costs and benefits of texas motor vehicle inspections for
play

Costs and Benefits of Texas Motor Vehicle Inspections for passenger - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Costs and Benefits of Texas Motor Vehicle Inspections for passenger vehicles and non-CMV trucks Workshop / WebEx University of Texas at Austin PRC Commons Learning Center June 26, 2018 9AM 3PM COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.


  1. Costs and Benefits of Texas Motor Vehicle Inspections for passenger vehicles and non-CMV trucks Workshop / WebEx University of Texas at Austin – PRC Commons Learning Center June 26, 2018 9AM – 3PM COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  2. WELCOME ! COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  3. 9AM – 11AM 1. Welcome and brief introductions Mike Murphy (CTR) 2. Plenary Session Presentations a. Overview – Study Scope and Objectives Mike Murphy (CTR) b. ‘Big Data’ Analysis – preliminary results Nan Jiang (CTR) c. MVSIP costs Darren Hazlett (CTR) d. Incorporating recalls in MVSIP Michael St. Denis (Revecorp) e. Online surveys – preliminary results Mike Murphy (CTR) Buffet Lunch 11AM – 12PM 12PM – 2PM 3. Breakout Sessions a. Bevo Meeting Room – Workshop attendees b. Stadium Meeting Room – Workshop attendees c. Balcones Meeting Room – WebEx 2PM – 3PM 4. Reconvene – Balcones Room Breakout Session Key Takeaways 5. Adjourn COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  4. Study and Workshop Objectives Mike Murphy, Ph.D., P.E. Deputy Director – Center for Transportation Research COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  5. Study Scope and Objectives Study Scope 1. Affects passenger vehicles and non CMV trucks 2. Does not affect emissions testing in non‐attainment counties Study Objectives 1. Document Safety Impacts if Motor Vehicle Safety Inspections were eliminated for (1). 2. Document the costs and impacts to state budget(s) if TMVSI were eliminated for (1). COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  6. BEVO Breakout ‐ Session Numbers 1 ‐ 3 Breakout Session Breakout Meeting Room Name Title Company affiliation Number 1 BEVO Nan Jiang Research Associate UT‐Center for Transportation Research 1 BEVO Stefanos Politis Graduate Research Assistant UT‐Center for Transportation Research 1 BEVO Pablo Luna DPS Program Manager Texas Department of Public Safety 1 BEVO Paula Kennedy Program coordinator Texas Department of Public Safety 1 BEVO Ember Brillhart Honda, State Govenrment Relations Manager Honda North America (HNA) 1 BEVO Charles Ray Texas State Manager DEKRA North America 1 BEVO Stacy Dutton Association Manager TAIPA 2 BEVO Zhe Han Researcher UT‐Center for Transportation Research 2 BEVO Robert Harrison Senior Research Scientist UT‐Center for Transportation Research 2 BEVO JoJo Heselmeyer Senior Manager DPS ‐ resource Texas Department of Public Safety 2 BEVO Esther Martin Training Coordinator Texas Department of Public Safety 2 BEVO Laird Doran Vice President Government Relations & Senior Counsel The Friedkin Group / Gulf States Toyota 2 BEVO Dr. Michael St. Denis Safety Researcher Revecorp Inc. 2 BEVO Edgar Gilmore Mobile Source Program Coordinator Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 3 BEVO Brandy Savarese CTR Research Associate UT Center for Transportation Research 3 BEVO Oscar Galvis Graduate Research Assistant UT‐Center for Transportation Research 3 BEVO Carolina Baumanis Research/Engineering Scientist Associate UT‐Center for Transportation Research 3 BEVO Abel Porras Co‐Chair DPS Vehicle Inspection Advisory Board 3 BEVO Mike Butler VP Operations Parsons 3 BEVO Mike Sullivan Director of Governmental and Public Affairs Group 1 Automotive (NYSE: GPI) 3 BEVO Ed Martin Chair, Board of Directors Texas State Inspection Association COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  7. Stadium Breakout ‐ Session Numbers 4 ‐ 5 Breakout Session Breakout Meeting Room Name Title Company affiliation Number 4 Stadium Lisa Loftus‐Otway Senior Research Scientist UT‐Center for Transportation Research 4 Stadium Ahmed Ahsan Graduate Research Assistant UT‐Center for Transportation Research 4 Stadium Natalia Ruiz Research Associate UT‐CTR ‐ Network Modeling Center 4 Stadium Rosemary Guerrero Operations Manager Texas Department of Public Safety 4 Stadium James Williams Senior Engineer Williamson County 4 Stadium Michael Nowels Executive Director Texas State Inspection Association 4 Stadium Joseph Battista VP Sales Parsons 5 Stadium Darren Hazlett CTR Researcher UT‐Center for Transportation Research 5 Stadium Srijith Balakrishnan Graduate Research Assistant UT‐Center for Transportation Research 5 Stadium Jim Schutz Training Specialist Texas Department of Public Safety 5 Stadium Candy Southerland Management Analyst TxDMV Vehicle Titles & Registration 5 Stadium John Firm ASA Texas Firm Automotive 5 Stadium Pete Villari Executive Vice President DEKRA North America COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  8. Balcones WebEx Breakout Breakout Session Breakout Meeting Room Name Title Company affiliation Number Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Mike Murphy CTR ‐ Deputy Director UT ‐ Center for Transportation Research Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Laura Kolstad Government Affairs Staffer Texas Department of Transportation Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Morris Brown Mobile Source Programs Team Leader Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Alexander Ansley Senior Safety Recall Specialist U.S. DOT / NHTSA Webex Webex ‐ Balcones David Serrins Mobile Source Programs Team Work Lead Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Sarah Thomas Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Marissa Duron Vehicle Inspection Texas Department of Public Safety Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Chris Murphy ASA Texas President Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Micah Harmon Sheriff Lavaca County, TX Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Shawn Dintino Air Quality Planner, VIAC member North Central Texas Council of Governments Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Brooke Remes Director Stout Advisory Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Shelly Richardson President HAF, Inc Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Joshua Swedlow Stout Advisory Webex Webex ‐ Balcones Mark Long Training Specialist Texas Department of Public Safety COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  9. Breakout Session Questions COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  10. Does anyone have a Question they would like to add to the list? COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  11. ‘BiG Data’ Analysis Preliminary Results Nan Jiang, Ph.D., P.E. CTR – Associate Researcher COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  12. Primary Data Sources 1. TxDOT Crash Data • 2010‐2017 • Over 600,000 crashes each year 2. DPS Texas Highway Patrol High Value Data Sets (Citation Data) • 2010‐2016 • About 4‐5 million records each year 3. TxDMV Vehicle Registration Data • 2015‐2017 • Over 22 million records each year COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  13. TxDOT Crash Data • TxDOT maintains a statewide, automated database for reportable motor vehicle traffic crashes received by TxDOT. • Crash data are submitted by Texas law enforcement officers on form CR‐3, Texas Peace Officer's Crash Report. COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  14. Data Analysis Preliminary Results Crashes Involving Defective Vehicles 2015 2016 2017 Crash Severity Type PV CMV PV CMV PV CMV Killed 85 31 93 23 87 21 Incapacitating Injury 310 38 367 46 345 44 Non‐Incapacitating Injury 1171 111 1304 129 1408 146 Possible Injury 1577 159 1803 123 1770 144 Not Injured 6242 736 6970 736 6837 889 Total 9562 1079 10736 1060 10660 1251 Personal vehicle (PV); commercial motor vehicle (CMV) TxDOT crash costs*: • Fatal Crash: $3,500,000 • Type A Injury: $3,500,000 • Type B Injury: $500,000 The costs of those crashes involving defective vehicles: • 2015: $1,968 million (PV) + $297 million (CMV) = $2.3 billion • 2016: $2,262 million (PV) + $306 million (CMV) = $2.6 billion • 2017: $2,216 million (PV) + $300.5 million (CMV) = $2.5 billon *2018 dollars from TxDOT 2018 Highway Safety Improvement Program Call COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  15. Data Analysis Preliminary Results A comparison between vehicles with and without defects using 2017 fatalities and incapacitating injuries as an example: PV PV CMV CMV No Defects with Defects No Defects with Defects Number of fatalities 3070 96 588 21 Number of vehicles in crashes 1,055,040 10,972 76,048 1273 Fatalities per number of 1 fatality / 1 fatality / 1 fatality / 1 fatality / vehicles in crashes 343 vehicles 114 vehicles 129 vehicles 60 vehicles PV PV CMV CMV No Defects with Defects No Defects with Defects Number of incapacitating injuries 16056 480 1491 53 Number of vehicles in crashes 1,055,040 10,972 76,048 1273 Incapacitating injuries per number 1 incap injury 1 incap injury 1 incap injury 1 incap injury of vehicles in crashes / 65 vehicles / 22 vehicles / 51 vehicles / 24 vehicles COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

  16. Data Analysis Preliminary Results Percentage of Vehicles Involved in Fatal Crashes 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% Percent 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 2015 2016 2017 Year Percentage of Vehicles Involved in Incapacitating PV without defect PV with defect Injury Crashes 4.0% 3.3% 3.2% 3.2% 3.5% 3.0% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.5% Percent 2.0% Similar trends are 1.5% 1.0% observed for CMVs 0.5% 0.0% 2015 2016 2017 Year PV without defect PV with defect COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend