Corporate Overview November 2017 1 Alnylam Forward Looking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

corporate overview
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Corporate Overview November 2017 1 Alnylam Forward Looking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Colin Living with Porphyria Corporate Overview November 2017 1 Alnylam Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Colin

Living with Porphyria

Corporate Overview

November 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Alnylam Forward Looking Statements

This presentation contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated by these forward- looking statements. These important factors include our ability to discover and develop novel drug candidates and delivery approaches and successfully demonstrate the efficacy and safety of our product candidates; pre-clinical and clinical results for our product candidates; actions or advice of regulatory agencies; delays, interruptions or failures in the manufacture and supply of our product candidates; our ability to obtain, maintain and protect intellectual property, enforce our intellectual property rights and defend

  • ur patent portfolio; our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval, pricing and reimbursement for

products; our progress in establishing a commercial and ex-United States infrastructure; competition from

  • thers using similar technology and developing products for similar uses; our ability to manage our growth

and operating expenses, obtain additional funding to support our business activities and establish and maintain business alliances; the outcome of litigation; and the risk of government investigations; as well as those risks more fully discussed in our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q under the caption “Risk Factors.” If one or more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this presentation and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update such statements.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

RNAi Therapeutics

New Class of Innovative Medicines

Harness natural pathway Catalytic mechanism Silence any gene in genome Upstream of today’s medicines Clinically proven approach

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Genetically validated, liver-expressed target gene Biomarker for POC in Phase 1 Definable path to approval and patient access

Alnylam Platform and R&D Safety

Building a Pipeline of Potentially Transformative Medicines

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Alnylam Clinical Development Pipeline

HUMAN POC* EARLY STAGE

(IND or CTA Filed-Phase 2)

LATE STAGE

(Phase 2-Phase 3)

REGISTRATION/ COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL RIGHTS Patisiran

Hereditary ATTR Amyloidosis

  • US, Canada,

Western Europe

Fitusiran**

Hemophilia and Rare Bleeding Disorders

  • 50%

US, Canada, Western Europe

Inclisiran

Hypercholesterolemia

  • Milestones &

Royalties

Givosiran

Acute Hepatic Porphyrias

  • Global

Cemdisiran

Complement- Mediated Diseases

  • Global

ALN-GO1

Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1

  • Subject to

partner option rights

ALN-TTRsc02

Hereditary ATTR Amyloidosis

  • Subject to

partner option rights Focused in 3 Strategic Therapeutic Areas (STArs):

Genetic Medicines Cardio-Metabolic Diseases Hepatic Infectious Diseases

*POC, Proof of concept - defined as having demonstrated target gene knockdown and/or additional evidence of activity in clinical studies **Fitusiran currently on hold with intent to resume dosing as soon as possible upon agreement with regulatory authorities on risk mitigation/safety monitoring
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Hereditary ATTR Amyloidosis

Patisiran

Leo

Living with hATTR Amyloidosis

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Hereditary ATTR (hATTR) Amyloidosis

DESCRIPTION

Orphan multi-system disease caused by mutant transthyretin (TTR) amyloid deposits in nerves, heart, GI tract, and other tissues

Image based on Conceicao et al., J Peripher Nerv Syst, 2016;21:5–9 *Ando et al., Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2013; Ruberg et al., Circulation, 2012

Significant morbidity and fatal within

2-15

years from symptom onset

PATIENT POPULATION*

~50,000

worldwide

CNS A utonomic neuropathy Ocular Peripheral sensory-motor neuropathy Cardiovascular Nephropathy GI
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Mutant Transthyretin (TTR) is disease-causing protein Serum Biomarker TTR

Genetically validated, liver-expressed target gene Biomarker for POC in Phase 1 Definable path to approval and patient access

Study Day % Mean Serum TTR KD Relative to BL 100 80 60 40 20
  • 20
  • 40
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Placebo 0.01 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.15 mg/kg 0.30 mg/kg 0.50 mg/kg Control siRNA 0.4 mg/kg

Motor strength/weakness (192)

304

Reflexes (20) Quantitative Sensory Testing (80)

