se me ste r tha t is in se ssio n during the c o urse e nd da te will se rve a s the se me ste r o f tra nsc riptio n fo r tra nsfe r wo rk a wa rde d F

• r e xa mple , if a stude nt c o mple te s a c a re e r te c hno lo g y c e nte r

c o urse o n April 1, 2019, the hig he r e duc a tio n institutio n will po st it a s a Spring 2019 tra nsfe r c o urse .

• All tra nsfe r c re dit a wa rde d thro ug h the Sta te wid e Artic ula tio n

Ag re e me nt must b e c o nve rte d to c re dit ho urs. I n a c c o rda nc e with 34 CF R §668.8(l)(1), o ne se me ste r c re dit ho ur must inc lude a t le a st 37.5 c lo c k ho urs o f instruc tio n.

3.6 Contr a c tua l Ar r a ng e me nts

3.6 Contr a c tua l Ar r a ng e me nts

Hig he r E d uc a tio n Institutio n (Institutio n) ma y c re a te a c o ntra c t with a te c hno lo g y c e nte r whe re the instruc tio n a t the te c hno lo g y c e nte r is o ve rse e n b y the c o lle g e fa c ulty. Co ntra c t is c re a te d b e twe e n the institutio n a nd the te c hno lo g y c e nte r, inc lud ing a n inve nto ry o f c o ntra c t c o urse s a pplic a ble to the te c hnic a l d e g re e . T he c o ntra c t is sub mitte d to the Sta te Re g e nts fo r re vie w a nd a ppro va l. Co ntra c ts fo r up to 25% o f d e g re e re q uire me nts must ha ve Hig he r L e a rning Co mmissio n (HL C) no tific a tio n. Co ntra c ts fo r 25-50% o f d e g re e re q uire me nts must ha ve HL C re vie w a nd a ppro va l whic h c o uld inc lud e a site visit. At the suc c e ssful c o mple tio n o f the c o ntra c tua l te c hnic a l c o urse (s) a t the te c hno lo g y c e nte r, the c o urse is tra nsc ripte d b y the institutio n a s re sid e nt c re d it a t the e nd o f the te rm e a rne d .

Ho w c o ntra c tua l a rra ng e me nts a re c re a te d

Que stio ns o n Co ntra c tua l Arra ng e me nts

3.6 Contr a c tua l Ar r a ng e me nts

Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Re vie w

 All a c tive pro g ra ms re q uire a pro g ra m re vie w e ve ry 5

ye a rs

• In-de pth re vie w o f pro g ra m (e xte rna l re vie w is o ptio na l)
• Ce rtific a te s e mb e dde d within a pro g ra m a re re vie we d a lo ng

with the ma in pro g ra m

• Ce rtific a te s no t e mb e dde d within a pro g ra m must b e

re vie we d inde pe nde ntly

 I

nstitutio ns ma y re q ue st to use e xte rna l a c c re dita tio n in lie u o f 5-ye a r pro g ra m re vie w

 Must b e sub mitte d fro m Pre side nt to Cha nc e llo r (ha rd

c o py o r e le c tro nic a lly)

 Due b y e nd o f c a le nda r ye a r

3.7 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Re vie w

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 Pro g ra ms tha t do no t me e t minimum pro duc tivity c rite ria

• utline d in po lic y (3.7.5.B.3)

De g re e s c o nfe rre d Ma jo rs e nro lle d AA/ AS 5 AA/ AS 25 AAS 5 AAS 17 Ba c he lo r’ s 5 Ba c he lo r’ s 12 Ma ste r’ s 3 Ma ste r’ s 3 Do c to ra te 2 Do c to ra te 2  Pro g ra ms e xc lude d fro m L

• w Pro duc tivity re po rting :
• Pro g ra ms in Po st-Aud it
• Re c e ive d a n e xc e ptio n within the pa st 5 ye a rs
• Suspe nd e d pro g ra ms

 No tific a tio n se nt to Chie f Ac a de mic Offic e r  Re po rt due in Ma rc h-April  Pro c e ss must b e c o mple te d b y June Sta te Re g e nts’ me e ting

3.7 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Re vie w

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 Do e s no t ta ke the pla c e o f a 5-ye a r pro g ra m

re vie w

 Co ntinua tio n o f pro g ra m

• Spe c ify whic h e xc e ptio n is b e ing re q ue ste d
• Pro vide b rie f e xpla na tio n o f why pro duc tivity wa s no t me t
• Wha t ste ps will b e ta ke n to inc re a se pro duc tivity
• Pro vide ra tio na le fo r c o ntinua tio n

 De le tio n o r suspe nsio n o f pro g ra m

• F
• llo w-up with Re q ue st fo r Pro g ra m Mo dific a tio n a nd

de le tio n o r suspe nsio n re q ue st

• Must ha ve g o ve rning b o a rd a ppro va l

3.7 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Re vie w

L

• w Pro duc tivity

1) Ne w Pro g ra m

• Pro g ra ms re c e ntly o ut o f po st-a udit

2) L ib e ra l Arts a nd Sc ie nc e s Pro g ra ms

• Pro g ra ms in whic h the c urric ulum suppo rt the g e ne ra l

e duc a tio n a nd o the r de g re e pro g ra ms

3) Offline Pro g ra ms

• Pro g ra ms sc he dule d fo r de le tio n o r suspe nsio n

4) Re struc ture d Pro g ra ms

• Pro g ra ms tha t ha ve unde rg o ne mo dific a tio ns

5) Spe c ia l Purpo se Pro g ra ms

• Pro g ra ms tha t se rve a spe c ia l po pula tio n o r

c o mmunity ne e d

6) Da ta Disc re pa nc ie s

• F

a c tua l e rro rs tha t c a n b e ve rifie d

7) No Co st/ Justifia b le Co st Pro g ra ms

• Pro g ra ms tha t re q uire no a dditio na l c o st o r ha ve

justifia b le c o sts

3.7 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Re vie w

L

• w Pro duc tivity

 Co de d in de g re e inve nto ry a c c o rding to e xc e ptio n

re q ue st

 Re ma in o n L

• w Pro duc tivity re po rt fo r 5 ye a rs

 I

f still lo w pro duc ing a fte r 5 ye a rs – pro g ra m will a ppe a r

• n the re po rt

 E

xa mple

• AS in E

ng lish – re q ue ste d in 2013 fo r c o ntinua tio n b a se d o n b e ing a L ib e ra l Arts a nd Sc ie nc e s Pro g ra m

• Re g a rdle ss o f pro duc tivity, pro g ra m do e s no t a ppe a r o n

re po rt fo r 5 ye a rs

• In 2018, if AS in E

ng lish still do e s no t me e t pro duc tivity c rite ria , a no the r re q ue st fo r c o ntinua tio n must b e sub mitte d

3.7 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Re vie w

Que stio ns o n Pro g ra m Re vie w

3.7 Ac a de mic Pr

• g r

a m Re vie w

Cha ng e s in Ac a de mic Struc ture a nd No me nc la ture

 Cha ng e s tha t re q uire Sta te Re g e nts’ a ppro va l

• Cre a tio n o f ne w instruc tio na l unit whe re no ne e xiste d

(de pa rtme nt, sc ho o l, c o lle g e )

• Divisio n o f a sing le instruc tio na l unit into two o r mo re
• Upg ra ding a n instruc tio na l unit to a hig he r le ve l sta tus

(de pa rtme nt to sc ho o l)

 Cha ng e s tha t re q uire no tific a tio n o nly

• Cha ng e in na me o f instruc tio na l unit (ma inta in sta tus

le ve l)

• Mo ve instruc tio na l unit fro m o ne c o lle g e / sc ho o l to

a no the r

3.8 Ac a de mic Str uc tur e a nd Nome nc la tur e

Que stio ns o n Ac a de mic Struc ture a nd No me nc la ture

3.8 Ac a de mic Str uc tur e a nd Nome nc la tur e

Unde rg ra dua te De g re e Re q uire me nts

E sta b lishe s re q uire me nts fo r the fo llo wing

 Ge ne ra l e duc a tio n re q uire me nts a nd minimum sta nda rds fo r:



Asso c ia te in Arts a nd Asso c ia te in Sc ie nc e



Asso c ia te in Applie d Arts



Ba c c a la ure a te  De fine s type s o f b a c c a la ure a te de g re e s



Ba c he lo r o f Arts



Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e



Ba c he lo r o f (Spe c ia lty) – re stric te d to sma ll numb e r o f fie ld s in whic h tra d itio na l na tio na l pra c tic e o r d e ma nd s o f the fie ld d isc ipline re q uire a d e g re e d e sig na tio n to inc lud e the na me o f the pro fe ssio n o r d isc ipline  Ge ne ra l e duc a tio n fra me wo rk a nd c o re  Po lic y ha s ta b le s with spe c ific ho urs/ re q uire me nts

3.15 Unde r g r a duate De g r e e Re quir e me nts

AA, AS, a nd AAS De g re e s

3.15 Unde r g r a duate De g r e e Re quir e me nts

Associate in Arts or Associate in Science Number of Hours Required Total semester credit hours required 60 General education 37 Credit in residence at the awarding institution 15 Course work applicable to major 23 Associate in Applied Science Number of Hours Required Total semester credit hours required 60 General education 18 Credit in residence at the awarding institution 15 Technical-occupational specialty 27 Support and related courses 0-15

Ba c he lo r De g re e s

3.15 Unde r g r a duate De g r e e Re quir e me nts

Bachelor of Arts Degree Number of Hours Required Total semester credit hours required 120 General education 40 Liberal arts and sciences course work 80 Credit in residence at the awarding institution (15 of the final 30 hours

• r 50 percent of the

major also required in residence) 30 Credit from a baccalaureate degree-granting institution (40 hours must be upper-division) 60 Area of specialization (50 percent must be upper-division) 30 Bachelor of Science Degree Number of Hours Required Total semester credit hours required 120 General education 40 Liberal arts and sciences course work 55 Credit in residence at the awarding institution (15 of the final 30 hours

• r 50 percent of the

major also required in residence) 30 Credit from a baccalaureate degree-granting institution (40 hours must be upper-division) 60 Area of specialization (50 percent must be upper-division) 30 Bachelor of (Specialty) Degree Number of Hours Required Total semester credit hours required 120 General education 40 Liberal arts and sciences course work 40 Credit in residence at the awarding institution (15 of the final 30 hours

• r 50 percent of the

major also required in residence) 30 Credit from a baccalaureate degree-granting institution (40 hours must be upper-division) 60 Area of specialization (50 percent must be upper-division) 30

Que stio ns o n Unde rg ra dua te De g re e Re q uire me nts

3.15 Unde r g r a duate De g r e e Re quir e me nts

Ac a de mic Ca le nda r

 F

• rm is upda te d in July a nd a va ila b le o nline b y Aug ust

 Due in De c e mbe r  Ma y b e se nt e le c tro nic a lly to Ac a de mic Affa irs sta ff

• Must inc lude Pre side nt’ s sig na ture

 Co mpile d into 2 E

xc e l do c ume nts

• http:/ / www.o srhe .e du/ a dmin-fa c / a c a de mic -c a le nda r/
• Re g ula r se me ste r sc he dule
• Sho rt/ inte rim c o urse s sc he dule

 Ava ila b le o n we b site e nd o f Ja nua ry  Re vie w da te s c a re fully

3.19 Ac a de mic Ca le nda r

Spring b re a k sho uld e nc o mpa ss the third We dne sda y in Ma rc h

Ho use Bill No . 2727, Se c tio n 22, e xpre sse d le g isla tive inte nt tha t pub lic sc ho o ls, a re a vo c a tio na l-te c hnic a l sc ho o ls, a nd hig he r e d uc a tio n institutio ns c o o rd ina te spring b re a k d a te s fo r the 2001-2002 sc ho o l ye a r. T he c o o rd ina te d spring b re a k d a te s b e yo nd 2002 still ne e d to b e e sta b lishe d . T

he we e k e nc ompa ssing the thir d We dne sda y of Ma r c h of e a c h ye a r is hig he r e duc a tion's sug g e ste d time line . Ple a se c o nta c t

this o ffic e to ind ic a te if yo u c o nc ur with the pro po se d c o o rd ina te d spring b re a k sc he d ule . T hro ug h 2025, the se d a te s a re :

3.19 Ac a de mic Ca le nda r

2020 - Ma rc h 16 – Ma rc h 20 2021 - Ma rc h 15 – Ma rc h 19 2022 - Ma rc h 14 – Ma rc h 18 2023 - Ma rc h 13 – Ma rc h 17 2024 - Ma rc h 18 – Ma rc h 22 2025 - Ma rc h 17 – Ma rc h 21

Que stio ns o n Ac a de mic Ca le nda r

3.19 Ac a de mic Ca le nda r

Co nta c t I nfo rma tio n

• Dr. Ste pha nie Be a uc ha mp

Asso c ia te Vic e Cha nc e llo r fo r Ac a de mic Affa irs sb e a uc ha mp@ o srhe .e du (405) 225-9399

• Dr. Rac he l Bate s

Assoc iate Vic e Chanc e llor for E duc ational Partne rships

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n F a ll Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 11, 2019

Co nte nts

 PART

1: Histor y of Math Suc c e ss Initiative

 PART

2: Syste m Wide I nitia tive s

 PART

3: Building o n the Cha ng e

 Co nc urre nt E

nro llme nt

 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

Conte nts

T ime line

PART 3

PART 1

Oc to b e r 2011: April 2012: Se pte mb e r 2012: Se pte mb e r 2013: April 2015: Ma rc h 2016: April 2017: April 2017: Se pte mb e r 2017: F e b rua ry 2018: F e b rua ry 2018: F a ll 2018: Jo ine d Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a I nc re a se the numb e r o f de g re e s a nd c e rtific a te s b y 67 % b y 2023 Re me dia l Re fo rm Summit Ma the ma tic s F a c ulty Co nfe re nc e Ma th Suc c e ss Gro up Pla nning Me e ting Hig he r E duc a tio n Co mple tio n Co nfe re nc e Co -re q uisite a t Sc a le Co nfe re nc e De sig ning Ma th Pa thwa ys Wo rksho p OK Re g e nts a ppro ve d re c o mme nda tio ns Ma th Co urse De ve lo pme nt Advising a nd Ma the ma tic s Pa thwa ys Wo rksho p Re vise d Ga te wa y Ma the ma tic s Co urse s I mple me nt ne w g a te wa y ma the ma tic s c o urse s

Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a

 Go a l to inc re a se the numb e r o f de g re e s a nd c e rtific a te s

e a rne d in Okla ho ma b y 67 pe rc e nt b y 2023.

 Multiple initia tive s:

• I

nstitutio na l De g re e Co mple tio n Pla ns/ Ac a de mic Pla ns

• 15 to F

inish

• Ma th Suc c e ss I

nitia tive

• Re ve rse T

ra nsfe r

• Co o pe ra tive Ag re e me nt Pro g ra ms

 F

ive na tio na l fo unda tio ns pro viding multi-ye a r suppo rt:

• Ca rne g ie Co rpo ra tio n o f Ne w Yo rk
• Bill a nd Me linda Ga te s F
• unda tio n
• F
• rd F
• unda tio n
• W. K

. K e llo g g F

• unda tio n
• L

umina F

• unda tio n fo r E

duc a tio n

PART 1

Re me dia l Re fo rm Summit

I n 2012, OSRHE he ld a Re me dia l Re fo rm Summit a nd Ma the ma tic s F a c ulty Co nfe re nc e to disc uss suc c e ss ra te s in re me dia l a nd g a te wa y ma the ma tic s c o urse s.

 Re me dia tio n:

• 40% o f po st-se c o nda ry stude nts re q uire re me dia tio n.
• 60% o f stude nts e nte ring c o mmunity c o lle g e s re q uire

re me dia tio n.

• 23% o f stude nts c o mple te g a te wa y c o urse within two ye a rs.
• 11% o f stude nts g ra dua te within thre e ye a rs.

PART 1

Ma th Suc c e ss Gro up

T he Ma the ma tic s Suc c e ss Gro up, whic h c o nsists o f 35 ma the ma tic s fa c ulty, de pa rtme nt c ha irs a nd te a c he r e duc a to rs, b e g a n me e ting in 2013 to de ve lo p a stra te g ic pla n a nd o b ta ine d fe e db a c k fro m sta te a nd na tio na l g ro ups. Prio ritie s o f the stra te g ic pla n inc lude d:

1.

I mpro ve pre pa ra tio n o f hig h sc ho o l stude nts a nd c o lle g e tra nsitio n;

2.

Re fo rm re me dia tio n;

3.

I mpro ve c o urse pla c e me nt; a nd

4.

Cre a te multiple ma th pa thwa ys b a se d upo n me ta - ma jo rs.

PART 1

MPC Pro je c t

I n No ve mb e r 2015, the Ma the ma tic s Pa thwa ys to Co mple tio n pro g ra m o f the Unive rsity o f T e xa s Cha rle s A. Da na Ce nte r invite d Okla ho ma to jo in five o the r sta te s a nd re c e ive suppo rt a nd c o nsulta tio n in pursuing ma th pa thwa ys fo r the Sta te Syste m.

 Okla ho ma dra fte d a sta te wide , multi-ye a r pla n to g uide lo ng -

te rm imple me nta tio n o f ma th pa thwa ys;

 Okla ho ma ma th fa c ulty suc c e ssfully c re a te d fo ur g a te wa y

g e ne ra l e duc a tio n c o urse s;

 100% o f hig he r e duc a tio n institutio ns ha ve imple me nte d a t le a st

two ma th pa thwa ys; a nd

 Co ntinue d e ffo rts a re in pla c e suc h tha t a t le a st 50% o f

pro g ra ms will b e a lig ne d to the a ppro pria te ma th pa thwa ys.

PART 1

1.

E sta b lish sta te wide c o lle g e me ta -ma jo rs a nd c o rre spo nding ma th pa thwa ys, e nsuring tra nsfe ra b ility a c ro ss institutio ns;

2.

I nc re a se stude nt e ng a g e me nt a nd the te a c hing o f a pplic a tio ns in g a te wa y ma th c la sse s;

3.

I nc re a se suppo rt fo r impo rta nt a c a de mic suc c e ss skills in g a te wa y ma th c la sse s;

4.

Pro vide fa c ulty a nd a dviso r pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt a nd re so urc e s; a nd

5.

I mpro ve stude nt pre pa ra tio n, inc luding e ffo rts in K

• 12 e duc a tio n a nd re me dia tio n

re fo rm.

Re c o mme nda tio ns

Sig nific a nt Pro g re ss

Sig nific a nt Pro g re ss

PART 1

1.

Establish statewide college meta-majors and corresponding math pathways, ensuring transferability across institutions;

2.

Increase student engagement and the teaching of applications in gateway math classes;

3.

Increase support for important academic success skills in gateway math classes;

4.

Provide faculty and advisor professional development and resources; and

5.

Improve student preparation, including efforts in K-12 education and remediation reform.

MIP 2019-2023

Recommendations

PART 1

Co nte nts

 PART

1: Histo ry o f Ma th Suc c e ss I nitia tive

 PART

2: Syste m Wide Initiative s

 PART

3: Building o n the Cha ng e

PART 2

Syste m Wide T a sk F

• rc e s/ I

nitia tive s

 Co mple te Co lle g e Ame ric a  Jo b s fo r the F

uture

 OK

Pro mise

 Re a c h Hig he r  Dua l Cre dit/ Co nc urre nt E

duc a tio n

 Hig h sc ho o l ma the ma tic s a lig nme nt

PART 2

Co nte nts

 PART

1: Syste m Ove rvie w a nd Re la te d I nfo rma tio n

 PART

2: Syste m Wide I nitia tive s

 PART

3: Building on the Change

PART 3

Pla c e me nt

I n 2015, OSRHE a ppro ve d a re vise d a sse ssme nt a nd re me dia tio n po lic y with two sig nific a nt c ha ng e s fro m pre vio us po lic ie s.

1.

I de ntify a sse ssme nts tha t mo re a c c ura te ly de sc rib e a stude nt’ s c ha nc e a t suc c e ss in e ntry-le ve l c o urse s.

2.

Allo w re me dia tio n to b e o ffe re d thro ug h a va rie ty o f me c ha nisms, inc luding the c o -re q uisite mo de l.

PART 3

Advising Stra te g ie s

 E

a c h institutio n ha s ha d to re think stude nt a dvising pra c tic e s a nd po lic ie s. E ffo rts to de ve lo p de g re e ma ps tha t c le a rly de fine pre sc rib e d c urric ula vs e xplo ra to ry ma jo rs is o ng o ing wo rk.

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – De g re e Alig nme nt

 Our g o a l is to de ve lo p a c le a r a lig nme nt o f

ma the ma tic pa thwa ys to de g re e s (a c ro ss institutio ns le a ding to sta te wide a lig nme nt).

 I

de ntify o ne de fa ult o r re c o mme nde d g a te wa y ma th re q uire me nt b a se d o n the me ta -ma jo rs de te rmine d b y the re g io na l unive rsity/ c o lle g e .

PART 3

 Co lle g e s a nd unive rsitie s a c ro ss Okla ho ma ha ve

re vise d the ir c o re c urric ulum to a c c o mmo da te multiple ma the ma tic s pa thwa ys a nd e nsure the tra nsfe ra b ility o f a ll e ntry-le ve l ma th c o urse s.

 T

he Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t (CE P) summa rize s the se c ha ng e s.

 T

he fo llo wing da ta fro m the 2018-2019 CE P illustra te s ho w institutio ns o f hig he r e duc a tio n ha ve sta rte d to imple me nt the c o re c urric ulum o ffe ring s.

Building o n Cha ng e – CE P

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – Ma th Optio ns

Ga te wa y ma the ma tic s c o urse o ptio ns inc lude :

• Quantitative Re asoning – E

xplo ra tio n o f va rio us to pic s de sig ne d to to e xpo se stude nt to ma the ma tic a l pro b le ms within nume ro us disc ipline s. L ib e ra l Arts ma the ma tic s c o urse

• F

unc tions and Mode ling – Study o f e q ua tio ns, func tio ns

a nd mo de ling da ta . Ag ric ultura l, b usine ss, life / he a lth sc ie nc e s o r so c ia l sc ie nc e ma jo rs. Co urse De sc riptio ns a nd Stude nt L e a rning Outc o me s

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – Ma th Optio ns

Ga te wa y ma the ma tic s c o urse o ptio ns inc lude :

• E

le me ntar y Statistic s – I

ntro duc tio n to sta tistic s inc lude s de sc riptive sta tistic s, summa ry sta tistic s, pro b a b ility a nd distrib utio n.

• Alge br

a for ST E M – Study o f e q ua tio ns a nd func tio ns.

Suita b le a s the pre pa ra tio n fo r Ca lc ulus. Co mmo n T itle s: Co lle g e Alg e b ra Pre -Ca lc ulus

PART 3

PART 3

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – Co re q uisite

OK pub lic institutio ns o f hig he r e duc a tio n ha ve me e t the fo llo wing g o a ls fo r the 2017-2018 a c a de mic ye a r:

 100% o f a ll re me dia l stude nts within the sta te a tte nd a n

institutio n tha t offe r

s at le ast one c o-r e quisite

ma the ma tic s c o urse ;

 100% o f a ll pub lic institutio ns o f hig he r e duc a tio n offe r

at le ast one c o-r e quisite mathe matic s c our se;

 Okla ho ma pub lic institutio ns o f hig he r e duc a tio n ha ve

inc o rpo ra te d the use of multiple me asur

e s to

a de q ua te ly suppo rt stude nts with c urric ula r de fic ie nc ie s in ma the ma tic s; a nd

 Co mple tio n ra te s in g a te wa y Ma th/ E

ng lish c o urse s will c o ntinue to b e studie d a nd a na lyze d fo r po te ntia l mo dific a tio ns.

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – Co nc urre nt

Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt: e lig ib le hig h sc ho o l junio r/ se nio r who e nro ll in c o lle g e c o urse s a nd e a rn hig h sc ho o l/ c o lle g e c re dit.

1.

ACT / SAT

• r e ntr

y le ve l c our se plac e me nt me asur e in

a c c o rda nc e with institutio n’ s Sta te Re g e nts a ppro ve d a sse ssme nt pla n

2.

Sig ne d fo rm fro m hig h sc ho o l princ ipa l o r c o unse lo r

3.

Pe rmissio n fro m a pa re nt o r le g a l g ua rdia n

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – Co nc urre nt

Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt: wo rk lo a d

 A hig h sc ho o l stude nt ma y e nro ll in a c o mb ine d numb e r

• f hig h sc ho o l a nd c o lle g e c o urse s pe r se me ste r no t to

e xc e e d a full-time c o lle g e wo rklo a d o f 19-se me ste r- c re dit-ho urs.

 A stude nt ma y e nro ll in a ma ximum o f nine c re dit-ho urs

during a summe r se me ste r witho ut b e ing c o nc urre ntly e nro lle d in hig h sc ho o l during the summe r te rm.

 Co nc urre nt se nio rs a re e ntitle d to a tuitio n wa ive r fo r a

ma ximum o f 18 c re dit ho urs – no se me ste r

c r e dit hour limits.

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – Hig h Sc ho o l

OSRHE a nd OK SDE c o ntinue to wo rk with the So uthe rn Re g io na l E duc a tio n Bo a rd a nd the Co lle g e a nd Ca re e r Ma th Re a dine ss c o urse .

 Pr

• je c t: Hig h Sc ho o l to Co lle g e Ma the ma tic s Pa thwa ys

 Goals: T

he Ma the ma tic s Suc c e ss wo rk te a m c ha rg e d with de ve lo ping syste ma tic , stra te g ic c o nve rsa tio ns b e twe e n hig h sc ho o ls a nd c o lle g e s.

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – CCMR

Colle ge Care e r Math Re ady is a fre e c o urse de sig ne d fo r hig h

sc ho o l se nio rs who ha ve c o mple te d Alg e b ra I , Ge o me try, a nd Alg e b ra I I , a nd ne e d a tra nsitio n c o urse to g e t the m re a dy fo r c o lle g e -le ve l c o urse wo rk. T he c o urse e mpha size s unde rsta nding o f ma the ma tic s c o nc e pts ra the r tha n me mo rizing pro c e dure s. By e ng a g ing stude nts in re a l-wo rld a pplic a tio ns, Colle ge Care e r Math

Re ady de ve lo ps c ritic a l-thinking skills tha t stude nts will use in

c o lle g e a nd the ir c a re e rs.

CCMR a t SDE : https:/ / sde .o k.g o v/ c c mr # OK Ma thRe a dy

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – CCMR

CCMR T raining Workshops are be ing de ve lope d and planne d for F all 2019 – Spring 2020 and Summe r 2020.

CCMR a t SDE : https:/ / sde .o k.g o v/ c c mr # OK Ma thRe a dy

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – I CAP

As hig h sc ho o ls b e g in to imple me nt the I CAP, c o lle g e s a nd unive rsitie s a re c urre ntly inve stig a ting wa ys to imple me nt the I CAP a s stude nts e nte r into hig he r e duc a tio n.

(E po rtfo lio – hig h sc ho o l tra nsc ripts – c a re e r e xplo ra tio n)

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – Hig h Sc ho o l

Okla ho ma is pa rtic ipa ting in the Co nfe re nc e Bo a rd o f the Ma the ma tic a l Sc ie nc e s (CMBS) F

• rum pro je c t. T

he fo c us o f this pro je c t is to b ridg e the g a ps b e twe e n hig h sc ho o l a nd c o lle g e ma the ma tic s.

 Pr

• je c t: Hig h Sc ho o l to Co lle g e Ma the ma tic s Pa thwa ys:

Pre pa ring Stude nts fo r the F uture

 Goals: T

• he lp OSRHE

a nd OK SDE c re a te po lic ie s a nd pra c tic e s fo r ma the ma tic s instruc tio n tha t c o ntrib ute to suc c e ssful c o mple tio n witho ut re duc ing q ua lity.

Building o n Cha ng e – Hig h Sc ho o l

Mathways to E xc e lle nc e

Ba se d o n the ir e xpe rtise a nd e xpe rie nc e , the le a de rship te a m ha s ide ntifie d five c a te g o rie s o f prima ry pro b le ms tha t ne e d to b e a ddre sse d to e nsure stude nts a re suffic ie ntly pre pa re d fo r the tra nsitio n fro m hig h sc ho o l to c o lle g e b y me a ns o f a lig ning sta nda rds a nd e xpe c ta tio ns b e twe e n se c o nda ry a nd po st-se c o nda ry e duc a tio n.

Building o n Cha ng e – Hig h Sc ho o l

1.

L ac k of mathe matic s c ur r ic ulum alignme nt be twe e n K-12 and post-se c ondar y.

2.

L ac k of pr e par ation for c olle ge math.

3.

Inc onsiste nt and pote ntially ine ffe c tive plac e me nt pr ac tic e s ac r

• ss the state syste m.

4.

L ac k of e quitable ac c e ss to AP and c onc ur r e nt oppor tunitie s for all stude nts.

5.

L ac k of c ohe r e nt mathe matic al pathways for stude nts.

Mo me ntum Ye a r E

ve nt:

• Ca mpus L

ia iso ns a ppo inte d b y Pre side nt

• CCA will b e ho sting a L

ia iso n We lc o me we b ina r

• Sa ve the da te : Oc to b e r 31st a t UCO

PART 3

Building o n Cha ng e – CCA

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

Ge ne r al Infor mation

 T

he c o nc urre nt e nro llme nt po lic y c rite ria , whic h ha d no t b e e n sub sta ntive ly re vise d sinc e the 90’ s, wa s pre vio usly de ta ile d within the OSRHE I

nstitutio nal Admissio n and Re te ntio n po lic y.

 T

he sc o pe o f c o nc urre nt e nro llme nt e xte nds b e yo nd a dmissio n issue s; thus, a ne w sta nd-a lo ne Co nc urre nt

E nro llme nt po lic y wa s c re a te d in 2017.

Pe r mission

 Pe rmissio n fro m pa re nt  All stude nts must ha ve a sig ne d fo rm fro m the hig h sc ho o l

princ ipa l o r c o unse lo r sta ting tha t he / she is e lig ib le to sa tisfy re q uire me nts fo r g ra dua tio n fro m hig h sc ho o l (inc luding c urric ula r re q uire me nts fo r c o lle g e a dmissio n) no la te r tha n the spring o f the se nio r ye a r.

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

Re se ar c h Unive r sitie s Me e t One o f the fo llo wing : 1. Na tio na l ACT , Pre -ACT (10th Gra de ), o r Re sidua l ACT *=24 2. SAT

• r PSAT

10=1160 3. 3.0 GPA (unwe ig hte d) a nd to p 33% Re gional Unive r sitie s Me e t One o f the fo llo wing : 1. Na tio na l ACT , Pre -ACT (10th Gra de ), o r Re sidua l ACT *=20 2. SAT

• r PSAT

10=1020 3. 3.0 GPA (unwe ig hte d) a nd to p 50% Community Colle ge s Me e t One o f the fo llo wing : 1. Na tio na l ACT , Pre -ACT (10th Gra de ), o r Re sidua l ACT *=19 2. SAT

• r PSAT

10=980 3. 3.0 GPA (unwe ig hte d)

* Stude nts c a n utilize o ne Re sidua l ACT pe r ye a r fro m No ve mb e r 1 to Oc to b e r 31

Junior s and Se nior s fr

• m Re c ognize d Ac c r

e dite d High Sc hools

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

Re se ar c h Unive r sitie s Me e t One o f the fo llo wing : 1. Na tio na l ACT , Pre -ACT (10th Gra de ), o r Re sidua l ACT *=24 2. SAT

• r PSAT

10=1160 Re gional Unive r sitie s Me e t One o f the fo llo wing : 1. Na tio na l ACT , Pre -ACT (10th Gra de ), o r Re sidua l ACT *=20 2. SAT

• r PSAT

10=1020 Community Colle ge s Me e t One o f the fo llo wing : 1. Na tio na l ACT , Pre -ACT (10th Gra de ), o r Re sidua l ACT *=19 2. SAT

• r PSAT

10=980

* Stude nts c a n utilize o ne Re sidua l ACT pe r ye a r fro m No ve mb e r 1 to Oc to b e r 31

Junior s and Se nior s fr

• m Home sc hool OR Unac c r

e dite d and Non-Re c ognize d Ac c r e dite d High Sc hools

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

 An institutio n wishing to o ffe r o ff-c a mpus c o nc urre nt

e nro llme nt will b e re q uire d to me e t the sta nda rds in po lic y se c tio n 3.10.6. T he se sta nda rds inc lude :

 Spe c ifying tha t the e xpe c ta tio ns in o ff-c a mpus c o nc urre nt

c o urse s sho uld b e the sa me a s o n-c a mpus c o urse s;

 Adhe ring to HL

C’ s fa c ulty q ua lific a tio n re q uire me nts;

 Pro viding a n o rie nta tio n a nd pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt fo r

fa c ulty;

 E

va lua ting fa c ulty; a nd

 Cre a ting a n MOU b e twe e n the hig he r e duc a tio n institutio n a nd

the o ff-c a mpus lo c a tio n.

Off-Campus Cour se s

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

Re te ntion Standar ds

 Hig h sc ho o l stude nts c o nc urre ntly e nro lle d in c o lle g e

c o urse s ma y c o ntinue c o nc urre nt e nro llme nt in sub se q ue nt se me ste rs if the y a c hie ve a c o lle g e GPA o f 2.0 o r a b o ve o n a 4.0 sc a le .

 Stude nts fa lling b e lo w 2.0 GPA o n a 4.0 sc a le a re no t

e lig ib le fo r sub se q ue nt se me ste r c o nc urre nt e nro llme nt.

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

Old T uition Waive r Pr

• gr

am

Co nc urre nt se nio rs re c e ive a tuitio n wa ive r fo r six ho urs pe r te rm (Summe r b e twe e n junio r a nd se nio r ye a r a nd F a ll a nd Spring se me ste rs o f the se nio r ye a r).

Ne w T uition Waive r Pr

• gr

am

Stude nts a re e lig ib le fo r the wa ive r fo r the first 18 ho urs o f c o nc urre nt e nro llme nt o ve r the se nio r ye a r (Summe r b e twe e n junio r a nd se nio r ye a r a nd F a ll a nd Spring se me ste rs o f the se nio r ye a r).

T uition Waive r Pr

• gr

am Change : E ffe c tive July 1, 2018

 T

he T uitio n Wa ive r Pro g ra m is no t a c a de mic po lic y.

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

T uition Waive r

 T

he T uitio n Wa ive r Pro g ra m is no t a c a de mic po lic y.

 E

xa mple o f Se nio r T uitio n Wa ive r: A c o nc urre nt se nio r stude nt who to o k thre e ho urs in Summe r, thre e ho urs in the F a ll, a nd 12 ho urs in the Spring wo uld ha ve a ll o f his/ he r tuitio n wa ive d b e c a use he / she did no t e xc e e d the 18 ho ur limit.

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

 F

irst Re po rt Due b y De c e mb e r 1, 2019: Sub mit via e ma il to rb a te s@ o srhe .e d u

Re por t for Off-Campus Ac tivity

3.10 Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt

3.20.1 Pur pose

 Asse ssme nt o f stude nts fulfills two purpo se s:

1.

impro ve me nt o f te a c hing a nd le a rning ; a nd

2.

a c c o unta b ility a nd institutio na l e ffe c tive ne ss.

 Co urse Pla c e me nt  Ge ne ra l E

duc a tio n

 Pro g ra m Outc o me s  Stude nt Sa tisfa c tio n

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

3.20.4 E ntry L e ve l Asse ssme nt and Course Plac e me nt

 Stude nts sc o ring b e lo w the ACT

sub je c t sc o re minimum le ve l will b e re vie we d with a dditio na l info rma tio n, a s a ppro ve d b y the Sta te Re g e nts, to de te rmine the le ve l

• f re a dine ss fo r c o lle g e -le ve l c o urse wo rk. Ano the r te st

is no t re q uire d.

 I

nstitutio na l e ntry le ve l a sse ssme nt pro g ra ms sho uld inc lude a n e va lua tio n o f pa st a c a de mic pe rfo rma nc e , e duc a tio na l g o a ls, study skills, va lue s, se lf-c o nc e pt a nd mo tiva tio n. A te st is no t re q uire d.

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

3.20.4.B Basic Ac ade mic Skills Re quire me nts

 Stude nts must b e g in re me dia tio n o f b a sic

a c a de mic skills de fic ie nc ie s during the first se me ste r a nd c o ntinue until pre pa re d fo r c o lle g e - le ve l c o urse wo rk in the re spe c tive sub je c t a re a .

 Stude nts sc o ring b e lo w the ACT

sub je c t sc o re minimum le ve l will b e re vie we d with a dditio na l info rma tio n, a s a ppro ve d b y the Sta te Re g e nts, to de te rmine the le ve l o f re a dine ss fo r c o lle g e - le ve l c o urse wo rk o r suc c e ssfully c o mple te de ve lo pme nta l e duc a tio n in the sub je c t a re a .

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

3.20.5 Ge ne r al E duc ation Asse ssme nt

 T

his a sse ssme nt is de sig ne d to me a sure the stude nt's a c a de mic pro g re ss a nd le a rning c o mpe te nc ie s in a re a s suc h a s c o mmunic a tio n, c ritic a l thinking , ma the ma tic s, re a ding , a nd writing .

 Mo re tha n the g e ne ra l e duc a tio n c o urse se le c tio n in

the first ha lf o f the de g re e pro g ra m.

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

3.20.6 Pr

• gr

am L e ar ning Outc ome s

 Se le c t instrume nts to a sse ss le a rning o utc o me s fo r e a c h

de g re e pro g ra m. Sho uld a sse ss hig he r le ve l thinking skills in a pplying le a rne d info rma tio n. Whe n a va ila b le a nd a ppro pria te , na tio na lly sta nda rdize d instrume nts will b e use d.

 All finding s will b e re po rte d in pro g ra m re vie ws a s

indic a te d in Ac a de mic Pro g ra m Re vie w po lic y. Re sults fro m na tio na lly sta nda rdize d instrume nts will b e re po rte d in the Annua l Stude nt Asse ssme nt Re po rt.

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

3.20.7 Stude nt E ngage me nt and Satisfac tion

 Stude nt a nd a lumni pe rc e ptio ns a re impo rta nt in the

e va lua tio n o f a c a de mic a nd c a mpus pro g ra ms a nd se rvic e s. Suc h pe rc e ptio ns a re va lua b le b e c a use the y pro vide a n indic a tio n o f the stude nts' sub je c tive vie w o f e ve nts a nd se rvic e s whic h c o lle c tive ly c o nstitute the ir unde rg ra dua te e xpe rie nc e s.

 E

va lua tio ns o f stude nt sa tisfa c tio n c a n b e a c c o mplishe d via surve ys, inte rvie ws, e tc . Re sulta nt da ta will b e use d fo r the impro ve me nt o f pro g ra ms a nd se rvic e s.

 Curre nt pra c tic e s inc lude NSSE

, CCSSE , BCSSE , F SSE , SSI , SRI , I DE A Stude nt Ra ting s o f I nstruc tio n, SE NSE .

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

3.20.8 Asse ssme nt Plan and Re por ting

 T

• a c hie ve the purpo se s o f this po lic y a nd to

a c c o mplish e ffe c tive a nd inno va tive Sta te Syste m a sse ssme nt, e ve ry institutio n will ma inta in a c urre nt a sse ssme nt pla n tha t inc lude s a minimum o f the a sse ssme nts re q uire d in this po lic y.

 T

he pla n will b e sub mitte d to the Sta te Re g e nts fo r a ppro va l e ve ry five ye a rs o r whe n sub sta ntive c ha ng e s a re ma de . Re po rt a ll c ha ng e s to sta ff to de te rmine if sub sta ntive .

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

3.20.8 Asse ssme nt Plan and Re por ting

 Annua lly, institutio ns sha ll sub mit to the Sta te Re g e nts a

stude nt a sse ssme nt re po rt c o nta ining info rma tio n re la te d to this po lic y a nd the institutio n’ s a ppro ve d pla n. Re fe r to the Ac a de mic Affa irs Pro c e dure s Ha ndb o o k fo r de ta ils re g a rding the re po rting re q uire me nts.

 Due De c e mb e r 1, 2019.

3.20 Stude nt Asse ssme nt a nd Re me dia tio n

T ha nk yo u fo r jo ining me to da y.

• Dr. Ra c he l Ba te s

rb a te s@ o srhe .e du 405.225.9168

PART 5

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 11, 2019

• Ms. Angie Willits

Adult De gre e Comple tion Ma na g e r

Re ac h Highe r Dire c t Comple te

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

• Ms. Ang ie Willits

Adult De g r e e Comple tion Ma na g e r

Are a s to b e Co ve re d

 Ba c kg ro und  Stude nt Re fe rra ls  Pa rtne rs a nd Asse ts  Upc o ming Pro mo tio n a nd Ma rke ting

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Ba c kg ro und

 Built o n Re a c h Hig he r F

• unda tio n.

 Okla ho ma re c e ive d infra struc ture g ra nt in 2016 fo r a n

Adult Pro mise type initia tive .

 De g re e pro g ra ms tha t le a d to c ritic a l o c c upa tio ns liste d

• n OK

Wo rks’ 100 Critic a l Oc c upa tio ns L ist.

 F

unding fro m multiple e ntitie s le ve ra g e d to c o ve r a dult stude nts’ c o sts to c o mple te de g re e tha t le a ds to e mplo yme nt in a Critic a l Oc c upa tio n.

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Stude nt Re fe rra ls

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te  Po te ntia l stude nts sho uld c o mple te a stude nt inte re st fo rm

a t www.re a c hhig he ro k.o rg

 Dire c t no tific a tio n will g o to na vig a to r fro m the institutio n o f

c ho ic e . Na vig a to r will c o nta c t the m within 3 b usine ss da ys.

 Pa rtne rship pa g e ha s lo g o s fo r a ll o ur pa rtne rs; thro ug ho ut

the ne w we b site , po te ntia l pa rtne rs c a n re q ue st mo re info rma tio n via a we b fo rm; a c o mmitme nt fo rm ma y b e do wnlo a de d dire c tly fro m we b site o n the pa rtne r info rma tio n pa g e .

 T

hirte e n pa rtic ipa ting institutio ns re pre se nte d b y a PIN o n a n inte ra c tive ma p; e a c h ha ve a c o nta c t pa g e tha t lists the ir na vig a to r’ s na me a nd c o nta c t info rma tio n, a nd dire c ts a po te ntia l stude nt to the ir a dult c o mple tio n we b pa g e .

Stude nt Re fe rra ls

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te  Bra nd ne w we b site a t www.re a c hhig he ro k.o rg  Ma ilb o x ha s b e e n se t up a t RHDire c tCo mple te @ o srhe .e du  T

isha Bra dfo rd, o ur T ulsa Na vig a to r, c he c ks ma il b o x da ily a nd e ma ils o r c a lls the po te ntia l stude nt

 Stude nt inte re st fo rm a va ila b le b y we b fo rm o n we b site ;

stude nt fo rms se nt dire c tly to the c a mpus na vig a to r a nd to the Dire c tCo mple te Inb o x

Pa rtic ipa ting I nstitutio ns

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Pa rtne rs a nd Asse ts

 Re so urc e s fo r E

duc a tio n mini-wo rksho ps

 Sc huste rma n fo unda tio n: $40,000 in sc ho la rships fo r T

ulsa re g io n o nly

 13 Dire c tCo mple te Co lle g e s a nd Unive rsitie s re pre se nting 6

• f 7 wo rkfo rc e re g io ns (No t So uthe rn)

 T

hre e trib e s o ffe r Dire c tCo mple te sc ho la rships fo r the ir c itize ns

 Stro ng pa rtne rships with Wo rkfo rc e De ve lo pme nt Bo a rds,

OE SC, DRS, OK Wo rks, a nd se ve ra l Cha mb e rs o f Co mme rc e thro ug ho ut the sta te

 Okla ho ma He a lth Ca re Wo rkfo rc e Ce nte r: $7500 in

sc ho la rships fo r 2YR RN Stude nts

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Pa rtne rs a nd Asse ts

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Upc o ming Visits a nd T ra ining

 Mo nthly me e ting s with Na tive Ame ric a n Busine ss

pa rtne rs a t AI CCOk thro ug ho ut the sta te

 Sta te wide pro mo tio n a nd ma rke ting fo r Re a c h

Hig he r: RE CONNE CT we e k, July 27th-Aug ust 1

 Mo nthly me e ting s with T

UL SA T AL E NT HUB

 Re g ula r me e ting s/ pre se nta tio n a t F

a ith in Busine ss, T ulsa

 Ong o ing Ma na g e r tra ining a nd Co a c hing Me nto rship

with I nside T ra c k

Re a c h Hig he r Dir e c t Comple te

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 11, 2019

• Ms. She ila Smith

Re a c h Hig he r Ma na g e r

Re ac h Highe r F le x F inish

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

• Ms. She ila Smith

R e a c h Hig he r Ma na g e r

Are a s to b e Co ve re d

Ba c kg ro und Curre nt Sta tus Po lic y I

ssue s fo r Asso c ia te De g re e Pro g ra ms

Po lic y I

ssue s fo r Ba c c a la ure a te De g re e Pro g ra ms

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Ba c kg ro und

 T

he Re a c h Hig he r initia tive pro vide s a dult de g re e c o mple tio n pro g ra ms in fle xib le , no n- tra ditio na l fo rma ts

 Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e in Org a niza tio n L

e a de rship

 Asso c ia te in Arts in E

nte rprise De ve lo pme nt

 Asso c ia te in Sc ie nc e in E

nte rprise De ve lo pme nt

 Ava ila b le a t se ve n unive rsitie s a nd 14

c o mmunity c o lle g e s a nd te c hnic a l b ra nc he s a c ro ss the sta te

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Curre nt Sta tus

5,477 Pro g ra m Gra dua te s thro ug h F a ll 2018 fo r 2-a nd 4-ye a r institutio ns

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Po lic y I ssue s Asso c ia te De g re e Pro g ra ms

 Re side nt Cre dit

 Ge ne ra l E

duc a tio n re q uire me nts (37 c re dit ho urs) c a n b e sa tisfie d b y c re dit e a rne d a t a n Okla ho ma institutio n pa rtic ipa ting in the Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t (CE P). Co urse s ta ke n fro m the CE P listing s will fulfill re side nt c re dit re q uire me nts.

 Co re c o urse s/ ma jo r re q uire me nts (23 c re dit ho urs) must

inc lude 15 o f the fina l c re dit ho urs fro m Okla ho ma institutio ns pa rtic ipa ting in the Re a c h Hig he r a sso c ia te de g re e c o mple tio n pro g ra m inc luding the 12 Okla ho ma c o mmunity c o lle g e s a nd 2 Okla ho ma te c hnic a l b ra nc he s a c c re dite d b y the Hig he r L e a rning Co mmissio n.

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Po lic y I ssue s Asso c ia te De g re e Pro g ra ms

 Co urse Sub stitutio n

 I

nstitutio ns ma y a llo w c o urse sub stitutio ns within a c o nte nt a re a if the c o urse is e q ua l to o r hig he r in rig o r a nd c o nsiste nt with institutio na l pra c tic e fo r c o urse sub stitutio ns in suc h c o nte nt a re a s fo r o the r de g re e pro g ra ms a t the institutio n.

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

Po lic y I ssue s Ba c c a la ure a te De g re e Pro g ra ms

 Re side nt Cre dit

 All 10 c o re c o urse s in the Ba c he lo r o f Sc ie nc e in

Org a niza tio na l L e a de rship (775) pro g ra m a re c o nside re d re side nt c re dit re g a rdle ss o f the institutio n o f re c o rd fo r the instruc tio n.

 Co urse Sub stitutio n

 No ne o f the c o re c o urse s ma y b e sub stitute d fo r o the r

c o urse s o r thro ug h prio r le a rning a sse ssme nt.

Re a c h Hig he r F le x F inish

• Mr. Kyle F
• ste r

Assistant Vic e Chanc e llor for Ac ade mic Affairs

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n F a ll Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 11, 2019



T his po lic y is de sig ne d to fa c ilita te the tra nsfe r o f stude nts b e twe e n a nd a mo ng c o mmunity c o lle g e s a nd unive rsitie s within the Sta te Syste m,



a nd the tra nsfe r o f te c hnic a l c o urse wo rk fo r stude nts thro ug h the Sta te wide Artic ula tio n Ag re e me nt with Okla ho ma te c hno lo g y c e nte rs.



Re q uire d GPAs fo r a dmissio n o f tra nsfe r stude nts c a n va ry a c ro ss the Sta te Syste m. Use the Ac a de mic Po lic ie s Pro c e dure s Ha ndb o o k to re vie w de ta ils.

Ge ne r al Issue s

3.11 Unde rg ra dua te T ra nsfe r a nd Artic ula tio n



T ra nsc ripts o f re c o rd fro m c o lle g e s a nd unive rsitie s a c c re dite d b y HL C o r o the r re g io na l a sso c ia tio ns will b e g ive n full va lue .



T ra nsc ripts o f re c o rd fro m de g re e g ra nting institutio ns a c c re dite d b y na tio na l a sso c ia tio ns a re sub je c t to re vie w a nd ma y tra nsfe r o n a c o urse -b y-c o urse b a sis.

T r ansc r ipts

3.11 Unde rg ra dua te T ra nsfe r a nd Artic ula tio n

No polic y r e visions sinc e pr e vious wor kshop

3.11 Unde rg ra dua te T ra nsfe r a nd Artic ula tio n

Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t



T he Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t (CE P) wa s e sta b lishe d in 1995.



F a c ulty a ppo inte d b y the pre side nts re vie w c o urse e q uiva le nc ie s in disc ipline s se le c te d b y the COI a nnua lly.



T he sta te tra nsfe r ta b le s a re upda te d a fte r fina l ve rific a tio n a nd a ppro va l b y the Sta te Re g e nts.

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t



Additio ns, de le tio ns a nd mo dific a tio ns o f c o urse wo rk ta ke pla c e a t Se pte mb e r F a c ulty Me e ting s.



COI me mb e rs ma y sub mit c ha ng e s fo r disc ipline s tha t do no t me e t in pe rso n tha t ye a r.



Priva te institutio ns ma y o nly a dd the ir c o urse s if the y a tte nde d tha t disc ipline ’ s F a c ulty Me e ting .

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t



8,106 c o urse s/ 50 disc ipline s o n the 2019-20 sta te ma trix ta b le



E a c h me e ting re q uire s a COI fa c ilita to r a nd se le c tio n o f a c ha ir fro m the fa c ulty g ro up



T ra ditio na l sta nda rd: 75% c o mmo n c o urse c o nte nt



Adde d 2017-18: Stude nt L e a rning Outc o me s fo r CE P Co urse s—Must me e t 100% fo r inc lusio n



www.OK Co urse T ra nsfe r.o rg

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

Co urse E q uiva le nc y Pro je c t

T ra nsfe r fro m T e c hno lo g y Ce nte rs

 Pa rt o f a Co o pe ra tive Ag re e me nt Pro g ra m (CAP)  Only fo r te c hnic a l pro g ra ms (AAS, c e rtific a te , o r

te c hno lo g y b a c c a la ure a te )

 Co lla b o ra tive e ffo rt b e twe e n institutio n a nd lo c a l

te c hno lo g y c e nte r to c re a te a ve ry spe c ific pa thwa y fo r stude nts

 Curre ntly re q uire s e xte nsive re vie w b y o utside

fa c ulty (po lic y unde r re vie w)

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

CE P Cyc le Ove rvie w

Cour se E quiva le nc y Pr

• je c t

Institution Review May-August Faculty Review September Institution 2nd Review October-December Council on Instruction Approval February State Regents Approval March Matrix Posted Online April

We a re he re !

Ove r vie w



T he purpo se o f the po lic y is to pro vide a fra me wo rk to e va lua te le a rning tha t ta ke s pla c e o utside o f the fo rma l hig he r e duc a tio n struc ture .



T he fra me wo rk pro vide s a syste ma tic a nd c o mpa ra b le me a ns thro ug h whic h stude nts mig ht b e a wa rde d c re dit fo r prio r le a rning .



Cre dit fo r prio r le a rning must b e va lida te d b y suc c e ssful c o mple tio n o f 12 o r mo re c re dit ho urs a t the a wa rding institutio n b e fo re b e ing pla c e d o n the stude nt’ s o ffic ia l tra nsc ript.



Cre dit fo r prio r le a rning , o nc e re c o rde d a t a Sta te Syste m institutio n, is tra nsfe ra b le o n the sa me b a sis a s if the c re dit ha d b e e n e a rne d thro ug h re g ula r study a t the a wa rding institutio n.

3.16 Cre dit fo r Prio r L e a rning

3.16 Cr e dit for Pr ior L e a r ning

8 Optio ns fo r Va lida ting PL A Cre dit

 ACE

re c o mme nda tio n

 Univ. o f Sta te o f NY’ s Co lle g e

Cre dit Re c o mme nda tio n Se rvic e (CCRS)

 Sta nda rds e xa ms suc h a s AP*,

CL E P, a nd DANT E S

 PL

A c re dit a wa rde d a nd tra nsc ripte d b y a no the r institutio n

 Po rtfo lio using CAE

L

• r o the r

sta nda rdize d g uide line s

 I

nte rna tio na l Ba c c a la ure a te (I B) pro g ra m

 I

nstitutio na lly pre pa re d a sse ssme nts de ve lo pe d b y q ua lifie d fa c ulty with c o nte nt e xpe rtise

 Syste mwide te c hnic a l

a sse ssme nt inve nto ry (pa rt o f the CAP pro g ra m) *Sta te Re g e nts’ po lic y re q uire s c re dit b e g ra nte d fo r a 3 o r hig he r o n the AP e xa m

3.16 Cr e dit for Pr ior L e a r ning

Online Co nso rtium o f Okla ho ma (OCO)



Due s-b a se d c o nso rtium



Sta te Syste m institutio ns



Pro vide pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt, suppo rt, a nd re so urc e s to me mb e r institutio ns



Online le a rning



Affo rda b le c o urse ma te ria ls



E duc a tio na l te c hno lo g y



E sta b lishe d this spring , a lre a dy c o nduc te d se ve ra l PD tra ining s a c ro ss the sta te a nd o nline

Que stio ns, c o mme nts, o r sug g e stio ns?

 K

yle F

• ste r

 kfo ste r@ o srhe .e du | (405) 225-9163

Council on Instruction Fall Policy Workshop

July 11, 2019

• Dr. Goldie Thompson

Assistant Vice Chancellor for Teacher Preparation and Special Programs

Teacher Education Policy

Areas to be Covered

 3.21.3 Criteria for Admission  3.21.4 The 4x12, Reading Instruction and Other

Requirements

 3.21.6 Guidelines for Teacher Preparation Faculty  3.21.7 Guidelines for Participation on Residency Year

Committees

 Oklahoma Teacher Connection

Teacher Education

 Alignment with the Office of Educational Quality and

Accountability (OEQA) policy.

 3.21.3 Criteria for admission to a teacher education

program in Oklahoma:

 3.0 or higher in all general education courses  PRAXIS Core Academic Skills for Educators  Oklahoma General Education Test (OGET)  Baccalaureate Degree

Teacher Education Policy

Teacher Education

 3.21.4 Stresses the completion of the 4x12 degree

requirements, reading instruction and assessment

 Other requirements:

 Oklahoma Subject Area Tests (OSAT)  Clinical Field Experience – Minimum 45 hours/12 week

student teaching internship

 Numerous Evaluations and Assessments  Teacher Competencies, State and National Standards, as

well as Dispositions

 Oklahoma Professional Examination (OPTE)

Teacher Education Policy

Teacher Education

 3.21.6 Guidelines for Teacher Preparation Faculty

 Teach regularly scheduled classes in a state accredited

P-12 school(s) and/or perform a professionally appropriate role at the school site(s) which involves direct contact with students. A minimum of 10 clock hours per school year.

 Faculty members are expected to incorporate their

varied common school classroom experiences into their teacher preparation program.

 Empowering students with teaching skills and strategies

for diverse classrooms.

Teacher Education Policy

Teacher Education

 3.21.7 Guidelines for Participation on Induction

Committees

 An induction committee may consist of a mentor

teacher(s), principal / assistant principal(s), other administrator(s), or a higher education faculty member inside or outside the teacher education unit.

 Teacher education faculty members participating on

induction committees are expected to have expertise and experience in the teaching field of the teacher inductee.

Teacher Education Policy

Teacher Education

Oklahoma Teacher Connection

 3.22 Oklahoma Teacher Connection

 Recruitment, retention and placement of teachers in the

public schools of the State of Oklahoma

 Funding of grants for campus-based recruitment,

retention and placement programs

 OTC Collegiate Grant Program

 Establishment and development of recruiting programs

for potential teachers – including pre-collegiate curricular courses

 Teach Oklahoma  Lead Oklahoma  Educators Rising

• Dr. Goldie Thompson

Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education Teacher Education gthompson@osrhe.edu 405.225.9143

Questions?

• Dr. De bbie Blanke

Se nior Vic e Chanc e llor for Ac ade mic and Stude nt Affairs

Co unc il o n I nstruc tio n F a ll Po lic y Wo rksho p

July 11, 2019

3.1 I nstitutio na l Ac c re dita tio n a nd Sta te Autho riza tio n

Polic y Re quir e me nts

 T

his po lic y re q uire s tha t a ll priva te de g re e g ra nting institutio ns a nd o ut-

• f-sta te pub lic de g re e g ra nting pub lic institutio ns tha t ha ve a physic a l

pre se nc e in Okla ho ma se e k a utho riza tio n fro m the Okla ho ma Sta te Re g e nts fo r Hig he r E duc a tio n (OSRHE ) to o pe ra te in the sta te .

 T

he po lic y re q uire s priva te de g re e g ra nting institutio ns a nd o ut-o f-sta te de g re e g ra nting pub lic institutio ns to :

• Be re g io na lly o r na tio na lly a c c re dite d b y a n a g e nc y tha t is re c o g nize d b y the

Unite d Sta te s De pa rtme nt o f E duc a tio n;

• Me e t c o nsume r pro te c tio n sta nda rds fo r o pe ra tio n;
• Utilize a n e nro llme nt a g re e me nt; a nd
• Re po rt da ta .

Polic y Re quir e me nts

 T

he po lic y re q uire s sta te syste m institutio ns to :

• Sub mit c o pie s o f se lf-study re po rts a nd fina l e va lua tio n re po rts

in a time ly ma nne r;

• Ha ve a stude nt c o mpla int pro c e ss; a nd
• E

nsure tha t its a dve rtise me nts, b ro c hure s, c a ta lo g s, we b site s,

• r o the r pub lic a tio ns a re no t misle a ding o r de c e ptive .

