Core losses: Quantification and electronic structure - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

โ–ถ
core losses quantification and electronic structure
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Core losses: Quantification and electronic structure - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Core losses: Quantification and electronic structure FYS5310/FYS9320 Lecture 6 23.02.2016 2 Elemental quantification The core loss EELS edges can be used to quantify the composition of your specimen In particular useful for low-Z


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Core losses: Quantification and electronic structure

FYS5310/FYS9320 Lecture 6 23.02.2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Elemental quantification

  • The core loss EELS edges can be used to quantify the

composition of your specimen

  • In particular useful for low-Z elements

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The fluorescence yield in EDS analysis

The probability for generating a characteristic X-ray is given by the fluorescence yield w The probability of generating an Auger electron is the 1- w.

F&H

Very few X-ray generated

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Elemental quantification

  • The core loss EELS edges can be used to quantify the

composition of your specimen

  • In particular useful for low-Z elements
  • You also avoid some of the experimental errors of EDS

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Spurious and system X-rays in EDS analysis

  • Spurious X-rays from the

specimen, but not the region of interest

  • System X-rays from the sample

holder, specimen support grid, microscope itself (Cu, Fe)

W&C

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Elemental quantification

  • The core loss EELS edges can be used to quantify the

composition of your specimen

  • In particular useful for low-Z elements
  • You also avoid some of the experimental errors of EDS

(spurious and system X-rays)

  • In the first approximation, the observed intensity I of edge i of

element A is:

  • Relative composition is then

7

๐ฝ๐ต

๐‘— = ๐ฝ0๐‘‚ ๐ต๐œ ๐ต ๐‘—

๐‘‚

๐ต

๐‘‚๐ถ = ๐ฝ๐ต

๐‘—

๐ฝ๐ถ

๐‘˜

๐œ๐ถ

๐‘˜

๐œ

๐ต ๐‘—

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Boron K edge Nitrogen K edge

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What scattering cross section do we use?

9

๏ค1 ๏ค2

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What scattering cross section do we use?

10

Sample Collection angle

๏ข

To prism

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

  • In practice, our experiment looks only at inelastic scattering in an

energy range [E,E+๏ค] and scattering angle [0,๏ข]

  • Partial cross section ๏ณ(๏ค,๏ข) must be used

What scattering cross section do we use?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Geometry of the experiment

13

To prism

Microscope in Collection angle determined by imaging mode size of microscope objective apperture diffraction mode size of spectrometer entrance apperture

Sample Collection angle Incident beam convergence angle

๏ก ๏ข

GIF entrance apperture or Microscope objective apperture

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How to determine partial cross sections

  • Calculations

โ€“ Hydrogenic model โ€“ Hartree-Slater model

  • Experimentally

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Background removal

15

Power law model:

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Plural scattering

  • Remove using Fourier-ratio or Fourier-log methods

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Free atom cross sections compared to spectra from materials

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Under usual assumtions, the core loss EELS spectrum probes the

  • local density of states around the excited atomโ€ฆ
  • with symmetry l๏‚ฑ1โ€ฆ
  • above the Fermi-level

The site and symmetry selected DOS

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

L3 L2

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

L3 L2

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The 3d orbitals

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Letโ€™s imagine octahedral coordination

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Ti 3d orbitals

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

L3 L2 t2g eg t2g eg

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Direct comparison with calculated density of states (DOS)

  • The transition matrix determines the underlying edge shape
  • Usually slowly varying with energy
  • The density of states gives more rapid variations on top of this
  • Allows comparison with calculated DOS, e.g. from density

functional theory (DFT)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Direct observations of charge transfer in copper oxide

Cu metal Cu2

+ O2โˆ’

Cu2+ O2โˆ’

  • V. J. Keast et al. J. Microsc. (2001)

Charge is transferred from copper atom towards oxygen because of greater electronegativity

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Oxygen 2p DOS of AlV2O4

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The core hole problem

  • We have so far assumed that the probed

DOS is the ground state DOS

  • But we are explicitly exciting the system out
  • f the ground state
  • Coloumb interaction between electron and

hole

  • Change in electrostatic potential ๏ƒž change

in the DOS and rearrangement of charge

EF

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Experiment p ground state DOS s ๏‚ฎ p

The core hole problem

SiO2 as an example

  • J. B. Neaton et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2000)

Si L2,3 O K

s and d DOS with core hole s and d ground state DOS p ๏‚ฎ s,d Experiment

  • The core hole should in

principle always be accounted for

  • Neglecting the core hole

sometimes works well or even better (metals), other times not (insulators and

  • xides)
slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • If the initial states are sharply peaked in

energy, then all transitions originate at this energy

  • One particular Ei and one particular E

takes you to a single point in the conduction band Ef

  • In effect we are convoluting the

conduction band DOS with a delta function

  • But what if the initial states are in the

valence band?

  • Topic for next time

32

๐ธ๐‘“๐‘š๐‘ข๐‘ ๐‘”๐‘ฃ๐‘œ๐‘‘๐‘ข๐‘—๐‘๐‘œ โŠ— ๐‘‘๐ธ๐‘ƒ๐‘‡ = ๐‘‘๐ธ๐‘ƒ๐‘‡ ๐‘ค๐ธ๐‘ƒ๐‘‡ โŠ— ๐‘‘๐ธ๐‘ƒ๐‘‡ =?