Nerve Conduction Studies (10) Postural BP
  • r HRdb (2)
Patisiran Phase 1 results: Coelho et al., N Engl J Med;369:819-29 (2013)

mNIS+7

Established Endpoint Neurological Impairment Score

Patisiran for hATTR Amyloidosis

Potential for Disease Modification by Reducing Pathogenic Protein

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

APOLLO Phase 3 Study Design

OLE, open-label extension; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02510261 Adams D, et al. BMC Neurology 2017

Patient Population

  • hATTR amyloidosis: any

TTR mutation, FAP Stage 1 or 2

  • Neurological impairment

score (NIS) of 5-130

  • Prior tetramer stabilizer

use permitted 2:1 RANDOMIZATION†

Patisiran 0.3 mg/kg IV q3w* Placebo IV q3W*

Primary Endpoint

  • Change in mNIS+7 from

baseline at 18 months Secondary Endpoints

  • Norfolk QOL-DN
  • NIS-weakness
  • R-ODS
  • 10-meter walk
  • mBMI
  • COMPASS-31

Select Exploratory Endpoints

  • EQ-5D QOL
  • NIS+7
  • Serum TTR levels
  • Cardiac assessments
  • Grip strength
  • Skin biopsies for nerve fiber

density and amyloid

†Stratification factors for randomization include: neuropathy impairment score (NIS: < 50 vs. ≥ 50), early onset V30M (< 50 years of age at onset) vs. all
  • ther mutations (including late onset V30M), and previous tetramer stabilizer use (tafamidis or diflunisal) vs. no previous tetramer stabilizer use

*To reduce likelihood of infusion-related reactions, patients receive following premedication or equivalent at least 60 min before each study drug infusion: dexamethasone; oral acetaminophen/paracetamol; H2 blocker (e.g., ranitidine or famotidine); and H1 blocker (e.g., diphenhydramine).

99% of patients who completed APOLLO study enrolled in Global OLE Study

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01960348
  • r
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

  • 10
  • 5

5 10 15 20 Better Worse LS mean (SEM) ∆Norfolk-QOL from baseline Baseline 9 Months 18 Months

p=1.10 x 10-10

  • 10
  • 5

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Better Worse LS mean (SEM) ∆mNIS+7 from baseline Baseline 9 Months 18 Months

p=9.26 x 10-24

APOLLO Phase 3 Study Results

Patisiran Meets Primary and all Secondary Endpoints

mNIS+7 reference range: 0-304 points Norfolk-QOL reference range: -4 to 136 *Improvement defined as patients with <0 point increase from baseline to 18 months

mNIS+7 at 18 mos

  • -6.0 point change relative to baseline
  • 34.0 point difference relative to placebo
  • 56.1% of patients improved

Norfolk-QOL at 18 mos

Patisiran Placebo
  • -6.7 point change relative to baseline
  • 21.1 point difference relative to placebo
  • 51.4% of patients improved
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

APOLLO Phase 3 Study Results

Patisiran Meets Key Exploratory Endpoints in Cardiac Subpopulation*

Biomarker Functional Echocardiographic

NT-proBNP 10MWT

  • 350
  • 300
  • 250
  • 200
  • 150
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Median ∆NT-proBNP from baseline at 18 mos (ng/L)

Better Worse
  • 0.4
  • 0.3
  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Mean ∆10-MWT gait speed from baseline at 18 mos (m/sec)

Better Worse

Longitudinal Strain

  • 1.5
  • 1.25
  • 1
  • 0.75
  • 0.5
  • 0.25

0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 Mean ∆longitudinal strain from baseline at 18 mos (%)

Better Worse

LV Wall Thickness

  • 0.12
  • 0.1
  • 0.08
  • 0.06
  • 0.04
  • 0.02

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 Mean ∆LV wall thickness from baseline at 18 mos (cm)

Better Worse Patisiran Placebo *Cardiac subpopulation: patients with pre-existing cardiac amyloid involvement without confounding medical conditions (i.e., patients with baseline LV wall thickness ≥1.3 cm and no aortic valve disease or hypertension in medical history) **p-values are nominal

p=7.74 x 10-8 ** p=0.0173** p=0.0154** p=7.42 x 10-9 **

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

APOLLO Phase 3 Study Results

Encouraging Safety & Tolerability Profile

Overall, 13 deaths in APOLLO study; no deaths considered related to study drug

  • Similar frequency of deaths in patisiran and placebo treatment groups
  • Causes of death (e.g., cardiovascular, infection) consistent with natural history

Majority of AEs mild or moderate in severity

  • Most common AEs more frequently observed in patisiran arm vs. placebo included peripheral edema (29.7% vs.