3.1 I nstitutio na l Ac c re dita tio n a nd Sta te Autho riza tio n

3.2 F unc tio ns o f Pub lic I nstitutio ns

T he Constitution of Oklahoma (Ar tic le XIII-A, Se c tion 2) dir e c ts the State Re ge nts to de te r mine the func tions and c our se s of study in e ac h of the institutions of the State Syste m.

3.2 F unc tio ns o f Pub lic I nstitutio ns

 Po lic y re vise d F

e b rua ry 2019 fo r func tio n e xc e ptio ns re q ue sts.

 Pro c e ss fo r I

nstitutio ns:

• sub mit a le tte r o f inte nt to the Sta te Re g e nts;
• sub mit a func tio n e xc e ptio n re q ue st a nd a sso c ia te d ne w

pro g ra m re q ue st;

• Ma y re q ue st a c o py o f a no the r institutio n’ s func tio n e xc e ptio n;
• Ma y pro vide writte n c o mme nts, sub mit q ue stio ns, o r pro te st.

Pr

• c e ss for

Gove r ning Boar ds

 e va lua tio n c rite ria whe n re vie wing a func tio n e xc e ptio n

re q ue st a nd a sso c ia te d ne w pro g ra m re q ue st:

• Purpo se fo r the e xc e ptio n
• Missio n
• Ac a de mic sta nda rds
• F

a c ulty

• Suppo rt re so urc e s
• de ma nd & c a pa c ity
• Co mple me nt to e xisting

func tio n a nd pro g ra ms

• Unne c e ssa ry duplic a tio n
• Co lla b o ra tio ns o r a lte rna tive

fo rms

• I

nstitutio na l c o sts

• F

unding

• Susta ina b ility
• Re vie w a nd a sse ssme nt

3.2 F unc tio ns o f Pub lic I nstitutio ns

 T

he g o ve rning b o a rd will pro vide a writte n re po rt do c ume nting its re vie w, de lib e ra tio ns, a nd re c o mme nda tio ns re g a rding the a fo re me ntio ne d c rite ria a nd fo rwa rd its re po rt to the Sta te Re g e nts fo r c o nside ra tio n.

3.2 F unc tio ns o f Pub lic I nstitutio ns

 I

nstitutio ns o ffe ring c o urse s a t physic a l lo c a tio ns o ut-o f-sta te sha ll se e k a ppro va l a nd g a in a utho riza tio n fro m the sta te a g e nc ie s o r a c c re diting a sso c ia tio ns in who se jurisdic tio n the c o urse s a re to b e a va ila b le .

 I

nstitutio ns de live ring dista nc e e duc a tio n o ut-o f-sta te o r c o nduc ting limite d

• ut-o f-sta te a c tivity sha ll:

OR **If not covered by SARA

State Author ization Re c ipr

• c ity Agr

e e me nt

3.17 Dista nc e E duc a tio n a nd T ra ditio na l Off-Ca mpus Co urse s a nd Pro g ra ms

Se e k a ppro va l a nd g a in a utho riza tio n fro m the sta te a g e nc ie s in a sta te in whic h the limite d a c tivity will o c c ur a nd/ o r in a sta te in whic h a c urre nt dista nc e e d stude nt re side s Se e k Sta te Re g e nts’ a ppro va l to pa rtic ipa te in the Sta te Autho riza tio n Re c ipro c ity Ag re e me nt

SARA Re ne wal Issue s

 T

he re ne wa l a pplic a tio n must b e sig ne d b y the c hie f e xe c utive o ffic e r o r the c hie f a c a de mic o ffic e r o f the institutio n.

 Upo n no tic e o f a n a ppro ve d re ne wa l a pplic a tio n, the institutio n sha ll sub mit

the re ne wa l fe e to NC-SARA within 30 da ys. A 30-da y g ra c e pe rio d b e yo nd the institutio na l re ne wa l da te ma y b e g ra nte d upo n re q ue st; ho we ve r, if re ne wa l is no t c o mple te a fte r the 30-da y g ra c e pe rio d, a la te fe e o f 25% o f the institutio n's re ne wa l fe e is a pplie d.

 I

f pa yme nt is no t ma de to NC‐SARA within 5 b usine ss da ys a fte r the e xpira tio n o f the 30‐da y g ra c e pe rio d, the institutio n will b e re mo ve d fro m the NC‐SARA list o f pa rtic ipa ting institutio ns.

 I

nstitutio ns de nie d re ne wa l o r no t c o mplying with re ne wa l po lic ie s within spe c ifie d time line s ma y re a pply to b e c o me a SARA institutio n 180 da ys a fte r re mo va l fro m the SARA pa rtic ipa nt list.

Sta te Autho riza tio n Re c ipro c ity Ag re e me nt

Pur pose

 T

his po lic y e sta b lishe s minimum c urric ula r re q uire me nts, c rite ria , a nd sta nda rds fo r a dmissio n to Sta te Syste m institutio ns, a s we ll a s re te ntio n sta nda rds. Stude nts a dmitte d into a ll a sso c ia te a nd b a c c a la ure a te pro g ra ms must me e t the se sta nda rds.

 T

he a dmissio n pro c e ss ha s two c rite ria :

• Curric ula r Re q uire me nts
• Pe rfo rma nc e Re q uire me nts/ Admissio n Sta nda rds

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

3.9.3 Admission of F ir st-T ime F r e shman: Cur r ic ular Re quir e me nts

Units (Ye a rs) Co urse Are a s 4 E ng lish (g ra mma r, c o mpo sitio n, lite ra ture ; sho uld inc lud e a n inte g ra te d writing c o mpo ne nt) 3 L a b Sc ie nc e (Bio lo g y, c he mistry, physic s o r a ny la b sc ie nc e c e rtifie d b y the sc ho o l d istric t; Ge ne ra l sc ie nc e with o r witho ut a la b ma y no t b e use d to me e t this re q uire me nt.) 3 Ma the ma tic s (fro m a lg e b ra I, a lg e b ra I I , g e o me try, trig o no me try, ma th a na lysis, pre - c a lc ulus, sta tistic s a nd pro b a b ility (must ha ve c o mple te d g e o me try a nd Alg e b ra II ), c a lc ulus, Ad va nc e d Pla c e me nt sta tistic s) 3 Histo ry a nd Citize nship Skills (inc lud ing o ne unit o f Ame ric a n histo ry a nd two a d d itio na l units fro m the sub je c ts o f histo ry, e c o no mic s, g e o g ra phy, g o ve rnme nt, no n-We ste rn c ulture ) 2 Ad d itio na l units o f sub je c ts pre vio usly liste d o r se le c te d fro m: c o mpute r sc ie nc e , fo re ig n la ng ua g e , o r a ny Ad va nc e d Pla c e me nt c o urse e xc e pt a pplie d c o urse s in fine a rts. 15 T

• ta l Re q uire d Units

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

No te : OU a nd OSU a re a utho rize d to se t hig he r a dmissio n sc o re s whe n a ppro ve d b y the Sta te Re g e nts. Spe c ific sc o re s fo r institutio ns a re lo c a te d in the Ac a de mic Affa irs Pro c e dure s Ha ndb o o k.

3.9.4 Admission of F ir st-T ime F r e shme n: Pe r for manc e Re quir e me nts

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

Minimum Pe r for manc e -Base d Admission Standar ds: Re se ar c h Unive r sitie s

Optio n 1: Sta nda rdize d T e sts ACT

• r SAT

T

• p 33.3%

OR Optio n 2: Hig h Sc ho o l Pe rfo rma nc e A Hig h Sc ho o l GPA (All Co urse s) a nd Cla ss Ra nk T

• p 33.3%

OR Optio n 3: Hig h Sc ho o l Pe rfo rma nc e B Hig h Sc ho o l GPA in Sta te Re g e nts’ Re q uire d 15-Unit H.S. Co re T

• p 33.3%

3.9.4 Admission of F ir st-T ime F r e shme n: Pe r for manc e Re quir e me nts

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

Minimum Pe r for manc e -Base d Admission Standar ds: Re gional Unive r sitie s

Optio n 1: Sta nd a rd ize d T e sts ACT

• r SAT

OR Optio n 2: Hig h Sc ho o l Pe rfo rma nc e A Hig h Sc ho o l GPA (All Co urse s) a nd Cla ss Ra nk OR Optio n 3: Hig h Sc ho o l Pe rfo rma nc e B Hig h Sc ho o l GPA in Sta te Re g e nts’ Re q uire d 15-Unit H.S. Co re

 F

• r stude nts se e king a dmissio n to AA, AS, o r b a c c a la ure a te de g re e

pro g ra ms, a ny individua l who :

• Is a g ra d ua te o f a hig h sc ho o l a c c re d ite d b y the a ppro pria te re g io na l

a sso c ia tio n o r b y a n a ppro pria te a c c re d iting a g e nc y o f the ho me sta te o r ha s a c hie ve d a hig h sc ho o l e q uiva le nc y c e rtific a te b a se d o n the GE D;

• Ha s me t the c urric ula r re q uire me nts a s se t fo rth in pa rt 3.9.3. o f this po lic y;

a nd

• Ha s pa rtic ipa te d in the ACT

pro g ra m o r a simila r a c c e pta b le b a tte ry o f te sts

is e lig ib le fo r a dmissio n to a ny o f the c o mmunity c o lle g e s a nd te c hnic a l b ra nc he s in the Sta te Syste m.

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

3.9.4 Admission of F ir st-T ime F r e shme n: Pe r for manc e Re quir e me nts

Minimum High Sc hool Pe r for manc e Cr ite r ia for Admission of F ir st-T ime -E nte r ing Stude nts at Community Colle ge s and T e c hnic al Br anc he s

 T

he five re g io na l institutio ns o ffe ring a sso c ia te de g re e s, UCO, CU, L U, OPSU, RSU, a nd SWOSU (Sa yre ) will c o ntinue o ffe ring the se de g re e s with a n o pe n a dmissio n po lic y fo r stude nts within the ir g e o g ra phic se rvic e a re a .

 Stude nts wishing to tra nsfe r fro m AAS to AS, AA o r b a c c a la ure a te de g re e

pro g ra ms must fo rma lly a pply a nd me e t b o th the c urric ula r a nd pe rfo rma nc e a dmissio n sta nda rds.

