Consultation: Permanent forests Public Information Sessions 31 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

consultation permanent forests
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Consultation: Permanent forests Public Information Sessions 31 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ETS Forestry Package Consultation: Permanent forests Public Information Sessions 31 August to 14 September 2018 ETS treatment of permanent forests Overview: Why do we need permanent forests Does the Permanent Forest Sink Initiative


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Public Information Sessions 31 August to 14 September 2018

ETS Forestry Package Consultation: Permanent forests

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ETS treatment of permanent forests

Overview:

  • Why do we need permanent forests
  • Does the Permanent Forest Sink Initiative (PFSI) meet this need
  • Key design features for the new policy to be determined

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Permanent forests: long term mitigation

  • Different forest species

have different sequestration rates and total carbon stock

  • The graph is an example
  • nly

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Erosion control
  • Regulating water flows
  • Biodiversity
  • Adaptation for climate events

Non-carbon benefits from permanent forest

3

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Introduced in 2007 using the Forest Act 1949, before the ETS
  • Land owners can reconsider participation after 50 years
  • Each uses a unique covenant on the land title:
  • Describes the forest that can get carbon credits
  • Details how the carbon stock change is calculated
  • Discusses what can be done on the land and to the forest
  • Units issued to a PFSI forest can be tracked back to that forest
  • Land owner can harvest 20% basal area

Current Policy: PFSI

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Does the PFSI encourage permanent forest?

  • The cost of registering land in

the PFSI is around $5000 higher than the same area in the ETS.

  • Two previous consultations on

PFSI: both supportive of the permanent forests moving into the ETS.

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Detailed design decisions

  • Discussion document presents 11 detailed design questions.
  • Today we will focus on:
  • How units will be earned, and how permanent post-1989 forest will be treated in

the ETS (design questions 1 -2)

  • Whether a covenant is needed (design question 5)
  • The restrictions on harvest: how we define this, and how can it work (design

question 3-4)

  • Moving post-1989 (P89) forest into permanent post-1989 (PP89) (design

question 9-11)

  • What happens after the restrictions end (design question 7)

6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Earning units and treatment in the ETS

  • Majority of ETS treatment

the same as P89, inc FMA.

  • Two options for earning

units:

  • Averaging or
  • Stock change (preferred)
  • We recognise the need to

reconsider the default yield tables.

Pine Average

7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Whether a covenant is needed?

  • No clear view from previous consultations: some support for an optional

covenant or did not support one

  • Covenants significantly increase administrative complexity and cost for land owners

and the Crown.

  • As covenants endure so does the administrative complexity, and may act as a

barrier to land owner flexibility.

  • 50% of PFSI land is covenanted with another organisation

8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The restrictions on harvest

  • Key difference between P89 and PP89 is PP89 will not be able to be

clear fell harvested for 50 years

  • The participant must maintain the land in forest and forest species for the 50

years i.e. 30% canopy cover and 5m tall

  • Will allow ability to remove some trees either to promote forest

growth/management and/or use of the trees

  • Controls remain in place while forest is a permanent post-1989 forest in the ETS
  • Please note we are also asking for views on the 50 year period
  • 50 years is the current term for the PFSI
  • Simplifies access for Māori land

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Moving into permanent post-1989

  • Outside the ETS:
  • The participant earn units back to the start of the MERP the forest is

registered in

  • If first rotation and registered in the ETS:
  • The participant earn units back to the start of the MERP the forest is

registered in (and does not need to repay any units earned as P89)

  • If second rotation (or later) and registered in the ETS
  • Policy decision if carbon stock is between the minimum and the average:
  • Repay units between current stock and average (preferred)
  • Do not earn units until the average is reached

1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What happens after restrictions end?

Area of forest

  • utside

ETS Register as PP89 Register as P89 Area of forest

  • utside

the ETS After the 50 years

P89 may register as PP89

Prior to registering Change to a P89 PP89 forest

Repay down to the average

Sign up again Repay all units 50 years

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13