22.1%) and infusion-related reactions (18.9% vs. 9.1%)

  • Both AEs decreased over time; IRR led to discontinuation in only 1 patient (0.7%); peripheral edema led to no discontinuations

Additional notable safety findings

  • Encouraging safety & tolerability in cardiac subpopulation
  • Deaths in 5.6% of patisiran patients and 11.1% of placebo patients
  • No safety signals related to steroid pre-medication regimen or TTR knockdown
  • No safety signals regarding liver function tests, hematology including thrombocytopenia, or renal dysfunction related to

patisiran Type of Adverse Event, Number of patients (%) Placebo (N=77) Patisiran (N=148) Adverse event (AE) 75 (97.4) 143 (96.6) Severe AE 28 (36.4) 42 (28.4) Serious adverse event (SAE) 31 (40.3) 54 (36.5) AE leading to treatment discontinuation 11 (14.3) 7 (4.7) AE leading to study withdrawal 9 (11.7) 7 (4.7) Death 6 (7.8) 7 (4.7)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

hATTR Amyloidosis and APOLLO Assessments

Clinical Manifestations APOLLO Assessments

  • Heart failure
  • Arrhythmias/syncope
  • Impaired exercise tolerance
  • NT-proBNP
  • Echo longitudinal strain
  • Echo LV thickness
  • 10-MWT
  • AE profile
  • Loss of sensation
  • Muscle weakness
  • Impaired ambulation
  • mNIS+7
  • NIS-W subdomain
  • QST subdomain
  • Reflexes subdomain
  • Norfolk-QOL
  • R-ODS Disability
  • 10-MWT
  • Grip strength
  • AE profile
  • Orthostatic hypotension
  • Syncope/falls
  • Constipation/diarrhea
  • Urinary retention/UTIs
  • mNIS+7
  • Postural BP subdomain
  • Norfolk-QOL
  • Autonomic subdomain
  • mBMI
  • COMPASS-31
  • Orthostatic hypotension
  • GI and bladder subdomains
  • AE profile

Mutant & wild-type TTR in liver Misfolded mutant & wild-type TTR amyloid fibrils in circulation deposit in nerves and tissues of many organs Heart Sensorimotor Nerves Autonomic Nerves Patisiran

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

hATTR Amyloidosis Population

Patient identification will be key element of commercial success

  • ~50,000 hATTR amyloidosis patients worldwide with some endemic hot-spots
  • Continuum of peripheral/autonomic neuropathy and cardiac symptoms
  • Polyneuropathy phenotype believed to occur in 1:100K in non-endemic regions
  • >50% of patients with neurologic phenotype assumed to have concomitant cardiomyopathy (“mixed phenotype”)
  • >30% of patients with cardiac phenotype assumed to have concomitant neuropathy (“mixed phenotype”)
* Based on Alnylam estimates from interviews with key opinion leaders, THAOS registry, recent clinical trials and literature ** ROW includes only select countries (e.g., Japan, Brazil, Turkey) † Current diagnosis rates difficult to confirm and may be lower in initial launch years

Estimated Global Population*

U.S. EUCAN ROW**

PN Mixed CM Prevalence Current Diagnosis Rate†

~3K 8-12K 15-22K ~10-30% ~7K 1-3K 2-4K ~20-50%

PN Mixed CM

~2K ~4K ~8K ~10-30%

PN Mixed CM

Alnylam Territories Sanofi Genzyme Territories

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Building a Customer-Centric Organization

Expect ~150 U.S./EUCAN employees in customer-facing activities:

  • Medical affairs:
  • Health economics/outcomes research
  • Field-based MSLs
  • Patient advocacy
  • Medical communications
  • Commercial:
  • Marketing
  • Account management
  • Market access
  • Market insights
  • Patient services
  • Country leadership

Engagement and Advocacy Educate Access Retain Support and Solutions Best or First-in-Class Product Profiles