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

3.9.4 Admission of F ir st-T ime F r e shme n: Pe r for manc e Re quir e me nts

Minimum High Sc hool Pe r for manc e Cr ite r ia for Admission of F ir st-T ime -E nte r ing Stude nts at Community Colle ge s and T e c hnic al Br anc he s

 Stude nts a dmitte d must me e t c urric ula r sta nda rds a s de fine d in se c tio n

3.9.3 a nd must me e t the hig h sc ho o l pe rfo rma nc e c rite ria a s de fine d in se c tio n 3.9.4. T he o nly e xc e ptio ns a re stude nts a dmitte d in the fo llo wing spe c ia l a dmissio n c a te g o rie s:

A. Spe c ia l No n-De g re e Se e king Stude nt B. Alte rna tive Admissio n C. Adult Admissio n D. Ho me Study o r No n-Re c o g nize d Ac c re dite d o r Una c c re dite d Hig h Sc ho o ls E . Oppo rtunity Admissio n Ca te g o ry F . Co rre spo nde nc e Study E nro llme nt G. Summe r Pro visio na l Admissio n Pro g ra m (Re se a rc h a nd Re g io na l Unive rsitie s) H. Summe r Pro visio na l Admissio n Pro g ra m: Curric ula r De fic ie nc ie s (Re g io na l Unive rsitie s) I . Co nc urre nt E nro llme nt o f Hig h Sc ho o l Stude nts

3.9.6 Spe c ial Admission

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

 A stude nt will b e pla c e d o n a c a de mic pro b a tio n if the fo llo wing sta nda rds

a re no t me t:

3.9.8 Re te ntion Standar ds: Re te ntion GPA Re quir e me nts

3.9 I nstitutio na l Admissio n a nd Re te ntio n

Cr e dit Hour s Atte mpte d GPA Re quir e d 0-30

≥ 1.7

Mor e than 30

≥ 2.0

• F
• r 0-30 ho urs a tte mpte d , stud e nts who e a rn a GPA o f 1.7 to 2.0 a re put
• n a c a d e mic no tic e .
• F
• r mo re tha n 30 ho urs a tte mpte d , stud e nts who d ro p b e lo w 2.0 a re

pla c e d o n a c a d e mic pro b a tio n fo r o ne se me ste r. If 2.0 is no t a c hie ve d in re g ula rly g ra d e d c o urse wo rk,(inc lud ing re pe a ts/ a c a d e mic re prie ve s) the y a re suspe nd e d .

Ge ne r al Infor mation

 Purpo se : e sta b lish a unifo rm syste m o f g ra ding fo r Sta te Syste m

I nstitutio ns.

 De fine s symb o ls a nd g ra ding te rms.  Outline s the tra nsc ript a s the o ffic ia l do c ume nt issue d b y a n institutio n

with stude nt info rma tio n tha t is a c o mple te a nd a c c ura te re fle c tio n o f a stude nt’ s a c a de mic c a re e r.

 Ac a de mic F

• rg ive ne ss Pro visio ns:
• Re pe a te d
• Ac a d e mic Re prie ve
• Ac a d e mic Re ne wa l

 Re po rting Ac a de mic Sta nding (re te ntio n sta nda rds/ re q uire me nts,

c umula tive GPA a nd re te ntio n/ g ra dua tio n GPA). No te a ll a c a de mic pro b a tio n/ suspe nsio ns.

3.12 Gra ding

3.13 Unde rg ra dua te Ac a de mic Co urse L

• a d

Outline s the ma ximum workloa d for stude nts in the State Syste m



Und e rg ra d ua te c o urse lo a d is limite d to a numb e r o f se me ste r-c re d it ho urs whic h is 50 pe rc e nt g re a te r tha n the to ta l numb e r o f we e ks in the a pplic a b le a c a d e mic te rm – spring / fa ll – 24 ho urs. Summe r -12 ho urs.



No te : While hig h sc ho o l c o nc urre nt e nro llme nt a c a d e mic c o urse wo rklo a d is fo und in 3.10.3.B.2 – It is 19 se me ste r c re d it ho urs fo r the spring a nd fa ll a nd 9 ho urs fo r summe r.



No te : Wo rklo a d sta nd a rd s a pply to c o o pe ra tive a g re e me nt pro g ra m (CAP) stud e nts in c o ntra c tua l a rra ng e me nts. Yo u ma y ne e d to b e he lpful to yo ur te c hno lo g y c e nte r sta ff a nd e xpla in the c a lc ula tio n.

 T

he diplo ma sha ll b e a r the se a l o f the Sta te Re g e nts a nd sha ll c o nta in the sig na ture s o f the c ha irma n, the se c re ta ry, a nd the Cha nc e llo r (Diplo ma s a wa rde d sha ll b e a r the na me s o f o ffic e rs o f the Sta te Re g e nts se rving in the c urre nt fisc a l ye a r).

 F

• r the institutio n, the diplo ma sha ll b e a r the sig na ture s o f the

c ha irma n o f the g o ve rning b o a rd, the pre side nt o f the institutio n, a nd o ne a c a de mic o ffic e r.

 A sa mple diplo ma sha ll b e pro vide d a nnua lly, b y De c e mb e r 1 to

the Sta te Re g e nts’ o ffic e . Ple a se sc a n a nd e ma il a sa mple diplo ma to K yle F

• ste r a t kfo ste r@ o srhe .e du.

3.14.4 Diplomas

3.14 Gra nting o f De g re e s

Ge ne r al Infor mation

 T

his po lic y e sta b lishe s de finitio ns, princ iple s, c rite ria , a nd g uide line s to a ssist institutio na l o ffic ia ls in the c la ssific a tio n o f po stse c o nda ry stude nts a s in-sta te / o ut-o f-sta te stude nts.

 T

he po lic y de ta ils in-sta te / o ut-o f-sta te sta tus issue s c o nc e rning de pe nde nt a nd inde pe nde nt pe rso ns, do c ume nte d fo re ig n na tio na ls, undo c ume nte d stude nts, unifo rme d se rvic e s a nd o the r milita ry se rvic e me mb e rs, a nd full-time pro fe ssio na l pra c titio ne r/ wo rke rs.

3.18 I n-sta te / Out-o f-sta te Sta tus o f E nro lle d Stude nts

L e gislation

 T

hre e ye a rs a g o , c ha ng e s we re ma de to the OSRHE I n-Sta te Out-o f- Sta te Sta tus o f E nro lle d Stude nts po lic y to a lig n with Se na te Bill 138 a nd Se c tio n 702 o f the Ve te ra ns Ac c e ss, Cho ic e a nd Ac c o unta b ility Ac t o f 2014, whic h wa s c o difie d in 38 U.S.C. 3679.

 Mo re re c e ntly, Co ng re ss pa sse d Pub lic L

a w 114-315, whic h mo difie d 38 U.S.C. 3679(c ). T he se a me ndme nts we nt into e ffe c t fo r c o urse s, se me ste rs, o r te rms b e g inning a fte r July 1, 2017.

3.18 I n-sta te / Out-o f-sta te Sta tus o f E nro lle d Stude nts

2017 Re quir e me nt for a Spouse or De pe nde nt Child of an Ac tive Duty Se r vic e Me mbe r

 T

• c o mply with the a me ndme nts to U.S.C. 3679(c ): A pe rso n using

tra nsfe rre d Po st-9/ 11 G.I . Bill b e ne fits (38 U.S.C. § 3319) who live s in Okla ho ma (re g a rdle ss o f his/ he r fo rma l sta te o f re side nc e ) a nd the tra nsfe ro r is a me mb e r o f the unifo rme d se rvic e who is se rving o n a c tive duty (re g a rdle ss o f the tra nsfe ro r’ s ho me o f re c o rd) will b e e lig ib le fo r in-sta te sta tus.

3.18 I n-sta te / Out-o f-sta te Sta tus o f E nro lle d Stude nts

Ne w Re quir e me nt F r y Sc holar ship Re c ipie nts

 T

• c o mply with the a me ndme nts to U.S.C 3679(c ): A surviving spo use o r

c hild re c e iving the F ry Sc ho la rship who re side s in Okla ho ma a nd e nro lls a t a sta te syste m institutio n within 5 ye a rs o f a n a c tive duty se rvic e me mb e r’ s de a th in the line o f duty a fte r se rving 90 da ys o r mo re (re g a rdle ss o f the stude nt’ s fo rma l sta te o f re side nc e o r the ho me o f re c o rd o f the de c e a se d se rvic e me mb e r) will b e e lig ib le fo r in-sta te sta tus.

3.18 I n-sta te / Out-o f-sta te Sta tus o f E nro lle d Stude nts



T he Ha nd b o o k c o mple me nts the Sta te Re g e nts’ Ac a d e mic Po lic y Ma nua l b y pro vid ing spe c ific g uid a nc e o n ho w to imple me nt po lic y a nd c e rta in type s o f po lic y re la te d -info rma tio n tha t ma y c ha ng e pe rio d ic a lly, inc lud ing

• De finitio ns
• Re po rts a nd due da te s
• Ac c re dita tio n Pro c e dure s fo r Re c o g nitio n
• Clo se d sc ho o ls/ re c o rd info rma tio n
• Inte nsive E

ng lish Pro g ra m list

• F
• rms a nd Re fe re nc e Info rma tio n
• ACT

/ SAT Co nc o rda nc e T a b le

• F

AQs



T he Ha nd b o o k is upd a te d a nnua lly o r a s ne c e ssa ry thro ug h the COI . Sta te Re g e nts’ a ppro va l is no t re q uire d to upd a te the Ha nd b o o k.



If yo u find he lpful info rma tio n is missing o r so me thing ne e d s to b e c ha ng e d / c o rre c te d – ple a se c o nta c t E liza b e th Wa lke r lwa lke r@ o srhe .e d u o r 405-225-9154.

Ac a de mic Affa irs Pro c e dure s Ha ndb o o k