RNAi Therapeutics Success

Diagnose

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Raising hATTR Awareness and Care

Diagnosis, education, patient support, and access are key priorities

Diagnosis Education Support Access

  • Started 2014, expanded

in 2016

  • Free genetic screening
  • Now includes panels

for neuropathy, cardio

  • >350 physicians enrolled;

>2000 tests

  • Screened heart failure

patients for prevalence

  • f TTR mutations
  • Screened >1000,

identified 77 patients with hATTR mutations

https://hATTRbridge.com

HCP Website Patient Website

https://hATTRamyloidosis.com

Care Days

  • Local support program in

partnership with local KOLs

  • Agenda includes disease
  • verview, tips for living

with hATTR, and support and resources

  • 4 programs hosted in

2017; total attendance

  • ver 100 people

Expanded Access Program

  • Providing expanded access

to patisiran to patients who meet program criteria

  • Now open at >15 sites in

U.S.; compassionate use

  • ngoing in EU

Data

Big Data Projects

  • Integrating data sources

to inform MD targeting for field engagement

Advocacy

  • Working collaboratively

with patient advocacy groups to improve care for hATTR

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Inotersen ALN-TTRsc02

52

DOSES PER YEAR

4

DOSES PER YEAR ANTICIPATED

Ongoing Study in Normal Healthy Volunteers

Mean max TTR KD of 97.1%; ~80% TTR KD at nearly 1 year after single 50 mg dose**

Most potent Alnylam RNAi therapeutic to date

**Data cut-off 31May2017; reported at patisiran “RNAi Roundtable” webinar, August 3, 2017

Safety: Generally well tolerated in healthy volunteers (N=80)

  • No SAEs or discontinuations due to AEs; all AEs mild or moderate
  • 14 AEs in 8 subjects considered possibly related to treatment; majority mild
  • Events included erythema, pain, and bruising at the injection site, rhinorrhea,

pruritis, cough, nausea, fatigue, genital rash and abdominal pain

  • No clinically significant changes in physical exams, EKG or lab parameters (e.g.,

LFTs)

ALN-TTRsc02 Opportunity

Potential for Best-in-Class Profile

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Hemophilia and Rare Bleeding Disorders

Fitusiran

Venkat

Living with Hemophilia

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Hemophilia and Rare Bleeding Disorders

DESCRIPTION

Genetic deficiency resulting in inability to generate thrombin and stop bleeding

*World Federation of Hemophilia, Report on the Annual Global Survey 2014, October 2015

Global need due to frequent IV infusions, ability to manufacture, and cold chain PATIENT POPULATION*

Hemophilia A and B

200,000

~4,000

worldwide

with inhibitors

Highest need is prophylaxis for inhibitor patients and to avoid inhibitor

formation in all patients

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Genetically validated, liver-expressed target gene Biomarker for POC in Phase 1 Definable path to approval and patient access

Established Endpoint Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR)

AT FIX

FIXa FVIIa FVII FVIIIa FVa FV FX FXa Fibrinogen Fibrin

Thrombin

Prothrombin Blood clot Hemophilia B Hemophilia A

AT

FIX FVIII Plasma Biomarkers AT Lowering, Thrombin Generation

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 AT Activity (%) Days
  • 30
60 120 Peak Thrombin (nM) 20 40 60 80 100 Fitusiran Phase 1 results: Pasi et al., WFH, July 2016 Photo courtesy of Guy Young, M.D. Director, Hemostasis & Thrombosis Center at Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Professor of Pediatrics, USC Keck School of Medicine AT % Lowering Peak Thrombin

Fitusiran for Hemophilia

Potential to Restore Hemostasis in Hemophilia

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Fitusiran Phase 2 OLE Study Results*

38 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 ABR Summary of Median ABRs in Patients with Inhibitors

N=14 N=14 Pre-Study Observation

  • Median duration in observation period: 6 months [range: 1 –11]
  • Mean AT activity in observation period (relative to baseline): 18%

Initial Evidence for Potential Restoration of Hemostasis in Severe Hemophilia A and B

DURABILITY

Monthly SC fixed dose regimen

2 12 1.7 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 PPx OD Pre-Study ABR Summary of Median ABRs in Patients without Inhibitors

  • Median duration in observation period: 13 months [range: 2 –19]
  • Mean AT activity in observation period (relative to baseline): 22%

N=7 N=12 N=19 Observation

Ongoing Study in Hemophilia A & B Patients, Including Inhibitors; Currently on Hold

Alnylam, Sanofi Genzyme 50-50 US/Can/Western Europe; Sanofi Genzyme ROW *Clinical results as of Jun 15, 2017; Pasi et al., ISTH, July 2017; updated to reflect cerebral venous sinus thrombosis case noted in safety box

PLANNED NEXT STEPS

ATLAS Phase 3 results

in mid-to-late 2019

Updated Safety in Phase 2 OLE (N=33):

  • 3 SAEs considered possibly related to study drug
  • Fatal cerebral venous sinus thrombosis resulting in suspension of dosing and evaluation of enhanced
safety monitoring, currently in planning
  • Asymptomatic transaminase elevation in HCV infected patient and seizure in patient with seizure history
  • Majority of AEs mild or moderate in severity, unrelated to study drug
  • Mild ISRs in 6 (18%) patients
  • ALT increases >3x ULN observed in 11 (33%) patients
  • All asymptomatic, with no concurrent elevations of bilirubin >2x ULN
  • Reversible; all patients had medical history of HCV
  • No instances of anti-drug antibody formation
slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

  • Adults and adolescents

with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors

  • Currently manage bleeds

with on-demand bypassing agent therapy

  • N~50

2:1 9 months fitusiran 9 months

  • n-demand BPA

Primary Endpoints:

  • ABR†

Secondary Endpoints:

  • Spontaneous ABR
  • Joint ABR
  • QOL (Haem-A-QOL)

OR

  • Adults and adolescents

with hemophilia A or B with

  • r without inhibitors
  • Currently manage bleeds

prophylactically

  • N~100

7 months fitusiran 6 months PPX factor/BPA

  • Adults and adolescents

with hemophilia A or B without inhibitors

  • Currently manage bleeds

with on-demand (OD) factor replacement therapy

  • N~100

2:1 Patients who complete the study may be eligible for fitusiran treatment in ATLAS-OLE study 9 months fitusiran 9 months

  • n-demand factor

OR Primary Endpoints:

  • ABR‡

Secondary Endpoints:

  • Spontaneous ABR
  • Joint ABR
  • QOL (Haem-A-QOL)

Primary Endpoints:

  • ABR in factor/BPA

and fitusiran period Secondary Endpoints:

  • Spontaneous ABR
  • Joint ABR
  • QOL (Haem-A-QOL)
*Intend to resume dosing as soon as possible upon agreement with regulatory authorities on risk mitigation/safety monitoring †ATLAS-INH powered to detect as little as a 60% reduction from control to fitusiran ‡ATLAS-A/B powered to detect as little as a 50% reduction from control to fitusiran

Fitusiran ATLAS Phase 3 Program

Initiated in July 2017; Currently on Hold*

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Acute Hepatic Porphyrias

Givosiran

Rose

Living with Porphyria

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Acute Hepatic Porphyrias

DESCRIPTION

Family of ultra-rare orphan diseases causing incapacitating and potentially fatal attacks

*ORPHANET; The Porphyria Consortium

Predominantly

female,

commonly misdiagnosed

Disease burden includes:

  • Acute, Severe Abdominal Pain
  • Frequent Hospitalizations
  • Peripheral and Autonomic Neuropathy
  • Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
  • Chronic Pain

PATIENT POPULATION*

~5,000

Patients with sporadic attacks in U.S./EU

~1,000

Patients with recurrent attacks in U.S./EU

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Genetically validated, liver-expressed target gene Biomarker for POC in Phase 1 Definable path to approval and patient access

Potential Endpoints

  • Annualized attack rate
  • ALA and PBG levels

Serum and Urinary Biomarkers ALA and PBG ALAS1 upstream of genetic defect

Up-regulation

  • f ALAS1

Accumulation of toxic intermediates ALA and PBG

Mean (SEM) % ALA Knockdown Time (Months) 10 100 80 60 40 20
  • 20
  • 40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Placebo 0.035 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.35 mg/kg 1.0 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg Givosiran Interim Phase 1 results: Sardh et al., ASH, December 2016

Givosiran for Acute Hepatic Porphyrias

Potential to Prevent Debilitating Attacks

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Givosiran Interim Phase 1 Study Results*

PLANNED NEXT STEPS

Phase 3 Interim Analysis

in mid-2018

Alnylam retains global rights to the givosiran program *Interim Phase 1 study results as of Apr 21, 2017; Sardh et al., ICPP, June 2017; ** Includes attacks treated in healthcare facility or with hemin

DURABILITY

Monthly and possibly quarterly SC dose regimen

Initial Evidence for Clinical Activity in Recurrent Attack Porphyria Patients

FDA Breakthrough and EMA PRIME Designations

Cohort 1, Givosiran – Patient 3 Treatment Run-in

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
  • 100
  • 50
50 100 150 mmol/mol/Cr Study Day PBG ALA Heme Porphyria Attack

Safety: Generally well tolerated (N=9)

  • No drug-related SAEs and no discontinuations due to AEs
  • As reported previously, one patient developed acute pancreatitis complicated

by pulmonary embolism resulting in death, considered unlikely related to study drug

  • Majority of AEs mild-moderate in severity
  • AEs possibly related include ISRs, hypersensitivity, myalgia, headache,

moderate renal impairment (in patient with history of same), and erythema

  • No clinically significant changes in vital signs, EKG, or clin labs
52 86 81 73 Cohort 1 (N=3) Cohort 2 (N=3) Cohort 3 (N=3) Mean Cohort 1-3 (N=9) % Decrease in Annualized Attack Rate 73% Mean Decrease in Annualized Attack Rate Givosiran Compared to Placebo 30 40 10 60 70 20 50 80 90

Ongoing Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Recurrent Attack Porphyria Patients

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

N ~ 74 Patient Population

  • Age ≥ 12 years
  • Diagnosis of AHP
  • ≥ 2 attacks within

prior 6 months

  • Willing to

discontinue and/or not initiate hemin prophylaxis

1:1 RANDOMIZATION

Givosiran SC QM 2.5 mg/kg 6 months Placebo SC QM 6 months Primary Endpoint:

  • Attacks requiring

hospitalization, urgent care visit, home IV hemin

Key Secondary Endpoints:

  • ALA and PBG
  • Hemin doses
  • Symptoms
  • QoL

OR

*Preliminary plans subject to further diligence and health authority feedback

Open- Label Extension

Statistical Considerations

  • 70 patients will have at least 90% power to detect 45% reduction in

annualized attack rate at 2-sided alpha of 0.05

  • Unblinded interim analysis in 30 patients using endpoint of reduction in

urinary ALA level at 3 months

➢ No plan to stop early for efficacy or futility Interim analysis when 30 patients complete 3 months treatment - mid-2018 interim readout, supporting potential NDA at or around YE 2018 (if positive); potential FDA approval early-to-mid 2019

Global Footprint

Plan to conduct Phase 3 in ~22 countries

Givosiran Phase 3 Study Design; Plan to Initiate in Late 2017

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study, Followed by Open-Label Extension

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Interim Analysis in Givosiran Phase 3 Study

If Positive, Supports Potential NDA at or Around YE 2018

Alignment with FDA that reduction of urinary ALA is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit

  • Interim analysis with ~30 patients after 3 mo dosing; expect data in mid-2018
*Sardh et al., ICPP, June 2017; Includes attacks treated in healthcare facility or with hemin

Relationship of ALA Lowering with Annualized Attack Rate* ALA Lowering in Phase 1, Part C at 2.5 mg/kg qM

5 10 15 20 25 30

Annualized Attack Rate

≤0% >25-50% >50-75% >0-25% >75% ALA increased from baseline More ALA lowering from patient’s baseline

Urinary ALA (mmol/mol creatinine)

6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

Time, Days

  • 120
  • 90
  • 60
  • 30
30 60 90 120 150 180

ULN

2.5 mg/kg/mo (N=3) placebo (N=4)
slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Other Clinical Programs to Watch

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Other Clinical Programs to Watch

PLANNED NEXT STEPS FOR INCLISIRAN:

Start Phase 3 Study

in late 2017

Inclisiran for Hypercholesterolemia*

51%

mean LDL-C lowering at Day 180 after two quarterly doses1

Cemdisiran for Complement-Mediated Diseases

Sustained control

  • f disease hemolysis

with up to

67%

reduction in eculizumab dose in PNH patients2

Safety (N=6):
  • No SAEs, no discontinuations due to
AEs
  • 1 AE of hemolysis in setting of URI;
moderate in severity and considered unrelated to study drug
  • 1 AE of asymptomatic, transient grade 3
elevation of LFTs; considered possibly related Safety (N=501)1:
  • No drug-related SAEs, no discontinuations
due to AEs
  • Two patient deaths due to MI and stroke,
both unrelated to study drug
  • No LFT elevations related to study drug
  • Majority of AEs mild or moderate in severity

Up to

8-fold

increase in plasma glycolate in healthy volunteers3

ALN-GO1 for Primary Hyperoxaluria 1 (PH1)

Safety (N=32):
  • No SAEs, no discontinuations due to AEs
  • All AEs mild or moderate, with exception
  • f one subject with transient,
asymptomatic CPK elevation considered unrelated to study drug

RECENT ACTIVITY FOR ALN-GO1:

First PH1 Patient Dosed

in March 2017

PLANNED NEXT STEPS FOR CEMDISIRAN:

Report Phase 2 aHUS Data

in late 2018

1ORION-1 Phase 2 Study; ESC, Aug 2017 2Phase 1/2 Study; Hill et al., ASH, Dec 2016 3Phase 1/2 Study; Milliner et al., IPNA, Sep 2016 *The Medicines Company is leading and funding development of inclisiran from Phase 2 onward and will commercialize the program, if successful
slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Samantha

Regulatory Affairs, Alnylam

Guidance and Goals

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32 32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Fitusiran Patisiran Givosiran

Building commercial capabilities to prepare for upcoming product launches

  • Patisiran in U.S., Canada, and Western

Europe

  • Fitusiran co-develop/co-commercialize

in U.S., Canada, and Western Europe

  • Givosiran globally

Manufacturing build-out to ensure consistent drug supply underway

  • Alewife facility fully operational and

ready for patisiran launch

  • Norton drug substance facility

expected to be commercially

  • perational in 2020

~2018-2020

Transition to Potential Commercialization

Planned Rapid Launch Succession

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

2017*

Early Mid Late

PATISIRAN

(hATTR Amyloidosis)

Phase 2 OLE data APOLLO Phase 3 top-line APOLLO Phase 3 results NDA/MAA filing

FITUSIRAN†

(Hemophilia and RBD)

Phase 2 OLE data ATLAS Phase 3 program start

GIVOSIRAN

(Acute Hepatic Porphyrias)

Phase 1, Part C data Phase 3 study start

INCLISIRAN**

(Hypercholesterolemia)

ORION-1 Phase 2 data ORION-2 HoFH study start ORION-3 Phase 2 OLE study start ASCVD Phase 3 study start

ADDITIONAL CLINICAL PROGRAMS

Continue to advance early/mid-stage pipeline; Present clinical data

*Early is Q1-Q2, Mid is Q2-Q3, and Late is Q3-Q4 †Fitusiran currently on hold with intent to resume dosing as soon as possible upon agreement with regulatory authorities on risk mitigation/safety monitoring **Based on The Medicines Company guidance as of January 2017

Alnylam 2017 Pipeline Goals

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Financial Summary and Guidance

2017 Q2 Financial Results

  • Cash $1.25B
  • Includes $355.2M of net proceeds from the May 2017 public offering
  • Includes $21.4M of proceeds from Sanofi Genzyme’s purchase of common stock
  • Includes $150.0M in restricted investments
  • GAAP Revenues $15.9M
  • Total GAAP Operating Expenses $136.4M
  • Research and Development Expenses $90.6M
  • General and Administrative Expenses $45.8M
  • GAAP Net Loss $118.4M
  • Non-GAAP Net Loss* $94.4M
  • Shares Outstanding 91.7M

2017 Guidance

  • Year-end cash >$1.0B
  • Includes $150.0M in restricted investments

* Non-GAAP net loss excludes stock-based compensation expenses.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Thank You